Loading...

Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Biochemical Engineering

Related Titles S. Lutz, U.T. Bornscheuer (Eds.)

Protein Engineering Handbook 2009 ISBN: 978-3-527-31850-6

A. Seidel-Morgenstern (Ed.)

Membrane Reactors Distributing Reactants to Improve Selectivity and Yield 2009 ISBN: 978-3-527-32039-4

S.I. Sandler

Chemical, Biochemical, and Engineering Thermodynamics 2006 ISBN: 978-0-471-66174-0

K. Buchholz, V. Kasche, U.T. Bornscheuer

Biocatalysts and Enzyme Technology 2005 ISBN: 978-3-527-30497-4

Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida

Biochemical Engineering A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists

WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA

The Authors Prof. Shigeo Katoh Kobe University Graduate School of Science and Technology Kobe 657-8501 Japan Prof. Fumitake Yoshida w Sakyo-ku Matsugasaki Yobikaeshi-cho 2 Kyoto 606-0912 Japan

& All books published by Wiley-VCH are carefully produced. Nevertheless, authors, editors, and publisher do not warrant the information contained in these books, including this book, to be free of errors. Readers are advised to keep in mind that statements, data, illustrations, procedural details or other items may inadvertently be inaccurate. Library of Congress Card No.: applied for British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de & 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim All rights reserved (including those of translation into other languages). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form – by photoprinting, microfilm, or any other means – nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission from the publishers. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifically marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law. Printed in the Federal Republic of Germany Printed on acid-free paper Cover Design Formgeber, Eppelheim Typesetting Macmillan Publishing Solutions, Bangalore, India ¨rlenbach Printing Strauss GmbH, Mo Bookbinding Litges & Dopf Buchbinderei GmbH, Heppenheim ISBN:

978-3-527-32536-8

|V

Contents Preface XI Nomenclature

XIII 1

Part I

Basic Concepts and Principles

1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

Introduction 3 Background and Scope 3 Dimensions and Units 4 Intensive and Extensive Properties 6 Equilibria and Rates 6 Batch versus Continuous Operation 8 Material Balance 8 Energy Balance 9 References 11

2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6

Elements of Physical Transfer Processes 13 Introduction 13 Heat Conduction and Molecular Diffusion 13 Fluid Flow and Momentum Transfer 14 Laminar versus Turbulent Flow 18 Transfer Phenomena in Turbulent Flow 21 Film Coefficients of Heat and Mass Transfer 22 References 25

3 3.1 3.2 3.2.1 3.2.1.1 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.3 3.2.2 3.2.2.1

Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics 27 Introduction 27 Fundamental Reaction Kinetics 27 Rates of Chemical Reaction 27 Elementary Reaction and Equilibrium 28 Temperature Dependence of Reaction Rate Constant k 29 Rate Equations for First- and Second-Order Reactions 30 Rates of Enzyme Reactions 34 Kinetics of Enzyme Reaction 35

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

VI

| Contents 3.2.2.2 3.2.2.3

Evaluation of Kinetic Parameters in Enzyme Reactions Inhibition and Regulation of Enzyme Reactions 39 References 45

4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5

Cell Kinetics 47 Introduction 47 Cell Growth 47 Growth Phases in Batch Culture 49 Factors Affecting Rates of Cell Growth 50 Cell Growth in Batch Fermentors and Continuous Stirred-Tank Fermentors (CSTF) 52 Batch Fermentor 52 Continuous Stirred-Tank Fermentor 54 References 55

4.5.1 4.5.2

37

59

Part II

Unit Operations and Apparatus for Bio-Systems

5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.4.1 5.4.2 5.4.3 5.4.4 5.5

Heat Transfer 59 Introduction 59 Overall Coefficients U and Film Coefficients h 59 Mean Temperature Difference 62 Estimation of Film Coefficients h 64 Forced Flow of Fluids Through Tubes (Conduits) 64 Forced Flow of Fluids Across a Tube Bank 66 Liquids in Jacketed or Coiled Vessels 67 Condensing Vapors and Boiling Liquids 68 Estimation of Overall Coefficients U 68 References 71

6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.4 6.3.5 6.3.6 6.4 6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.5

Mass Transfer 73 Introduction 73 Overall Coefficients k and Film Coefficients k of Mass Transfer Types of Mass Transfer Equipment 77 Packed Column 77 Plate Column 79 Spray Column 79 Bubble Column 79 Packed (Fixed-)-Bed Column 80 Other Separation Methods 80 Models for Mass Transfer at the Interface 80 Stagnant Film Model 80 Penetration Model 81 Surface Renewal Model 81 Liquid-Phase Mass Transfer with Chemical Reactions 82

73

Contents

6.6 6.6.1 6.6.2 6.6.3 6.7 6.7.1 6.7.2 6.7.3

Correlations for Film Coefficients of Mass Transfer 84 Single-Phase Mass Transfer Inside or Outside Tubes 84 Single-Phase Mass Transfer in Packed Beds 85 J-Factor 86 Performance of Packed Columns 87 Limiting Gas and Liquid Velocities 87 Definitions of Volumetric Coefficients and HTUs 88 Mass Transfer Rates and Effective Interfacial Areas 91 References 95

7 7.1 7.2 7.2.1 7.2.2 7.2.2.1 7.2.2.2 7.2.2.3 7.2.2.4 7.2.3

Bioreactors 97 Introduction 97 Some Fundamental Concepts 98 Batch and Continuous Reactors 98 Effects of Mixing on Reactor Performance 99 Uniformly Mixed Batch Reactor 99 Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor (CSTR) 99 Plug Flow Reactor (PFR) 100 Comparison of Fractional Conversions by CSTR and PFR 101 Effects of Mass Transfer Around and Within Catalyst or Enzymatic Particles on the Apparent Reaction Rates 101 Liquid Film Resistance Controlling 102 Effects of Diffusion Within Catalyst Particles 103 Effects of Diffusion Within Immobilized Enzyme Particles 105 Bubbling Gas–Liquid Reactors 107 Gas Holdup 107 Interfacial Area 107 Mass Transfer Coefficients 108 Definitions 109 Measurements of kLa 109 Mechanically Stirred Tanks 112 General 112 Power Requirements of Stirred Tanks 113 Ungassed Liquids 114 Gas-Sparged Liquids 115 kLa in Gas-Sparged Stirred Tanks 116 Liquid Mixing in Stirred Tanks 118 Suspending of Solid Particles in Liquid in Stirred Tanks 120 Gas Dispersion in Stirred Tanks 120 Bubble Columns 120 General 121 Performance of Bubble Columns 121 Gas Holdup 122 kLa 122 Bubble Size 122

7.2.3.1 7.2.3.2 7.2.3.3 7.3 7.3.1 7.3.2 7.3.3 7.3.3.1 7.3.3.2 7.4 7.4.1 7.4.2 7.4.2.1 7.4.2.2 7.4.3 7.4.4 7.4.5 7.5 7.6 7.6.1 7.6.2 7.6.2.1 7.6.2.2 7.6.2.3

| VII

VIII

| Contents 7.6.2.4 7.6.2.5 7.6.2.6 7.6.2.7 7.7 7.7.1 7.7.2 7.8 7.9

Interfacial Area a 123 kL 123 Other Correlations for kLa 123 kLa and Gas Holdup for Suspensions and Emulsions Airlift Reactors 125 IL Airlifts 125 EL Airlifts 125 Packed-Bed Reactors 127 Microreactors [29] 127 References 131

8 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.6.1 8.6.2 8.6.3 8.6.4

Membrane Processes 133 Introduction 133 Dialysis 134 Ultrafiltration 135 Microfiltration 138 Reverse Osmosis 139 Membrane Modules 141 Flat Membrane 141 Spiral Membrane 142 Tubular Membrane 142 Hollow-Fiber Membrane 142 References 143

9 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5

Cell–Liquid Separation and Cell Disruption Introduction 145 Conventional Filtration 146 Microfiltration 147 Centrifugation 148 Cell Disruption 151 References 153

10 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5

Sterilization 155 Introduction 155 Kinetics of the Thermal Death of Cells 155 Batch Heat Sterilization of Culture Media 156 Continuous Heat Sterilization of Culture Media Sterilizing Filtration 162 References 164

11 11.1 11.2 11.2.1 11.2.2

Adsorption and Chromatography 165 Introduction 165 Equilibria in Adsorption 165 Linear Equilibrium 165 Adsorption Isotherms of Langmuir-Type and Freundlich-Type

123

145

158

166

Contents

11.3 11.4 11.5 11.5.1 11.5.2 11.6 11.6.1 11.6.2 11.6.2.1 11.6.2.2 11.6.2.3 11.6.3 11.6.4 11.6.5

Rates of Adsorption into Adsorbent Particles 167 Single- and Multi-Stage Operations for Adsorption Adsorption in Fixed Beds 170 Fixed-Bed Operation 170 Estimation of the Break Point 171 Separation by Chromatography 174 Chromatography for Bioseparation 174 General Theories on Chromatography 176 Equilibrium Model 176 Stage Model 177 Rate Model 178 Resolution Between Two Elution Curves 178 Gel Chromatography 179 Affinity Chromatography 181 References 183

Part III

Practical Aspects in Bioengineering

12 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.4.1 12.4.1.1 12.4.1.2 12.4.1.3 12.4.1.4 12.4.1.5 12.4.1.6 12.4.2 12.5 12.6 12.6.1 12.6.2 12.6.3 12.6.4 12.7

Fermentor Engineering 187 Introduction 187 Stirrer Power Requirements for Non-Newtonian Liquids Heat Transfer in Fermentors 191 Gas–Liquid Mass Transfer in Fermentors 193 Special Factors Affecting kLa 194 Effects of Electrolytes 194 Enhancement Factor 194 Presence of Cells 194 Effects of Antifoam Agents and Surfactants 195 kLa in Emulsions 195 kLa in Non-Newtonian Liquids 197 Desorption of Carbon Dioxide 198 Criteria for Scaling-Up Fermentors 199 Modes of Fermentor Operation 202 Batch Operation 202 Fed-Batch Operation 203 Continuous Operation 204 Operation of Enzyme Reactors 206 Fermentors for Animal Cell Culture 207 References 209

13 13.1 13.2 13.2.1

Downstream Operations in Bioprocesses 211 Introduction 211 Separation of Microorganisms by Filtration and Microfiltration 213 Dead-End Filtration 214

168

187

189

| IX

X

| Contents 13.2.2 13.3 13.3.1 13.3.1.1 13.3.1.2 13.3.1.3 13.3.1.4 13.3.2 13.4 13.5

Cross-Flow Filtration 216 Separation by Chromatography 218 Factors Affecting the Performance of Chromatography Columns Velocity of Mobile Phase and Diffusivities of Solutes 218 Radius of Packed Particles 219 Sample Volume Injected 220 Column Diameter 220 Scale-Up of Chromatography Columns 221 Separation in Fixed Beds 222 Sanitation in Downstream Processes 224 References 209

14 14.1 14.2 14.2.1 14.2.2 14.3 14.3.1 14.3.2 14.3.3 14.3.4 14.3.5 14.3.5.1 14.3.5.2 14.3.6 14.4 14.4.1 14.4.2 14.4.2.1 14.4.2.2 14.4.2.3 14.4.3 14.5 14.5.1 14.5.2

Medical Devices 227 Introduction 227 Blood and Its Circulation 227 Blood and Its Components 227 Blood Circulation 228 Oxygenation of Blood 230 Use of Blood Oxygenators 230 Oxygen in Blood 231 Carbon Dioxide in Blood 233 Types of Blood Oxygenator 234 Oxygen Transfer Rates in Blood Oxygenators 235 Laminar Blood Flow 236 Turbulent Blood Flow 236 Carbon Dioxide Transfer Rates in Blood Oxygenators 242 Artificial Kidney 242 Human Kidney Functions 243 Artificial Kidneys 245 Hemodialyzer 245 Hemofiltration 246 Peritoneal Dialysis 246 Mass Transfer in Hemodialyzers (cf. Section 8.2) 247 Bioartificial Liver 251 Human Liver 251 Bioartificial Liver Devices 251 References 254 Appendix Index

257

255

218

| XI

Preface Bioengineering can be defined as the application of the various branches of engineering, including mechanical, electrical, and chemical engineering, to biological systems, including those related to medicine. Likewise, biochemical engineering refers to the application of chemical engineering to biological systems. This book is intended for use by undergraduates, and deals with the applications of chemical engineering to biological systems in general. In that respect, no preliminary knowledge of chemical engineering is assumed. Since the publication of the pioneering text Biochemical Engineering, by Aiba, Humphrey and Mills in 1964, several articles on so-called ‘‘biochemical’’ or ‘‘bioprocess’’ engineering have been published. Whilst all of these have combined the applications of chemical engineering and biochemistry, the relative space allocated to the two disciplines has varied widely among the different texts. In this book, we describe the application of chemical engineering principles to biological systems, but in doing so assume that the reader has some practical knowledge of biotechnology, but no prior background in chemical engineering. Hence, we have attempted to demonstrate how a typical chemical engineer would address and solve such problems. Consequently, a simplified rather than rigorous approach has often been adopted in order to facilitate an understanding by newcomers to this field of study. Although in Part I of the book we have outlined some very elementary concepts of chemical engineering for those new to the field, the book can be used equally well for senior or even postgraduate level courses in chemical engineering for students of biotechnology, when the reader can simply start from Part II. Naturally, this book should prove especially useful for those biotechnologists interested in self-studying chemical bioengineering. In Part III, we provide descriptions of the applications of biochemical engineering not only to bioprocessing but also to other areas, including the design of selected medical devices. Moreover, to assist progress in learning, a number of worked examples, together with some ‘‘homework’’ problems, are included in each chapter. I would like to thank the two external reviewers, Prof. Ulfert Onken (Dortmund University) and Prof. Alois Jungbauer (University of Natural Resources and

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

XII

| Preface Applied Life Sciences), for providing invaluable suggestions. I also thank the staff of Wiley-VCH Verlag for planning, editing and producing this book. Finally I thank Kyoko, my wife, for her support while I was writing this book. Shigeo Katoh

| XIII

Nomenclaturen A a b C Cn Cp Cx Cl cp D D Dl d de E E Ea ED, EH, EV Ef F f Gm GV g H H H Hs Ht h

n

Area (m2) Specific interfacial area (m2 m3 or m1) Width of rectangular conduit (m) Concentration (kg or kmol m3, g or mol cm3) Cell number density (m3) Heat capacity (kcal 1C1 or kJ K1) Cell mass concentration (kg m3) Clearance of kidney or hemodialyzer (cm3 min1) Specific heat capacity (kJ kg1 K1 or kcal kg1 1C1) Diffusivity (m2 h1 or cm2 s1) Tank or column diameter (m) Dialysance of hemodialyzer (cm3 min1) Diameter (m or cm) Equivalent diameter (m or cm) Enhancement factor ¼ kn /k(–) Internal energy (kJ) Activation energy (kJ kmol1) Eddy diffusivity, Eddy thermal diffusivity, and Eddy kinematic viscosity, respectively (m2 h1 or cm2 s1) Effectiveness factor Volumetric flow rate (–) (m3 h1 or cm3 s1 or min1) Friction factor Fluid mass velocity (kg h1 m2) Volumetric gas flow rate per unit area (m h1) Gravity acceleration (¼ 9.807 m s2) Henry’s law constant (atm or Pa kmol1 (or kg1) m3) Height, Height per transfer unit (m) Enthalpy (kJ) Height equivalent to an equilibrium stage (–) Hematocrit (%) Individual phase film coefficient of heat transfer (W m2 K1 or kcal h1 m2 1C1)

Some symbols and subscripts explained in the text are omitted.

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

XIV

| Nomenclature J JF KL K K Km k k kM L Lv m N N N N Ni n n P P p Q Q q qp R R R, r rp ri T t t U U u V Vmax v vt W W W w

Mass transferf flux (kg or kmol h1 m2) Filtrate flux (m s1, m h1, cm min1 or cm s1) Consistency index (g cm1 sn2 or kg m1 sn2) Overall mass transfer coefficient (m h1 or cm s1) Distribution coefficient, Equilibrium constant (–) Michaelis costant (kmol m3 or mol cm3) Individual phase mass transfer coefficient (m h1 or cm s1) Reaction rate constant (s1, m3 kmol1 s1 etc.) Diffusive membrane permeabilty coefficient (m h1 or cm s1) Length (m or cm) Volumetric liquid flow rate per unit area (m h1) Partition coefficient (–) Mass transfer rate per unit volume (kmol or kg h1 m3) Number of revolutions (T1) Number of transfer unit (–) Number of theoretical plates (–) Number of moles of i component (kmol) Flow behavior index (–) Cell number (–) Total pressure (Pa or bar) Power requirement (kj s1 or W) Partial pressure (Pa or bar) Heat transfer rate (kcal/h or kJ/s or W) Total flow rate (m3 s1) Heat transfer flux (W m2 or kcal h1 m2) Adsorbed amount (kmol kg1) Gas law constant atm l gmol1 K1, ( ¼ 0.08206 kJ kmol1 K1, etc.) Hydraulic resistance in filtration ( ¼ 8.314 m1) Radius (m or cm) Sphere-equivalent particle radius (m or cm) Reaction rate of i component (kmol m3 s1) Temperature (K) Temperature (1C or K) Time (s) Overall heat transfer coefficient (kcal h1 m2 1C1 or W m2 K1) Superficial velocity (m s1 or cm s1) Velocity (m s1 or cm s1) Volume (m3) Maximum reaction rate (kmol m3 s1) Velocity averaged over conduit cross section (m s1 or cm s1) Terminal velocity (m s1) Work done to system (kJ/s or W) Mass flow rate per tube (kg s1 or g s1) Peak width (m3 or s) Weight (kg)

Nomenclature

x xi x Yx/s y y Dyf Z z

Thickness of wall or membrne (m or cm) Mole fraction (–) Fractional conversion (–) Cell yield (kg dry cells/kg substrate consumed) Distance (m or cm) Oxygen saturation (% or –) Effective film thickness (m or cm) Column height (m) Height of rectangular conduit of channel (m or cm)

Subscripts

G i L o 0

Gas Interface, Inside, Inlet Liquid Outside, Outlet Initial

Superscripts n

Value in equilibrium with the other phase

Greek letters

a a g e e f k m m n P r s s s t t o

Thermal diffusivity (m2 h1 or cm2 s1) Specific cake resistance (m kg1) Shear rate (s1) Void fraction (–) Gas holdup (–) Thiele modulus (–) Thermal conductivity (W m1 K1 or kcal m1 h1 1C1) Viscosity (Pa s or g cm1 s1) Specific growth rate (h1) Kinematic viscosity ¼ m/r (cm2 s1 or m2 h1) Osmotic pressure (atm or Pa) Density (kg m3) Surface tension (kg s2) Reflection coefficient (–) Standard deviation (–) Shear stress (Pa) Residence time (s) Angular velocity (s1)

| XV

XVI

| Nomenclature Dimensionless numbers

(Bo) ¼ (g D2 r/s) (Da) ¼ (ra,max/kL A Cab) (Fr) ¼ [UG /(g D)1/2] (Ga) ¼ (g D3/n2) (Gz) ¼ (W Gp/k L) (Nu) ¼ (h d/k) (Nx) ¼ (F/D L) (Pe) ¼ (v L/ED) (Pr) ¼ (cpm/k) (Re) ¼ (d n r/m) (Sc) ¼ (m/r D) (Sh) ¼ (k d/D) (St) ¼ (k/v) or (h/cp v r)

Bond number ¨hler number Damko Froude number Galilei number Graetz number Nusselt number Unnamed Peclet number Prandtl number Reynolds number Schmidt number Sherwood number Stanton number

Part I Basic Concepts and Principles

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

This page intentionally left blank

|3

1 Introduction

1.1 Background and Scope

Engineering can be defined as ‘‘the science or art of practical applications of the knowledge of pure sciences such as physics, chemistry, and biology.’’ Compared with civil, mechanical, and other forms of engineering, chemical engineering is a relatively young branch of the subject that has been developed since the early twentieth century. The design and operation of efficient chemical plant equipment are the main duties of chemical engineers. It should be pointed out that industrial-scale chemical plant equipment cannot be built simply by enlarging the laboratory apparatus used in basic chemical research. Consider, for example, the case of a chemical reactor–that is, the apparatus used for chemical reactions. Although neither the type nor size of the reactor will affect the rate of the chemical reaction per se, they will affect the overall or apparent reaction rate, which involves effects of physical processes, such as heat and mass transfer and fluid mixing. Thus, in the design and operation of plant-size reactors, the knowledge of such physical factors – which often is neglected by chemists – is important. G. E. Davis, a British pioneer in chemical engineering, described in his book, A Handbook of Chemical Engineering (1901, 1904), a variety of physical operations commonly used in chemical plants. In the United States, such physical operations as distillation, evaporation, heat transfer, gas absorption, and filtration were termed ‘‘unit operations’’ in 1915 by A. D. Little of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where the instruction of chemical engineering was organized via unit operations. The first complete textbook of unit operations entitled Principles of Chemical Engineering by Walker, Lewis and McAdams of the MIT was published in 1923. Since then, the scope of chemical engineering has been broadened to include not only unit operations but also chemical reaction engineering, chemical engineering thermodynamics, process control, transport phenomena, and other areas. Bioprocess plants using microorganisms and/or enzymes, such as fermentation plants, have many characteristics similar to those of chemical plants. Thus, a chemical engineering approach should be useful in the design and operation of

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

4

| 1 Introduction various plants which involve biological systems, if the differences in the physical properties of some materials are taken into account. Furthermore, chemical engineers are required to have some knowledge of biology when tackling problems that involve biological systems. Since the publication of a pioneering textbook [1] in 1964, some excellent books [2, 3] have been produced in the area of the so-called ‘‘biochemical’’ or ‘‘bioprocess’’ engineering. Today, the applications of chemical engineering are becoming broader to include not only bioprocesses but also various biological systems involving environmental technology and even some medical devices, such as artificial organs.

1.2 Dimensions and Units

A quantitative approach is important in any branch of engineering. However, this does not necessarily mean that engineers can solve everything theoretically, and quite often they use empirical rather than theoretical equations. Any equation – whether theoretical or empirical – which expresses some quantitative relationship must be dimensionally sound, as will be stated below. In engineering calculations, a clear understanding of dimensions and units is very important. Dimensions are the basic concepts in expressing physical quantities. Dimensions used in chemical engineering are length (L), mass (M), time (T), the amount of substance (n) and temperature (y). Some physical quantities have combined dimensions; for example, the dimensions of velocity and acceleration are LT1 and LT2, respectively. Sometimes force (F) is also regarded as a dimension; however, as the force acting on a body is equal to the product of the mass of that body and the acceleration working on the body in the direction of force, F can be expressed as MLT2. Units are measures for dimensions. Scientists normally use the centimeter (cm), gram (g), second (s), mole (mol), and degree Centigrade (1C) as the units for the length, mass, time, amount of substance, and temperature, respectively (the CGS system). Whereas, the units often used by engineers are m, kg, h, kmol, and 1C. Traditionally, engineers have used kg as the units for both mass and force. However, this practice sometimes causes confusion, and to avoid this a designation of kg-force (kgf) is recommended. The unit for pressure, kg cm2, often used by plant engineers should read kgf cm2. Mass and weight are different entities: the weight of a body is the gravitational force acting on the body, that is, (mass) (gravitational acceleration g). Strictly speaking, g – and hence weight – will vary slightly with locations and altitudes on the Earth. It would be much smaller in a space ship. In recent engineering research papers, units with the International System of Units (SI) are generally used. The SI system is different from the CGS system often used by scientists, or from the conventional metric system used by engineers [4]. In the SI system, kg is used for mass only, and Newton (N), which is the unit

1.2 Dimensions and Units 2

for force or weight, is defined as kg m s . The unit for pressure, Pa (pascal), is defined as N m2. It is roughly the weight of an apple distributed over the area of one square meter. As it is generally too small as a unit for pressure, kPa (kilopascal) (i.e., 1000 Pa) and MPa (megapascal) (i.e., 106 Pa) are more often used. One bar, which is equal to 0.987 atm, is 100 kPa = 0.1 MPa = 1000 h Pa (hectopascal). The SI unit for energy or heat is the joule (J), which is defined as J = N m = kg m2 s2 = Pa m3. In the SI, calorie is not used as a unit for heat, and hence no conversion between heat and work, such as 1 cal = 4.184 J, is needed. Power is defined as energy per unit time, and the SI unit for power is W (watt) = J s1. Since W is usually too small for engineering calculations, kW ( = 1000 W) is more often used. Although use of the SI units is preferred, we shall also use in this book the conventional metric units that are still widely used in engineering practice. The English engineering unit system is also used in engineering practice, but we do not use it in this text book. Values of the conversion factors between various units that are used in practice are listed in the Appendix, at the back of this book. Empirical equations are often used in engineering calculations. For example, the following type of equation can relate the specific heat capacity cp (J kg1 K1) of a substance with its absolute temperature T (K). cp ¼ a þ bT

ð1:1Þ

where a (kJ kg1 K1) and b (kJ kg1 K2) are empirical constants. Their values in the kcal, kg, and 1C units are different from those in the kJ, kg, and K units. Equations such as Equtation 1.1 are called dimensional equations. The use of dimensional equations should preferably be avoided; hence, Equtation 1.1 can be transformed to a non-dimensional equation such as ðcp =RÞ ¼ a0 þ b0 ðT=Tc Þ

ð1:2Þ

where R is the gas law constant with the same dimension as cp, and Tc is the critical temperature of the substance in question. Thus, as long as the same units are used for cp and R and for T and Tc, respectively, the values of the ratios in the parentheses as well as the values of coefficients au and bu do not vary with the units used. Ratios such as those in the above parentheses are called dimensionless numbers (groups), and equations involving only dimensionless numbers are called dimensionless equations. Dimensionless equations – some empirical and some with theoretical bases – are often used in chemical engineering calculations. Most dimensionless numbers are usually called by the names of the person(s) who first proposed or used such numbers. They are also often expressed by the first two letters of a name, beginning with a capital letter; for example, the well-known Reynolds number, the values of which determine conditions of flow (laminar or turbulent) is usually designated as Re, or sometimes as NRe . The Reynolds number for flow inside a round, straight tube is defined as dvr/m, in which d is the inside tube diameter (L), v is the fluid velocity averaged over the tube cross-section (L T1), r is the fluid density (M L3), and m the fluid viscosity (M L1 T1) (this will be defined in Chapter 2). Most dimensionless numbers have some significance, usually ratios

|5

6

| 1 Introduction of two physical quantities. How known variables could be arranged in a dimensionless number in an empirical dimensionless equation can be determined by a mathematical procedure known as dimensional analysis, which will not be described in this text. Examples of some useful dimensionless equations or correlations will appear in the following chapters of the book. Example 1.1

A pressure gauge reads 5.80 kgf cm2. What is the pressure (p) in SI units? Solution

Let g = 9.807 m s2. p ¼ ð5:80Þð9:807Þ=ð0:012 Þ ¼ 569 000 Pa ¼ 569 kPa ¼ 0:569 MPa

1.3 Intensive and Extensive Properties

It is important to distinguish between the intensive (state) properties (functions) and the extensive properties (functions). Properties which do not vary with the amount of mass of a substance – for example, temperature, pressure, surface tension, and mole fraction – are termed intensive properties. On the other hand, those properties which vary in proportion to the total mass of substances – for example, total volume, total mass, and heat capacity – are termed extensive properties. It should be noted, however, that some extensive properties become intensive properties, in case their specific values – that is, their values for unit mass or unit volume – are considered. For example, specific heat (i.e., heat capacity per unit mass) and density (i.e., mass per unit volume) are intensive properties. Sometimes, capital letters and small letters are used for extensive and intensive properties, respectively. For example, Cp indicates heat capacity (kJ 1C1) and cp specific heat capacity (kJ kg1 1C1). Measured values of intensive properties for common substances are available in various reference books [5]. 1.4 Equilibria and Rates

Equilibria and rates should be clearly distinguished. Equilibrium is the end point of any spontaneous process, whether chemical or physical, in which the driving forces (potentials) for changes are balanced and there is no further tendency to change. Chemical equilibrium is the final state of a reaction at which no further changes in compositions occur at a given temperature and pressure. As an example of a physical process, let us consider the absorption of a gas into a liquid.

1.4 Equilibria and Rates

When the equilibrium at a given temperature and pressure is reached after a sufficiently long time, the compositions of the gas and liquid phases cease to change. How much of a gas can be absorbed in the unit volume of a liquid at equilibrium – that is, the solubility of a gas in a liquid – is usually given by the Henry’s law: p ¼ HC

ð1:3Þ

where p is the partial pressure (Pa) of a gas, C is its equilibrium concentration (kg m3) in a liquid, and H (Pa kg1 m3) is the Henry’s law constant, which varies with temperature. Equilibrium values do not vary with the experimental apparatus and procedure. The rate of a chemical or physical process is its rapidity – that is, the speed of spontaneous changes toward the equilibrium. The rate of absorption of a gas into a liquid is how much of the gas is absorbed into the liquid per unit time. Such rates vary with the type and size of the apparatus, as well as its operating conditions. The rates of chemical or biochemical reactions in a homogeneous liquid phase depend on the concentrations of reactants, the temperature, the pressure, and the type and concentration of dissolved catalysts or enzymes. However, in the cases of heterogeneous chemical or biochemical reactions using particles of catalyst, immobilized enzymes or microorganisms, or microorganisms suspended in a liquid medium, and with an oxygen supply from the gas phase in case of an aerobic fermentation, the overall or apparent reaction rate(s) or growth rate(s) of the microorganisms depend not only on chemical or biochemical factors but also on physical factors such as rates of transport of reactants outside or within the particles of catalyst or of immobilized enzymes or microorganisms. Such physical factors vary with the size and shape of the suspended particles, and with the size and geometry of the reaction vessel, as well as with the operating conditions, such as the degree of mixing or the rate(s) of gas supply. The physical conditions in industrial plant equipment are often quite different from those in the laboratory apparatus used in basic research. Let us consider, as an example, a case of aerobic fermentation. The maximum amount of oxygen that can be absorbed into the unit volume of a fermentation medium at given temperature and pressure (i.e., the equilibrium relationship) is independent of the type and size of vessel used. On the other hand, the rates of oxygen absorption into the medium vary with the type and size of the fermentor, and also with its operating conditions, such as the agitator speeds and rates of oxygen supply. To summarize, chemical and physical equilibria are independent of the configuration of apparatus, whereas overall or apparent rates of chemical, biochemical, or microbial processes in industrial plants are substantially dependent on the configurations and operating conditions of the apparatus used. Thus, it is not appropriate to perform so-called ‘‘scaling-up’’ using only those data obtained with a small laboratory apparatus.

|7

8

| 1 Introduction 1.5 Batch versus Continuous Operation

Most chemical, biochemical, and physical operations in chemical and bioprocess plants can be performed either batchwise or continuously. A simple example is the heating of a liquid. If the amount of the fluid is rather small (e.g., 1 kl d1), then batch heating is more economical and practical, with use of a tank which can hold the entire liquid volume and is equipped with a built-in heater. However, when the amount of the liquid is fairly large (e.g., 1000 kl d1), then continuous heating is more practical, using a heater in which the liquid flows at a constant rate and is heated to a required constant temperature. Most unit operations can be carried out either batchwise or continuously, depending on the scale of operation. Most liquid-phase chemical and biochemical reactions, with or without catalysts or enzymes, can be carried out either batchwise or continuously. For example, if the production scale is not large, then a reaction to produce C from A and B, all of which are soluble in water, can be carried out batchwise in a stirred-tank reactor; that is, a tank equipped with a mechanical stirrer. The reactants A and B are charged into the reactor at the start of the operation. Product C is subsequently produced from A and B as time goes on, and can be separated from the aqueous solution when its concentration has reached a predetermined value. When the production scale is large, the same reaction can be carried out continuously in the same type of reactor, or even with another type of reactor (see Chapter 7). In this case, the supplies of the reactants A and B and the withdrawal of the solution containing product C are performed continuously, all at constant rates. The washout of the catalyst or enzyme particles can be prevented by installing a filter mesh at the exit of the product solution. Except for the transient start-up and finish-up periods, all of the operating conditions such as temperature, stirrer speed, flow rates and the concentrations of the incoming and outgoing solutions, remain constant – that is, in the steady state. 1.6 Material Balance

Material (mass) balance, the natural outcome from the law of conservation of mass, is a very important and useful concept in chemical engineering calculations. With normal chemical and/or biological systems, we need not consider nuclear reactions that convert mass into energy. Let us consider a system, which is separated from its surroundings by an imaginary boundary. The simplest expression for the total mass balance for the system is as follows: input output ¼ accumulation

ð1:4Þ

The accumulation can be either positive or negative, depending on the relative magnitudes of the input and output. It should be zero with a continuously operated reactor mentioned in the previous section.

1.7 Energy Balance

We can also consider the mass balance for a particular component in the total mass. Thus, for a component in a chemical reactor, input output þ formation disappearance ¼ accumulation

ð1:5Þ

In mass balance calculations involving chemical and biochemical systems, it is sometimes more convenient to use the molar units, such as kmol, rather than simple mass units, such as the kilogram. Example 1.2

A flow of 2000 kg h–1 of aqueous solution of ethanol (10 wt% ethanol) from a fermentor is to be separated by continuous distillation into the distillate (90 wt% ethanol) and waste solution (0.5 wt% ethanol). Calculate the amounts of the distillate D (kg h1) and the waste solution W (kg h1). Solution

Total mass balance: 2000 ¼ D þ W Mass balance for ethanol: 2000 0:10 ¼ D 0:90 þ ð2000 DÞ 0:005 From these relationships we obtain D = 212 kg h1 and W = 1788 kg h1.

1.7 Energy Balance

Energy balance is an expression of the first law of thermodynamics – that is, the law of the conservation of energy. For a nonflow system separated from the surroundings by a boundary, the increase in the total energy of the system is given by: Dðtotal energy of the systemÞ ¼ Q W

ð1:6Þ

in which Q is the net heat supplied to the system, and W is the work done by the system. Q and W are both energy in transit and hence have the same dimension as energy. The total energy of the system includes the total internal energy E, potential energy (PE), and kinetic energy (KE). In normal chemical engineering calculations, changes in (PE) and (KE) can be neglected. The internal energy E is the intrinsic energy of a substance including chemical and thermal energy of molecules. Although absolute values of E are unknown, DE, difference from its base values, for example, from those at 01C and 1 atm, are often available or can be calculated. Neglecting D(PE) and D(KE) we obtain from Equtation 1.6 DE ¼ Q W

ð1:7Þ

|9

10

| 1 Introduction The internal energy per unit mass e is an intensive (state) function. Enthalpy h, a compound thermodynamic function defined by Equation 1.8, is also an intensive function. h ¼ e þ pv

ð1:8Þ

in which p is the pressure, and v is the specific volume. For a constant pressure process, it can be shown that dh ¼ cp dt

ð1:9Þ

where cp is the specific heat at constant pressure. For a steady-state flow system, again neglecting changes in the potential and kinetic energies, the energy balance per unit time is given by Equation 1.10. DH ¼ Q Ws

ð1:10Þ

where DH is the total enthalpy change, Q is the heat supplied to the system, and Ws is the so-called ‘‘shaft work’’ done by moving fluid to the surroundings, for example, work done by a turbine driven by a moving fluid. Example 1.3

In the second milk heater of a milk pasteurization plant, 1000 l h1 of raw milk is to be heated continuously from 75 to 135 1C by saturated steam at 500 kPa (152 1C). Calculate the steam consumption (kg h1), neglecting heat loss. The density and specific heat of milk are 1.02 kg l1 and 0.950 (kcal kg1 1C1), respectively. Solution

Applying Equation 1.10 to this case, Ws is zero. DH ¼ Q ¼ ð0:950Þð1:02Þð1000Þð135 75Þ ¼ 58 140 kcal h1 The heat of condensation (latent heat) of saturated steam at 500 kPa is given in the steam table as 503.6 kcal kg1. Hence, the steam consumption is 58 140/ 503.6 = 115.4 kg h1.

" Problems

1.1 Convert the following units. (a) Energy of 1 cm3 bar into J. (b) A pressure of 25.3 lbf in2 into SI units. 1.2 Explain the difference between mass and weight.

Further Reading

1.3 The Henry constant Hu = p/x for NH3 in water at 20 1C is 2.70 atm. Calculate the values of H = p/C, where C is kmol m3, and m = y/x, where x and y are the mole fractions in the liquid and gas phases, respectively. 1.4 It is required to remove 99% of CH4 from 200 m3 h1 of air (1 atm, 20 1C) containing 20 mol% of CH4 by absorption into water. Calculate the minimum amount of water required (m3 h1). The solubility of CH4 in water Hu = p/x at 20 1C is 3.76 10 atm. 1.5 A weight with a mass of 1 kg rests at 10 m above ground. It then falls freely to the ground. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m s1. Calculate (a) the potential energy of the weight relative to the ground; (b) the velocity and kinetic energy of the weight just before it strikes the ground. 1.6 100 kg h1 of ethanol vapor at 1 atm, 78.3 1C is to be condensed by cooling with water at 20 1C. How much water will be required in the case where the exit water temperature is 30 1C? The heat of vaporization of ethanol at 1 atm, 78.3 1C is 204.3 kcal kg1. 1.7 In the milk pasteurization plant of Example 1.3, what percentage of the heating steam can be saved if a heat exchanger is installed to heat fresh milk at 75 to 95 1C by pasteurized milk at 132 1C?

References 1 Aiba, S., Humphrey, A.E. and Mills, N.F. (1964, 1973) Biochemical Engineering, University of Tokyo Press. 2 Lee, J.M. (1992) Biochemical Engineering, Prentice-Hall. 3 Doran, P.M. (1995) Bioprocess Engineering Principles, Academic Press.

Further Reading 1 Hougen, O.A., Watson, K.M., and Ragatz, R.A. (1943, 1947, 1947). Chemical Process Principles, Parts I, II, III, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

4 Oldeshue, J.Y. (1977) Chem. Eng. Prog., 73, (8), 135. 5 Perry, R.H., Green, D.W., and Malony, J.O. (eds) (1984, 1997) Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 6th and 7th edns, McGrawHill.

| 11

This page intentionally left blank

| 13

2 Elements of Physical Transfer Processes

2.1 Introduction

The role of physical transfer processes in bioprocess plants is as important as that of biochemical and microbial processes. Thus, knowledge of the engineering principles of such physical processes is important in the design and operation of bioprocess plants. Although this chapter is intended mainly for non-chemical engineers who are unfamiliar with such engineering principles, it might also be useful to chemical engineering students at the start of their careers. In chemical engineering, the terminology transfer of heat, mass, and momentum is referred to as the ‘‘transport phenomena.’’ The heating or cooling of fluids is a case of heat transfer, a good example of mass transfer being the transfer of oxygen from air into the culture media in an aerobic fermentor. When a fluid flows through a conduit, its pressure drops due to friction as a result of transfer of momentum, as will be shown later. The driving forces, or driving potentials, for transport phenomena are: (i) the temperature difference for heat transfer; (ii) the concentration or partial pressure difference for mass transfer; and (iii) the difference in momentum for momentum transfer. When the driving force becomes negligible, then the transport phenomenon will ceases to occur, and the system will reach equilibrium. It should be mentioned here that, in living systems the transport of mass sometimes takes place apparently against the concentration gradient. This ‘‘uphill’’ mass transport, which usually occurs in biological membranes with the consumption of biochemical energy, is called ‘‘active transport,’’ and should be distinguished from ‘‘passive transport,’’ which is the ordinary ‘‘downhill’’ mass transport as discussed in this chapter. Active transport in biological systems is beyond the scope of this book. Transport phenomena can take place between phases, as well as within one phase. Let us begin with the simpler case of transport phenomena within one phase, in connection with the definitions of transport properties.

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

14

| 2 Elements of Physical Transfer Processes 2.2 Heat Conduction and Molecular Diffusion

Heat can be transferred by conduction, convection, or radiation, and/or combinations thereof. Heat transfer within a homogeneous solid or a perfectly stagnant fluid in the absence of convection and radiation takes place solely by conduction. According to Fourier’s law, the rate of heat conduction along the y-axis per unit area perpendicular to the y-axis (i.e., the heat flux q, expressed as W m2 or kcal m2 h1) will vary in proportion to the temperature gradient in the y direction, dt/dy (1C m1 or K m1), and also to an intensive material property called heat or thermal conductivity k (W m1 K1 or kcal h1 m1 1C1). Thus, q ¼ kdt=dy

ð2:1Þ

The negative sign indicates that heat flows in the direction of negative temperature gradient, viz., from warmer to colder points. Some examples of the approximate values of thermal conductivity (kcal h1 m1 1C1) at 20 1C are 330 for copper, 0.513 for liquid water, and 0.022 for oxygen gas at atmospheric pressure. Values of thermal conductivity generally increase with increasing temperature. According to Fick’s law, the flux of the transport of a component A in the mixture of A and B along the y axis by pure molecular diffusion, that is, in the absence of convection, JA (kg h1 m2) is proportional to the concentration gradient of the diffusing component in the y direction, dCA/dy (kg m4) and a system property called diffusivity or the diffusion coefficient of A in a mixture of A and B, DAB (m2 h1 or cm2 s1). Thus, JA ¼ DAB dCA =dy

ð2:2Þ

It should be noted that DAB is a property of the mixture of A and B, and is defined with reference to the mixture and not to the fixed coordinates. Except in the case of equimolar counter-diffusion of A and B, the diffusion of A would result in the movement of the mixture as a whole. However, in the usual case where the concentration of A is small, the value of DAB is practically equal to the value defined with reference to the fixed coordinates. Values of diffusivity in gas mixtures at normal temperature and atmospheric pressure are in the approximate range of 0.03 to 0.3 m2 h1, and usually increase with temperature and decrease with increasing pressure. Values of the liquid-phase diffusivity in dilute solutions are in the approximate range of 0.2 to 1.2 105 m2 h1, and increase with temperature. Both, gas-phase and liquid-phase diffusivities can be estimated by various empirical correlations available in reference books. There exists a conspicuous analogy between heat transfer and mass transfer. Hence, Equation 2.1 can be rewritten as: q ¼ ðk=cp rÞdðcp rtÞ=dy ¼ adðcp rtÞ=dy

ð2:3Þ

where cp is specific heat (kcal kg1 1C1), r is density (kg m3), and a { ¼ k/(cp r)} is the thermal diffusivity (m2 h1), which has the same dimension as diffusivity.

2.3 Fluid Flow and Momentum Transfer

2.3 Fluid Flow and Momentum Transfer

The flow of fluid – whether gas or liquid – through pipings takes place in most chemical or bioprocess plants. There are two distinct regimes or modes of fluid flow. In the first regime, when all fluid elements flow only in one direction, and with no velocity components in any other direction, the flow is called laminar, streamline, or viscous flow. In the second regime, the fluid flow is turbulent, with random movements of the fluid elements or clusters of molecules occurring, but the flow as a whole is in one general direction. Incidentally, such random movements of fluid elements or clusters of molecules should not be confused with the random motion of individual molecules that causes molecular diffusion and heat conduction discussed in the previous sections, and also the momentum transport in laminar flow discussed below. Figure 2.1 shows, in conceptual fashion, the velocity profile in the laminar flow of a fluid between two large parallel plates moving at different velocities. If both plates move at constant but different velocities, with the top plate A at a faster velocity than the bottom plate B, a straight velocity profile such as shown in the figure will be established when steady conditions have been reached. This is due to the friction between the fluid layers parallel to the plates, and also between the plates and the adjacent fluid layers. In other words, a faster-moving fluid layer tends to pull the adjacent slower-moving fluid layer, and the latter tends to resist it. Thus, momentum is transferred from the faster-moving fluid layer to the adjacent slower-moving fluid layer. Therefore, a force must be applied to maintain the velocity gradient; such force per unit area parallel to the fluid layers t (Pa) is called the shear stress. This varies in proportion to the velocity gradient du/dy (s1), which is called the shear rate and is denoted by g (s1). Thus, t ¼ mðdu=dyÞ ¼ mg

ð2:4Þ

The negative sign indicates that momentum is transferred down the velocity gradient. The proportionality constant m (Pa s) is called molecular viscosity or simply viscosity, which is an intensive property. The unit of viscosity in CGS units is called poise (g cm1 s1). From Equation 2.4 we obtain t ¼ ðm=rÞdðu rÞ=dy ¼ n dðu rÞ=dy

Figure 2.1 The velocity profile of laminar flow between parallel plates moving at different velocities.

ð2:5Þ

| 15

16

| 2 Elements of Physical Transfer Processes which indicates that the shear stress; that is, the flux of momentum transfer varies in proportion to the momentum gradient and kinematic viscosity n ( ¼ m/r) (cm2 s1 or m2 h1). The unit (cm2 s1) is sometimes called Stokes and denoted as St. This is the Newton’s law of viscosity. A comparison of Equations 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5 indicates evident analogies among the transfer of mass, heat, and momentum. If the gradients of concentration, heat content and momentum are taken as the driving forces in the three respective cases, the proportionality constants in the three rate equations are diffusivity, thermal diffusivity, and kinematic viscosity, respectively, all having the same dimensions (L2 T1) and the same units (cm2 s1 or m2 h1). A fluid with viscosity which is independent of shear rates is called a Newtonian fluid. On a shear stress–shear rate diagram, such as Figure 2.2, it is represented by a straight line passing through the origin, the slope of which is the viscosity. All gases, and most common liquids of low molecular weight (e.g., water and ethanol) are Newtonian fluids. It is worth remembering that the viscosity of water at 20 1C is 0.01 poise (1 centipoise) in CGS units and 0.001 Pa s in SI units. Liquid viscosity decreases with increasing temperature, whereas gas viscosity increases with increasing temperature. The viscosities of liquids and gases generally increase with pressure, with gas and liquid viscosities being estimated by a variety of equations and correlations available in reference books. Fluids that show viscosity variations with shear rates are called non-Newtonian fluids. Depending on how the shear stress varies with the shear rate, these are categorized into pseudoplastic, and dilatant, and Bingham plastic fluids (see Figure 2.2). The viscosity of pseudoplastic fluids decreases with increasing shear rate, whereas dilatant fluids show an increase in viscosity with shear rate. Bingham plastic fluids do not flow until a threshold stress called the yield stress is

Figure 2.2 Relationships between shear rate and shear stress for Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.

2.3 Fluid Flow and Momentum Transfer

applied, after which the shear stress increases linearly with the shear rate. In general, the shear stress t can be represented by Equation 2.6: t ¼ Kðdu=dyÞn ¼ ma ðdu=dyÞ

ð2:6Þ

where K is called the consistency index, and n is the flow behavior index. Values of n are smaller than 1 for pseudoplastic fluids, and greater than 1 for dilatant fluids. The apparent viscosity ma (Pa s), which is defined by Equation 2.6, varies with shear rates (du/dy) (s1); for a given shear rate, ma is given as the slope of the straight line joining the origin and the point for the shear rate on the shear rate–shear stress curve. Fermentation broths – that is, fermentation media containing microorganisms – often behave as non-Newtonian liquids, and in many cases their apparent viscosities vary with time, notably during the course of the fermentation. Fluids that show elasticity to some extent are termed viscoelastic fluids, and some polymer solutions demonstrate such behavior. Elasticity is the tendency of a substance or body to return to its original form, after the applied stress that caused a strain (i.e., a relative volumetric change in the case of a polymer solution) has been removed. The elastic modulus (Pa) is the ratio of the applied stress (Pa) to strain (–). The relaxation time (s) of a viscoelastic fluid is defined as the ratio of its viscosity (Pa s) to its elastic modulus.

Example 2.1

The following experimental data were obtained with use of a rotational viscometer for an aqueous solution of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) containing 1.3 g CMC per 100 ml solution. Shear rate du/dy (s1) Shear stress t (Pa)

0.80 0.329

3.0 0.870

12 2.44

50 6.99

200 19.6

Determine the values of the consistency index K, the flow behavior index n, and also the apparent viscosity ma at the shear rate of 50 s1. Solution

Taking the logarithms of Equation 2.6 we get log t ¼ log K þ n logðdu=dyÞ Thus, plotting the shear stress t on the ordinate and the shear rate du/dy on the abscissa of a log–log paper gives a straight line Figure 2.3, the slope of which n ¼ 0.74. The value of the ordinate for the abscissa du/dy ¼ 1.0 gives K ¼ 0.387. Thus, this CMC solution is pseudoplastic. Also, the average viscosity at ma at the shear rate of 50 s1 is 6.99/50 ¼ 0.140 Pa s ¼ 140 cp. Incidentally, plotting data on a log–log paper (i.e., log–log plot) is often used for determining the value of an exponent, if the data can be represented by an empirical power function, such as Equation 2.6.

| 17

18

| 2 Elements of Physical Transfer Processes

Figure 2.3 Relationships between shear rate and shear stress.

2.4 Laminar versus Turbulent Flow

As mentioned above, two distinct patterns of fluid flow can be identified, namely laminar flow and turbulent flow. Whether a fluid flow becomes laminar or turbulent depends on the value of a dimensionless number called the Reynolds number, (Re). For a flow through a conduit with a circular cross-section (i.e., a round tube), (Re) is defined as: Re ¼ dvr=m

ð2:7Þ

where d is the inside diameter of the tube (L), v is the linear flow velocity averaged over the tube cross-section (LT1) (i.e., volumetric flow rate divided by the inside cross-sectional area of the tube), r is the fluid density (M L3), and m is the fluid viscosity (M L1 T1). Under steady conditions, the flow of fluid through a straight round tube is laminar, when (Re) is less than approximately 2300. However, when (Re) is higher than 3000, the flow becomes turbulent. In the transition range between these two (Re) values the flow is unstable; that is, a laminar flow exists in a very smooth tube, but only small disturbances will cause a transition to turbulent flow. This holds true also for the fluid flow through a conduit with a noncircular cross-section, if the equivalent diameter defined later is used in place of d in Equation 2.7. However, fluid flow outside a tube bundle, whether perpendicular or oblique to the tubes, becomes turbulent at much smaller (Re), in which case the outer diameter of tubes and fluid velocity, whether perpendicular or oblique to the tubes, are substituted for d and v in Equation 2.7, respectively. Figure 2.4a shows the velocity distribution in a steady isothermal laminar flow of an incompressible Newtonian fluid through a straight, round tube. The velocity distribution in laminar flow is parabolic and can be represented by: u=v ¼ 2½1 ðr 2 =ri2 Þ

ð2:8Þ

2.4 Laminar versus Turbulent Flow

Figure 2.4 Velocity profiles of laminar and turbulent flows through a tube.

where u is the local velocity (m s1) at a distance r (m) from the tube axis, v is the average velocity over the entire cross-section (m s1) (i.e., volumetric flow rate divided by the-cross section), and ri is the inner radius of the tube (m). Equation 2.8 indicates that the maximum velocity at the tube axis, where r ¼ 0, is twice the average velocity. Equation 2.8 can be derived theoretically, if one considers in the stream an imaginary coaxial fluid cylinder of radius r and length L, equates (a) the force pr2 DP due to the pressure drop (i.e., the pressure difference DP between the upstream and downstream ends of the imaginary cylinder) to (b) the force due to inner friction (i.e., the shear stress on the cylindrical surface of the imaginary cylinder, 2prLt ¼ 2prLm (du/dr)), and integrates the resulting equation for the range from the tube axis, where r ¼ 0 and u ¼ umax to the tube surface, where r ¼ ri and u ¼ 0. From the above relationships it can also be shown that the pressure drop DP (Pa) in the laminar flow of a Newtonian fluid of viscosity m (Pa s) through a straight, round tube of diameter d (m) and length L (m) at an average velocity of v (m s1) is given by Equation 2.9, which expresses the Hagen–Poiseuille law: DP ¼ 32mvL=d2

ð2:9Þ

| 19

20

| 2 Elements of Physical Transfer Processes Thus, the pressure drop DP for laminar flow through a tube varies in proportion to the viscosity m, the average flow velocity v, and the tube length L, and in inverse proportion to the square of the tube diameter d. Since v is proportional to the total flow rate Q (m3 s1) and to d2, DP should vary in proportion to m, Q, L, and d4. The principle of the capillary tube viscometer is based on this relationship. Example 2.2

Derive an equation for the shear rate at the tube surface gw for laminar flow of Newtonian fluids through a tube of radius ri. Solution

Differentiation of Equation 2.8 gives gw ¼ ðdu=drÞr¼R ¼ 4v=ri

Figure 2.4b shows, conceptually, the velocity distribution in the steady turbulent flow through a straight, round tube. The velocity at the tube wall is zero, and the fluid near the wall moves in laminar flow, even though the flow of the main body of fluid is turbulent. The thin layer near the wall in which the flow is laminar is called the laminar sublayer or laminar film, while the main body of fluid where turbulence always prevails is called the turbulent core. The intermediate zone between the laminar sublayer and the turbulent core is called the buffer layer, where the motion of fluid may be either laminar or turbulent at any given instant. With a relatively long tube, the above statement holds for most of the tube length, except for the entrance region. A certain length of tube is required for the laminar sublayer to develop fully. Velocity distributions in turbulent flow through a straight, round tube vary with the flow rate or the Reynolds number. With increasing flow rates, the velocity distribution becomes flatter and the laminar sublayer thinner. Dimensionless empirical equations involving viscosity and density are available which correlate the local fluid velocities in the turbulent core, buffer layer, and the laminar sublayer as functions of the distance from the tube axis. The ratio of the average velocity over the entire tube cross-section to the maximum local velocity at the tube axis is approximately 0.7–0.85, and increases with the Reynolds number. The pressure drop DP (Pa) in turbulent flow of an incompressible fluid with density r(kg m3) through a tube of length L (m) and diameter d (m) at an average velocity of v (m s1) is given by Equation 2.10, viz. the Fanning equation: DP ¼ 2f rv2 ðL=dÞ

ð2:10Þ

where f is the dimensionless friction factor, which can be correlated with the Reynolds number by various empirical equations, for example,

2.5 Transfer Phenomena in Turbulent Flow

f ¼ 0:079=ðReÞ

0:25

ð2:11Þ

for the range of (Re) from 3000 to 100 000. It can be seen from comparison of Equations 2.9 and 2.10 that Equation 2.10 also holds for laminar flow, if f is given as f ¼ 16=ðReÞ

ð2:12Þ

Correlations are available for pressure drops in flow-through pipe fittings, such as elbows, bends, and valves, for sudden contractions and enlargements of the pipe diameter as the ratio of equivalent length of straight pipe to its diameter.

2.5 Transfer Phenomena in Turbulent Flow

The transfer of heat and/or mass in turbulent flow occurs mainly by eddy activity, namely the motion of gross fluid elements which carry heat and/or mass. Transfer by heat conduction and/or molecular diffusion is much smaller compared to that by eddy activity. In contrast, heat and/or mass transfer across the laminar sublayer near a wall, in which no velocity component normal to the wall exists, occurs solely by conduction and/or molecular diffusion. A similar statement holds for momentum transfer. Figure 2.5 shows the temperature profile for the case of heat transfer from a metal wall to a fluid flowing along the wall in turbulent flow. The temperature gradient in the laminar sublayer is linear and steep, because heat transfer across the laminar sublayer is solely by conduction, and the thermal conductivities of fluids are much smaller those of metals. The temperature gradient in the turbulent core is much smaller, as heat transfer occurs mainly by convection – that is, by mixing of the gross fluid elements. The gradient becomes smaller with increasing distance from the wall due to increasing turbulence. The temperature gradient in the buffer region between the laminar sublayer and the turbulent core is smaller than in the laminar sublayer, but greater than in the turbulent core, and becomes smaller with increasing distance from the wall. Conduction and convection are comparable in the buffer region. It should be noted that no distinct demarcations exist between the laminar sublayer and the buffer region, nor between the turbulent core and the buffer region. What has been said above also holds for solid–fluid mass transfer. The concentration gradients for mass transfer from a solid phase to a fluid in turbulent flow should be analogous to the temperature gradients, such as shown in Figure 2.5. When representing rates of transfer of heat, mass, and momentum by eddy activity, the concepts of eddy thermal conductivity, eddy diffusivity, and eddy viscosity are sometimes useful. Extending the concepts of heat conduction, molecular diffusion, and molecular viscosity to include the transfer mechanisms by eddy activity, one can use Equations 2.13 to 2.15, which correspond to Equations 2.3, 2.2, and 2.5, respectively.

| 21

22

| 2 Elements of Physical Transfer Processes

Figure 2.5 Temperature gradient in turbulent heat transfer from solid to fluid.

For heat transfer q ¼ ða þ EH Þdðcp rtÞ=dy

ð2:13Þ

For mass transfer JA ¼ ðDAB þ ED ÞðdCA =dyÞ

ð2:14Þ

For momentum transfer t ¼ ðv þ EV ÞdðurÞ=dy

ð2:15Þ

In the above equations, EH, ED, and EV are eddy thermal diffusivity, eddy diffusivity, and eddy kinematic viscosity, respectively, all having the same dimensions (L2 T1). It should be noted that these are not properties of fluid or system, because their values vary with the intensity of turbulence which depends on flow velocity, geometry of flow channel, and other factors.

2.6 Film Coefficients of Heat and Mass Transfer

If the temperature gradient across the laminar sublayer and the value of thermal conductivity were known, it would be possible to calculate the rate of heat transfer by Equation 2.1. This is usually impossible, however, because the thickness of the

2.6 Film Coefficients of Heat and Mass Transfer

laminar sublayer and the temperature distribution, such as shown in Figure 2.5, are usually immeasurable and vary with the fluid velocity and other factors. Thus, a common engineering practice is to use the film (or individual) coefficient of heat transfer, h, which is defined by Equation 2.16 and based on the difference between the temperature at the interface, ti and the temperature of the bulk of fluid, tb: q ¼ hðti tb Þ

ð2:16Þ

where q is the heat flux (W m2 or kcal h1 m2), and h is the film coefficient of heat transfer (W m2 K1 or kcal h1 m2 1C1). It is worth remembering that 1 kcal m2 h1 1C1 ¼ 1.162 W m2 K1. The bulk (mixing-cup) temperature tb, which is shown in Figure 2.5 by a broken line, is the temperature that a stream would have, if the whole fluid flowing at a cross-section of the conduit were to be thoroughly mixed. The temperature of a fluid emerging from a heat transfer device is the bulk temperature at the exit of the device. If the temperature profile were known, as in Figure 2.5, then the thickness of the effective (or fictive) laminar film shown by the chain line could be determined from the intersection of the extension of the temperature gradient in the laminar film with the line for the bulk temperature. It should be noted that the effective film thickness Dyf is a fictive concept for convenience. This is thicker than the true thickness of the laminar sublayer. From Equations 2.1 and 2.16, it is seen that h ¼ k=Dyf

ð2:17Þ

Thus, values of h for heating or cooling increase with thermal conductivity k. Also, h values can be increased by decreasing the effective thickness of the laminar film Dyf by increasing fluid velocity along the interface. Various correlations for predicting film coefficients of heat transfer are provided in Chapter 5. The film (individual) coefficients of mass transfer can be defined similarly to the film coefficient of heat transfer. Few different driving potentials are used today to define the film coefficients of mass transfer. Some investigators use the mole fraction or molar ratio, but often the concentration difference DC (kg or kmol m3) is used to define the liquid-phase coefficient kL (m h1), while the partial pressure difference Dp (atm) is used to define the gas film coefficient kGp (kmol h1 m2 atm1). However, using kL and kGp of different dimensions is not very convenient. In this book, except for Chapter 14, we shall use the gas-phase coefficient kGc (m h1) and the liquid-phase coefficient kL (m h1), both of which are based on the molar concentration difference DC (kmol m3). With such practice, the mass transfer coefficients for both phases have the same simple dimension (L T1). Conversion between kGp and kGc is easy, as can be seen from Example 2.4. By applying the effective film thickness concept, we obtain Equation 2.18 for the individual phase mass transfer coefficient kC (L T1), which is analogous to Equation 2.17 for heat transfer: kC ¼ D=Dyf where D is diffusivity (L2 T1), and Dyf is the effective film thickness (L).

ð2:18Þ

| 23

24

| 2 Elements of Physical Transfer Processes Example 2.3

Air is heated from 20 to 80 1C with use of an air heater. From operating data, the air-side film coefficient of heat transfer was determined as 44.2 kcal h1 m2 1C1. Estimate the effective thickness of the air film. The heat conductivity of air at 50 1C is 0.0481 kcal h1 m1 1C1. Solution

From Equation 2.17 the effective thickness of the air film is Dyf ¼ k=h ¼ 0:0481=44:2 ¼ 0:00 109 m ¼ 0:109 cm

Example 2.4

Show the relationship between kGp and kGc. Solution

Applying the ideal gas law to the diffusing component A in the gas phase, pA, the partial pressure of A, is given as pA ðatmÞ ¼ RT=V ¼ RðKÞðkmol=m3 Þ ¼ 0:0821ðKÞCA where R is the gas constant (atm m3 kmol1 K1), T is the absolute temperature (K), and CA is the molar concentration of A in the gas phase (kmol m3). Thus, the driving potential: DpA ðatmÞ ¼ RTDCA ¼ 0:0821 K kmol=m3 1kGp ¼ 1 kmol m2 h1 atm1 ¼ 1 kmol m2 h1 ð0:0821 K kmol m3 Þ1 ¼ 12:18 m h1 =ðKÞ ¼ 12:18 kGc ðKÞ1 or 1 kGc ¼ 0:0821ðKÞ kGp i:e:; 1 kGc ¼ RT kGp

" Problems

2.1 Derive Equations 2.8 and 2.9. 2.2 Estimate the pressure drop when 5 m3 h1 of oil flows through a horizontal pipe, 3 cm i.d. and 50 m long. Properties of the oil: density r ¼ 0.800 g cm3; viscosity m ¼ 20 poise.

Further Reading

2.3 From a flat surface of water at 20 1C water is vaporizing into air (25 1C, water pressure 15.0 mmHg) at a rate of 0.0041 g cm2 h1. The vapor pressure of water at 20 1C is 17.5 mmHg. The diffusivity of water vapor in air at the air film temperature is 0.25 cm2 s1. Estimate the effective thickness of the air film above the water surface. 2.4 The film coefficient of heat transfer in a water heater to heat water from 20 to 80 1C is 2300 kcal h1 m2 1C1. Calculate the heat flux and estimate the effective thickness of the water film. The thermal conductivity of water at 50 1C is 0.55 kcal h1 m1 1C1. 2.5 The values of the consistency index K and the flow behavior index n of a dilatant fluid are 0.415 and 1.23, respectively. Estimate the value of the apparent viscosity of this fluid at a shear rate of 60 s1.

Further Reading 1 Bennett, C.O. and Myers, J.E. (1962) Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer, McGraw-Hill. 2 Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., and Lightfoot, E.N. (2001) Transport Phenomena, 2nd edn., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

| 25

This page intentionally left blank

| 27

3 Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics

3.1 Introduction

Bioprocesses involve many chemical and/or biochemical reactions. Knowledge concerning changes in the compositions of reactants and products, as well as their rates of utilization and production under given conditions, is essential when determining the size of a reactor. With a bioprocess involving biochemical reactions, for example, the formation and disappearance terms in Equation 1.5, as well as the mass balance of a specific component, must be calculated. It is important, therefore, that we have some knowledge of the rates of those enzyme-catalyzed biochemical reactions that are involved in the growth of microorganisms, and are utilized for various bioprocesses. In general, bioreactions can occur in either a homogeneous liquid phase or in heterogeneous phases, including gas, liquid, and/or solid. Reactions with particles of catalysts, or of immobilized enzymes and aerobic fermentation with oxygen supply, represent examples of reactions in heterogeneous phases. In this chapter, we will provide the fundamental concepts of chemical and biochemical kinetics, that are important for understanding the mechanisms of bioreactions, and also for the design and operation of bioreactors. First, we shall discuss general chemical kinetics in a homogeneous phase, and then apply its principles to enzymatic reactions in homogeneous and heterogeneous systems.

3.2 Fundamental Reaction Kinetics 3.2.1 Rates of Chemical Reaction

The rate of reaction ri (kmol m3 s1) is usually defined per unit volume of the fluid in which the reaction takes place, that is: 1 dNi ri ¼ ð3:1Þ V dt Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

28

| 3 Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics where V is the fluid volume (m3) in a reactor, Ni the number of moles of i formed (kmol), and t is the time (s). In Equation 3.1, the suffix i usually designates a reaction product. The rate ri is negative, in case i is a reactant. Several factors, such as temperature, pressure, the concentrations of the reactants, and also the existence of a catalyst, affect the rate of a chemical reaction. In some cases, what appears to be one reaction may in fact involve several reaction steps in series or in parallel, one of which may be rate limiting. 3.2.1.1 Elementary Reaction and Equilibrium If the rate-limiting step in an irreversible second-order reaction to produce P from reactants A and B is the collision of single molecules of A and B, then the reaction rate should be proportional to the concentrations (C) of A and B; that is, CA (kmol m3) and CB (kmol m3). Thus, the rate of reaction can be given as:

rA ¼ kCA CB

ð3:2Þ

where k is the rate constant for the second-order reaction (m3 kmol1 s1). Its value for a given reaction varies with temperature and the properties of the fluid in which the reaction occurs, but is independent of the concentrations of A and B. The dimension of the rate constant varies with the order of a reaction. Equation 3.2 corresponds to the simple stoichiometric relationship: AþB!P This type of reaction for which the rate equation can be written according to the stoichiometry is called an elementary reaction. Rate equations for such cases can easily be derived. Many reactions, however, are nonelementary, and consist of a series of elementary reactions. In such cases, we must assume all possible combinations of elementary reactions in order to determine one mechanism which is consistent with the experimental kinetic data. Usually, we can measure only the concentrations of the initial reactants and final products, since measurements of the concentrations of intermediate reactions in series are difficult. Thus, rate equations can be derived under assumptions that rates of change in the concentrations of those intermediates are approximately zero (steady-state approximation). An example of such treatment applied to an enzymatic reaction will be shown in Section 3.2.2. In a reversible elementary reaction such as A þ B2R þ S the rates of the forward and reverse reactions are given by Equation 3.3 and Equation 3.4, respectively: rR,forward ¼ kf CA CB

ð3:3Þ

rR,reverse ¼ kb CR CS

ð3:4Þ

3.2 Fundamental Reaction Kinetics

The rates of the forward and reverse reactions should balance at the reaction equilibrium. Hence CR CS kf ¼ ¼ Kc CA CB kb

ð3:5Þ

where Kc is the reaction equilibrium constant. 3.2.1.2 Temperature Dependence of Reaction Rate Constant k The rates of chemical and biochemical reactions usually increase with temperature. The dependence of the reaction rate on temperature can usually be represented by the following Arrhenius-type equation over a wide temperature range:

k ¼ k0 eEa =RT

ð3:6Þ

where k0 and Ea are the frequency factor and the activation energy (kJ kmol1), R is the gas law constant (8.31 kJ kmol1 K1), and T is the absolute temperature (K). The frequency factor and the rate constant k should be of the same unit. The frequency factor is related to the number of collisions of reactant molecules, and is slightly affected by temperature in actual reactions. The activation energy is the minimum excess energy which the reactant molecules should possess for a reaction to occur. From Equation 3.6, ln k ln k0 ¼

Ea RT

ð3:7Þ

Hence, as shown in Figure 3.1, a plot of the natural logarithm of k against 1/T gives a straight line with a slope of Ea/R, from which the value of Ea can be calculated.

Figure 3.1 An Arrhenius plot.

| 29

30

| 3 Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics Example 3.1

Calculate the activation energy of a reaction from the plot of the experimental data, ln k versus 1/T, as shown in Figure 3.1. Solution

The slope of the straight line through the data points (Ea/R) is 6740 K. Thus, the activation energy is given as: Ea ¼ 6740 8:31 ¼ 56 000 kJ kmol1

Rates of reactions with larger values of activation energy are more sensitive to temperature changes. If the activation energy of a reaction is approximately 50 000 kJ kmol1, the reaction rate will be doubled with a 10 1C increase in reaction temperature at room temperature. Strictly, the Arrhenius equation is valid only for elementary reactions. Apparent activation energies can be obtained for nonelementary reactions.

3.2.1.3 Rate Equations for First- and Second-Order Reactions The rates of liquid-phase reactions can generally be obtained by measuring the time-dependent concentrations of reactants and/or products in a constant-volume batch reactor. From experimental data, the reaction kinetics can be analyzed either by the integration method or by the differential method:

. In the integration method, an assumed rate equation is integrated and mathematically manipulated to obtain a best straight line plot to fit the experimental data of concentrations against time. . In the differential method, values of the instantaneous reaction rate per unit volume (1/V)(dNi/dt) are obtained directly from experimental data points by differentiation and fitted to an assumed rate equation. Each of these methods has both merits and demerits. For example, the integration method can easily be used to test several well-known specific mechanisms. In more complicated cases the differential method may be useful, but this requires more data points. Analysis by the integration method can generally be summarized as follows. The rate equation for a reactant A is usually given as a function of the concentrations of reactants. Thus, dCA ¼ k f ðCi Þ rA ¼ dt where f(Ci) is an assumed function of the concentrations Ci.

ð3:8Þ

3.2 Fundamental Reaction Kinetics

If f(Ci) is expressed in terms of CA, and k is independent of CA, the above equation can be integrated to give:

ZCA CA0

dCA ¼k f ðCA Þ

Zt

dt ¼ k t

ð3:9Þ

0

where CA0 is the initial concentration of A. Plotting the left-hand side of Equation 3.9 against t should give a straight line of slope k. If experimental data points fit this straight line well, then the assumed specific mechanism can be considered valid for the system examined. If not, another mechanism could be assumed. Irreversible First-Order Reaction If a reactant A is converted to a product P by an irreversible unimolecular elementary reaction:

A!P then the reaction rate is given as rA ¼

d CA ¼ kCA dt

ð3:10Þ

Rearrangement and integration of Equation 3.10 give ln

CA0 ¼ kt CA

ð3:11Þ

The fractional conversion of a reactant A is defined as xA ¼

NA0 NA NA0

ð3:12Þ

where NA0 (kmol) is the initial amount of A at t ¼ 0, and NA (kmol) is the amount of A at t ¼ t. The fractional conversion can be expressed also in terms of the concentrations (kmol m3), xA ¼

CA0 CA CA0

ð3:13Þ

CA ð1 xA Þ

ð3:14Þ

Thus, CA0 ¼

Substitution of Equation 3.14 into Equation 3.11 gives lnð1 xA Þ ¼ k t

ð3:15Þ

If the reaction is of the first order, then plotting ln(1xA) or ln(CA0/CA) against time t should give a straight line through the origin, as shown in Figure 3.2. The slope gives the value of the rate constant k (s1).

| 31

32

| 3 Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics

Figure 3.2 Analysis of a first-order reaction by the integration method.

The heat sterilization of microorganisms and heat inactivation of enzymes are examples of first-order reactions. In the case of an enzyme being irreversibly heatinactivated as follows: kd

Nðactive formÞ ! Dðinactivated formÞ where kd is the inactivation rate constant, and the rate of decrease in the concentration CN of the active form is given by

dCN ¼ kd CN dt

ð3:16Þ

Upon integration, ln

CN ¼ kd t CN0

ð3:17Þ

Plots of the natural logarithm of the fractional remaining activity ln(CN/CN0) against incubation time at several temperatures should give straight lines. The time at which the activity becomes one-half of the initial value is called the half-life, t1/2. The relationship between kd and t1/2 is given by kd ¼

ln 2 t1=2

ð3:18Þ

An enzyme with a higher inactivation constant loses its activity in a shorter time. Example 3.2

The percentage decreases in the activities of a-amylase incubated at 70, 80, and 85 1C are given in Table 3.1. Calculate the inactivation constants of a-amylase at each temperature.

3.2 Fundamental Reaction Kinetics Table 3.1 Heat inactivation of a-amylase.

Incubation time (min)

Remaining activity (%)

0 5 10 15 20

70 1C 100 100 100 100 100

80 1C 100 75 63 57 47

85 1C 100 25 10

Solution

Plots of the fractional remaining activity CN/CN0 against incubation time on semi-logarithmic coordinates give straight lines, as shown in Figure 3.3. The values of the inactivation constant kd calculated from the slopes of these straight lines are as follows: Temperature

kd (s1)

70 1C 80 1C 85 1C

Almost zero 0.000 66 0.004

At higher temperatures, the enzyme activity decreases more rapidly with incubation time. The heat inactivation of many enzymes follows such patterns.

Figure 3.3 Heat inactivation of a-amylase.

| 33

34

| 3 Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics Irreversible Second-Order Reaction In the case where the reactants A and B are converted to a product P by a bimolecular elementary reaction:

AþB!P the rate equation is given as rA ¼

d CA d CB ¼ ¼ kCA CB dt dt

ð3:19Þ

As this reaction is equimolar, the amount of reacted A should be equal to that of B; that is, CA0 xA ¼ CB0 xB

ð3:20Þ

Thus, the rate equation can be rewritten as rA ¼ CA0

d xA ¼ kðCA0 CA0 xA ÞðCB0 CA0 xA Þ dt CB0 2 ð1 xA Þ xA ¼ k CA0 CA0

ð3:21Þ

Integration and rearrangement give ln

ð1 xB Þ CB CA0 ¼ ln ¼ ðCB0 CA0 Þk t ð1 xA Þ CB0 CA

ð3:22Þ

As shown in Figure 3.4, a plot of ln[(CBCA0)/(CB0CA)] or ln[(1xB)/(1xA)] against t gives a straight line, from the slope of which k can be evaluated.

Figure 3.4 Analysis of a second-order reaction using the integration method.

3.2 Fundamental Reaction Kinetics

3.2.2 Rates of Enzyme Reactions

Most biochemical reactions in living systems are catalyzed by enzymes – that is, biocatalysts – which includes proteins and, in some cases, cofactors and coenzymes such as vitamins, nucleotides, and metal cations. Enzyme-catalyzed reactions generally proceed via intermediates, for example: A þ B þ þ EðEnzymeÞ$EAB ðintermediateÞ$P þ Q þ þ E The reactants in enzyme reactions are known as substrates. Enzyme reactions may involve uni-, bi-, or tri-molecule reactants and products. An analysis of the reaction kinetics of such complicated enzyme reactions, however, is beyond the scope of this chapter, and the reader is referred elsewhere [1] or to other reference books. Here, we shall treat only the simplest enzyme-catalyzed reaction – that is, an irreversible, uni-molecular reaction. We consider that the reaction proceeds in two steps, namely: AþE

ðfirst reactionÞ

$

EA

ðsecond reactionÞ

!

PþE

where A is a substrate, E an enzyme, EA is an intermediate (i.e., an enzyme– substrate complex), and P is a product. Enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis and isomerization reactions are examples of this type of reaction mechanism. In this case, the kinetics can be analyzed by the following two different approaches, which lead to similar expressions. 3.2.2.1

Kinetics of Enzyme Reaction

Michaelis–Menten Approach [2] In enzyme reactions, the total molar concentration of the free and combined enzyme, CE0 (kmol m3), should be constant; that is:

CE0 ¼ CE þ CEA

ð3:23Þ

where CE (kmol m3) and CEA (kmol m3) are the concentrations of the free enzyme and the enzyme–substrate complex, respectively. It is assumed that the aforementioned first reaction is reversible and very fast, reaches equilibrium instantly, and that the rate of the product formation is determined by the rate of the second reaction, which is slower and proportional to the concentration of the intermediate. For the first reaction at equilibrium the rate of the forward reaction should be equal to that of the reverse reaction, as stated in Section 3.2.1.1. k1 CA CE ¼ k1 CEA

ð3:24Þ

Thus, the equilibrium constant K of the first reaction is K¼

k1 k1

ð3:25Þ

| 35

36

| 3 Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics The rate of the second reaction for product formation is given as rp ¼

dCP ¼ k2 CEA dt

ð3:26Þ

Substitution of Equation 3.23 into Equation 3.24 gives the concentration of the intermediate, CEA. CE0 CA k1 þ CA

CEA ¼ k

1

ð3:27Þ

Substitution of Equation 3.27 into Equation 3.26 gives the following Michaelis– Menten equation: rp ¼

k2 CE0 CA Vmax CA ¼ k1 K m þ CA k1 þ CA

ð3:28Þ

where Vmax is the maximum rate of the reaction attained at the very high substrate concentrations (kmol m3 s1), and Km is the Michaelis constant (kmol m3), which is equal to the reciprocal of the equilibrium constant of the first reaction. Thus, a small value of Km indicates a strong interaction between the substrate and the enzyme. An example of the relationship between the reaction rate and the substrate concentration given by Equation 3.28 is shown in Figure 3.5. Here, the reaction rate is roughly proportional to the substrate concentration at low substrate concentrations, and is asymptotic to the maximum rate Vmax at high substrate concentrations. The reaction rate is one-half of Vmax at the substrate concentration equal to Km. It is usually difficult to express the enzyme concentration in molar units, because of difficulties in determining the enzyme purity. Thus, the concentration is sometimes expressed as a ‘‘unit,’’ which is proportional to the catalytic activity of an enzyme. The definition of an enzyme unit is arbitrary, but one unit is generally defined as the amount of enzyme which produces 1 mmol of the product in 1 minute at the optimal temperature, pH, and substrate concentration.

Figure 3.5 The relationship between the reaction rate and substrate concentration.

3.2 Fundamental Reaction Kinetics

Briggs–Haldane Approach [3] In this approach, the concentration of the intermediate is assumed to attain a steady-state value shortly after the start of a reaction (steady-state approximation); that is, the change of CEA with time becomes nearly zero. Thus,

dCEA ¼ k1 CA CE k1 CEA k2 CEA ﬃ 0 dt

ð3:29Þ

Substitution of Equation 3.23 into Equation 3.29 and rearrangement give the following equation. CES ¼

k1 CE0 CA k1 þ k2 þ k1 CA

ð3:30Þ

Then, the rate of product formation is given by rp ¼

dCp k2 CE0 CA Vmax CA ¼ ¼ k þk 1 2 dt K þ C m þ CA A k

ð3:31Þ

1

This expression by Briggs–Haldane is similar to Equation 3.28, obtained by the Michaelis–Menten approach, except that Km is equal to (k1+k2)/k1. These two approaches become identical, if k1ck2, which is the case of most enzyme reactions. 3.2.2.2 Evaluation of Kinetic Parameters in Enzyme Reactions In order to test the validity of the kinetic models expressed by Equations 3.28 and 3.31, and to evaluate the kinetic parameters Km and Vmax, experimental data with different concentrations of substrate are required. Several types of plots for this purpose have been proposed. Lineweaver–Burk Plot [4] Rearrangement of the Michaelis–Menten equation (Equation 3.28) gives

1 1 Km 1 ¼ þ rp Vmax Vmax CA

ð3:32Þ

A plot of 1/rp against 1/CA would give a straight line with an intercept of 1/Vmax. The line crosses the x-axis at 1/Km, as shown in Figure 3.6a. Although the Lineweaver–Burk plot is widely used to evaluate the kinetic parameters of enzyme reactions, its accuracy is affected greatly by the accuracy of data at low substrate concentrations. CA/rp versus CA Plot

Multiplication of both sides of Equation 3.32 by CA gives

CA Km CA ¼ þ rp Vmax Vmax

ð3:33Þ

| 37

38

| 3 Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics

Figure 3.6 Evaluation of kinetic parameters in Michaelis–Menten equation.

A plot of CA/rp against CA would give a straight line, from which the kinetic parameters can be determined, as shown in Figure 3.6b. This plot is suitable for regression by the method of least-squares. Eadie–Hofstee Plot gives

Another rearrangement of the Michaelis–Menten equation

rp ¼ Vmax Km

rp CA

ð3:34Þ

A plot of rp against rp/CA would give a straight line with a slope of Km and an intercept of Vmax, as shown in Figure 3.6c. Results with a wide range of substrate concentrations can be compactly plotted when using this method, although the measured values of rp appear in both coordinates.

3.2 Fundamental Reaction Kinetics

All of the above treatments are applicable only to uni-molecular irreversible enzyme reactions. In the case of more complicated reactions, additional kinetic parameters must be evaluated, but plots similar to that for Equation 3.32, giving straight lines, are often used to evaluate the kinetic parameters. Example 3.3

The rates of hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl-b-D-glucopyranoside by b-glucosidase, an irreversible uni-molecular reaction, were measured at several concentrations of the substrate. The initial reaction rates were obtained as shown in Table 3.2. Determine the kinetic parameters of this enzyme reaction. Table 3.2 Hydrolysis rate of p-nitrophenyl-b-D-glucopyranoside by b-glucosidase.

Substrate concentration (gmol m3)

Reaction rate (gmol m3 s1)

5.00 2.50 1.67 1.25 1.00

4.84 104 3.88 104 3.18 104 2.66 104 2.14 104

Solution

The Lineweaver–Burk plot of the experimental data is shown in Figure 3.7. The straight line was obtained by the method of least-squares. From the figure, the values of Km and Vmax were determined as 2.4 gmol m3 and 7.7 104 gmol m3 s1, respectively.

3.2.2.3 Inhibition and Regulation of Enzyme Reactions Rates of enzyme reactions are often affected by the presence of various chemicals and ions. Enzyme inhibitors combine, either reversibly or irreversibly, with enzymes and cause a decrease in enzyme activity. Effectors control enzyme reactions by combining with the regulatory site(s) of enzymes. There are several mechanisms of reversible inhibition and for the control of enzyme reactions. Competitive Inhibition An inhibitor competes with a substrate for the binding site of an enzyme. As an enzyme–inhibitor complex does not contribute to product formation, it decreases the rate of product formation. Many competitive inhibitors have steric structures similar to substrates, and are referred to as substrate analogues. Product inhibition is another example of such an inhibition mechanism of an enzyme reactions, and is due to a structural similarity between the substrate and

| 39

40

| 3 Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics

Figure 3.7 Lineweaver-Burk plot for the hydrolysis of substrate by b-glucosidase.

the product. The mechanism of competitive inhibition in a uni-molecular irreversible reaction is considered as follows: A þ E$EA I þ E$EI EA ! P þ E where A, E, I, and P designate the substrate, enzyme, inhibitor, and product, respectively. The sum of the concentrations of the remaining enzyme CE and its complexes, CEA and CEI, should be equal to its initial concentration, CE0. CE0 ¼ CEA þ CEI þ CE

ð3:35Þ

If the rates of formation of the complexes EA and EI are very fast, then the following two equilibrium relationships should hold: CE CA k1 ¼ ¼ Km CEA k1

ð3:36Þ

CE CI ki ¼ ¼ KI CEI ki

ð3:37Þ

where KI is the equilibrium constant of the inhibition reaction and is called the inhibitor constant. From Equations 3.35 to 3.37, the concentration of the enzyme–substrate complex is given as CEA ¼

CE0 CA CA þ Km 1 þ CKII

ð3:38Þ

3.2 Fundamental Reaction Kinetics

Thus, the rate of product formation is given as Vmax CA rp ¼ CA þ Km 1 þ CKII

ð3:39Þ

In comparison with Equation 3.28 for the reaction without inhibition, the apparent value of the Michaelis constant increases by (KmCI)/KI, and hence the reaction rate decreases. At high substrate concentrations, the reaction rates approach the maximum reaction rate, because a large amount of the substrate decreases the effect of the inhibitor. Rearrangement of Equation 3.39 gives 1 1 Km CI 1 ¼ þ 1þ rp Vmax Vmax KI CA

ð3:40Þ

Thus, by the Lineweaver–Burk plot the kinetic parameters Km, KI, and Vmax can be graphically evaluated, as shown in Figure 3.8. Other Reversible Inhibition Mechanisms In noncompetitive inhibition, an inhibitor is considered to combine with both an enzyme and the enzyme–substrate complex. Thus, the following reaction is added to the competitive inhibition mechanism:

I þ EA$EAI We can assume that the equilibrium constants of the two inhibition reactions are equal in many cases. Then, the following rate equation can be obtained by the

Figure 3.8 Evaluation of kinetic parameters of competitive inhibition.

| 41

42

| 3 Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics Michaelis–Menten approach: Vmax rp ¼ 1 þ KCmA 1 þ CKII ð3:41Þ Vmax CA ¼ ðCA þ Km Þ 1 þ CKII For the case of uncompetitive inhibition, where an inhibitor can combine only with the enzyme–substrate complex, the rate equation is given as: rp ¼ k2 CEA ¼

V C max A CA 1 þ CKII þ Km

ð3:42Þ

The substrate inhibition, in which the reaction rate decreases at high concentrations of substrate, follows this mechanism. Example 3.4

A substrate L-benzoyl arginine p-nitroanilide hydrochloride was hydrolyzed by trypsin, with inhibitor concentrations of 0, 0.3, and 0.6 mmol l1. The hydrolysis rates obtained are listed in Table 3.3 [5]. Determine the inhibition mechanism and the kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax, KI) of this enzyme reaction. Table 3.3 Hydrolysis rates of L-benzoyl arginine p-nitroanilide hydrochloride by trypsin,

with and without an inhibitor. Substrate concentration (mmol l1)

Inhibitor concn (mmol l1)

0.1 0.15 0.2 0.3

0 0.79 1.11 1.45 2.00

0.3 0.57 0.84 1.06 1.52

0.6 0.45 0.66 0.86 1.22

Hydrolysis rate (mmol l1 s1)

Solution

The results given in Table 3.3 are plotted as shown in Figure 3.9. This Lineweaver–Burk plot shows that the mechanism is competitive inhibition. From the line for the data without the inhibitor, Km and Vmax are obtained as 0.98 gmol m3 and 9.1 mmol m3 s1, respectively. From the slopes of the lines, KI is evaluated as 0.6 gmol m3.

3.2 Fundamental Reaction Kinetics

Figure 3.9 Lineweaver–Burk plot of hydrolysis reaction by trypsin.

" Problems

3.1 The rate constants of a first-order reaction k

A ! P are obtained at different temperatures, as listed in Table P3.1. Calculate the frequency factor and the activation energy for this reaction. Temperature (K)

Reaction rate constant (1/s)

293 303 313 323

0.011 0.029 0.066 0.140

3.2 In a constant batch reactor, an aqueous reaction of a reactant A proceeds as given in Table P3.2. Find the rate equation and calculate the rate constant for the reaction, using the integration method. Time (min) CA (kmol m3)

0 1.0

10 0.85

20 0.73

50 0.45

100 0.20

| 43

44

| 3 Chemical and Biochemical Kinetics 3.3 Derive an integrated rate equation similar to Equation 3.22 for the irreversible second-order reaction, when reactants A and B are introduced in the stoichiometric ratio: 1=CA 1=CA0 ¼ ½xA =ð1 xA Þ=CA0 ¼ kt 3.4 An irreversible second-order reaction in the liquid phase 2A ! P proceeds as shown in Table P3.4. Calculate the second-order rate constant for this reaction, using the integration method. Time (min) CA (kmol m3)

0 1.00

50 0.600

100 0.450

200 0.295

300 0.212

3.5 An enzyme is irreversibly heat inactivated with an inactivation rate of kd=0.001 1/s at 80 1C. Estimate the half-life t1/2 of this enzyme at 80 1C. 3.6 An enzyme b-galactosidase catalyzes the hydrolysis of a substrate p-nitrophenyl-b-D-glucopyranoside to p-nitrophenol, the concentrations of which are given at 10, 20, and 40 min in the reaction mixture, as shown in Table P3.6. Time (min) p-Nitrophenol concentration (gmol m3)

10 0.45

20 0.92

40 1.83

1. Calculate the initial rate of the enzyme reaction. 2. What is the activity (units cm3) of b-glucosidase in the enzyme solution? 3.7 An angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE) controls blood pressure by catalyzing the hydrolysis of two amino acids (His-Leu) at the C terminus of angiotensin-I to produce a vasoconstrictor, angiotensin-II. The enzyme can also hydrolyze a synthetic substrate, hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine (HHL) to hippuric acid (HA). At four different concentrations of HHL solutions (pH 8.3), the initial rates of HA formation (mmol min1) are obtained as shown in Table P3.7. Several small peptides (e.g., Ile-Lys-Tyr) can irreversibly inhibit the ACE activity. The reaction rates of HA formation in the presence of 1.5 mmol l1 and 2.5 mmol l1 of an inhibitory peptide (Ile-Lys-Tyr) are also given in the table. HHL concentration (gmol m3) Reaction rate (mmol m3 min1) Without peptide 1.5 mmol l1 peptide 2.5 mmol l peptide

20

8.0

4.0

2.0

1.83 1.37 1.05

1.37 0.867 0.647

1.00 0.550 0.400

0.647 0.313 0.207

Further Reading

1. Determine the kinetic parameters of the Michaelis–Menten reaction for the ACE reaction without the inhibitor. 2. Determine the inhibition mechanism and the value of KI. 3.8 The enzyme invertase catalyzes the hydrolysis of sucrose to glucose and fructose. The rate of this enzymatic reaction decreases at higher substrate concentrations. Using the same amount of invertase, the initial rates at different sucrose concentrations are given in Table P3.8. Sucrose concentration (gmol m3)

Reaction rate (gmol m3 min1)

10 25 50 100 200

0.140 0.262 0.330 0.306 0.216

1. When the following reaction mechanism of the substrate inhibition is assumed, derive Equation 3.42. E þ S$ES ES þ S$ES2

k1 =k1 ¼ Km ki =ki ¼ KI

ES ! E þ P 2. Assuming that the values of Km and KI are equal, determine the value.

References 1 King, E.L. and Altman, C. (1963) J. Phys. Chem., 60, 1375. 2 Michaelis, L. and Menten, M.L. (1913) Biochem. Zeitschr., 49, 333. 3 Briggs, G.E. and Halden, J.B.S. (1925) Biochem. J., 19, 338.

4 Lineweaver, H. and Burk, D. (1934) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 56, 658. 5 Erlanger, B.F., Kokowsky, N. and Cohen, W. (1961) Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 95, 271.

Further Reading 1 Hougen, O.A., Watson, K.M., and Ragatz, R.A. (1947) Chemical Process Principles, Part III, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2 Levenspiel, O. (1962) Chemical Reaction Engineering, 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

3 Smith, J.M. (1956) Chemical Engineering Kinetics, McGraw-Hill.

| 45

This page intentionally left blank

| 47

4 Cell Kinetics

4.1 Introduction

A number of foods, alcohols, amino acids and other materials have long been produced via fermentations employing microorganisms. Recent developments in biotechnology – and especially in gene technology – have made it possible to use genetically engineered microorganisms and cells for the production of new pharmaceuticals and agricultural chemicals. These materials are generally produced via complicated metabolic pathways of the microorganisms and cells, and achieved by complicated parallel and serial enzyme reactions that are accompanied by physical processes, such as those described in Chapter 2. At this point it is not appropriate to follow such mechanisms of cell growth only from the viewpoints of individual enzyme kinetics, such as discussed in Chapter 3. Rather, in practice, we can assume some simplified mechanisms, and consequently a variety of models of kinetics of cell growth have been developed based on such assumptions. In this chapter, we will discuss the characteristics and kinetics of cell growth.

4.2 Cell Growth

If microorganisms are placed under suitable physical conditions in an aqueous medium containing suitable nutrients, they are able to increase their number and mass by processes of fission, budding, and/or elongation. As the bacterial cells contain 80–90% water, some elements – such as carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur, as well several other metallic elements – must be supplied from the culture medium. Typical compositions of culture media for bacteria and yeast are listed in Table 4.1. For animal cell culture, the media normally consist of a basal medium containing amino acids, salts, vitamins, glucose, and so on, in addition to 5–20% blood serum. Aerobic cells require oxygen for their growth, whereas anaerobic cells are able to grow without oxygen. Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

48

| 4 Cell Kinetics Table 4.1 Typical compositions of fermentation media.

For bacteria (LMB medium) Yeast extract Tryptone NaCl MgCl2 (2 M) Tris–HCl buffer (2 M, pH 7.4) Water to make

For yeast (YEPD medium) 5g 10 g 5g 5 ml 4 ml 1 liter

Yeast extract Peptone Glucose (20%) Water to make

10 g 20 g 100 ml 1 liter

The cell concentration is usually expressed by the cell number density Cn (the number of cells per cubic meter of medium), or by the cell mass concentration Cx (the dry weight, in kg, of cells per cubic meter of medium). For any given size and composition of a cell, the cell mass and the cell number per unit volume of medium should be proportional. Such is the case of balanced growth, which is generally attained under some suitable conditions. The growth rate of cells on a dry mass basis, rx (expressed as kg dry cells m3 h1), is defined by: rx ¼ dCx =dt

ð4:1Þ

In balanced growth, rx ¼

dCx ¼ mCx dt

ð4:2Þ

where the constant m (h1) is the specific growth rate, a measure of the rapidity of growth. The time required for the cell concentration (mass or number) to double – that is, the doubling time td (h) – is given by Equation 4.3, upon integration of Equation 4.2. td ¼ ðln 2Þ=m

ð4:3Þ

The time from one fission to the next fission, or from budding to budding, is the generation time tg (h), and is approximately equal to the doubling time. Several examples of specific growth rates are given in Table 4.2. As cells grow, they consume the nutrients (i.e., substrates) from the medium. A portion of a substrate is used for the growth of cells and constitutes the ell Table 4.2 Examples of specific growth rates.

Bacterium or cell

Temperature (1C)

Specific growth rate (h1)

E. coli Aspergillus niger Saccharomyces cerevisiae HeLa cell

40 30 30 37

2.0 0.35 0.17–0.35 0.015–0.023

4.3 Growth Phases in Batch Culture

components. The cell yield with respect to a substrate S in the medium Yxs [(kg dry cells formed)/(kg substrate consumed] is defined by Yxs ¼

Cx Cx0 Cs0 Cs

ð4:4Þ

where Cs is the mass concentration of the substrate, and Cs0 ad Cx0 are the initial values of Cs and Cx, respectively. Examples of the cell yields for various cells with some substrates are given in Table 4.3 [1].

Table 4.3 Cell yields of several microorganisms.

Microorganism

Substrate

YxS (kg dry cell kg substrate1)

Aerobacter aerogenes Saccharomyces cerevisiae Candida utilis Candida utilis Candida utilis Pseudomonas fluorescens

Glucose Glucose (aerobic) Glucose Acetic acid Ethanol Glucose

0.40 0.50 0.51 0.36 0.68 0.38

4.3 Growth Phases in Batch Culture

When a small number of cells are added (inoculated) to a fresh medium of a constant volume, the cells will first self-adjust to their new environment and then begin to grow. At the laboratory scale, oxygen needed for aerobic cell growth is supplied by: (i) shaking the culture vessel (shaker flask) which contains the culture medium and is equipped with a closure that is permeable only to air and water vapor; or (ii) by bubbling sterile air through the medium contained in a static culture vessel. The cell concentration increases following a distinct time course; an example is shown in Figure 4.1, where logarithms of the cell concentrations are plotted against the cultivation time. A semi-logarithmic paper can conveniently be used for such a plot. The time course curve, or growth curve, for a batch culture usually consists of six phases, namely the lag, accelerating, exponential growth, decelerating, stationary, and declining phases. During the lag phase, the cells inoculated into a new medium self-adjust to the new environment and begin to synthesize the enzymes and components necessary for growth. The number of cells does not increase during this period. The duration of the lag phase depends on the type of cells, the age and number of inoculated cells, their adaptability to the new culture conditions, and other factors. For example, if cells already growing in the exponential growth phase are inoculated into

| 49

50

| 4 Cell Kinetics

Figure 4.1 Typical growth curve in batch cell culture.

a medium of the same composition, the lag phase may be very short. On the other hand, if cells in the stationary phase are inoculated, they may show a longer lag phase. Cells that have adapted to the new culture conditions begin to grow after the lag phase; this period is called the accelerating phase. The growth rate of the cells gradually increases and reaches a maximum value in the exponential growth phase, where cells grow with a constant specific growth rate, mmax (balanced growth). For the exponential growth phase, Equation 4.2 can be integrated from time zero to t to give Cx ¼ Cx0 expðmmax tÞ

ð4:5Þ

where Cx0 (kg dry cells m3 medium) is the cell mass concentration at the start of the exponential growth phase. It is clear from Equation 4.5 why this phase is called the exponential growth phase; the cell concentration–time relationship for this phase can be represented by a straight line on a log C versus t plot, as shown in Figure 4.1. After the exponential growth phase, the cell growth is limited by the availability of nutrients and the accumulation of waste products of metabolism. Consequently, the growth rate gradually decreases, and this phase is called the decelerating phase. Finally, growth stops in the stationary phase. In some cases the rate of cell growth is limited by the supply of oxygen to the medium. When the stationary phase cells begin to die and destroy themselves (by lysis) in the declining phase, the result is a decrease in the cell concentration.

4.4 Factors Affecting Rates of Cell Growth

4.4 Factors Affecting Rates of Cell Growth

The rate of cell growth is influenced by temperature, pH, composition of medium, the rate of air supply, and other factors. In the case that all other conditions are kept constant, the specific growth rate may be affected by the concentration of a certain specific substrate (the limiting substrate). The simplest empirical expression for the effect of the substrate concentration on the specific growth rate is the following Monod equation, which is similar in form to the Michaelis–Menten equation for enzyme reactions: m¼

mmax Cs Ks þ Cs

ð4:6Þ

where Cs is the concentration of the limiting substrate (kmol m3) and the constant Ks is equal to the substrate concentration at which the specific growth rate is one-half of mmax (h1). It is assumed that cells grow with a constant cell composition and a constant cell yield. Examples of the relationships between the concentrations of the limiting substrate and the specific growth rates are shown in Figure 4.2.

Figure 4.2 Specific growth rates by several models, mmax ¼ 0.35 h1, Ks ¼ 1.4 104 kmol m3, KI ¼ 5 104 kmol m3.

Several improved expressions for the cell growth have been proposed. In the case that cells do not grow below a certain concentration of the limiting substrate, due to the maintenance metabolism, a term ms (h1) corresponding to the substrate concentration required for maintenance is subtracted from the right-hand side of Equation 4.6. Thus, m¼

mmax Cs ms Ks þ Cs

ð4:7Þ

| 51

52

| 4 Cell Kinetics m ¼ 0, when mmax Cs ms Ks þ C s

ð4:8Þ

Some substrates inhibit cell growth at high concentrations. Equation 4.9, one of the expressions for such cases, can be obtained on the assumption that excess substrate will inhibit cell growth, in analogy to the uncompetitive inhibition in enzyme reactions, for which Equation 3.42 holds: m¼

mmax Cs C2

ð4:9Þ

Ks þ Cs þ KSI KI can be defined similarly to Equation 3.42. The products of cell growth, such as ethyl alcohol and lactic acid, occasionally inhibit cell growth. In such cases, the product is considered to inhibit cell growth in the same way as do inhibitors in enzyme reactions, and the following equation (which is similar to Equation 3.41, for noncompetitive inhibition in enzyme reactions) can be applied: m¼

mmax Cs KI Ks þ Cs KI þ Cp

ð4:10Þ

where Cp is the concentration of the product.

4.5 Cell Growth in Batch Fermentors and Continuous Stirred-Tank Fermentors (CSTF) 4.5.1 Batch Fermentor

In case the Monod equation holds for the rates of cell growth in the exponential growth, decelerating and stationary phases in a uniformly mixed fermentor operated batchwise, a combination of Equations 4.2 and 4.6 gives dCx m Cs ¼ max Cx dt Ks þ Cs

ð4:11Þ

As the cell yield is considered to be constant during these phases,

dCs 1 dCx ¼ Yxs dt dt

ð4:12Þ

Thus, plotting Cx against Cs should give a straight line with a slope of Yxs, and the following relationship should hold: Cx0 þ Yxs Cs0 ¼ Cx þ Yxs Cs ¼ constant

ð4:13Þ

4.5 Cell Growth in Batch Fermentors and Continuous Stirred-Tank Fermentors (CSTF)

where Cx0 and CS0 are the concentrations of cell and the limiting substrate at t ¼ 0, respectively. Substitution of Equation 4.13 into Equation 4.11 and integration give the following equation: KS YxS X KS YxS 1 X0 ð4:14Þ mmax t ¼ þ 1 ln þ ln X0 Cx0 þ YxS CS0 1 X Cx0 þ YxS CS0 where X¼

Cx Cx0 þ Yxs Cs0

ð4:15Þ

Note that X is the dimensionless cell concentration. Example 4.1

Draw dimensionless growth curves (X against mmaxt) for Ks Yxs =Cx0 þ Yxs Cs0 ¼ 0; 0:2; and 0:5, when X0 ¼ 0.05. Solution

In Figure 4.3 the dimensionless cell concentrations X are plotted on semilogarithmic coordinates against the dimensionless cultivation time mmaxt for the different values of Ks Yxs =Cx0 þ Yxs Cs0 . With an increase in these values, the growth rate decreases and reaches the decelerating phase at an earlier time. Other models can be used for estimation of the cell growth in batch fermentors.

Figure 4.3 Dimensionless growth curves in a batch fermentor.

| 53

54

| 4 Cell Kinetics 4.5.2 Continuous Stirred-Tank Fermentor

Stirred-tank reactors can be used for continuous fermentation, because the cells can grow in this type of fermentor without their being added to the feed medium. In contrast, if a plug-flow reactor is used for continuous fermentation, then it is necessary to add the cells continuously to the feed medium, but this makes the operation more difficult. There are two different ways of operating a continuous stirred-tank fermentor, namely chemostat and turbidostat. In the chemostat, the flow rate of the feed medium and the liquid volume in the fermentor are kept constant. The rate of cell growth will then adjusts itself to the substrate concentration, which depends on the feed rate and substrate consumption by the growing cells. In the turbidostat the liquid volume in the fermentor and the liquid turbidity, which varies with the cell concentration, are kept constant by adjusting the liquid flow rate. Whereas, turbidostat operation requires a device to monitor the cell concentration (e.g., an optical sensor) and a control system for the flow rate, chemostat is much simpler to operate and hence is far more commonly used for continuous fermentation. The characteristics of the continuous stirred-tank fermentor (CSTF), when operated as a chemostat, is discussed in Chapter 12.

" Problems

4.1 Escherichia coli grows with a doubling time of 0.5 h in the exponential growth phase. 1. What is the value of the specific growth rate? 2. How much time would be required to grow the cell culture from 0.1 kg-dry cell m3 to 10 kg-dry cell m3? 4.2 E. coli grows from 0.10 kg-dry cell m3 to 0.50 kg-dry cell m3 in 1 h. 1. Assuming the exponential growth during this period, evaluate the specific growth rate. 2. Evaluate the doubling time during the exponential growth phase. 3. How much time would be required to grow from 0.10 kg-dry cell m3 to 1.0 kgdry cell m3? You may assume the exponential growth during this period. 4.3 Pichia pastoris (a yeast) was inoculated at 1.0 kg-dry cell m3 and cultured in a medium containing 15 wt% glycerol (batch culture). The time-dependent concentrations of cells are shown in Table P4.3.

Time (h) 0 1 2 3 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 50 Cell conc. (kg-dry cell m3) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.7 4.1 8.3 18.2 36.2 64.3 86.1 98.4

Further Reading

1. Draw a growth curve of the cells by plotting the logarithm of the cell concentrations against the cultivation time. 2. Assign the accelerating, exponential growth, and decelerating phases of the growth curve in part (a). 3. Evaluate the specific growth rate during the exponential growth phase. 4.4 Yeast cells grew from 19 kg-dry cell m3 to 54 kg-dry cell m3 in 7 h. During this period, 81 g of glycerol was consumed per 1 l of the fermentation broth. Determine the average specific growth rate and the cell yield with respect to glycerol. 4.5 E. coli was continuously cultured in a continuous stirred-tank fermentor with a working volume of 1.0 l by chemostat. A medium containing 4.0 g l1 of glucose as a carbon source was fed to the fermentor at a constant flow rate of 0.5 l h1, and the glucose concentration in the output stream was 0.20 g l1. The cell yield with respect to glucose (Yxs) was 0.42 g-dry cell/g-glucose. Determine the cell concentration in the output stream and the specific growth rate.

Reference 1 Nagai, S. (1979) Adv. Biochem. Eng., 11, 53.

Further Reading 1 Aiba, S., Humphrey, A.E., and Mills, N.F. (1973) Biochemical Engineering, 2nd edn, University of Tokyo Press.

| 55

This page intentionally left blank

Part II Unit Operations and Apparatus for Bio-Systems

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

This page intentionally left blank

| 59

5 Heat Transfer

5.1 Introduction

Heat transfer (heat transmission) is an important unit operation in chemical and bioprocess plants. In general, heat is transferred by one of the three mechanisms, namely conduction, convection, and radiation, or by their combinations. However, we need not consider radiation in bioprocess plants, which usually operate at relatively low temperatures. The heating and cooling of solids rarely become problematic in bioprocess plants. The term ‘‘heat exchanger’’ in the broader sense means heat transfer equipment in general. In the narrower sense, however, it means an equipment in which colder fluid is heated with use of the waste heat from a hotter fluid. For example, in milk pasteurization plants the raw milk is usually heated in a heat exchanger by pasteurized hot milk, before the raw milk is heated by steam in the main heater. Figure 5.1 shows, conceptually, four commonly used types of heat transfer equipment, although many more refined designs of such equipment exist. On a smaller scale, a double-tube type is used, whereas on an industrial scale a shelland-tube-type heat exchanger is frequently used.

5.2 Overall Coefficients U and Film Coefficients h

Figure 5.2 shows the temperature gradients in the case of heat transfer from fluid 1 to fluid 2 through a flat, metal wall. As the thermal conductivities of metals are greater than those of fluids, the temperature gradient across the metal wall is less steep than those in the fluid laminar sublayers, through which heat must be transferred also by conduction. Under steady-state conditions, the heat flux q (kcal h1 m2 or W m2) through the two laminar sublayers and the metal wall should be equal. Thus, q ¼ h1 ðt1 tw1 Þ ¼ ðk=xÞðtw1 tw2 Þ ¼ h2 ðtw2 t2 Þ Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

ð5:1Þ

60

| 5 Heat Transfer

Figure 5.1 Some common types of heat exchanger.

where h1 and h2 are the film coefficients of heat transfer (kcal h1 m2 1C1) (cf. Section 2.6) for fluids 1 and 2, respectively, k is the thermal conductivity of the metal wall (kcal h1 m1 1C1 or W m1 K1), and x is the metal wall thickness (m). Evidently, t1 t2 ¼ ðt1 tw1 Þ þ ðtw1 tw2 Þ þ ðtw2 t2 Þ

ð5:2Þ

In designing and evaluating heat exchangers, Equation 5.1 cannot be used directly, as the temperatures of the wall surface tw1 and tw2 are usually unknown. Thus, the usual practice is to use the overall heat transfer coefficient U (kcal h1 m2 1C1 or W m2 K1), which is based on the overall temperature difference (t1t2); that is, difference between the bulk temperatures of two fluids. Thus, q ¼ Uðt1 t2 Þ

ð5:3Þ

From Equations 5.1 to 5.3 we obtain 1=U ¼ 1=h1 þ x=k þ 1=h2

ð5:4Þ

This equation indicates that the overall heat transfer resistance, 1/U, is the sum of the heat transfer resistances of fluid 1, metal wall, and fluid 2. The values of k and x are usually known, while the values of h1 and h2 can be estimated, as will be described later. It should be noted that, as in the case of electrical resistances in series, the overall resistance for heat transfer is often controlled by the largest individual resistance. Suppose, for instance, a gas (fluid 2)

5.2 Overall Coefficients U and Film Coefficients h

Figure 5.2 The temperature gradients in heat transfer from one fluid to another through a metal wall.

is heated by condensing steam (fluid 1) in a heat exchanger with a stainless steel wall (k ¼ 20 kcal h1 m1 1C1), 1 mm thick. In case it is known that h1 ¼ 7000 kcal h1 m2 1C1 and h2 ¼ 35.0 kcal h1 m2 1C1), calculation by Equation 5.4 gives U ¼ 34.8 kcal h1 m2 1C1, which is almost equal to h2. In such cases, the resistances of the metal wall and condensing steam can be neglected. In the case of heat transfer equipment using metal tubes, one problem is which surface area – the inner surface area Ai or the outer surface area Ao – should be taken in defining U. Although this is arbitrary, the values of U will depend on which surface area is taken. Clearly, the following relationship holds: Ui Ai ¼ Uo Ao

ð5:5Þ

where Ui is the overall coefficient based on the inner surface area Ai, and Uo is based on the outer surface area Ao. In a case such as mentioned above, where h on one of the surface is much smaller than h on the other side, it is suggested that U should be defined based on the surface for smaller h values. Then, U would become practically equal to the smaller h. For the general case, see Example 5.1. In practical design calculations, we usually must consider the heat transfer resistance of the dirty deposits that accumulate on the heat transfer surface after a period of use. This problem of resistance cannot be neglected, in case the values of heat transfer coefficients h are relatively high The reciprocal of this resistance is termed the fouling factor, and this has the same dimension as h. Values of the

| 61

62

| 5 Heat Transfer fouling factor based on experience are available in a variety of reference books. As an example, the fouling factor with cooling water and that with organic liquids are in the (very approximate) ranges of 1000 to 10 000 kcal h1 m2 1C1 and 1000 to 5000 kcal h1 m2 1C1, respectively.

Example 5.1

A liquid–liquid heat exchanger uses metal tubes that are 30 mm internal diameter and 34 mm outer diameter. The value of h for liquid 1 flowing inside the tubes (h1)i ¼ 1230 kcal h1 m2 1C1, while h for liquid 2 flowing outside the tubes (h2)o ¼ 987 kcal h1 m2 1C1. Estimate Uo based on the outside tube surface, and Ui for the inside tube surface, neglecting the heat transfer resistance of the tube wall and the dirty deposit. Solution

First, (h1)i is converted to (h1)o based on the outside tube surface: ðh1 Þo ¼ ðh1 Þi 30=34 ¼ 1230 30=34 ¼ 1085 kcal h1 m2 C1 Then, neglecting the heat transfer resistance of the tube wall 1=U o ¼ 1=ðh1 Þo þ 1=ðh2 Þo ¼ 1=1085 þ 1=987 Uo ¼ 517 kcal h1 m2 C1 By Equation 5.5 Ui ¼ 517 34=30 ¼ 586 kcal h1 m2 C1

5.3 Mean Temperature Difference

The points discussed so far apply only to the local rate of heat transfer at one point on the heat transfer surface. As shown in Figure 5.3, the distribution of the overall temperature differences in practical heat transfer equipment is not uniform over the entire heat transfer surface in most cases. Figure 5.3 shows the temperature difference distributions in: (a) a counter-current heat exchanger, in which both fluids flow in opposite directions without phase change; (b) a co-current heat exchanger, in which both fluids flow in the same directions without phase change; (c) a fluid heated by condensing vapor, such as steam, or a vapor condenser cooled by a fluid, such as water; and (d) a fluid cooled by a boiling liquid, for example, a boiling refrigerant. In all of these cases, a mean temperature difference should be used in the design or evaluation of the heat transfer equipment. It can be shown that, in the overall rate equation (Equation 5.6), the logarithmic mean temperature difference (Dt)lm as defined by Equation 5.7 should be used, provided that at least

5.3 Mean Temperature Difference

one of the two fluids, which flow in parallel or counter-current to each other, undergoes no phase change and that the variations of U and the specific heats are negligible. Q ¼ U A ðDtÞlm

ð5:6Þ

ðDtÞlm ¼ ðDt1 Dt2 Þ=lnðDt1 =Dt2 Þ

ð5:7Þ

where

where Q is the total heat transfer rate (kcal h1 or W), A is the total heat transfer area (m2), and Dt1 and Dt2 are the larger and smaller temperature differences (1C) at both ends of the heat transfer area, respectively. The logarithmic mean is always smaller than the arithmetic mean. When the ratio of Dt2 and Dt1 is less than 2, the arithmetic mean could be used in place of the logarithmic mean, because the two mean values differ by only several percentage points. In those cases where the two fluids do not flow in counter-current or parallel-current without phase change, for example, in cross-current to each other, then the logarithmic mean temperature difference (Dt)lm must be multiplied by certain correction factors, the values of which for various cases are provided in reference books (e.g., [1]). It can be shown that the logarithmic mean temperature difference may also be used for the batchwise heating or cooling of fluids. In such cases, the logarithmic mean of the temperature differences at the beginning and end of the operation should be used as the mean temperature difference.

Figure 5.3 Typical temperature differences in heat transfer equipment.

| 63

64

| 5 Heat Transfer Example 5.2

Derive Equation 5.6 for the logarithmic mean temperature difference. Solution

If variations of U, and the specific heat(s) and flow rate(s) of the fluid(s) flowing without phase change are negligible, then the relationship between Q and Dt should be linear. Thus, dðDtÞ=dQ ¼ ðDt1 Dt2 Þ=Q

ðaÞ

dQ ¼ UDt dA

ðbÞ

and

Combining Equations a and b dðDtÞ=Dt ¼ ðDt1 Dt2 ÞUdA=Q

ðcÞ

Integration of Equation c gives lnðDt1 =Dt2 Þ ¼ ðDt1 Dt2 ÞUA=Q

i:e:; Equation 5:6

5.4 Estimation of Film Coefficients h

Extensive experimental data and many correlations are available in the literature for individual heat transfer coefficients in various cases, such as the heating and cooling of fluids without phase change, and for cases with phase change, viz., the boiling of liquids and condensation of vapors. Individual heat transfer coefficients can be predicted by a variety of correlations, most of which are either empirical or semi-empirical, although it is possible to predict h-values from a theoretical standpoint for pure laminar flow. Correlations for h are available for heating or cooling of fluids in forced flow in various heat transfer devices, natural convection without phase change, condensation of vapors, boiling of liquids, and other cases, as functions of fluid physical properties, geometry of devices, and operating conditions such as fluid velocity. Only a few examples of correlations for h in simple cases will be outlined below; for other examples the reader should refer to various reference books, if necessary (e.g., [1]). 5.4.1 Forced Flow of Fluids Through Tubes (Conduits)

For the individual (film) coefficient h for heating or cooling of fluids, without phase change, in turbulent flow through circular tubes, the following dimensionless

5.4 Estimation of Film Coefficients h

equation [2] is well established. In the following equations all fluid properties are evaluated at the arithmetic-mean bulk temperature. ðh di =kÞ ¼ 0:023ðdi v r=mÞ0:8 ðcp m=kÞ1=3

ð5:8Þ

or ðNuÞ ¼ 0:023ðReÞ0:8 ðPrÞ1=3

ð5:8aÞ

in which di is the inner diameter of tube (m), k is the thermal conductivity of fluid (kcal h1 m1 1C1), v is the average velocity of fluid through tube (m h1), r is the liquid density (kg m3), cp is the specific heat at constant pressure (kcal kg1 1C1), m is the liquid viscosity (kg m1 h1), (Nu) is the dimensionless Nusselt number, (Re) is the dimensionless Reynolds number (based on the inner tube diameter), and (Pr) is the dimensionless Prandtl number. The film coefficient h for turbulent flow of water through a tube can be estimated by the following dimensional equation [1]: h ¼ ð3210 þ 43tÞv0:8 =di0:2

ð5:8bÞ

in which h is the film coefficient (kcal h1 m2 1C1), t is the average water temperature (1C), v the average water velocity (m s1), and di is the inside diameter of the tube (cm). Flow through tubes is sometimes laminar, when fluid viscosity is very high or the conduit diameter is very small, as in the case of hollow fibers. The values of h for laminar flow through tubes can be predicted by the following dimensionless equation [1, 3]: ðNuÞ ¼ ðh di =kÞ ¼ 1:62 ðReÞ1=3 ðPrÞ1=3 ðdi =LÞ1=3

ð5:9Þ

or ðNuÞ ¼ 1:75ðWcp =k LÞ1=3 ¼ 1:75 ðGzÞ1=3

ð5:9aÞ

in which (Gz) is the dimensionless Graetz number, W is the mass flow rate of fluid per tube (kg h1), and L is the tube length (m), which affects h in laminar flow because of the end effect. Equations 5.9 and 5.9a hold for the range of (Gz) larger than 40. Values of (Nu) for (Gz) below 10 approach an asymptotic value of 3.66. (Nu) for the intermediate range of (Gz) can be estimated by interpolation on log–log coordinates. Equations 5.8 and 5.9 give h for straight tubes. It is known that the values of h for fluids flowing through coils increase somewhat with decreasing radius of helix. However, in practice the values of h for straight tubes can be used in this situation. In general, values of h for the heating or cooling of a gas (e.g., 5–50 kcal h1 2 m 1C1 for air) are much smaller than those for liquids (e.g., 1000–5000 kcal h1 m2 1C1 for water), because the thermal conductivities of gases are much lower than those of liquids. Values of h for turbulent or laminar flow through a conduit with a noncircular cross-section can also be predicted by either Equation 5.8 or Equation 5.9,

| 65

66

| 5 Heat Transfer respectively, by using the equivalent diameter de, as defined by the following equation, in place of di. de ¼ 4 ðcross-sectional areaÞ=ðwetted perimeterÞ

ð5:10Þ

For example, de for a conduit with a rectangular cross-section with the width b and height z is given as: de ¼ 4 b z=½2ðb þ zÞ

ð5:11Þ

Thus, de for a narrow space between two parallel plates, of which b is sufficiently large compared with z, de is almost equal to 2z. Values of de for such cases as fluid flow through the annular space between the outer and inner tubes of the double tube-type heat exchanger or fluid flow outside and parallel to the tubes of multitubular heat exchanger can be calculated using Equation 5.11. Example 5.3

Calculate the equivalent diameter of the annular space of a double tube-type heat exchanger. The outside diameter of the inner tube (d1) is 4.0 cm, and the inside diameter of the outer tube (d2) is 6.0 cm. Solution

By Equation 5.10, de ¼ 4ðp=4Þ ðd22 d21 Þ=pðd1 þ d2 Þ ¼ d2 d1 ¼ 6:0 cm 4:0 cm ¼ 2:0 cm In the above example, the total wetted perimeter is used in calculating de. In certain practices, however, the wetted perimeter for heat transfer – which would be p d1 in the above example – is used in the calculation of de. In the case where the fluid flow is parallel to the tubes, as in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger without transverse baffles, the equivalent diameter de of the shell side space is calculated as mentioned above, and h at the outside surface of tubes can be estimated by Equation 5.8 with use of de. 5.4.2 Forced Flow of Fluids Across a Tube Bank

In the case where a fluid flows across a bank of tubes, the film coefficient of heat transfer at the tube outside surface can be estimated using the following equation [1]: ðh do =kÞ ¼ 0:3ðdo Gm =mÞ0:6 ðcp m=kÞ1=3

ð5:12Þ

that is, ðNuÞ ¼ 0:3ðReÞ0:6 ðPrÞ1=3

ð5:12aÞ

5.4 Estimation of Film Coefficients h

where do is the outer diameter of tubes (m), and Gm is the fluid mass velocity (kg h1 m2) in the transverse direction, based on the minimum free area available for fluid flow; the other symbols are the same as in Equation 5.8. In the case where fluid flows in the shell side space of a shell-and-tube-type heat exchanger, with transverse baffles, in directions that are transverse, diagonal and partly parallel to the tubes, very approximate values of the heat transfer coefficients at the tube outside surfaces can be estimated using Equation 5.12, if Gm is calculated as the transverse velocity across the plane, including the shell axis [1]. 5.4.3 Liquids in Jacketed or Coiled Vessels

Many correlations are available for heat transfer between liquids and the walls of stirred vessels or the surface of coiled tubes installed in the stirred vessels. For details of the different types of stirrer available, see Section 7.4.1. Case 1 Data on heat transfer between liquid and the vessel wall and between liquid and the surface of helical coil in the vessels stirred with flat-blade paddle stirrers were correlated as [4]:

ðh D=kÞ ¼ aðL2 Nr=mÞ2=3 ðcp m=kÞ1=3

ð5:13Þ

where h is the film coefficient of heat transfer, D is the vessel diameter, k is the liquid thermal conductivity, L is the impeller diameter, N is the number of revolutions, r is the liquid density, m is the liquid viscosity, and cp is the liquid specific heat (all in consistent units). The values of a are 0.36 for the liquid– vessel wall heat transfer, and 0.87 for the liquid–coil surface heat transfer. Any slight difference between h for heating and cooling can be neglected in practice. Case 2 Data on heat transfer between a liquid and the wall of vessel of diameter D, stirred by a vaned-disk turbine, were correlated [5] by Equation 5.13. The values of a were 0.54 without baffles, and 0.74 with baffles. Case 3 Data on heat transfer between liquid and the surface of helical coil in the vessel stirred by flat-blade turbine were correlated [6] by Equation 5.14.

ðhdo =kÞ ¼ 0:17ðL2 Nr=mÞ0:67 ðcp m=kÞ0:37

ð5:14Þ

where do is the outside diameter of coil tube, and all other symbols are the same as in Equation 5.13.

| 67

68

| 5 Heat Transfer 5.4.4 Condensing Vapors and Boiling Liquids

Heating by condensing vapors, usually by saturated steam, is a very common practice in chemical and bioprocess plants. Liquid boiling and vapor condensation also occur in distillation or evaporation equipment. Correlations are available for the film coefficients of heat transfer for condensing vapors and boiling liquids, usually as functions of fluid physical properties, temperature difference, and other factors such as the condition of the metal surface. Although of academic interests, the use of some assumed values of h is usually sufficient in practice, because for condensing vapors or boiling liquids these are much larger than those for the film coefficient h-values for fluids without phase change, in which case the overall coefficient U is controlled by the latter. In addition, as will be mentioned later, the heat transfer resistance of any dirty deposit is often larger than that of the condensing vapor and boiling liquid. To provide some examples, h-values for the film-type condensation of water vapor (when a film of condensed water would cover the entire cooling surface) will range from 4000 to 15 000 kcal h1 m2 1C1, while those for boiling water would be in the range of 1500 to 30 000 kcal h1 m2 1C1.

5.5 Estimation of Overall Coefficients U

The values of the film coefficients of heat transfer h, and accordingly those of the overall coefficient U, vary by orders of magnitudes, depending on the fluid properties and on whether or not they undergo phase change – that is, condensation or boiling. Thus, the correct estimation of U is very important in the design of heat transfer equipment. The first consideration when designing or evaluating heat transfer equipment is, on which side of the heat transfer wall will the controlling heat transfer resistance exist. For example, when air is heated by condensing saturated steam, the air-side film coefficient may be 30 kcal h1 m2 1C1, while the steam-side film coefficient might be on the order of 10 000 kcal h1 m2 1C1. In such a case, we need not consider the steam side resistance. The overall coefficient would be almost equal to the air-side film coefficient, which can be predicted by correlations such as those in Equation 5.8 or Equation 5.12. The resistance of the metal wall is negligible in most cases, except when the values of U are very large. The values of the film coefficient for liquids without phase change are usually larger than those for gases, by one or two orders of magnitude. Nonetheless, the liquid-side heat transfer resistance may be the major resistance in an equipment heated by saturated steam. Film coefficient for liquids without phase change can be predicted by correlations such as those in Equations 5.8, 5.12, or 5.13. In the case of gas–gas or liquid–liquid heat exchangers, the film coefficients for the fluids on both sides of the metal wall are of the same order of magnitude, and

5.5 Estimation of Overall Coefficients U Table 5.1 Some typical fouling factors.

Material

Fouling factor (kcal h1 m2 1C1)

Condensing steam Clean water Dirty water Oils (vegetable and fuel oils)

15 000 2500–10 000 1000–2500 1000–1500

can be predicted by correlations, for example with Equation 5.8 or 5.12. Neither of the fluid film resistances can be neglected. In a gas–liquid heat exchanger, the controlling resistance is on the gas side, as mentioned above. In practice, we must consider the heat transfer resistance of the dirt or scale which has been deposited on the metal surface, except when the values of U are small, as in the case of a gas heater or cooler. Usually, we use the so-called fouling factor hf, which is the reciprocal of the dirt resistance and hence has the same dimension as the film coefficient h. The dirt resistance sometimes becomes controlling, when U without dirt is very large – as in the case of a liquid boiler heated by saturated steam. Thus, in case the dirt resistance is not negligible, the overall resistance for heat transfer 1/U is given by the following equation: 1=U ¼ 1=h1 þ x=k þ 1=hf þ 1=h2

ð5:15Þ

The first, second, third, and fourth terms on the right-hand side of Equation 5.15 represent the resistances of the fluid 1, metal wall, dirt deposit, and film 2, respectively. Occasionally, we must also consider the resistances of the dirt on both sides of the metal wall. Some typical values of the fouling factor hf are listed in Table 5.1. Example 5.4

Milk, flowing at 2000 l h1 through the stainless steel inner tube (40 mm i.d., 2 mm thick) of a double tube-type heater, is to be heated from 10 to 85 1C by saturated steam condensing at 120 1C on the outer surface of the inner tube. Calculate the total length of the heating tube required. Solution

The thermal conductivity of stainless steel is 20 kcal h1 m2 1C1. The mean values of the properties of milk for the temperature range are as follows: . . . .

Specific heat, cp ¼ 0.946 kcal kg1 1C1 Density, r ¼ 1030 kg m3 Thermal conductivity, k ¼ 0.457 kcal h1 m1 1C1 ¼ 0.0127 cal s1 cm1 1C1 Viscosity, m ¼ 1.12 103 kg m1 s1 ¼ 0.0112 g cm1 s1

| 69

70

| 5 Heat Transfer Velocity of milk through the tube u ¼ 2000 1000/[(p/4) 42 3600] ¼ 44.2 cm s1. Then (Re) ¼ du r/m ¼ 16 260; (Pr) ¼ cpm/k ¼ 8.34. Substitution of these values of (Re) and (Pr) into Equation 5.8 gives the milkside film coefficient of heat transfer, hm ¼ 1245 kcal h1 m2 1C1. Assumed steam-side coefficient hs ¼ 10 000 kcal h1 m2 1C1 Assumed milk-side fouling factor hf ¼ 3000 kcal h1 m2 1C1 Resistance of the tube wall rw ¼ 0.002/20 ¼ 0.0001 h m2 1C kcal1 Overall heat transfer resistance 1/U ¼ 1/hs + rw + 1/hm + 1/hf ¼ 0.00133 h m2 1C kcal1 . Overall heat transfer coefficient U ¼ 750 kcal h1 m2 1C1 . Temperature differences: (Dt)1 ¼ 12010 ¼ 110 1C; (Dt)2 ¼ 12085 ¼ 35 1C . . . .

By Equation 5.7 (Dt)lm ¼ (11035)/ln (110/35) ¼ 65.6 1C Thus, heat to be transferred Q ¼ 2000 1030 0.946 (8510) ¼ 146 200 kcal h1 In calculating the required heat transfer surface area A of a tube, it is rational to take the area of the surface where h is smaller; that is, where the heat transfer resistance is larger and controlling – which is the milk-side inner surface area in this case. Thus, A ¼ Q=½UðDtÞ1m ¼ 146 200=ð750 65:6Þ ¼ 2:97 m2 Hence, total length of heating tube required ¼ 2.97/(0.040 p) ¼ 23.6 m

" Problems

5.1 Water enters a countercurrent shell-and-tube-type heat exchanger at 10 m3 h1 on the shell side, so as to increase the water temperature from 20 to 40 1C. The hot water enters at a temperature of 80 1C and a rate of 8.0 m3 h1. The overall heat transfer coefficient is 900 W m2 K1. You may use the specific heat cp ¼ 4.2 kJ kg1 K1 and density r ¼ 992 kg m3 of water. Determine: (i) the exit temperature of the shell side water; and (ii) the required heat transfer area. 5.2 Air at 260 K and 1 atm is flowing through a 10 mm i.d. tube at a velocity of 10 m s1. The temperature is to be increased to 300 K. Estimate the film coefficient of heat transfer. The properties of air at 280 K are: r ¼ 1.26 kg m3, cp ¼ 1.006 kJ kg1 K1, k ¼ 0.0247 W m1 K1, m ¼ 1.75 105 Pa s. 5.3 Estimate the overall heat transfer coefficient U, based on the inside tube surface area, of a shell-and-tube-type vapor condenser, in which cooling water at 25 1C flows through stainless steel tubes, 25 mm i.d. and 30 mm o.d., at a velocity of 1.2 m s1. It can be assumed that the film coefficient of condensing vapor at the outside tube surface is 2000 kcal h1 m2 1C1, and that the fouling factor of the water side is 5000 kcal h1 m2 1C1.

Further Reading

5.4 A double-tube-type heat exchanger consisting of an inner copper tube of 50 mm o.d. and 46 mm i.d., and a steel outer tube of 80 mm i.d., is used to cool methanol from 60 to 30 1C by water entering at 20 1C and leaving at 25 1C. Methanol flows through the inner tube at a flow rate of 0.25 m s1, and water flows countercurrently through the annular space. Estimate the total length of double tube that would be required. The properties of methanol at 45 1C are: r ¼ 780 kg m3, cp ¼ 0.62 kcal kg1 1C1, k ¼ 0.18 kcal h1 m1 1C1, m ¼ 0.42 cp. 5.5 Estimate the heat transfer coefficient between an oil and the wall of a baffled kettle, 100 cm in diameter, stirred by a flat-blade turbine, 30 cm in diameter, when the impeller rotational speed N is 100 r.p.m. The properties of the oil are: r ¼ 900 kg m3, cp ¼ 0.468 kcal kg1 1C1, k ¼ 0.109 kcal h1 m1 1C1, m ¼ 90 cp.

References 1 McAdams, W.H. (1954) Heat Transmission, 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill. 2 Colburn, A.P. (1933) Trans. AIChE, 29, 174. 3 Drew, T.B., Hottel, H.C., and McAdams, W.H. (1936) Trans. AIChE, 32, 271.

Further Reading 1 Kern, D.Q. (1950) Process Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill. 2 Perry, R.H., Green, D.W., and Malony, J.O. (eds) 1984, 1997) Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 6th and 7th edns, McGrawHill.

4 Chilton, T.H., Drew, T.B., and Jebens, R.H. (1944) Ind. Eng. Chem., 36, 510. 5 Brooks, G. and Jen, G.-J. (1959) Chem. Eng. Prog., 55 (10), 54. 6 Oldshue, J.Y. and Gretton, A.T. (1954) Chem. Eng. Prog., 50 (12), 615.

| 71

This page intentionally left blank

| 73

6 Mass Transfer

6.1 Introduction

Rates of gas–liquid, liquid–liquid, and solid–liquid mass transfer are important, and often control the overall rates in bioprocesses. For example, the rates of oxygen absorption into fermentation broths often control the overall rates of aerobic fermentation. The extraction of some products from a fermentation broth, using an immiscible solvent, represents a case of liquid–liquid mass transfer. Solid-liquid mass transfer is important in some bioreactors using immobilized enzymes. In various membrane processes (these will be discussed in Chapter 8), the rates of mass transfer between the liquid phase and the membrane surface often control the overall rates.

6.2 Overall Coefficients j and Film Coefficients k of Mass Transfer

In the case of mass transfer between two phases – for example, the absorption of a gas component into a liquid solvent, or the extraction of a liquid component by an immiscible solvent – we need to consider the overall as well as the individual phase coefficients of mass transfer. As stated in Section 2.6, two types of gas film mass transfer coefficients – kGp, based on the partial pressure driving potential, and kGc, based on the concentration driving potential – can be defined. However, hereafter in this text only the latter type is used; in other words: kG ¼ kGc

ð6:1Þ

JA ¼ kG ðCG CGi Þ

ð6:2Þ

Thus,

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

74

| 6 Mass Transfer where JA is mass transfer flux (kg or kmol h1 m2), CG and CGi are gas-phase concentrations (kg or kmol m3) in the bulk of the gas phase and at the interface, respectively. The liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient kL (m h1) is defined by JA ¼ kL ðCLi CL Þ

ð6:3Þ

where CLi and CL are liquid phase concentrations (kg or kmol m3) at the interface and the bulk of liquid phase, respectively. The relationships between the overall mass transfer coefficient and the film mass transfer coefficients in both phases are not as simple as the case of heat transfer, for the following reason. Unlike the temperature distribution curves in heat transfer between two phases, the concentration curves of the diffusing component in the two phases are discontinuous at the interface. The relationship between the interfacial concentrations in the two phases depends on the solubility of the diffusing component. Incidentally, it is known that there exists no resistance to mass transfer at the interface, except when a surface-active substance accumulates at the interface to give additional mass transfer resistance. Figure 6.1 shows the gradients of the gas and liquid concentrations when a component in the gas phase is absorbed into a liquid which is in direct contact with the gas phase. As an equilibrium is known to exist at the gas–liquid interface, the gas-phase concentration at the interface CGi and the liquid-phase concentration at the interface CLi should be on the solubility curve which passes through the origin. In a simple case where the solubility curve is straight, CGi ¼ mCLi

ð6:4Þ

where m is the slope (–) of the curve when CGi is plotted on the ordinate against CLi on the abscissa. In general, gas solubilities in liquids are given by the Henry’s law, that is: p ¼ Hm C L

ð6:5Þ

p ¼ H x xL

ð6:6Þ

or

where p is the partial pressure in the gas phase, CL is the molar concentration in liquid, and xL is the mole fraction in liquid. The mutual conversion of m, Hm, and Hx is not difficult, using the relationships such as given in Example 2.4 in Chapter 2; for example, CG ¼ pðRTÞ1 ¼ pð0:0821 TÞ1 ¼ 12:18 p K 1

ð6:7Þ

The solubilities of gases can be defined as the reciprocals of m, Hm, or Hx. Moreover, the larger these values, the smaller the solubilities. Table 6.1 provides approximate values of the solubilities (mole fraction atm1, i.e., xL/p ¼ 1/Hx) of some common gases in water, variations of which are negligible up to pressures of several bars. Note that the solubilities decrease with

6.2 Overall Coefficients k and Film Coefficients k of Mass Transfer

Figure 6.1 Concentration gradients near the gas–liquid interface in absorption.

increasing temperature. It is worth remembering that values of solubility in water are high for NH3; moderate for Cl2, CO2; and low for O2 and N2. Now, we shall define the overall coefficients. Even in the case when the concentrations at the interface are unknown (cf. Figure 6.1), we can define the overall driving potentials. Consider the case of gas absorption: the overall coefficient of gas– liquid mass transfer based on the liquid phase concentrations KL (m h1) is defined by JA ¼ KL ðCL CL Þ

ð6:8Þ

where CL is the imaginary liquid concentration which would be in equilibrium with the gas concentration in the bulk of gas phase CG, as shown by a broken line in Figure 6.1. Similarly, the overall coefficient of gas–liquid mass transfer based on the gas concentrations KG (m h1) can be defined by: JA ¼ KG ðCG CG Þ

ð6:9Þ

Table 6.1 Solubilities of common gases in water (mole fraction atm.–1).

Reproduced from Figure 6-7 in [1]. Temperature (1C)

NH3

SO2

Cl2

CO2

O2

N2

10 20 30 40

0.42 0.37 0.33 0.29

0.043 0.031 0.023 0.017

0.0024 0.0017 0.0014 0.0012

9.0 104 6.5 104 5.3 104 4.2 104

2.9 105 2.3 105 2.0 105 1.8 105

1.5 105 1.3 105 1.2 105 1.1 105

| 75

76

| 6 Mass Transfer where CG is the imaginary gas concentration which would be in equilibrium with the liquid concentration CL in the bulk of liquid (cf. Figure 6.1). Relationships between KL, KG, kL, and kG can be obtained easily. As can be seen from Figure 6.1, ðCG CG Þ ¼ ðCG CGi Þ þ ðCGi CG Þ ¼ ðCG CGi Þ þ mðCLi CL Þ

ð6:10Þ

Combination of Equations 6.2 to 6.4, 6.9, and 6.10 gives 1=KG ¼ 1=kG þ m=kL

ð6:11Þ

Similarly, we can obtain 1=KL ¼ 1=ðmkG Þ þ 1=kL

ð6:12Þ

Comparison of Equations 6.11 and 6.12 gives KL ¼ mKG

ð6:13Þ

Equations 6.11 and 6.12 lead to a very important concept. When the solubility of a gas into a liquid is very poor (i.e., m is very large), the second term of Equation 6.12 is negligibly small compared to the third term. In such a case, where the liquid-phase resistance is controlling, KL ﬃ k L

ð6:14Þ

It is for this reason that the gas-phase resistance can be neglected for oxygen transfer in aerobic fermentors. On the other hand, in the case where a gas is highly soluble in a liquid (e.g., when HCl gas or NH3 is absorbed into water), m will be very small and the third term of Equation 6.11 will be negligible compared to the second term. In such a case, KG ﬃ kG

ð6:15Þ

The usual practice in gas absorption calculations is to use the overall coefficient KG in cases where the gas is highly soluble, and the overall coefficient KL in cases where the solubility of the gas is low. KG and KL are interconvertible by using Equation 6.13. The overall coefficients of liquid–liquid mass transfer are important in the calculations for extraction equipment, and can be defined in the same way as the overall coefficients of gas–liquid mass transfer. In liquid–liquid mass transfer, one component dissolved in one liquid phase (phase 1) will diffuse into another liquid phase (phase 2). We can define the film coefficients kL1 (m h1) and kL2 (m h1) for phases 1 and 2, respectively, and whichever of the overall coefficients KL1 (m h1), defined with respect to phase 1, or KL2 (m h1) based on phase 2, is convenient can be used. Relationships between the two film coefficients and the two overall

6.3 Types of Mass Transfer Equipment

coefficients are analogous to those for gas–liquid mass transfer; that is: 1=KL1 ¼ 1=kL1 þ m=kL2

ð6:16Þ

1=KL2 ¼ 1=ðm kL1 Þ þ 1=kL2

ð6:17Þ

where m is the ratio of the concentrations in phase 1 and phase 2 at equilibrium, viz. the partition coefficient or its reciprocal. Example 6.1

A gas component A in air is absorbed into water at 1 atm and 20 1C. The Henry’s law constant Hm of A for this system is 1.67 103 Pa m3 kmol1. The liquid film mass-transfer coefficient kL and gas-film coefficient kG are 2.50 106 m s1 and 3.00 103 m s1, respectively. (i) Determine the overall coefficient of gas–liquid mass transfer KL (m s1). (ii) When the bulk concentrations of A in the gas phase and liquid phase are 1.013 104 Pa and 2.00 kmol m3, respectively, calculate the molar flux of A. Solution

(a) The Henry’s constant Hm in Equation 6.5 is converted to the partition constant m in Equation 6.4. m ¼ ðHm Þ=RT ¼ 1:67 103 =ð0:0821 1:0132 105 293Þ ¼ 6:85 104 1=KL ¼ 1=ðm kG Þ þ 1=kL ¼ 1=ð6:85 104 3:00 103 Þ þ 1=ð2:50 106 Þ KL ¼ 1:13 106 ms1 (b) CL ¼ 1:013 104 =Hm ¼ 1:013 104 =ð1:67 103 Þ ¼ 6:06 JA ¼ KL ðCL CL Þ ¼ 4:59 106 kmol s1 m3 ¼ 1:65 102 kmol h1 m3 6.3 Types of Mass Transfer Equipment

Numerous types of equipment are available for gas–liquid, liquid–liquid, and solid–liquid mass transfer operations. However, at this point only few representative types will be described, on a conceptual basis. Some schematic illustrations of three types of mass transfer equipment are shown in Figure 6.2.

| 77

78

| 6 Mass Transfer

Figure 6.2 Types of mass transfer equipment. (a) Packed column; (b) packings; (c) bubble column; (d) packed bed.

6.3.1 Packed Column

The packed column (packed tower) shown in Figure 6.2a is widely used for the absorption of gas into liquid (or its reverse operation), the desorption of dissolved gas from a liquid, and occasionally for distillation. Packed columns are very common equipment in chemical process plants, and are often as large as a few meters in diameter and 20–30 m high. The vessel is a vertical cylinder, the main part of which is filled with the so-called packings; these are small, regularly shaped pieces of corrosion-resistant materials (e.g., porcelain, carbon, metals, plastics) such that there is a large void space and a large surface area per unit packed volume. Figure 6.2b shows two common types of packing. The gas containing a component to be absorbed is passed through the packed column, usually in an upward direction. Liquid is supplied to the top of the column, and trickles down the surface of the packing; in this way, the liquid comes into direct contact with the gas, which flows through the void of the packing. A classical example of using packed columns can be seen in the production plant of liquefied or solid carbon

6.3 Types of Mass Transfer Equipment

dioxide. Gas containing CO2 – for example, flue gas from a coke-burning furnace, gas obtained on burning lime stone, or gas from a fermentation plant – is passed through a packed column, and the CO2 in the gas is absorbed in a solution of sodium (or potassium) carbonate or bicarbonate. Pure CO2 can be obtained by boiling the solution emerging from the bottom of the packed column. This is a case of chemical absorption; that is, gas absorption accompanied by chemical reactions. The rates of gas absorption with a chemical reaction are greater than those without reaction, as will be discussed in Section 6.5.

6.3.2 Plate Column

Plate columns (not shown in the figure), which can be used for the same purposes as packed columns, have many horizontal plates that are either perforated or equipped with so-called ‘‘bubble caps.’’ The liquid supplied to the top of the column flows down the column, in horizontal fashion, over each successive plate. The upwards-moving gas or vapor bubbles pass through the liquid on each plate, such that a gas–liquid mass transfer takes place at the surface of the bubbles.

6.3.3 Spray Column

The spray column or chamber (not shown in the figure) is a large, empty cylindrical column or horizontal duct through which gas is passed. Liquid is sprayed into the gas from the top, or sometimes from the side. The large number of liquid drops produced provide a very large gas–liquid contact surface. Owing to the high relative velocity between the liquid and the gas, the gas phase mass transfer coefficient is high, whereas the liquid phase coefficient is low because of the minimal liquid movements within the drops. Consequently, spray columns are suitable for systems in which the liquid-phase mass transfer resistance is negligible (e.g., the absorption of ammonia gas into water), or its reverse operation – that is, desorption – or when the resistance exists only in the gas phase; an example is the vaporization of a pure liquid or the humidification of air. This type of device is also used for the cooling of gases. Unfortunately, the spray column or chamber has certain disadvantages, primarily that a device is required to remove any liquid droplets carried over by the outgoing gas. Consequently, real gas–liquid countercurrent operation is difficult. Although the fall in gas pressure drop is minimal, the power requirements for liquid spraying are relatively high.

| 79

80

| 6 Mass Transfer 6.3.4 Bubble Column

The bubble column is shown in Figure 6.2c. In this type of equipment, gas is sparged from the bottom into a liquid contained in a large cylindrical vessel. A large number of gas bubbles provide a very large surface area for gas–liquid contact. Turbulence in the liquid phase creates a large liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient, while the gas-phase coefficient is relatively small because of the very little gas movement within the bubbles. Thus, the bubble column is suitable for systems of low gas solubility where the liquid-phase mass transfer resistance is controlling, such as the oxygen–water system. In fact, bubble columns are widely used as aerobic fermentors, in which the main resistance for oxygen transfer exists in the liquid phase. A detailed discussion of bubble columns is provided in Chapter 7. 6.3.5 Packed (Fixed-)-Bed Column

Another type of mass transfer equipment, shown in Figure 6.2d, is normally referred to as the packed (fixed-)-bed. Unlike the packed column for gas–liquid mass transfer, the packed-bed column is used for mass transfer between the surface of packed solid particles (e.g., catalyst particles or immobilized enzyme particles) and a single-phase liquid or gas. This type of equipment, which is widely used as reactors, adsorption columns, chromatography columns, and so on, is discussed in greater detail in Chapters 7 and 11. 6.3.6 Other Separation Methods

Membrane separation processes will be discussed in Chapter 8. Liquid-phase mass transfer rates at the surface of membranes – either flat or tubular – can be predicted by the correlations given in this chapter. A variety of gas–liquid contacting equipment with mechanical moving elements (e.g., stirred (agitated) tanks with gas sparging) are discussed in Chapters 7 and 12, including rotating-disk gas–liquid contactors and others.

6.4 Models for Mass Transfer at the Interface 6.4.1 Stagnant Film Model

The film model referred to in Chapters 2 and 5 provides, in fact, an oversimplified picture of what happens in the vicinity of the interface. Based on the film model

6.4 Models for Mass Transfer at the Interface

proposed by Nernst in 1904, Whitman [2] proposed in 1923 the two-film theory of gas absorption. Although this is a very useful concept, it is impossible to predict the individual (film) coefficient of mass transfer, unless the thickness of the laminar sublayer is known. According to this theory, the mass transfer rate should be proportional to the diffusivity, and inversely proportional to the thickness of the laminar film. However, as we usually do not know the thickness of the laminar film, the convenient concept of the effective film thickness has been assumed (as mentioned in Chapter 2). Despite this, experimental values of the film coefficient of mass transfer based on the difference between the concentrations at the interface and of the fluid bulk, do not vary in proportion to diffusivity, as is required by the film theory. 6.4.2 Penetration Model

The existence of a stagnant laminar fluid film adjacent to the interface is not difficult to visualize, especially in the case where the interface is stationary, as when the fluid flows along a solid surface. However, this situation seems rather unrealistic with the fluid–fluid interface, as when the surface of the liquid in an agitated vessel is in contact with a gas phase above, or if gas bubbles move upwards through a liquid, or when one liquid phase is in contact with another liquid phase in an extractor. In the penetration model proposed by Higbie [3] in 1935, it is assumed that a small fluid element of uniform solute concentration is brought into contact with the interface for a certain fixed length of time t. During this time the solute diffuses into the fluid element as a transient process, in the same manner as transient heat conduction into a solid block. Such a transient diffusion process of fixed contact time is not difficult to visualize in the situation where a liquid trickles down over the surface of a piece of packing in a packed column. Neglecting convection, Higbie derived (on a theoretical basis) Equation 6.18 for the liquidphase mass transfer coefficient kL averaged over the contact time t. kL ¼ 2ðD=ptÞ1=2

ð6:18Þ

If this model is correct, kL should vary with the diffusivity D to the 0.5 power, but this does not agree with experimental data in general. Also, t is unknown except in the case of some specially designed equipment. 6.4.3 Surface Renewal Model

In 1951, Danckwerts proposed the surface renewal model as an extension of the penetration model [4]. Instead of assuming a fixed contact time for all fluid elements, Danckwerts assumed a wide distribution of contact time, from zero to infinity, and supposed that the chance of an element of the surface being replaced

| 81

82

| 6 Mass Transfer with fresh liquid was independent of the length of time for which it has been exposed. Thus, it was shown, theoretically, that the averaged mass transfer coefficient kL at the interface is given as kL ¼ ðD sÞ1=2

ð6:19Þ

where s is the fraction of the area of surface which is replaced with fresh liquid in unit time. Compared to the film model or the penetration model, the surface renewal approach seems closer to reality in such a case where the surface of liquid in an agitated tank is in contact with the gas phase above, or with the surface of a liquid flowing through an open channel. The values of s are usually unknown, although they could be estimated from the data acquired from carefully planned experiments. As with the penetration model, kL values should vary with diffusivity D0.5. It can be seen that a theoretical prediction of kL values is not possible by any of the three above-described models, because none of the three parameters – the laminar film thickness in the film model, the contact time in the penetration model, and the fractional surface renewal rate in the surface renewal model – is predictable in general. It is for this reason that empirical correlations must normally be used for the prediction of individual coefficients of mass transfer. Experimentally obtained values of the exponent on diffusivity are usually between 0.5 and 1.0.

6.5 Liquid-Phase Mass Transfer with Chemical Reactions

So far, we have considered pure physical mass transfer without any reaction. Occasionally, however, gas absorption is accompanied by chemical or biological reactions in the liquid phase. For example, when CO2 gas is absorbed into an aqueous solution of Na2CO3, the following reaction takes place in the liquid phase: Na2 CO3 þ CO2 þ H2 O ¼ 2 NaHCO3 In an aerobic fermentation, the oxygen absorbed into the culture medium is consumed by microorganisms in the medium. In general, the rates of the mass transfer increase when it is accompanied by reactions. For example, if kL indicates the liquid-phase coefficient, including the effects of the reaction, then the ratio E can be defined as: E ¼ kL =kL

ð6:20Þ

and is referred to as the ‘‘enhancement’’ (reaction) factor. Values of E are always greater than unity. Hatta [5] derived a series of theoretical equations for E, based on the film model. Experimental values of E agree with the Hatta theory, and also with theoretical values of E derived later by other investigators, based on the penetration model.

6.5 Liquid-Phase Mass Transfer with Chemical Reactions

Figure 6.3 Gas absorption with a chemical reaction.

Figure 6.3a shows the idealized sketch of concentration profiles near the interface by the Hatta model, for the case of gas absorption with a very rapid secondorder reaction. The gas component A, when absorbed at the interface, diffuses to the reaction zone where it reacts with B, which is derived from the bulk of the liquid by diffusion. The reaction is so rapid that it is completed within a very thin reaction zone; this can be regarded as a plane parallel to the interface. The reaction product diffuses to the liquid main body. The absorption of CO2 into a strong aqueous KOH solution is close to such a case. Equation 6.21 provides the enhancement factor E for such a case, as derived by the Hatta theory: E ¼ 1 þ ðDB CB Þ=ðDA CAi Þ

ð6:21Þ

where DB and DA are liquid-phase diffusivities (L2 T 1) of B and A, respectively, CB is the concentration of B in the bulk of liquid, and CAi is the liquid-phase concentration of A at the interface. Figure 6.3b shows the idealized concentration profile of an absorbed component A, obtained by the Hatta theory, for the case of relatively slow reaction which is either first-order or pseudo first-order with respect to A. As A is consumed gradually whilst diffusing across the film, the gradient of concentration of A which is required for its diffusion will gradually decrease with increasing distance from the interface. The enhancement factor for such cases is given by the Hatta theory as: E ¼ g=ðtanhgÞ

ð6:22Þ

| 83

84

| 6 Mass Transfer where g ¼ ðk CB DA Þ1=2 =kL

ð6:23Þ

When CB (i.e., the concentration of B which reacts with A) is much larger than CA, CB can be considered approximately constant, and (kCB) can be regarded as the pseudo first-order reaction rate constant (T 1). The dimensionless group g, as defined by Equation 6.23, is often designated as the Hatta number (Ha). According to Equation 6.22, if gW5, it becomes practically equal to E, which is sometimes also called the Hatta number. For this range, kL ¼ EkL ¼ ðk CB DA Þ1=2

ð6:24Þ

Equation 6.24 indicates that the mass transfer rates are independent of kL and of the hydrodynamic conditions; hence, the whole interfacial area is uniformly effective when gW5. [6] As will be discussed in Chapter 12, any increase in the enhancement factor E due to the respiration of microorganisms can, in practical terms, be neglected as it is very close to unity.

6.6 Correlations for Film Coefficients of Mass Transfer

As noted in Chapter 2, close analogies exist between the film coefficients of heat transfer and those of mass transfer. Indeed, the same type of dimensionless equations can often be used to correlate the film coefficients of heat and mass transfer. 6.6.1 Single-Phase Mass Transfer Inside or Outside Tubes

Film coefficients of mass transfer inside or outside tubes are important in membrane processes using tube-type or so-called ‘‘hollow fiber’’ membranes. In the case where flow inside the tubes is turbulent, the dimensionless Equations 6.25 and 6.25a (analogous to Equations 5.8 and 5.8a for heat transfer) provide the film coefficients of mass transfer kc [7]. ðkc di =DÞ ¼ 0:023ðdi vr=mÞ0:8 ðm=rDÞ1=3

ð6:25Þ

that is, ðShÞ ¼ 0:023ðReÞ0:8 ðScÞ1=3

ð6:25aÞ

where di is the inner diameter of tube, D is the diffusivity, v is the average linear velocity of fluid, r is the fluid density, and m the fluid viscosity, all in consistent units. (Sh), (Re), and (Sc) are the dimensionless Sherwood, Reynolds, and Schmidt numbers, respectively.

6.6 Correlations for Film Coefficients of Mass Transfer

In case the flow is laminar, Equation 6.26 (analogous to Equation 5.9 for heat transfer) can be used: ðkc di =DÞ ¼ 1:62ðdi vr=mÞ1=3 ðm=rDÞ1=3 ðdi =LÞ1=3

ð6:26Þ

or ðShÞ ¼ 1:62ðReÞ1=3 ðScÞ1=3 ðdi =LÞ1=3 where L is the tube length (this is important in laminar flow, due to the end effects at the tube entrance). Equation 6.26 can be transformed into: ðShÞ ¼ ðkc di =DÞ ¼ 1:75ðF=D LÞ1=3 ¼ 1:75ðNxÞ1=3

ð6:26aÞ

where F is the volumetric flow rate (L3 T1) of a fluid through a tube. The dimensionless group (Nx) ¼ (F/DL) affects the rate of mass transfer between a fluid in laminar flow and the tube wall. By analogy between heat and mass transfer, the relationships between (Nx) and (Sh) should be the same as those between (Gz) and (Nu) (see Section 5.4.1). Equation 6.26a can be used for (Nx) greater than 40, whereas for (Nx) below 10, (Sh) approaches an asymptotic value of 3.66. Values of (Sh) for the intermediate range of (Nx) can be obtained by interpolation on log–log coordinates. In the case that the cross-section of the channel is not circular, the equivalent diameter de defined by Equations 5.10 and 5.11 should be used in place of di. As with heat transfer, taking the wetted perimeter for mass transfer rather than the total wetted perimeter, provides a larger value of the equivalent diameter and hence a lower value of the mass transfer coefficient. The equivalent diameter of the channel between two parallel plates or membranes is twice the distance between the plates or membranes, as noted in relation to Equation 5.11. In the case where the fluid flow outside the tubes is parallel to the tubes and laminar (as occurs in some membrane devices), the film coefficient of mass transfer on the outer tube surface can be estimated using Equation 6.26 and the equivalent diameter as calculated with Equation 5.10. In the case where fluid flow outside the tubes is normal or oblique to a tube bundle, approximate values of the film coefficient of mass transfer kc can be estimated by using Equation 6.27 [7], which is analogous to Equation 5.12: ðkc do =DÞ ¼ 0:3ðdo Gm =mÞ0:6 ðm=rDÞ1=3

ð6:27Þ

or ðShÞ ¼ 0:3ðReÞ0:6 ðScÞ1=3

ð6:27aÞ

where do is the outside diameter of tubes, Gm is the mass velocity of fluid in the direction perpendicular to tubes, r is the fluid density, m the fluid viscosity, and D the diffusivity, all in consistent units. Equation 6.27 should hold for the range of (Re) defined as above, between 2000 and 30 000.

| 85

86

| 6 Mass Transfer 6.6.2 Single-Phase Mass Transfer in Packed Beds

Coefficients of single-phase mass transfer are important in a variety of processes using fixed beds. Examples include reactions using particles of catalysts or immobilized enzymes, adsorption, chromatography, and also membrane processes. Many reports have been made on the single-phase mass transfer between the surface of packings or particles and a fluid flowing through the packed bed. In order to obtain gas-phase mass transfer data, most investigators have measured the rates of sublimation of solids or evaporation of liquids from porous packings. Liquid-phase mass transfer coefficients can be obtained, for example, by measuring rates of partial dissolution of solid particles into a liquid. Equation 6.28 [8] can correlate well the data of many investigators for gas or liquid film mass transfer in packed beds for the ranges of (Re) from 10 to 2500, and of (Sc) from 1 to 10 000. JD ¼ ðStÞD ðScÞ2=3 ¼ ðkc =UG Þðm=rDÞ2=3 ¼ 1:17ðReÞ0:415 ¼ 1:17ðdp UG r=mÞ0:415

ð6:28Þ

where JD is the so-called J-factor for mass transfer, as explained below, (St)D is the Stanton number for mass transfer, (Sc) the Schmidt number, kc the mass transfer coefficient, m the fluid viscosity, r the fluid density, D the diffusivity, and dp the particle diameter or diameter of a sphere having an equal surface area or volume as the particle. UG is not the velocity through the void space, but the superficial velocity (LT1) averaged over the entire cross-section of the bed.

6.6.3 J-Factor

The J-factors were first used by Colburn [7] for successful empirical correlations of heat and mass transfer data. The J-factor for heat transfer, JH, was defined as: JH ¼ ðStÞH ðPrÞ2=3 ¼ ðh=cp vrÞðcp m=kÞ2=3

ð6:29Þ

where (St)H is the Stanton number for heat transfer, (Pr) is the Prandtl number, h is the film coefficient of heat transfer, cp is the specific heat, v the superficial fluid velocity, m the fluid viscosity, r the fluid density, and k the thermal conductivity of fluid, all in consistent units. Data acquired by many investigators have shown a close analogy between the rates of heat and mass transfer, not only in the case of packed beds but also in other cases, such as flow through and outside tubes, and flow along flat plates. In such cases, plots of the J-factors for heat and mass transfer against the Reynolds number produce almost identical curves. Consider, for example, the case

6.7 Performance of Packed Columns

of turbulent flow through tubes. Since ðkc di =DÞ ¼ ðkc =vÞðm=rDÞðdi vr=mÞ

ð6:30Þ

The combination of Equation 6.25 and Equation 6.30 gives JD ¼ ðkc =nÞðm=rDÞ2=3 ¼ 0:023ðdvr=mÞ0:2

ð6:31Þ

Similar relationships are apparent for heat transfer for the case of turbulent flow through tubes. Since ðhd=kÞ ¼ ðh=cp vrÞðcp m=kÞðdvr=mÞ

ð6:32Þ

The combination of Equation 5.8 and Equation 6.32 gives JH ¼ ðh=cp vrÞðcp m=kÞ2=3 ¼ 0:023ðdi vr=mÞ0:2

ð6:33Þ

A comparison of Equations 6.31 and 6.33 shows that the J-factors for mass and heat transfer are exactly equal in this case. Thus, it is possible to estimate heat transfer coefficients from mass transfer coefficients, and vice versa.

6.7 Performance of Packed Columns

So far, we have considered only mass transfer within a single phase – that is, mass transfer between fluids and solid surfaces. For gas absorption and desorption, in which mass transfer takes place between a gas and a liquid, packed columns are extensively used, while bubble columns and sparged stirred vessels are used mainly for gas–liquid reactions or aerobic fermentation. As the latter types of equipment will be discussed fully in Chapter 7, we shall at this point describe only the performance of packed columns. 6.7.1 Limiting Gas and Liquid Velocities

The first criterion when designing a packed column is to determine the column diameter which affects the mass transfer rates, and accordingly the column height. It is important to remember that maximum allowable gas and liquid flow rates exist, and that the higher the liquid rates the lower will be the allowable gas velocities. The gas pressure drop in a packed column increases not only with gas flow rates but also with liquid flow rates. Flooding is a phenomenon which occurs when a liquid begins to accumulate in the packing as a continuous phase; this may occur when the gas rate exceeds a limit at a given liquid rate, or when the liquid rate exceeds a limit at a given gas rate. Generalized correlations for flooding limits as functions of the liquid and gas rates, and of the gas and liquid properties, are available in many textbooks and reference books (e.g., [9]). In practice, it is

| 87

88

| 6 Mass Transfer recommended that an optimum operating gas velocity of approximately 50% of the flooding gas velocity is used for a given liquid rate. 6.7.2 Definitions of Volumetric Coefficients and HTUs

The mass transfer coefficients considered so far – namely kG, kL, KG, and KL – are defined with respect to known interfacial areas. However, the interfacial areas in equipment such as the packed column and bubble column are indefinite, and vary with operating conditions such as fluid velocities. It is for this reason that the volumetric coefficients defined with respect to the unit volume of the equipment are used or, more strictly, the unit packed volume in the packed column or the unit volume of liquid containing bubbles in the bubble column. Corresponding to kG, kL, KG, and KL, we define kGa, kLa, KGa, and KLa, all of which have units of (kmol h1 m3)/(kmol m3) – that is, (h1). Although the volumetric coefficients are often regarded as single coefficients, it is more reasonable to consider a separately from the k-terms, because the effective interfacial area per unit packed volume or unit volume of liquid–gas mixture a (m2 m3) varies not only with operating conditions such as fluid velocities, but also with the types of operation, such as physical absorption, chemical absorption, and vaporization. Corresponding to Equations 6.11 to 6.13, we have the following relationships: 1=ðKG aÞ ¼ 1=ðkG aÞ þ m=ðkL aÞ

ð6:34Þ

1=ðKL aÞ ¼ 1=ðm kG aÞ þ 1ðkL aÞ

ð6:35Þ

KL a ¼ m KG a

ð6:36Þ

where m is defined by Equation 6.4. Now, we consider gas–liquid mass transfer rates in gas absorption and its reverse operation – that is, gas desorption in packed columns. The gas entering the column from the bottom, and the liquid entering from the top, exchange solute while contacting each other. In case of absorption, the amount of solute transferred from the gas to the liquid per unit sectional area of the column is UG ðCGB CGT Þ ¼ UL ðCLB CLT Þ

ð6:37Þ

where UG and UL are the volumetric flow rates of gas and liquid, respectively, divided by the cross-sectional area of the column (m h1), that is, superficial velocities. The C-terms are solute concentrations (kg or kmol m3), with subscripts G for gas and L for liquid, B for the column bottom, T for the column top. Although UL and UG will vary slightly as the absorption progresses, in practice they can be regarded as approximately constant. (Note: they can be made constant, if the concentrations are defined per unit volume of inert carrier gas and solvent.) In Figure 6.4, Equation 6.37 is represented by the straight line T–B, which is the operating line for absorption. The equilibrium curve 0–E and the operating line Tu–Bu for desorption are also shown in Figure 6.4.

6.7 Performance of Packed Columns

Figure 6.4 Operating lines for absorption and desorption.

In the case where the equilibrium curve is straight, the logarithmic mean driving potential (which is similar to the log-mean temperature difference used in heat transfer calculations) can be used to calculate the mass transfer rates in the column. The mass transfer rate r (kg or kmol h1) in a column of height Z per unit cross-sectional area of the column is given by: r ¼ Z KG aðDCG Þlm ¼ ZKL aðDCL Þlm

ð6:38Þ

in which (DCG)lm and (DCL)lm are the logarithmic means of the driving potentials at the top and at the bottom, viz. ðDCG Þlm ¼ ½ðDCG ÞT ðDCG ÞB =ln½ðDCG ÞT =ðDCG ÞB

ð6:39Þ

ðDCL Þlm ¼ ½ðDCL ÞT ðDCL ÞB =ln½ðDCL ÞT =ðDCL ÞB

ð6:40Þ

Thus, the required packed height Z can be calculated using Equation 6.38 with given values of r and the volumetric coefficient KG a or KL a. In the general case where the equilibrium line is curved, the mass transfer rate for gas absorption per differential packed height dZ and unit cross-sectional area of the column is given as: UG dCG ¼ KG aðCG CG ÞdZ

ð6:41Þ

¼ UL dCL ¼ KL aðCL CL ÞdZ

ð6:42Þ

where CG is the gas concentration in equilibrium with the liquid concentration CL, and CL is the liquid concentration in equilibrium with the gas concentration CG.

| 89

90

| 6 Mass Transfer Integration of Equations 6.41 and 6.42 gives

Z¼

Z¼

UG KG a

UL KL a

C ZGB

dCG UG ¼ NOG CG CG KG a

ð6:43Þ

dCL UL NOL ¼ CL CL KL a

ð6:44Þ

CGT

C ZLB CLT

The integral, that is, NOG in Equation 6.43, is called the NTU (number of transfer units) based on the overall gas concentration driving potential, while the integral in Equation 6.44, that is, NOL is the NTU based on the overall liquid concentration driving potential. In general, the NTUs can be evaluated by graphical integration. In most practical cases, however, where the equilibrium curve can be regarded as straight, we can use the following relationships: NOG ¼ ðCGB CGT Þ=ðDCG Þlm

ð6:45Þ

NOL ¼ ðCLB CLT Þ=ðDCL Þlm

ð6:46Þ

From Equations 6.43 and 6.44 we obtain HOG ¼ UG =KG a ¼ Z=NOG

ð6:47Þ

HOL ¼ UL =KL a ¼ Z=NOL

ð6:48Þ

and

where HOG is the HTU (Height per Transfer Units) based on the overall gas concentration driving potential, and HOL is the HTU based on the overall liquid concentration driving potential. The concepts of NTU and HTU were proposed by Chilton and Colburn [10]. NTUs based on the gas film NG and the liquid film driving potentials NL, and corresponding HG and HL can also be defined. Thus, HG ¼ UG =kG a

ð6:49Þ

HL ¼ UL =kL a

ð6:50Þ

From the above relationships: HOG ¼ HG þ HL mUG =UL

ð6:51Þ

HOL ¼ ðUL =mUG ÞHG þ HL

ð6:52Þ

HOG ¼ HOL ðmUG =UL Þ

ð6:53Þ

6.7 Performance of Packed Columns

Thus, the HTUs and Ka terms are interconvertible, whichever is convenient for use. Since the NTUs are dimensionless, HTUs have the simple dimension of length. Variations of HTUs with fluid velocities are smaller than those of the Ka terms; thus, the values of HTUs are easier to remember than those of the Kas. 6.7.3 Mass Transfer Rates and Effective Interfacial Areas

It is reasonable to separate the interfacial area a from Ka, because K and a are each affected by different factors. Also, it must be noted that a is different from the wetted area of packings, except in the case of vaporization of liquid from all-wet packings. For gas absorption or desorption, the semi-stagnant or slow-moving parts of the liquid surface are less effective than the fast-moving parts. In addition, liquids do not necessarily flow as films but more often as rivulets or as wedge-like streams. Thus, the gas–liquid interfacial areas are not proportional to the dry surface areas of packings. Usually, interfacial areas in packings of approximately 25 mm achieve maximum values compared to areas in smaller or larger packings. One method of estimating the effective interfacial area a is to divide values of kGa achieved with an irrigated packed column by the kG values achieved with an unirrigated packed bed. In this way, values of kG can be obtained by measuring rates of drying of all-wet porous packing [11] or rates of sublimation of packings made from naphthalene [12]. The results obtained with these two methods were in agreement, and the following dimensionless equation [11] provides such kG values for the bed of unirrigated, all-wet Raschig rings: 0:41 ðUG =kG Þ ¼ 0:935ðUG rA1=2 ðm=rDÞ2=3 p =mÞ

¼ 0:935ðReÞ0:41 ðScÞ2=3

ð6:54Þ

where Ap is the surface area of a piece of packing and UG is superficial gas velocity. (Note: all of the fluid properties in the above equation are for gas.) Figure 6.5 shows values of the effective interfacial area thus obtained by comparing kGa values [13] for gas-phase resistance-controlled absorption and vaporization with kG values by Equation 6.54. It is seen that the effective area for absorption is considerably smaller than that for vaporization, the latter being almost equal to the wetted area. The effect of gas rates on a is negligible. Liquid-phase mass transfer data [13–15] were correlated by the following dimensionless equation [13]: ðHL =dp Þ ¼ 1:9ðL=amL Þ0:5 ðmL =rL DL Þ0:5 ðdp grL =m2L Þ1=6

ð6:55Þ

where dp is the packing size (L), a is the effective interfacial area of packing (L1) given by Figure 6.5, DL is liquid phase diffusivity (L2 T1), g is the gravitational constant (L T2), HL is the height per transfer unit (L), mL is the liquid viscosity (M L1 T1), and rL is the liquid density (M L3), all in consistent units.

| 91

92

| 6 Mass Transfer

Figure 6.5 Effective and wetted areas in 25 mm Raschig rings.

The effective interfacial areas for absorption with a chemical reaction [6] in packed columns are the same as those for physical absorption, except that absorption is accompanied by rapid, second-order reactions. For absorption with a moderately fast first-order or pseudo first-order reaction, almost the entire interfacial area is effective, because the absorption rates are independent of kL, as can be seen from Equation 6.24 for the enhancement factor for such cases. For a new system with an unknown reaction rate constant, an experimental determination of the enhancement factor by using an experimental absorber with a known interfacial area would serve as a guide. Ample allowance should be made in practical design calculations, since previously published correlations have been based on data obtained with carefully designed experimental apparatus. Example 6.2

Air containing 2 vol% ammonia is to be passed through a column at a rate of 5000 m3 h1. The column is packed with 25 mm Raschig rings, and is operating at 20 1C and 1 atm. The aim is to remove 98% of the ammonia by absorption into water. Assuming a superficial air velocity of 1 m s1, and a water flow rate of approximately twice the minimum required, calculate the required column diameter and packed height. The solubility of ammonia in water at 20 1C is given by: m ¼ CG ðkg m3 Þ=CL ðkg m3 Þ ¼ 0:00202 The absorption of ammonia into water is a typical case where gas-phase resistance controls the mass transfer rates.

6.7 Performance of Packed Columns

Solution

Concentrations of NH3 in the air at the bottom and top of the column: CGB ¼ 17 0:02 273=ð22:4 293Þ ¼ 0:0141 kg m3 CGT ¼ 0:0141ð1 0:98Þ ¼ 0:000282 kg m3 Amount of NH3 to be removed: 0.0141 5000 0.98 ¼ 69.1 kg h1 Minimum amount of water required. L ¼ G ðCG =CL Þ ¼ 5000 0:00202 ¼ 10:1 m3 h1 If water is used at 20 m3 h1, then the NH3 concentration in water leaving the column: CLB ¼ 69.1/20 ¼ 3.46 kg m3 For a superficial gas velocity of 1 m s1, the required sectional area of the column is 5000/3600 ¼ 1.388 m2, and the column diameter is 1.33 m. Then, the superficial water rate: UL ¼ 20/1.39 ¼ 14.4 m h1 According to flooding limits correlations, this is well below the flooding limit. Now, the logarithmic mean driving potential is calculated. CGB ðin equilibrium with CLB Þ ¼ 3:46 0:00202 ¼ 0:00699 kg m3 ðDCG ÞB ¼ 0:0141 0:00699 ¼ 0:00711 kg m3 ðDCG ÞT ¼ 0:00028 kg m3 ðDCG Þlm ¼ ð0:00711 0:00028Þ=lnð0:00711=0:00028Þ ¼ 0:00211 kg m3 By Equation 6.46 NOG ¼ ð0:0141 0:00028Þ=0:00211 ¼ 6:55 The value of kG is estimated by Equation 6.54. With known values of UG ¼ 100 cm s1 Ap ¼ 39 cm2 ; r ¼ 0:00121 g cm3 ; m ¼ 0:00018 g cm1 s1 and D ¼ 0:22 cm2 s1 Equation 6.54 gives 100=kG ¼ 0:935ð4198Þ0:41 ð0:676Þ2=3 ¼ 22:0 kG ¼ 4:55 cm s1 ¼ 164 m h1 From Figure 6.5, the interfacial area a for 25 mm Raschig rings at UL ¼ 14.4 m h1 is estimated as: a ¼ 74 m2 m3

| 93

94

| 6 Mass Transfer Then kG a ¼ 164 74 ¼ 12 100 h1 HG ¼ 3600=12 100 ¼ 0:30 m The required packed height is: Z ¼ NG HG ¼ 6:55 0:30 ¼ 1:97 m With an approximate 25% allowance, a packed height of 2.5 m is used.

" Problems

6.1 An air–SO2 mixture containing 10 vol% of SO2 is flowing at 340 m3 h1 (20 1C, 1 atm). If 95% of the SO2 is to be removed by absorption into water in a countercurrent packed column operated at 20 1C, 1 atm, how much water (kg h1) is required? The absorption equilibria are given in Table P6.1.

pSO2 (mmHg) X (kg SO2 per 100 kg H2O)

26 0.5

59 1.0

123 2.0

6.2 Convert the value of kGp ¼ 8.50 kmol m2 h1 atm1 at 20 1C into kGc (m h1). 6.3 Ammonia in air is absorbed into water at 20 1C. The liquid film mass transfer coefficient and the overall coefficient are 2.70 105 m s1 and 1.44 104 m s1, respectively. Use the partition coefficient given in Example 6.2. Determine: 1. the gas film coefficient; 2. the percentage resistance to the mass transfer in the gas phase. 6.4 The solubility of NH3 in water at 15 1C is given as H ¼ p/C ¼ 0.461 atm m3 kmol1. It is known that the film coefficients of mass transfer are kG ¼ 1.10 kmol m2 h1 atm1 and kL ¼ 0.34 m h1. Estimate the value of the overall mass transfer coefficient KGc (m h1) and the percentage of the gas film resistance. 6.5 A gas is to be absorbed into water in a countercurrent packed column. The equilibrium relation is given by Y ¼ 0.06X, where Y and X are the gas and liquid concentrations in molar ratio, respectively. The required conditions are YB ¼ 0.009, YT ¼ 0.001, XT ¼ 0, YB ¼ 0.08 where the suffix B represents the column bottom, and T the column top. Given the values HL ¼ 30 cm, HG ¼ 45 cm, estimate the required packed height. 6.6 The value of HL for the desorption of O2 from water at 25 1C in a packed column is 0.30 m, when the superficial water rate is 20 000 kg m2 h1. What is the value of kLa?

Further Reading

References 1. King, C.J. (1971) Separation Processes, McGraw-Hill. 2. Whitman, W.G. (1923) Chem. Met. Eng., 29, 146. 3. Higbie, R. (1935) Trans. AIChE, 31, 365. 4. Danckwerts, P.V. (1951) Ind. Eng. Chem., 43, 1460. 5. (a) Hatta, S. (1928) Tohoku Imp. U. Tech. Rept, 8, 1.; (b) Hatta, S. (1932) Tohoku Imp. U. Tech. Rept, 10, 119. 6. Yoshida, F. and Miura, Y. (1963) AIChE J., 9, 331. 7. Colburn, A.P. (1933) Trans. AIChE, 29, 174. 8. Sherwood, T.K., Pigford, R.L., and Wilke, C.R. (1975) Mass Transfer, McGraw-Hill.

Further Reading 1 Danckwerts, P.V. (1970) Gas-Liquid Reactions, McGraw-Hill. 2 Treybal, R.E. (1980) Mass Transfer Operations, McGraw-Hill.

9. Perry, R.H., Green, D.W., and Malony, J.O. (eds) (1984, 1997) Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 6th and 7th edn, McGraw-Hill. 10. Chilton, T.H. and Colburn, A.P. (1935) Ind. Eng. Chem., 27, 255. 11. Taecker, R.G. and Hougen, O.A. (1949) Chem. Eng. Prog., 45, 188. 12. Shulman, H.L., Ullrich, C.F. and Wells, N. (1955) AIChE J., 1, 253. 13. Yoshida, F. and Koyanagi, T. (1962) AIChE J., 8, 309. 14. Sherwood, T.K. and Holloway, F.A.L. (1940) Trans. AIChE, 36, 39. 15. (a) Hikita, H., Kataoka, K., Nakanishi, K. (1959) Chem. Eng. (Japan), 23, 520; (b) Hikita, H., Kataoka, K. , and Nakanishi, K. (1960) Chem. Eng. (Japan), 24, 2.

| 95

This page intentionally left blank

| 97

7 Bioreactors

7.1 Introduction

Bioreactors are the apparatus in which practical biochemical reactions are performed, often with use of enzymes and/or living cells. Bioreactors which use living cells are usually called fermentors, and specific aspects of these will be discussed in Chapter 12. The apparatus applied to waste water treatment using biochemical reactions is another example of a bioreactor. Even blood oxygenators, that is, artificial lungs as discussed in Chapter 14, can also be regarded as bioreactors. Since most biochemical reactions occur in the liquid phase, bioreactors usually handle liquids. Processes in bioreactors often also involve a gas phase, as in cases of aerobic fermentors. Some bioreactors must handle particles, such as immobilized enzymes or cells, either suspended or fixed in a liquid phase. With regards to mass transfer, microbial or biological cells may be regarded as minute particles. Although there are many types of bioreactor, they can be categorized into the following major groups: . Mechanically stirred (agitated) tanks (vessels). . Bubble columns – that is, cylindrical vessels without mechanical agitation, in which gas is bubbled through a liquid, and their variations, such as airlifts. . Loop reactors with pumps or jets for forced liquid circulation. . Packed-bed reactors (tubular reactors). . Membrane reactors, using semi-permeable membranes, usually of sheet or hollow fiber-type. . Microreactors. . Miscellaneous types, for example, rotating-disk, gas–liquid contactors, and so on. In the design and operation of various bioreactors, a practical knowledge of physical transfer processes – that is, mass and heat transfer, as described in the relevant previous chapters – are often also required in addition to a knowledge of the kinetics of biochemical reactions and of cell kinetics. Some basic concepts on

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

98

| 7 Bioreactors the effects of diffusion inside the particles of catalysts, or of immobilized enzymes or cells, is provided in the following section.

7.2 Some Fundamental Concepts 7.2.1 Batch and Continuous Reactors

Biochemical reactors can be operated either batchwise or continuously, as noted in Section 1.5. Figure 7.1 shows, in schematic form, four modes of operation with two types of reactor for chemical and/or biochemical reactions in liquid phases, with or without suspended solid particles, such as catalyst particles or microbial cells. The modes of operation include: stirred batch; stirred semi-batch; continuous stirred; and continuous plug flow reactors. In the first three types, the contents of the tanks are completely stirred and uniform in composition. In a batch reactor, the reactants are initially charged and, after a certain reaction time, the product(s) are recovered batchwise. In the semi-batch (or fed-batch) reactor, the reactants are fed continuously, and the product(s) are recovered batchwise. In these batch and semibatch reactors, the concentrations of reactants and products change with time. Figure 7.1c and d show two types of the steady-state flow reactors with a continuous supply of reactants and continuous removal of product(s). Figure 7.1c shows the continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) in which the reactor contents are perfectly mixed and uniform throughout the reactor. Thus, the composition of the outlet flow is constant, and the same as that in the reactor. Figure 7.1d shows the plug flow reactor (PFR). Plug flow is the idealized flow, with a uniform fluid velocity across the entire flow channel, and with no mixing in the axial and radial

Figure 7.1 Modes of reactor operation.

7.2 Some Fundamental Concepts

directions. The concentrations of both reactants and products in the plug flow reactor change along the flow direction, but are uniform in the direction perpendicular to flow. Usually, mixing conditions in real continuous flow reactors are intermediate between these two extreme cases, viz. the CSTR with perfect mixing, and the PFR with no mixing in the flow direction. The material balance relationship (i.e., Equation 1.5) holds for any reactant. If the liquid in a reactor is completely stirred and its concentration is uniform, we can apply this equation to the whole reactor. In general, it is applicable to a differential volume element and must be integrated over the whole reactor.

7.2.2 Effects of Mixing on Reactor Performance 7.2.2.1 Uniformly Mixed Batch Reactor As there is no entering or leaving flow in the batch reactor, the material balance equation for a reactant A in a liquid of constant density is given as:

rA V ¼ V

dCA dxA ¼ VCA0 dt dt

ð7:1Þ

where rA is the reaction rate (kmol m3 s1), V is the liquid volume (m3), and CA is the reactant concentration (kmol m3). The fractional conversion xA() of A is defined as (CA0CA)/CA0, where CA0 is the initial reactant concentration in the liquid in the reactor. Integration of Equation 7.1 gives

t¼

ZcA cA0

dCA ¼ CA0 rA

ZwA 0

dxA rA

ð7:2Þ

Integration of Equation 7.2 for the irreversible first-order and second-order reactions leads to previously given Equations 3.15 and 3.22, respectively. Similarly, for enzyme-catalyzed reactions of the Michaelis–Menten type, we can derive Equation 7.3 from Equation 3.31. CA0 xA Km lnð1 xA Þ ¼ Vmax t

ð7:3Þ

7.2.2.2 Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor (CSTR) The liquid composition in the CSTR is uniform and equal to that of the exit stream, and the accumulation term is zero at steady state. Thus, the material balance for a reactant A is given as:

FCA0 FCA0 ð1 xA Þ ¼ rA V

ð7:4Þ

| 99

100

| 7 Bioreactors where F is the volumetric feed rate (m3 s1) and V is the volume of the reactor (m3), with other symbols being the same as in Equation 7.1. The residence time t (s) is given as: t¼

V CA0 xA ¼ F rA

ð7:5Þ

The reciprocal of t, that is, F/V, is called the dilution rate. For the irreversible first-order reaction and the Michaelis–Menten type reaction, the following Equations 7.6 and 7.7 hold, respectively: kt ¼

xA 1 xA

ð7:6Þ

Vmax t ¼ CA0 xA þ Km

xA 1 xA

ð7:7Þ

where Km is the Michaelis–Menten constant.

7.2.2.3 Plug Flow Reactor (PFR) The material balance for a reactant A for a differential volume element dV of the PFR perpendicular to the flow direction is given by:

FCA FðCA þ dCA Þ ¼ rA dV

ð7:8Þ

in which symbols are the same as in Equation 7.1. Hence, t¼

V ¼ F

ZcA cA0

dCA ¼ CA0 rA

ZxA 0

dxA rA

ð7:9Þ

Substitution of the rate equations into Equation 7.9 and integration give the following performance equations. For the first-order reaction, lnð1 xA Þ ¼ k t

ð7:10Þ

For the second-order reaction, ln

ð1 xB Þ CB CA0 ¼ ln ¼ ðCB0 CA0 Þk t CB0 CA ð1 xA Þ

ð7:11Þ

For the Michaelis–Menten-type reaction, CA0 xA Km lnð1 xA Þ ¼ Vmax t

ð7:12Þ

Equations 7.10 to 7.12 are identical in forms with those for the uniformly mixed batch reactor, that is, Equations 3.15, 3.22, and 7.3, respectively. It is seen that the time from the start of a reaction in a batch reactor (t) corresponds to the residence time in a plug flow reactor (t).

7.2 Some Fundamental Concepts

Example 7.1

A feed solution containing a reactant A (CA ¼ 1 kmol m3) is fed to a CSTR or to a PFR at a volumetric flow rate of 0.001 m3 s1, and converted to product P in the reactor. The first-order reaction rate constant is 0.02 s1. Determine the reactor volumes of the CSTR and PFR required to attain a fractional conversion of A, xA ¼ 0.95. Solution

(a) CSTR case From Equation 7.6 t¼

0:95 1 ¼ 950 s 1 0:95 0:02

V ¼ F t ¼ 0:001 950 ¼ 0:95 m3 (b) PFR case From Equation 7.10 t¼

lnð1 0:95Þ ¼ 150 s 0:02

V ¼ F t ¼ 0:001 150 ¼ 0:15 m3 It is seen that required volume of the PFR is a much smaller than that of the CSTR to attain an equal fractional conversion, as discussed below.

7.2.2.4 Comparison of Fractional Conversions by CSTR and PFR Figure 7.2 shows the calculated volume ratios of CSTR to PFR plotted against the fractional conversions (1xA) with the same feed compositions for first-order, second-order, and Michaelis–Menten-type reactions. A larger volume is always required for the CSTR than for the PFR in order to attain an equal specific conversion. The volume ratio increases rapidly with the order of reaction at higher conversions, indicating that liquid mixing strongly affects the performance of reactors in this range. In the CSTR, the reactants in the feed are instantaneously diluted to the concentrations in the reactor, whereas in the PFR there is no mixing in the axial direction. Thus, the concentrations of the reactants in the PFR are generally higher than those in the CSTR, and reactions of a higher order proceed under favorable conditions. Naturally, the performance for zero-order reactions is not affected by the type of reactor.

| 101

102

| 7 Bioreactors

Figure 7.2 Volume ratios of CSTR to PFR for first-order, second-order, and Michaelis–Menten-type reactions.

7.2.3 Effects of Mass Transfer Around and Within Catalyst or Enzymatic Particles on the Apparent Reaction Rates

For liquid-phase catalytic or enzymatic reactions, catalysts or enzymes are used as homogeneous solutes in the liquid, or as solids particles suspended in the liquid phase. In the latter case: (i) the particles per se may be catalysts; (ii) the catalysts or enzymes are uniformly distributed within inert particles; or (iii) the catalysts or enzymes exist at the surface of pores, inside the particles. In such heterogeneous catalytic or enzymatic systems, a variety of factors which include the mass transfer of reactants and products, heat effects accompanying the reactions, and/or some surface phenomena, may affect the apparent reaction rates. For example, in situation (iii) above, the reactants must move to the catalytic reaction sites within catalyst particles by various mechanisms of diffusion through the pores. In general, the apparent rates of reactions with catalyst or enzymatic particles are lower than the intrinsic reaction rates; this is due to the various mass transfer resistances, as will be discussed below. 7.2.3.1 Liquid Film Resistance Controlling In the case where the rate of the catalytic or enzymatic reaction is controlled by the mass transfer resistance of the liquid film around the particles containing catalyst or enzyme, the rate of decrease of the reactant A per unit liquid volume [i.e., rA (kmol m3 s1)] is given by Equation 7.13:

rA ¼ kL AðCAb CAi Þ

ð7:13Þ

where kL is the liquid film mass transfer coefficient (m s1), A is the surface area of catalyst or enzyme particles per unit volume of liquid containing particles

7.2 Some Fundamental Concepts 2

3

3

(m m ), CAb is the concentration of reactant A in the bulk of liquid (kmol m ), and CAi is its concentration on the particle surface (kmol m3). Correlations for kL in packed beds and other cases are given in the present chapter, as well as in Chapter 6 and also in various reference books. ¨hler The apparent reaction rate depends on the magnitude of the Damko number (Da) as defined by Equation 7.14; that is, the ratio of the maximum reaction rate to the maximum mass transfer rate. Da ¼

rA;max kL ACAb

ð7:14Þ

In the case when mass transfer of the reactants through the liquid film on the surface of catalyst or enzyme particles is much slower than the reaction itself (Dac1), then the apparent reaction rate becomes almost equal to the rate of mass transfer. This is analogous to the case of two electrical resistances of different magnitudes in series, where the overall resistance is almost equal to the higher resistance. In such a case, the apparent reaction rate is given by: rA ¼ kL ACAb

ð7:15Þ

7.2.3.2 Effects of Diffusion Within Catalyst Particles [1] The resistance to mass transfer of reactants within catalyst particles results in lower apparent reaction rates, due to a slower supply of reactants to the catalytic reaction sites. The long diffusional paths inside large catalyst particles, often through tortuous pores, result in a high resistance to mass transfer of the reactants and products. The overall effects of these factors involving mass transfer and reaction rates are expressed by the so-called (internal) effectiveness factor Ef, which is defined by the following equation, excluding the mass transfer resistance of the liquid film on the particle surface [2]:

Ef ¼

apparent reaction rate involving mass transfer within catalyst particles intrinsic reaction rate excluding mass transfer effects within catalyst particles

ð7:16Þ

If there is no mass transfer resistance within the catalyst particle, then Ef is unity. However, it will then decrease from unity with increasing mass transfer resistance within the particles. The degree of decrease in Ef is correlated with a dimensionless parameter known as the Thiele modulus [2], which involves the relative magnitudes of the reaction rate and the molecular diffusion rate within catalyst particles. The Thiele moduli for several reaction mechanisms and shapes of catalyst particles have been derived theoretically. The Thiele modulus f for the case of a spherical catalyst particle of radius R (cm), in which a first-order catalytic reaction occurs at every point within the particles, is given as:

| 103

104

| 7 Bioreactors R f¼ 3

sﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ k Deff

ð7:17Þ

where k is the first-order reaction rate constant (s1) and Deff is the effective diffusion coefficient (cm2 s1) based on the overall concentration gradient inside the particle. The radial distribution of the reactant concentrations in the spherical catalyst particle is theoretically given as: CA ¼

CA sinhð3fr Þ ¼ CAb r sinhð3fÞ

ð7:18Þ

where sinh x ¼ ðex ex Þ=2, f is the Thiele modulus, CA is the reactant concentration at a distance r from the center of the sphere of radius R, CAb is CA at the sphere’s surface, and r* ¼ r/R. Figure 7.3 shows the reactant concentrations within the particle calculated by Equation 7.18 as a function of f and the distance from the particle surface. Under steady-state conditions the rate of reactant transfer to the outside surface of the catalyst particles should correspond to the apparent reaction rate within the catalyst particles. Thus, the effectiveness factor Ef is given by the following equation: dCA 3 R Deff dr at r ¼1 Ef ¼ ð7:19Þ kCAb where 3/R is equal to the surface area divided by the volume of the catalyst particle. Combining Equations 7.18 and 7.19, the effectiveness factor for the first order

Figure 7.3 The concentration distribution of reactant within a spherical catalyst particle.

7.2 Some Fundamental Concepts

Figure 7.4 Effectiveness factor of spherical catalyst particle for a first-order reaction.

catalytic reaction in spherical particles is given as:

Ef ¼

3f cothð3fÞ 1 3f2

ð7:20Þ

In Figure 7.4 the effectiveness factor is plotted against the Thiele modulus for spherical catalyst particles. For low values of f, Ef is almost equal to unity, with reactant transfer within the catalyst particles having little effect on the apparent reaction rate. On the other hand, Ef decreases in inverse proportion to f for higher values of f, with reactant diffusion rates limiting the apparent reaction rate. Thus, Ef decreases with increasing reaction rates and the radius of catalyst spheres, and with decreasing effective diffusion coefficients of reactants within the catalyst spheres.

7.2.3.3 Effects of Diffusion Within Immobilized Enzyme Particles Enzymes, when immobilized in spherical particles or in films made from various polymers and porous materials, are referred to as ‘‘immobilized’’ enzymes. Enzymes can be immobilized by covalent bonding, electrostatic interaction, crosslinking of the enzymes, entrapment in a polymer network, among other techniques. In the case of batch reactors, the particles or films of immobilized enzymes can be reused after having been separated from the solution after reaction by physical means, such as sedimentation, centrifugation, and filtration. Immobilized enzymes can also be used in continuous fixed-bed reactors, fluidized reactors, and membrane reactors. Apparent reaction rates with immobilized enzyme particles also decrease due to the mass transfer resistance of reactants (substrates). The Thiele modulus of spherical particles of radius R for the Michaelis–Menten-type reactions is given as:

| 105

106

| 7 Bioreactors R f¼ 3

rﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ Vmax Deff Km

ð7:21Þ

where Vmax is the maximum reaction rate (kmol m3 s1) attained at the very high substrate concentrations, and Km is the Michaelis constant (kmol m3). Calculated values of Ef for several values of CAb/Km are shown in Figure 7.5, where Ef is seen to increase with increasing values of CAb/Km. When the values of CAb/Km approach zero, the curve approaches the first-order curve shown in Figure 7.4. The values of Ef decrease with increasing reaction rate and/or immobilized enzyme concentration, and also with increasing resistance to substrate mass transfer.

Figure 7.5 Effectiveness factor for various values of CAb/Km (Michaelis–Menten-type reaction, sphere).

Example 7.2

Immobilized enzyme beads of 0.6 cm diameter contain an enzyme which converts a substrate S to a product P by an irreversible, unimolecular enzyme reaction with Km ¼ 0.012 kmol m3 and a maximum rate Vmax ¼ 3.6 107 kmol (kg-bead)1 s1. The density of the beads and the effective diffusion coefficient of the substrate in the catalyst beads are 1000 kg m3 and 1.0 106 cm2 s1, respectively. Determine the effectiveness factor and the initial reaction rate, when the substrate concentration is 0.6 kmol m3.

7.3 Bubbling Gas–Liquid Reactors

Solution

The value of the Thiele modulus is calculated from Equation 7.21. rﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ 0:3 3:6 107 1000 ¼ 17:3 f¼ 3 1:0 106 0:012 The value of CAb/Km is 50, and thus a value of Ef ¼ 0.50 is obtained from Figure 7.5. The initial rate of the reaction is r P ¼ Ef

Vmax CS 3:6 104 0:6 ¼ 0:5 0:012 þ 0:6 Km þ CS

¼ 1:8 104 kmol m3 s1

7.3 Bubbling Gas–Liquid Reactors

In both the gassed (aerated) stirred tank and in the bubble column, the gas bubbles rise through a liquid, despite the mechanisms of bubble formation in the two types of apparatus being different. In this section, we shall consider some common aspects of the gas bubble–liquid systems in these two types of reactor. 7.3.1 Gas Holdup

Gas holdup is the volume fraction of gas bubbles in a gassed liquid. However, it should be noted that two different bases are used for defining gas holdup: (i) the total volume of gas bubble–liquid mixture, and (ii) the clear liquid volume excluding bubbles. Thus, the gas holdup defined on basis (ii) is given as: e ¼ VB =VL ¼ ðZF ZL Þ=ZL

ð7:22Þ

where VB is the volume of bubbles (L3), VL is the volume of liquid (L3), ZF is the total height of the gas–liquid mixture (L), and ZL is the height of liquid excluding bubbles. The gas holdup on basis (i) is defined as: e ¼ VB =ðVL þ VB Þ ¼ ðZF ZL Þ=ZF

ð7:23Þ

The gas holdups can be obtained by measuring ZF and ZL, or by measuring the corresponding hydrostatic heads. Evidently, the following relationship holds. e =e ¼ ðVL þ VB Þ=VL 41

ð7:24Þ

Although the use of basis (i) is more common, basis (ii) is more convenient in some cases.

| 107

108

| 7 Bioreactors 7.3.2 Interfacial Area

As with the gas holdup, there are two definitions of interfacial area, namely the interfacial area per unit volume of gas–liquid mixture a (L2 L3) and the interfacial area per unit liquid volume a (L2 L3). There are at least three methods to measure the interfacial area in liquid–gas bubble systems. The light transmission technique [3] is based on the fact that the fraction of light transmitted through a gas–liquid dispersion is related to the interfacial area and the length of the light pass, irrespective of bubble size. In the photographic method, the sizes and number of bubbles are measured on photographs of bubbles, but naturally there is wide distribution among the bubble sizes. The volume–surface mean bubble diameter dvs is defined by Equation 7.25: n

n

i¼1

i¼1

dvs ¼ S d3i = S d2i

ð7:25Þ

The value of a can then be calculated by using the following relationship: a ¼ 6e=dvs

ð7:26Þ

Equation 7.26 also gives dvs, in case the gas holdup e and the interfacial area a are known. The chemical method used to estimate the interfacial area is based on the theory of the enhancement factor for gas absorption accompanied with a chemical reaction. It is clear from Equations 6.22 to 6.24 that, in the range where gW5, the gas absorption rate per unit area of gas–liquid interface becomes independent of the liquid phase mass transfer coefficient kL, and is given by Equation 6.24. Such criteria can be met in the case of absorption with an approximately pseudo firstorder reaction with respect to the concentration of the absorbed gas component. Reactions that could be used for the chemical method include, for example, CO2 absorption in aqueous NaOH solution, and the air oxidation of Na2SO3 solution with a cupric ion or cobaltous ion catalyst (this is described in the following section). It is a well-known fact that bubble sizes in aqueous electrolyte solutions are much smaller than in pure water with equal values of viscosity, surface tension, and so on. This can be explained by the electrostatic potential of the resultant ions at the liquid surface, which reduces the rate of bubble coalescence. This fact should be remembered when planning experiments on bubble sizes or interfacial areas.

7.3 Bubbling Gas–Liquid Reactors

7.3.3 Mass Transfer Coefficients 7.3.3.1 Definitions Relationships between the gas-phase mass transfer coefficient kG, the liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient kL, and the overall mass transfer coefficients KG and KL were discussed in Section 6.2. With the definitions used in this book, all of these coefficients have a simple dimension (L T1). With regards to handling data on industrial apparatus for gas–liquid mass transfer (such as packed columns, bubble columns, and stirred tanks), it is more practical to use volumetric mass transfer coefficients, such as KGa and KLa, because the interfacial area a cannot be well defined and will vary with operating conditions. As noted in Section 6.7.2, the volumetric mass transfer coefficients for packed columns are defined with respect to the packed volume – that is, the sum of the volumes of gas, liquid, and packings. In contrast, volumetric mass transfer coefficients, which involve the specific gas–liquid interfacial area a (L2 L3), for liquid–gas bubble systems (such as gassed stirred tanks and bubble columns) are defined with respect to the unit volume of gas–liquid mixture or of clear liquid volume, excluding the gas bubbles. In this book we shall use a for the specific interfacial area with respect to the clear liquid volume, and a for the specific interfacial area with respect to the total volume of gas–liquid mixture. The question is, Why is the volumetric mass transfer coefficient KLa (T1) used so widely as a measure of performance of gassed stirred tanks and bubble columns? There is nothing wrong with using KGa, as did the early investigators in this field. Indeed, KGa and KLa are proportional and easily interconvertible by using Equation 6.13. However, as shown by Equation 6.12, if the solubility of the gas is rather low (e.g., oxygen absorption in fermentors), then KLa is practically equal to kLa, which could be directly correlated with liquid properties. On the other hand, in cases where the gas solubility is high, the use of KGa rather than KLa would be more convenient, as shown by Equation 6.11. In cases where the gas solubility is moderate, the mass transfer resistances of both liquid and gas phases must be considered. 7.3.3.2

Measurements of kLa

Steady-State Mass Balance Method In theory, the KLa in an apparatus which is operating continuously under steady-state conditions could be evaluated from the flow rates and the concentrations of the gas and liquid streams entering and leaving, and the known rate of mass transfer (e.g., the oxygen consumption rate of microbes in the case of a fermentor). However, such a method is not practical, except when the apparatus is fairly large and highly accurate instruments such as flow meters and oxygen sensors (or gas analyzers) are available. Unsteady-State Mass Balance Method One widely used technique for determining KLa in bubbling gas–liquid contactors is the physical absorption of oxygen or CO2

| 109

110

| 7 Bioreactors into water or aqueous solutions, or the desorption of such a gas from a solution into a sparging inert gas such as air or nitrogen. The time-dependent concentration of dissolved gas is followed by using a sensor (e.g., for O2 or CO2) with a sufficiently fast response to changes in concentration. Sulfite Oxidation Method The sulfite oxidation method is a classical, but still useful, technique for measuring kGa (or kLa) [4]. The method is based on the air oxidation of an aqueous solution of sodium sulfite (Na2SO3) to sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) with a cupric ion (Cu2 + ) or cobaltous ion (Co2 + ) catalyst. With appropriate concentrations of sodium sulfite (ca. 1 N) or cupric ions (W103 mol l1), the value of k L for the rate of oxygen absorption into sulfite solution, which can be determined by chemical analysis, is practically equal to kL for the physical oxygen absorption into sulfate solution; in other words, the enhancement factor E, as defined by Equation 6.20, is essentially equal to unity. It should be noted that this method yields higher values of kLa compared to those in pure water under the same operating conditions because, due to the effects of electrolytes mentioned before, the average bubble size in sodium sulfite solutions is smaller and hence the interfacial area is larger than in pure water. Dynamic Method This is a practical, unsteady-state technique to measure kLa in fermentors in operation [5] (see Figure 7.6). When a fermentor is operating under steady conditions, the air supply is suddenly turned off, which causes the oxygen concentration in the liquid, CL (kmol m3), to fall very quickly. As there is no oxygen supply by aeration, the oxygen concentration falls linearly (Figure 7.6, curve a–b), due to oxygen consumption by microbes. From the slope of the curve a–b during this period, it is possible to determine the rate of oxygen consumption by the microbes, qo (kmol kg1 h1), by the following relationship:

dCL =dt ¼ qo Cx

ð7:27Þ

where Cx (kg m3) is the concentration of microbes in the liquid medium. Upon restarting the aeration, the dissolved oxygen concentration will increase, as indicated by the curve b–c. The oxygen balance during this period is expressed by dCL =dt ¼ KL aðCL CL Þ qo Cx

ð7:28Þ

where CL (kmol m3) is the liquid oxygen concentration in equilibrium with that in air. A rearrangement of Equation 7.28 gives CL ¼ CL ð1=KL aÞ ðdCL =dt þ qo Cx Þ

ð7:29Þ

Thus, plotting the experimental values of CL after restarting aeration against (dCL/dt + qoCx) would give a straight line with a slope of (1/KLa). Possible sources of error for this technique are bubble retention immediately after the aeration cutoff, especially with viscous liquids, and aeration from the free liquid surface (although the latter can be prevented by passing nitrogen over the free liquid surface).

7.3 Bubbling Gas–Liquid Reactors

Figure 7.6 Dynamic measurement of kLa for oxygen transfer in fermentors.

Example 7.3

In an aerated stirred tank, air is bubbled into degassed water. The oxygen concentration in water was continuously measured using an oxygen electrode, such that the data shown in Table 7.1 were obtained. Evaluate the overall volumetric mass transfer coefficient of oxygen KLa (in unit of h1). The equilibrium concentration of oxygen in equilibrium with air under atmospheric pressure is 8.0 mg l1; the delay in response of the oxygen electrode may be neglected. Table 7.1 Oxygen concentration in water.

Time (s)

O2 concentration (mg l1)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0 2.84 4.63 5.87 6.62 7.10 7.40

Solution

From the oxygen balance, the following equation is obtained: dCL =dt ¼ KL aðCL CL Þ Upon integration with the initial condition CL ¼ 0 at t ¼ 0, ln½CL =ðCL CL Þ ¼ KL a t

| 111

112

| 7 Bioreactors Plots of CL /(CL CL) against time on semi-logarithmic coordinates produces a straight line, from the slope of which can be calculated the value of KLa ¼ 79 h1.

7.4 Mechanically Stirred Tanks 7.4.1 General

Stirred (agitated) tanks, which are widely used as bioreactors (especially as fermentors), are vertical cylindrical vessels equipped with a mechanical stirrer (agitator) or stirrers that rotate around the axis of the tank. The objectives of liquid mixing in stirred tanks are to: (i) make the liquid concentration as uniform as possible; (ii) suspend the particles or cells in the liquid; (iii) disperse the liquid droplets in another immiscible liquid, as in the case of a liquid–liquid extractor; (iv) disperse gas as bubbles in a liquid in the case of aerated (gassed) stirred tanks; and (v) transfer heat from or to a liquid in the tank, through the tank wall, or to the wall of coiled tube installed in the tank. Figure 7.7 shows three commonly used types of impeller or stirrer. The six flatblade turbine, often called the Rushton turbine (Figure 7.7a), is widely used. The standard dimensions of this type of stirrer relative to the tank size are as follows: d=D ¼ 1=3

D ¼ HL

L=d ¼ 1=4

b=d ¼ 1=5

d ¼ Hi

where D is the tank diameter, HL is the total liquid depth, d is the impeller diameter, Hi is the distance of the impeller from the tank bottom, and L and b are the length and width of the impeller blade, respectively. When this type of impeller is used, typically four vertical baffle plates, each onetenth of the tank diameter in width and the total liquid depth in length, are fixed perpendicular to the tank wall so as to prevent any circular flow of liquid and the formation of a concave vortex at the free liquid surface. With this type of impeller in operation, liquid is sucked to the impeller center from below and above, and then driven radially towards the tank wall, along which it is deflected upwards and downwards. It then returns to the central region of the impeller. Consequently, this type of impeller is referred to as a radial flow impeller. If the ratio of the liquid depth to the tank diameter is 2 or more, then multiple impellers fixed to a common rotating shaft are often used. When liquid mixing with this type of impeller is accompanied by aeration (gassing), the gas is supplied at the tank bottom through a single nozzle or via a circular sparging ring (which is a perforated circular tube). Gas from the sparger should rise within the radius of the impeller, so that it can be dispersed by the rotating impeller into bubbles that are usually several millimeters in diameter. The

7.4 Mechanically Stirred Tanks

Figure 7.7 Typical impeller types: (a) a six-flat blade turbine; (b) a two-flat blade paddle; (c) a three-blade marine propeller. See the text for details of the abbreviations.

dispersion of gas into bubbles is in fact due to the high liquid shear rates produced by the rotating impeller. Naturally, the patterns of liquid movements will vary with the type of impeller used. When marine propeller-type impellers (which often have two or three blades; see Figure 7.7c) are used, the liquid in the central part moves upwards along the tank axis and then downwards along the tank wall. Hence, this type of impeller is categorized as an axial flow impeller. This type of stirrer is suitable for suspending particles in a liquid, or for mixing highly viscous liquids. Figure 7.7b shows a flat-blade paddle with two blades. If the flat blades are pitched, then the liquid flow pattern becomes intermediate between axial and radial flows. Many other types of impeller are used in stirred tanks, but these are not described at this point. Details of heat transfer in stirred tanks are provided in Sections 5.4.3 and 12.3. 7.4.2 Power Requirements of Stirred Tanks

The power required to operate a stirred tank is mostly the mechanical power required to rotate the stirrer. Naturally, the stirring power varies with the stirrer type. In general, the power requirement will increase in line with the size and/or rotating speed, and will also vary according to the properties of the liquid. The stirrer power requirement for a gassed (aerated) liquid is less than for an ungassed liquid,

| 113

114

| 7 Bioreactors because the average bulk density of a gassed liquid, particularly in the vicinity of the impeller, is less than that for an ungassed liquid. 7.4.2.1 Ungassed Liquids There are well-established empirical correlations for stirrer power requirements [6, 7]. Figure 7.8 [6] is a log–log plot of the power number NP for ungassed liquids versus the stirrer Reynolds number (Re). These dimensionless numbers are defined as follows:

NP ¼ P=ðrN 3 d5 Þ

ð7:30Þ

Re ¼ N d2 r=m

ð7:31Þ

where P is the power required (ML2T3), N is the number of revolutions of the impeller per unit time (T1), d is the impeller diameter (L), r is the liquid density (M/L3), and m is the liquid viscosity (M L1 T1). Since the product N d is proportional to the peripheral speed (i.e., the tip speed of the rotating impeller), Equation 7.31 defining (Re) for the rotating impeller corresponds to Equation 2.7, the (Re) for flow through a straight tube. In Figure 7.8, the curves a, b, and c correlate data for three types of impeller, namely the six-flat blade turbine, two-flat plate paddle, and three-blade marine propeller, respectively. It should be noted that, for the range of (Re) greater than 104, NP is independent of (Re). For this turbulent regime it is clear from

Figure 7.8 Correlation between Reynolds number (Re) and Power number (Np). Curve (a): six-flat blade turbine, four baffles Wb ¼ 0.1 D (see Figure 7.7); Curve (b): two-flat blade paddle, four baffles, Wb ¼ 0.1 D; Curve (c): three-blade marine propeller, four baffles, Wb ¼ 0.1 D.

7.4 Mechanically Stirred Tanks

Equation 7.30 that P ¼ c1 NP rN 3 d5

ð7:32Þ

where c1 is a constant which varies with the impeller types. Thus, P for a given type of impeller varies in proportion to N3, d5 and liquid density r, but is independent of the liquid viscosity m For the ranges of Re below approximately 10, the plots are straight lines with a slope of 1; that is, NP is inversely proportional to (Re). Then, for this laminar regime, we can obtain Equation 7.33 from Equations 7.30 and 7.31: P ¼ c2 mN 2 d3

ð7:33Þ

Thus, P for the laminar regime varies in proportion to liquid viscosity m, N2, d3 and to a constant c2, which varies with impeller types, although P is independent of the liquid density r. It is worth remembering that the power requirements of geometrically similar stirred tanks are proportional to N3 d5 in the turbulent regime, and to N2 d3 in the laminar regime. Equal power per unit liquid volume is sometimes used as a criterion for scale-up. Details of stirrer power requirements for non-Newtonian liquids are provided in Section 12.2. 7.4.2.2 Gas-Sparged Liquids The ratio of the power requirement of gas-sparged (aerated) liquid in a stirred tank, PG, to the power requirement of ungassed liquid in the same stirred tank, P0, can be estimated using Equation 7.34 [7]. This is an empirical, dimensionless equation based on data for six-flat blade turbines, with a blade width which is onefifth of the impeller diameter d, while the liquid depth HL is equal to the tank diameter. Although these data were for tank diameters up to 0.6 m, Equation 7.34 would apply to larger tanks where the liquid depth-to-diameter ratio is typically in the region of unity.

LogðPG =P0 Þ ¼ 192ðd=DÞ4:38 ðd2 N=nÞ0:115 ðdN 2 =gÞ1:96ðd=DÞ ðQ=N d3 Þ ð7:34Þ where d is the impeller diameter (L), D is the tank diameter (L), N is the rotational speed of the impeller (T1), g is the gravitational constant (LT2), Q is the gas rate (L3T1), and n is the kinematic viscosity of the liquid (L2T1). The dimensionless groups include: (d2N/n) ¼ Reynolds number (Re); (dN2/g) ¼ Froude number (Fr); and (Q/N d3) ¼ aeration number (Na), which is proportional to the ratio of the superficial gas velocity with respect to the tank cross-section to the impeller tip speed. The ratio PG/P0 for flat-blade turbine impeller systems can also be estimated by Equation 7.35 [8]. PG =P0 ¼ 0:10ðQ=N VÞ1=4 ðN 2 d4 =g b V 2=3 Þ1=5

ð7:35Þ

where V is the liquid volume (L3), and b is the impeller blade width (L). All other symbols are the same as in Equation 7.34.

| 115

116

| 7 Bioreactors Example 7.4

Calculate the power requirements, with and without aeration, of a 1.5 mdiameter stirred tank, containing water 1.5 m deep, equipped with a six-blade Rushton turbine that is 0.5 m in diameter d, with blades 0.25 d long and 0.2 d wide, operating at a rotational speed of 180 r.p.m. Air is supplied from the tank bottom at a rate of 0.6 m3 min1. Operation is at room temperature. Values of water viscosity m ¼ 0.001 kg m1 s1 and water density r ¼ 1000 kg m3; hence m/r ¼ n ¼ 106 m2 s1 can be used. Solution

(a) The power requirement without aeration can be obtained using Figure 7.8. ðReÞ ¼ d2 N=n ¼ 0:52 3=106 ¼ 7:5 105 This is in the turbulent regime. Then, from Figure 7.8: NP ¼ 6 P0 ¼ 6rN 3 d5 ¼ 6ð1000Þ33 ð0:5Þ5 ¼ 5060 kg m2 s3 ¼ 5060 W (b) Power requirement with aeration is estimated using Equation 7.34. logðPG =P0 Þ ¼ 192ð1=3Þ4:38 ð0:52 3=106 Þ0:115 ð0:5 32 =9:8Þ1:96=3 ð0:01=3 0:53 Þ ¼ 0:119 PG =P0 ¼ 0:760 Hence, PG ¼ 5060 0:760 ¼ 3850 W For comparison, calculation by Equation 7.35 gives PG =P0 ¼ 0:676

PG ¼ 3420 W

7.4.3 kLa in Gas-Sparged Stirred Tanks

Gas–liquid mass transfer in fermentors is discussed in detail in Section 12.4. In dealing with kLa in gas-sparged stirred tanks, it is more rational to separate kL and a, because both are affected by different factors. It is possible to measure a by using either a light-scattering technique [9] or a chemical method [4]. The average bubble size dvs can then be estimated by Equation 7.26 from measured values of a and the gas holdup e. Correlations for kL have been obtained in this way (e.g., [10, 11]), but in order to use them it is necessary that a and dvs are known.

7.4 Mechanically Stirred Tanks

It would be more practical, if kLa in gas-sparged stirred tanks were to be directly correlated with operating variables and liquid properties. It should be noted that the definition of kLa for a gas-sparged stirred tank (both in this text and in general) is based on the clear liquid volume, without aeration. The empirical Equations 7.36 and 7.36a [3] can be used for very rough estimation of kLa in aerated stirred tanks with accuracy within 20–40%. It should be noted that in using Equations 7.36 and 7.36a, PG must be estimated by the correlations given in Section 7.4.2. For an air–water system, a water volume V less than 2.6 m3, and a gas-sparged power requirement PG/V between 500 and 10 000 W m3, kL aðs1 Þ ¼ 0:026ðPG =VÞ0:4 U 0:5 G

ð7:36Þ

where UG (m s1) is the superficial gas velocity. For air–electrolyte solutions, a liquid volume V less than 4.4 m3, and PG/V between 500 and 10 000 W m3, 0:2 kL aðs1 Þ ¼ 0:002ðPG =VÞ0:7 U G

ð7:36aÞ

It is worth remembering that the power requirement of gas-sparged stirred tanks per unit liquid volume at a given superficial gas velocity UG is proportional to N3 L 2, where N is rotational speed of the impeller (T1) and L the tank size (L), such as the diameter. Usually, kLa values vary in proportion to (PG/V)m and UGn, where m ¼ 0.4–0.7 and n ¼ 0.2–0.8, depending on operating conditions. Thus, in some cases, such as scaling-up of geometrically similar stirred tanks, the estimation of power requirement can be simplified using the above relationship. Correlations for kLa in gas-sparged stirred tanks such as Equations 7.36 and 7.36a apply only to water or to aqueous solutions with properties close to those of water. Values of kLa in gas-sparged stirred tanks are affected not only by the apparatus geometry and operating conditions but also by various liquid properties, such as viscosity and surface tension. The following dimensionless Equation 7.37 [12], which includes various liquid properties, is based on data of oxygen desorption from various liquids, including some viscous Newtonian liquids, in a stirred tank, with 25 cm inside diameter, of standard design with a six-blade turbine impeller: ðkL a d2 =DL Þ ¼ 0:060ðd2 Nr=mÞ1:5 ðdN 2 =gÞ0:19 ðm=rDL Þ0:5 ðmUG =sÞ0:6 ðNd=UG Þ0:32

ð7:37Þ

in which d is the impeller diameter, DL is the liquid-phase diffusivity, N is the impeller rotational speed, UG is the superficial gas velocity, r is the liquid density, m is the liquid viscosity, and s is the surface tension (all in consistent units). A modified form of the above equation for non-Newtonian fluids is given in Chapter 12. In evaluating kLa in gas-sparged stirred tanks, it can usually be assumed that the liquid concentration is uniform throughout the tank. This is especially true with small experimental apparatus, in which the rate of gas–liquid mass transfer at the

| 117

118

| 7 Bioreactors free liquid surface might be a considerable portion of total mass transfer rate. This can be prevented by passing an inert gas (e.g., nitrogen) over the free liquid.

Example 7.5

Estimate kLa for oxygen absorption into water in the sparged stirred tank of Example 7.4. The operating conditions are the same as in Example 7.4. Solution

Equation 7.36 is used. From Example 7.4 PG ¼ 3850 W Volume of water ¼ 2:65 m3 PG =V ¼ 3850=2:65 ¼ 1453 Wm3 ; ðPG =VÞ0:4 ¼ 18:40 Since the sectional area of the tank ¼ 1.77 m2, UG ¼ 0:6=ð1:77 60Þ ¼ 0:00565 ms1 ; UG0:5 ¼ 0:0752 kL a ¼ 0:026ð1453Þ0:4 ð0:00565Þ0:5 ¼ 0:0360 s1 ¼ 130 h1 Although this solution appears simple, it requires an estimation of PG, which was given in Example 7.4.

7.4.4 Liquid Mixing in Stirred Tanks

In this section, the term ‘‘liquid mixing’’ is used to mean the macroscopic movement of liquid, excluding ‘‘micromixing’’, which is a synonym of diffusion. The mixing time is a practical index of the degree of liquid mixing in a batch reactor. The shorter the mixing time, the more intense is mixing in the batch reactor. The mixing time is defined as the time required, from the instant a tracer is introduced into a liquid in a reactor, for the tracer concentration, measured at a fixed point, to reach an arbitrary deviation (e.g., 10%) from the final concentration. In practice, a colored substance, an acid or alkali solution, a salt solution, or a hot liquid can be used as the tracer, and fluctuations of color, pH, electrical conductivity, temperature, and so on are monitored. The mixing time is a function of size and geometry of the stirred tank and the impeller, fluid properties, and operating parameters such as impeller speed, and aeration rates. Mixing times in industrial-size stirred tanks with liquid volumes smaller than 100 kl are usually less than 100 s. Correlations are available for mixing times in stirred-tank reactors with several types of stirrer. One of these, for the standard Rushton turbine with baffles [13], is shown in Figure 7.9, in which the product () of the stirrer speed N(s1) and the mixing time tm (s) are plotted against the Reynolds number on log–log

7.4 Mechanically Stirred Tanks

coordinates. For (Re) above approximately 5000, the product N tm approaches a constant values of about 30. The existence of solid particles suspended in the liquid caused an increase in the liquid mixing time. In contrast, aeration caused a decrease in the liquid mixing time for water, but an increase for non-Newtonian liquids [14]. Example 7.6

A stirred-tank reactor equipped with a standard Rushton turbine of the following dimensions contains a liquid with density r ¼ 1.000 g cm3 and viscosity m ¼ 0.013 g cm1 s1. The tank diameter D ¼ 2.4 m, liquid depth HL ¼ 2.4 m, the impeller diameter d ¼ 0.8 m, and liquid volume ¼ 10.85 m3. Estimate the stirrer power required and the mixing time, when the rotational stirrer speed N is 90 r.p.m., that is, 1.5 s1. Solution

The Reynolds number: Re ¼ Nd2 r=m ¼ 1:5 802 1=0:013 ¼ 7:38 105 From Figure 7.8 the power number Np ¼ 6 The power required P ¼ 6 N3 d5 r ¼ 6 1.53 0.85 1000 kg m2 s3 ¼ 6650 kg m2 s3 ¼ 6650 W ¼ 6.65 kW.

Figure 7.9 Correlations for mixing times (using a standard Rushton turbine).

| 119

120

| 7 Bioreactors From Figure 7.9, values of N tm for the above Reynolds number should be about 30. Then, tm ¼ 30/1.5 ¼ 20 s.

7.4.5 Suspending of Solid Particles in Liquid in Stirred Tanks

On occasion, solid particles – such as catalyst particles, immobilized enzymes, or even solid reactant particles – must be suspended in liquid in stirred-tank reactors. In such cases, it becomes necessary to estimate the dimension and speed of the stirrer required for suspending the solid particles. The following empirical equation [15] gives the minimum critical stirrer speed Ns (s1) to suspend the particles: Ns ¼ Sn0:1 x 0:2 ðgDr=rÞ0:45 B0:13 =d 0:85

ð7:38Þ

where n is the liquid kinematic viscosity (m2 s1), x is the size of the solid particle (m), g is the gravitational constant (m s2), r is the liquid density (kg m3), Dr is the solid density minus liquid density (kg m3), B is the solid weight per liquid weight (%), and d the stirrer diameter (m). S is an empirical constant which varies with the types of stirrer, the ratio of tank diameter to the stirrer diameter D/d, and with the ratio of the tank diameter to the distance between the stirrer and the tank bottom D/Hi. Values of S for various stirrer types are given graphically as functions of D/d and D/Hi [15]. For example, S-values for the Rushton turbine (D/Hi ¼ 1 to 7) are 4 for D/d ¼ 2 and 8 for D/d ¼ 3. The critical stirrer speed for solid suspension increases slightly with increasing aeration rate, solid loading, and non-Newtonian flow behavior [14].

7.5 Gas Dispersion in Stirred Tanks

One of the functions of the impeller in an aerated stirred tank is to disperse gas into the liquid as bubbles. For a given stirrer speed there is a maximum gas flow rate, above which the gas is poorly dispersed. Likewise, for a given gas flow rate there is a minimum stirrer speed, below which the stirrer cannot disperse gas. Under such conditions the gas passes up along the stirrer shaft, without being dispersed. This phenomenon, which is called ‘‘flooding’’ of the impeller, can be avoided by decreasing the gas rate for a given stirrer speed, or by increasing the stirrer speed for a given gas rate. The following dimensionless empirical equation [16] can predict the limiting maximum gas flow rate Q (m3 s1) and the limiting minimum impeller speed N (s1) for flooding with the Rushton turbine and for liquids with viscosities not much greater than water. ðQ=Nd3 Þ ¼ 30ðd=DÞ3:5 ðdN 2 =gÞ

ð7:39Þ

where d is the impeller diameter (m), D the tank diameter (m), and g the gravitational constant (m s2).

7.6 Bubble Columns

7.6 Bubble Columns 7.6.1 General

Unlike the mechanically stirred tank, the bubble column has no mechanical stirrer (agitator). Rather, it is a relatively tall cylindrical vessel that contains a liquid through which gas is bubbled, usually from the bottom to the top. A single-nozzle gas sparger or a gas sparger with perforations is normally used. The power required to operate a bubble column is mainly the power to feed a gas against the static head of the liquid in the tank. The gas pressure drop through the gas sparger is relatively small. In general, the power requirements of bubble columns are less than those of mechanically stirred tanks of comparative capacities. The other advantages of a bubble column over a mechanically stirred tank are a simpler construction, with no moving parts and an easier scaling-up. Thus, bubble columns are increasingly used for large gas–liquid reactors, such as large-scale aerobic fermentors. Two different regimes have been developed for bubble column operation, in addition to the intermediate transition regime. When the superficial gas velocity (i.e., the total gas rate divided by the cross-sectional area of the column) is relatively low (e.g., 3–5 cm s1), known as the ‘‘homogeneous’’ or ‘‘quiet flow’’ regime, the bubbles rise without interfering with one another. However, at the higher superficial gas velocities which are common in industrial practice, the rising bubbles interfere with each other and repeat coalescence and breakup. In this ‘‘heterogeneous’’ or ‘‘turbulent flow’’ regime, the mean bubble size depends on the dynamic balance between the surface tension force and the turbulence force, and is almost independent of the sparger design, except in the relatively small region near the column bottom. In ordinary bubble columns without any internals, the liquid–gas mixtures move upwards in the central region and downwards in the annular region near the column wall. This is caused by differences in the bulk densities of the liquid–gas mixtures in the central region and the region near the wall. Usually, a uniform liquid composition can be assumed in evaluating kLa, except when the aspect ratio (the column height/diameter ratio) is very large, or operation is conducted in the quiet regime. Bubble columns in which gas is bubbled through suspensions of solid particles in liquids are known as ‘‘slurry bubble columns’’. These are widely used as reactors for a variety of chemical reactions, and also as bioreactors with suspensions of microbial cells or particles of immobilized enzymes. 7.6.2 Performance of Bubble Columns

The correlations detailed in Sections 7.6.2.1 to 7.6.2.5 [17, 18] are based on data for the turbulent regime with four bubble columns, up to 60 cm in diameter, and for

| 121

122

| 7 Bioreactors 11 liquid–gas systems with varying physical properties. Unless otherwise stated, the gas holdup, interfacial area, and volumetric mass transfer coefficients in the correlations are defined per unit volume of aerated liquid, that is, for the liquid– gas mixture. 7.6.2.1 Gas Holdup The slope of a log–log plot of fractional gas holdup e(–) against a superficial gas velocity UG (L T1) decreases gradually at higher gas rates. However, the gas holdup can be predicted by the following empirical dimensionless equation, which includes various liquid properties:

e=ð1 eÞ4 ¼ 0:20ðBoÞ1=8 ðGaÞ1=12 ðFrÞ1:0

ð7:40Þ

where (Bo) is the Bond number ¼ g D2 r/s (dimensionless), (Ga) is the Galilei number ¼ g D3/n2 (dimensionless), (Fr) is the Froude number ¼ UG/(g D)1/2 (dimensionless), g is the gravitational constant (L T2), D is the column diameter (L); r is the liquid density (M L3), s the surface tension (M T2); and n the liquid kinematic viscosity (L2 T1). 7.6.2.2 kLa Data with four columns, each up to 60 cm in diameter, were correlated by the following dimensionless equation:

ðkL a D2 =DL Þ ¼ 0:60ðScÞ0:50 ðBoÞ0:62 ðGaÞ0:31 e1:1

ð7:41Þ

in which DL is the liquid phase diffusivity (L2 T1), and (Sc) is the Schmidt number ¼ (n/DL) (dimensionless). According to Equation 7.41, kLa increases with the column diameter D to the power of 0.17. As this trend levels off with larger columns, it is recommended to adopt kLa values for a 60 cm column when designing larger columns. Data for a large industrial column which was 5.5 m in diameter and 9 m in height, agreed with the values calculated by Equation 7.41 for a column diameter of 60 cm [19]. The above equations for e and kLa are for nonelectrolyte solutions. For electrolyte solutions, it is suggested to increase e and kLa by approximately 25%. In electrolyte solutions the bubbles are smaller, the gas holdups larger, and the interfacial areas larger than in nonelectrolyte solutions. 7.6.2.3 Bubble Size The bubble size distribution was studied by taking photographs of the bubbles in transparent columns of square cross-section, after it had been confirmed that a square column gave the same performance as a round column with a diameter equal to the side of the square. The largest fraction of bubbles was in the range of one to several millimeters, mixed with few larger bubbles. As the shapes of bubbles were not spherical, the arithmetic mean of the maximum and minimum dimensions was taken as the bubble size. Except for the relatively narrow region near the gas sparger, or for columns operating in the quiet regime, the average bubble size is minimally affected by the sparger design or its size, mainly because

7.6 Bubble Columns

the bubble size is largely controlled by a balance between the coalescence and breakup rates, which in turn depend on the superficial gas velocity and liquid properties. The distribution of bubble sizes was seen to follow the logarithmic normal distribution law. The ratio of calculated values of the volume–surface mean bubble diameter dvs to the column diameter D can be correlated by following dimensionless equation: ðdvs =DÞ ¼ 26ðBoÞ0:50 ðGaÞ0:12 ðFrÞ0:12

ð7:42Þ

7.6.2.4 Interfacial Area a The gas–liquid interfacial area per unit volume of gas–liquid mixture, a (L2 L3 or L1), calculated by Equation 7.26 from the measured values of the fractional gas holdup e and the volume–surface mean bubble diameter dvs, were correlated by the following dimensionless equation:

ða DÞ ¼ ð1=3Þ ðBoÞ0:5 ðGaÞ0:1 e1:13

ð7:43Þ

7.6.2.5 kL Values of kL, obtained by dividing kLa by a, were correlated by the following dimensionless equation:

ðShÞ ¼ ðkL dvs =DL Þ ¼ 0:5ðScÞ1=2 ðBoÞ3=8 ðGaÞ1=4

ð7:44Þ

where (Sh) is the Sherwood number. In this equation dvs is used in place of D in (Bo) and (Ga). According to Equation 7.44, the kL values vary in proportion to DL1/2 and dvs1/2, but are independent of the liquid kinematic viscosity n. 7.6.2.6 Other Correlations for kLa Several other correlations are available for kLa in simple bubble columns without internals, and most of these show approximate agreements. Figure 7.10 compares kLa values calculated by various correlations for water–oxygen at 20 1C as a function of the superficial gas velocity UG. For kLa with non-Newtonian (excluding viscoelastic) fluids, Equation 7.45 [23], which is based on data with water and aqueous solutions of sucrose and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) in a 15 cm column, may be useful. Note that kLa in this equation is defined per unit volume of clear liquid, without aeration.

ðkL a D2 =DL Þ ¼ 0:09ðScÞ0:5 ðBoÞ0:75 ðGaÞ0:39 ðFrÞ1:0

ð7:45Þ

For kLa in bubble columns for non-Newtonian (including viscoelastic) fluids, see Section 12.4.1. 7.6.2.7 kLa and Gas Holdup for Suspensions and Emulsions The correlations for kLa as discussed above are for homogeneous liquids. Bubbling gas–liquid reactors are sometimes used for suspensions, and bioreactors of this type must often handle suspensions of microorganisms, cells, or immobilized

| 123

124

| 7 Bioreactors

Figure 7.10 Comparison of kLa by several correlations (water–O2, 20 1C). Data from [17, 20–22].

cells or enzymes. Occasionally, suspensions of nonbiological particles, to which organisms are attached, are handled. Consequently, it is often necessary to predict how the kLa values for suspensions will be affected by the system properties and operating conditions. In fermentation with a hydrocarbon substrate, the substrate is usually dispersed as droplets in an aqueous culture medium. Details of kLa with emulsions are provided in Section 12.4.1.5. In general, the gas holdups and kLa for suspensions in bubbling gas–liquid reactors decrease substantially with increasing concentrations of solid particles, possibly because the coalescence of bubbles is promoted by presence of particles, which in turn results in a larger bubble size and hence a smaller gas–liquid interfacial area. Various empirical correlations have been proposed for the kLa and gas holdup in slurry bubble columns. Equation 7.46 [24], which is dimensionless and based on data for suspensions with four bubble columns, 10–30 cm in diameter, over a range of particle concentrations from 0 to 200 kg m3 and particle diameter of 50–200 mm, can be used to predict the ratio r of the ordinary kLa values in bubble columns. This can, in turn, be predicted for example by Equation 7.41, to the kLa values with suspensions. r ¼ 1 þ 1:47 104 ðcs =rs Þ0:612 ðvt =ðD gÞ1=2 Þ0:486 ðD2 g rL =sL Þ0:477 ðD UG rL =mL Þ0:345

ð7:46Þ

where cs is the average solid concentration in the gas-free slurry (kg m3), D is the column diameter (m), g is gravitational acceleration (m s2), UG is the superficial

7.7 Airlift Reactors 1

gas velocity (m s ), vt is the terminal velocity of a single particle in a stagnant liquid (m s1), mL is the liquid viscosity (Pa s), rL is the liquid density (kg m3), rs is the solid density (kg m3), and sL is the liquid surface tension (N m1).

7.7 Airlift Reactors

In some respects, airlift reactors (airlifts) can be regarded as modifications of the bubble column. Airlift reactors have separate channels for upward and downward fluid flows, whereas the bubble column has no such separate channels. Thus, fluid mixing in bubble columns is more random than in airlift reactors. There are two major types of airlift reactor, namely the internal loop (IL) and external loop (EL). 7.7.1 IL Airlifts

The IL airlift reactor shown in Figure 7.11a is a modification of the bubble column equipped with a draft tube (a concentric cylindrical partition) that divides the column into two sections of roughly equal sectional areas. These are the central ‘‘riser’’ for upward fluid flow, and the annular ‘‘downcomer’’ for downward fluid flow. Gas is sparged at the bottom of the draft tube. In another type of IL airlift, the gas is sparged at the bottom of the annular space, which acts as the riser, while the central draft tube serves as the downcomer. The ‘‘split-cylinder’’ IL airlift reactor (not shown in the figure) has a vertical flat partition which divides the column into two halves which act as the riser and downcomer sections. In these IL airlift reactors, as the gas holdup in the downcomer is smaller than that in the riser, the liquid will circulate through the riser and downcomer sections due to differences in the bulk densities of the liquid–gas mixtures in the two sections. The overall values of kLa for a well-designed IL airlift reactor of both the draft tube and split-cylinder types, are approximately equal to those of bubble columns of similar dimensions. The ‘‘deep shaft reactor’’ is a very tall IL airlift reactor that has vertical partitions, and is built underground for the treatment of biological waste water. This reactor is quite different in its construction and performance from the simple IL airlift reactor with a vertical partition. In the deep-shaft reactor, air is injected into the downcomer and carried down with the flowing liquid. A very large liquid depth is required in order to achieve a sufficiently large driving force for liquid circulation. 7.7.2 EL Airlifts

Figure 7.11b shows an EL airlift reactor, in schematic form. Here, the downcomer is a separate vertical tube that is usually smaller in diameter than the riser, and is connected to the riser by pipes at the top and bottom, thus forming a circuit for

| 125

126

| 7 Bioreactors

Figure 7.11 Schematic representations of airlift reactors; (a) internal loop (IL) airlift reactor, (b) external loop (EL) airlift reactor.

liquid circulation. The liquid entering the downcomer tube is almost completely degassed at the top. The liquid circulation rate can be controlled by a valve on the connecting pipe at the bottom. One advantage of the EL airlift reactor is that an efficient heat exchanger can easily be installed on the liquid loop line. The characteristics of EL airlift reactors [25–27] are quite different from those of the IL airlift reactor. With tubular loop EL airlifts, both the superficial liquid velocity UL and the superficial gas velocity UG are important operating parameters. Moreover, UL increases with increasing UG and varies with the reactor geometry and liquid properties. UL can be controlled by a valve at the bottom connecting pipe. The gas holdup, and consequently also kLa, increase with UG, but at a given UG they decrease with increasing UL. For a given gas velocity, the gas holdup and kLa in the EL airlift reactor are always smaller than in the bubble column reactor, and decrease with increasing liquid velocities. Yet, this is not disadvantageous, as the EL airlift reactor is operated at superficial gas velocities which are two- or threefold higher than in the bubble column. Values of kLa in tubular loop EL airlift reactors at a given UG are smaller than those in bubble columns and IL airlift reactors fitted with draft tubes. No general correlations for kLa are available for EL airlift reactors. However, it has been suggested [28] that, before a production-scale airlift reactor is built, experiments are performed with an airlift which has been scaled-down from a production-scale airlift designed with presently available information. The final

7.8 Packed-Bed Reactors

production-scale airlift should then be designed with use of the experimental data acquired from the scaled-down airlift reactor.

7.8 Packed-Bed Reactors

The packed-bed reactor is a cylindrical, usually vertical, reaction vessel into which particles containing the catalyst or enzyme are packed. The reaction proceeds while the fluid containing reactants is passed through the packed bed. In the case of a packed-bed bioreactor, a liquid containing the substrate is passed through a bed of particles of immobilized enzyme or cells. Consider an idealized simple case of a Michaelis–Menten-type bioreaction taking place in a vertical cylindrical packed-bed bioreactor containing immobilized enzyme particles. The effects of mass transfer within and outside the enzyme particles are assumed to be negligible. The reaction rate per differential packed height (m) and per unit horizontal cross-sectional area of the bed (m2) is then given as (cf. Equation 3.28): U dCA =dz ¼ Vmax CA =ðKm þ CA Þ

ð7:47Þ

where U is the superficial fluid velocity through the bed (m s1), CA is the reactant concentration in liquid (kmol m3), Km is the Michaelis constant (kmol m3), and Vmax is the maximum rate of the enzyme reaction (kmol m3 s1). The required height of the packed bed z can be obtained by integration of Equation 7.47. Thus, z ¼ U½ðKm =Vmax ÞlnðCAi =CAf Þ þ ðCAi CAf Þ=Vmax

ð7:48Þ

where CAi and CAf are the inlet and outlet reactant concentrations (kmol m3), respectively. The reaction time t(s) in the packed bed is given as t ¼ z=U

ð7:49Þ

which should be equal to the reaction time in both the batch reactor and the plug flow reactor. In the case that the mass transfer effects are not negligible, the required height of the packed bed is greater than that without mass transfer effects. In some practices, the ratio of the packed-bed heights without and with the mass transfer effects is defined as the overall effectiveness factor Zo(–), the maximum value of which is unity. However, if the right-hand side of Equation 7.47 is multiplied by Zo, it cannot be integrated simply, since Zo is a function of CA, U, and other factors. If the reaction is extremely rapid and the liquid-phase mass transfer on the particle surface controls the overall rate, then the rate can be estimated by Equation 6.28.

| 127

128

| 7 Bioreactors 7.9 Microreactors [29]

Microreactors are miniaturized reaction systems with fluid channels of very small dimensions, perhaps 0.05 to 1 mm. They are a relatively new development, and at present are used mainly for analytical systems. However, microreactor systems could be useful for small-scale production units, for the following reasons: . Because of the very small fluid layer thickness of the microchannels, the specific interfacial areas (i.e., the interfacial areas per unit volume of the microreactor systems) are much larger than those of conventional systems. . Because of the very small fluid channels (Re is very small), the flows in microreactor systems are always laminar. Thus, mass and heat transfers occur solely by molecular diffusion and conduction, respectively. However, due to the very small transfer distances, the coefficients of mass and heat transfer are large. Usually, film coefficients of heat and mass transfer can be estimated using Equations 5.9a and 6.26a, respectively. . As a result of the first two points, microreactor systems are much more compact than conventional systems of equal production capacity. . There are no scaling-up problems with microreactor systems. The production capacity can be increased simply by increasing the number of microreactor units used in parallel. Microreactor systems usually consist of a fluid mixer, a reactor, and a heat exchanger, which is often combined with the reactor. Several types of system are available. Figure 7.12, for example, shows (in schematic form) two types of combined microreactor-heat exchanger. The cross-section of a parallel flow-type microreactor-heat exchanger is shown in Figure 7.12a. For this, microchannels (0.06 mm wide and 0.9 mm deep) are fabricated on both sides of a thin (1.2 mm)

Figure 7.12 Schematic diagrams of two types of microreactorheat exchanger; (a) parallel flow, (b) cross flow.

7.9 Microreactors [29]

metal plate. The channels on one side are for the reaction fluid, while those on the other side are for the heat-transfer fluid, which flows countercurrently to the reaction fluid. The sketch in Figure 7.12b shows a crossflow-type microreactor-heat exchanger with microchannels that are 0.1 0.08 mm in cross-section and 10 mm long, fabricated on a metal plate. The material thickness between the two fluids is 0.02–0.025 mm. The reaction plates and heat-transfer plates are stacked alternately, such that both fluids flow crosscurrently to each other. These microreactor systems are normally fabricated from silicon, glass, metals, and other materials, using mechanical, chemical, or physical (e.g., laser) technologies. Microreactors can be used for either gas-phase or liquid-phase reactions, whether catalyzed or uncatalyzed. Heterogeneous catalysts (or immobilized enzymes) can be coated onto the channel wall, although on occasion the metal wall itself can act as the catalyst. Gas–liquid contacting can be effected in the microchannels by either bubbly or slug flow of gas, an annular flow of liquid, or falling liquid films along the vertical channel walls. Contact between two immiscible liquids is also possible. The use of microreactor systems in the area of biotechnology shows much promise, not only for analytical purposes but also for small-scale production systems.

" Problems

7.1 A reactant A in liquid will be converted to a product P by an irreversible firstorder reaction in a CSTR or a PFR reactor with a reactor volume of 0.1 m3. A feed solution containing 1.0 kmol m3 of A is fed at a flow rate of 0.01 m3 min1, and the first-order reaction rate constant is 0.12 min1. Calculate the fractional conversions of A in the output stream from the CSTR and PFR. 7.2 The same reaction in Problem 7.1 is proceeding in two CSTR or PFR reactors with a reactor volume of 0.05 m3 connected in series, as shown in the diagram below.

V/2

V/2 V/2

PFR

V/2 CSTR

Determine the fractional conversions in the output stream from the second reactor. 7.3 Derive Equation 7.20, where sinh x ¼

ex ex ; 2

cosh x ¼

ex þ ex ; 2

coth x ¼

cosh x sinh x

| 129

130

| 7 Bioreactors 7.4 A reactant in liquid will be converted to a product by an irreversible first-order reaction using spherical catalyst particles that are 0.4 cm in diameter. The firstorder reaction rate constant and the effective diffusion coefficient of the reactant in catalyst particles are 0.001 s1 and 1.2 106 cm2 s1, respectively. The liquid film mass transfer resistance of the particles can be neglected. 1. Determine the effectiveness factor for the catalyst particles under the present reaction conditions. 2. How can the effectiveness factor of this catalytic reaction be increased? 7.5 A substrate S will be converted to a product P by an irreversible uni-molecular enzyme reaction with the Michaelis constant Km ¼ 0.010 kmol m3 and the maximum rate Vmax ¼ 2.0 105 kmol m3 s1. 1. A substrate solution of 0.1 kmol m3 is reacted in a stirred-batch reactor using the free enzyme. Determine the initial reaction rate and the conversion of the substrate after 10 min. 2. Immobilized-enzyme beads with a diameter of 10 mm containing the same amount of the enzyme above are used in the same stirred-batch reactor. Determine the initial reaction rate of the substrate solution of 0.1 kmol m3. Assume that the effective diffusion coefficient of the substrate in the catalyst beads is 1.0 106 cm2 s1. 3. How small should the diameter of immobilized-enzyme beads be to achieve an effectiveness factor larger than 0.9 under the same reaction conditions, as in case (2)?

Figure P-7.6 Oxygen concentration versus time plot.

References

7.6 By using the dynamic method, the oxygen concentration was measured as shown in Figure P-7.6. The static volume of a fermentation broth, the flow rate of air and the cell concentration were 1 l, 1.5 l min1 and 3.0 g-dry cell l1, respectively. Estimate the oxygen consumption rate of the microbes and the volumetric mass transfer coefficient. 7.7 An aerated stirred-tank fermentor equipped with a standard Rushton turbine of the following dimensions contains a liquid with density r ¼ 1010 kg m3 and viscosity m ¼ 9.8 104 Pa s. The tank diameter D is 0.90 m, liquid depth HL ¼ 0.90 m, impeller diameter d ¼ 0.30 m. The oxygen diffusivity in the liquid DL is 2.10 105 cm2 s1. Estimate the stirrer power required and the volumetric mass transfer coefficient of oxygen (use Equation 7.36a), when air is supplied from the tank bottom at a rate of 0.60 m3 min1 at a rotational stirrer speed of 120 r.p.m., that is, 2.0 s1. 7.8 When the fermentor in Problem 7.7 is scaled-up to a geometrically similar tank of 1.8 m diameter, show the criteria for scale-up and determine the aeration rate and rotational stirrer speed. 7.9 A 30 cm-diameter bubble column containing water (clear liquid height 2 m) is aerated at a flow rate of 10 m3 h1. Estimate the volumetric coefficient of oxygen transfer and the average bubble diameter. The values of water viscosity m ¼ 0.001 kg m1 s1, density r ¼ 1000 kg m3 and surface tension s ¼ 75 dyne cm1 can be used. The oxygen diffusivity in water DL is 2.10 105 cm2 s1.

References 1 Levenspiel, O. (1972) Chemical Reaction Engineering, 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2 Thiele, E.W. (1939) Ind. Eng. Chem. 31, 916. 3 Van’t Riet, K. (1979) Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 18, 357. 4 Yoshida, F., Ikeda, A., Imakawa, S., and Miura, Y. (1960) Ind. Eng. Chem. 52, 435. 5 Taguchi, H. and Humphrey, A.E. (1966) J. Ferment. Technol. 12, 881. 6 Rushton, J.H., Costich, E.W., and Everett, H.J. (1950) Chem. Eng. Prog. 46, 395, 467. 7 Nagata, S. (1975) MIXING Principles and Applications, Kodansha and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 8 Hughmark, G.A. (1980) Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 19, 638. 9 Calderbank, P.H. (1958) Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 36, 443.

10 Calderbank, P.H. (1959) Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 37, 173. 11 Yoshida, F. and Miura, Y. (1963) Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 2, 263. 12 Yagi, H. and Yoshida, F. (1975) Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 14, 488. 13 Hoogendoorm, C.J. and den Hartog, A.P. (1967) Chem. Eng. Sci. 22, 1689. 14 Kawase, Y., Shimizu, K., Araki, T., and Shimodaira, T. (1997) Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36, 270. 15 Zwietering, Th.N. (1958) Chem. Eng. Sci., 8, 244. 16 Nienow, A.W. (1990) Chem. Eng. Sci. 86, 61. 17 Akita, K. and Yoshida, F. (1973) Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 12, 76. 18 Akita, K. and Yoshida, F. (1974) Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 13, 84.

| 131

132

| 7 Bioreactors 19 Kataoka, H., Takeuchi, H., Nakao, K. et al. (1979) J. Chem. Eng. Jap. 12, 105. ¨ zte ¨rk, S.S., Schumpe, A., and 20 O Deckwer, W.-D. (1987) AIChE J. 33, 1473. 21 Hikita, H., Asai, S., Tanigawa, K., Segawa, K., and Kitao, M. (1981) Chem. Eng. J. 22, 61. 22 Kawase, Y., Halard, B., and Moo-Young, M. (1987) Chem. Eng. Sci. 42, 1609. 23 Nakanoh, M. and Yoshida, F. (1980) Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 19, 190.

Further Reading 1 Deckwer, W.-D. (1992) Bubble Column Reactors, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

24 Koide, K., Takazawa, A., Komura, M., and Matsunaga, H. (1984) J. Chem. Eng. Japan 17, 459. 25 Weiland, P. and Onken, U. (1981) Ger. Chem. Eng. 4, 42. 26 Weiland, P. and Onken, U. (1981) Ger. Chem. Eng. 4, 174. 27 Weiland, P. (1984) Ger. Chem. Eng. 7, 374. 28 Choi, P.B. (1990) Chem. Eng. Prog. 86 (12), 32. ¨we, H. 29 Ehrfeld, W., Hessel, V., and Lo (2000) Microreactors, Wiley-VCH.

This page intentionally left blank

| 133

8 Membrane Processes

8.1 Introduction

In bioprocesses, a variety of apparatus which incorporate artificial (usually polymeric) membranes are often used for both separations and for bioreactions. In this chapter, we shall briefly review the general principles of several membrane processes, namely dialysis, ultrafiltration, microfiltration, and reverse osmosis. Permeation is a general term meaning the movement of a substance through a solid medium (e.g., a membrane), due to a driving potential such as a difference in concentration, hydraulic pressure, or electric potential, or a combination of these. It is important to understand clearly the driving potential(s) for any particular membrane process. Only part of the feed solution or suspension supplied to a membrane device will permeate through the membrane; this fraction is referred to as the permeate, while the remainder which does not permeate through the membrane is called the retentate. Dialysis is a process that is used to separate larger and smaller solute molecules in a solution by utilizing differences in the diffusion rates of larger and smaller solute molecules across a membrane. When a feed solution containing larger and smaller solute molecules is passed on one side of an appropriate membrane, and a solvent (usually water or an appropriate aqueous solution) flows on the other side of the membrane – the dialysate –, then the molecules of smaller solutes diffuse from the feed side to the solvent side, while the larger solute molecules are retained in the feed solution. In dialysis, those solutes which are dissolved in a membrane, or in the liquid that exists in the minute pores of a membrane, will diffuse through the membrane due to the concentration driving potential rather than to the hydraulic pressure difference. Thus, the pressure on the feed side of the membrane need not be higher than that on the solvent side. Microfiltration (MF) is a process that is used to filter very fine particles (smaller than several microns) in a suspension by using a membrane with pores that are smaller than the particles. The driving potential here is the difference in hydraulic pressure.

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

134

| 8 Membrane Processes Ultrafiltration (UF) is used to filter any large molecules (e.g., proteins) present in a solution by using an appropriate membrane. Although the driving potential in UF is the hydraulic pressure difference, the mass transfer rates will often affect the rate of UF due to a phenomenon known as ‘‘concentration polarization’’ (this will be discussed later in the chapter). Reverse osmosis (RO) is a membrane-based process that is used to remove solutes of relatively low molecular weight that are in solution. As an example, almost pure water can be obtained from sea water by using RO, which will filter out molecules of NaCl and other salts. The driving potential for water permeation is the difference in hydraulic pressure. A pressure that is higher than the osmotic pressure of the solution (which itself could be quite high if the molecular weights of the solutes are small) must be applied to the solution side of the membrane. Reverse osmosis also involves the concentration polarization of solute molecules. Nanofiltration (NF), a relatively new system, falls between the boundaries of UF and RO, with an upper molecular weight cut-off of approximately 1000 Da. Typical transmembrane pressure differences (in bar) are 0.5–7 for UF, 3–10 for NF, and 10–100 for RO [1]. Conventional methods for gas separation, such as absorption and distillation, usually involve phase changes. The use of membranes for gas separation seems to show promise due to its lower energy requirement. Membrane modules (i.e., the standardized unit apparatus for membrane processes) will be described at the end of this chapter.

8.2 Dialysis

Figure 8.1 shows, in graphical terms, the concentration gradients of a diffusing solute in the close vicinity and inside of the dialyzer membrane. As discussed in Chapter 6, the sharp concentration gradients in liquids close to the surfaces of the membrane are caused by the liquid film resistances. The solute concentration within the membrane depends on the solubility of the solute in the membrane, or in the liquid in the minute pores of the membrane. The overall mass transfer flux of the solute JA (kmol h1 m2) is given as: JA ¼ KL ðC1 C2 Þ

ð8:1Þ

where KL is the overall mass transfer coefficient (kmol h1 m2)/(kmol m3) (i.e., m h1), and C1 and C2 are the bulk solute concentrations (kmol m3) in the feed and dialysate solutions, respectively. For a flat membrane, the mass transfer fluxes through the two liquid films on the membrane surfaces and through the membrane should be equal to JA. CM2 Þ ¼ kL2 ðCM2 C2 Þ JA ¼ kL1 ðC1 CM1 Þ ¼ kM ðCM1

ð8:2Þ

Here, kL1 and kL2 are the liquid film mass transfer coefficients (m h1) on the membrane surfaces of the feed side and the dialysate side, respectively; CM1 and

8.2 Dialysis

Figure 8.1 Solute concentration gradients in dialysis.

CM2 are the solute concentrations (kmol m3) in the feed and dialysate at the and CM2 are the solute concentrations membrane surfaces, respectively; and CM1 3 in the membrane (kmol m ) at its surfaces on the feed side and the dialysate side, , and between CM2 and CM2, respectively. The relationships between CM1 and CM1 are given by the solute solubility in the membrane. kM is the diffusive membrane permeability (m h1), and should be equal to DM/xM, where DM is the diffusivity of the solute through the membrane (m2 h1) and xM is the membrane thickness (m). DM varies with membranes and with solutes; for a given membrane, DM usually decreases with increasing size of solute molecules and increases with temperature. In the case where the membrane is flat, the overall mass transfer resistance – that is, the sum of the individual mass transfer resistances of the two liquid films and the membrane – is given as: 1=KL ¼ 1=kL1 þ 1=kM þ 1=kL2

ð8:3Þ

The values of kL and kM (especially the latter) decrease with the increasing molecular weights of diffusing solutes. Thus, when a feed solution containing solutes of smaller and larger molecular weights is dialyzed with use of an appropriate membrane, most of the smaller-molecular-weight solutes will pass through the membrane into the dialysate, while most of the larger-molecularweight solutes will be retained in the feed solution. Dialysis is used on large scale in some chemical industries. In medicine, blood dialyzers, which are used extensively to treat kidney disease patients, are discussed in Chapter 14.

| 135

136

| 8 Membrane Processes 8.3 Ultrafiltration

The driving potential for UF – that is, the filtration of large molecules – is the hydraulic pressure difference. Because of the large molecular weights, and hence the low molar concentrations of solutes, the effect of osmotic pressure is usually minimal in UF; this subject will be discussed in Section 8.5. Figure 8.2 shows data acquired [2] from the UF of an aqueous solution of blood serum proteins in a hollow fiber-type ultrafilter. In this figure, the ordinate is the filtrate flux and the abscissa the transmembrane pressure (TMP) (i.e., the hydraulic pressure difference across the membrane). It can be seen from this figure that the filtrate flux JF for serum solutions increases with TMP at lower TMP-values, but becomes independent of the TMP at higher TMP-values. In contrast, the JF for NaCl solutions, using the same apparatus in which case the solute passes into the filtrate, increases linearly with the TMP for all TMP values. The data in the figure also show that, over the range where the JF for serum solutions is independent of TMP, JF increases with the wall shear rate gw (cf. Example 2.2), which is proportional to the average fluid velocity along the membrane surface for laminar flow, as in this case. These data from serum solutions can be explained if it is assumed that the main hydraulic resistance exists in the protein gel layer formed on the membrane surface, and that the resistance increases in proportion to the TMP.

Figure 8.2 Filtrate flux versus TMP in the ultrafiltration of serum solutions [2].

8.3 Ultrafiltration

The mechanism of such UF can be explained by the following concentration polarization model (cf. Figure 8.3) [3, 4]. In the early stages of UF, the thickness of the gel layer increases with time. However, after the steady state has been reached, the solute diffuses back from the gel layer surface to the bulk of solution; this occurs due to the difference between the saturated solute concentration at the gel layer surface and the solute concentration in the bulk of solution. A dynamic balance is attained, when the rate of back-diffusion of the solute has become equal to the rate of solute carried by the bulk flow of solution towards the membrane. This rate should be equal to the filtrate flux, and consequently the thickness of the gel layer should become constant. Thus, the following dimensionally consistent equation should hold: JF C ¼ DL dC=dx

ð8:4Þ

where JF is the filtrate flux (L T1), DL is the solute diffusivity in solution (L2 T1), x is the distance from the gel layer surface (L), and C is the solute concentration in the bulk of feed solution (M L3). Integration of Equation 8.4 gives JF ¼ ðDL =DxÞlnðCG =CÞ ¼ kL lnðCG =CÞ

ð8:5Þ

where Dx is the effective thickness of laminar liquid film on the gel layer surface, CG is the saturated solute concentration at the gel layer surface (M L3), and kL is the liquid film mass transfer coefficient for the solute on the gel layer surface (L T1), which should vary with the fluid velocity along the membrane and other factors. Thus, if experiments are performed with solutions of various concentrations C and at a given liquid velocity along the membrane (i.e., at one kL value), and the

Figure 8.3 The concentration polarization model.

| 137

138

| 8 Membrane Processes experimental values of JF are plotted against log C on a semi-log paper, then a straight line with a slope of kL should be obtained. Also, it is seen that such straight lines should intersect the abscissa at CG, because ln(CG/C) is zero where C ¼ CG. If such experiments are performed at various liquid velocities, then kL could be correlated with the liquid velocity and other variables. Figure 8.4 shows the data [2] of the UF of serum solutions with a hollow fibertype ultrafilter, with hollow fibers 16 cm in length and 200 mm in i.d., at four shear rates on the inner surface of the hollow-fiber membrane. Slopes of the straight lines, which converge at a point C ¼ CG on the abscissa, give kL values at the shear rates gw given in the figure. The following empirical dimensional equation [5], which is based on data for the UF of diluted blood plasma, can correlate the filtrate flux JF (cm min1) averaged over the hollow fiber of length L (cm): JF ðcm min1 Þ ¼ 49ðgw D2L =LÞ1=3 lnðCG =CÞ

ð8:6Þ

The shear rate gw (s1) at the membrane surface is given by gw ¼ 8v/d (cf. Example 2.2), where v is average linear velocity (cm s1), d is the fiber inside diameter (cm), and DL is the molecular diffusion coefficient (cm2 s1); all other symbols are as in Equation 8.4. Hence, Equation 8.6 is most likely applicable to UF in hollow-fiber membranes in general.

Figure 8.4 Ultrafiltration of serum solutions, JF versus log C [2].

8.4 Microfiltration

8.4 Microfiltration

Microfiltration can be categorized between conventional filtration and UF. The process is used to filter very small particles (usually o10 mm in size) from a suspension, by using a membrane with very fine pores. Example of microfiltration include the separation of some microorganisms from their suspension, and the separation of blood cells from whole blood, using a microporous membrane. Although the driving potential in microfiltration is the hydraulic pressure gradient, the microfiltration flux is often also affected by the fluid velocity along the membrane surface. This is invariably due to the accumulation of filtered particles on the membrane surface; in other words, the concentration polarization of particles. Equation 8.7 [6] was obtained to correlate the experimental data on membrane plasmapheresis, which is the microfiltration of blood to separate the blood cells from the plasma. The filtrate flux was affected by the blood velocity along the membrane. Since, in plasmapheresis, all of the protein molecules and other solutes will pass into the filtrate, the concentration polarization of protein molecules is inconceivable. In fact, the hydraulic pressure difference in plasmapheresis is smaller than that in the UF of plasma. Thus, the concentration polarization of red blood cells was assumed in deriving Equation 8.7. The shape of the red blood cell is approximately discoid, with a concave area at the central portion, the cells being approximately 1–2.5 mm thick and 7–8.5 mm in diameter. Thus, a value of r ( ¼ 0.000 257 cm), the radius of the sphere with a volume equal to that of a red blood cell, was used in Equation 8.7. JF ¼ 4:20ðr 4 =LÞ1=3 gw lnðCG =CÞ

ð8:7Þ

Here, JF is the filtrate flux (cm min1) averaged over the hollow fiber membrane of length L (cm), and gw is the shear rate (s1) on the membrane surface, as in Equation 8.6. The volumetric percentage of red blood cells (the hematocrit) was taken as C, and its value on the membrane surface, CG, was assumed to be 95%. In the case where a liquid suspension of fine particles of radius r (cm) flows along a solid surface at a wall shear rate gw (s1), the effective diffusivity DE (cm2 s1) of particles in the direction perpendicular to the surface can be correlated by the following empirical equation [7]: DE ¼ 0:025r 2 gw

ð8:8Þ

Equation 8.8 was assumed to hold in deriving Equation 8.7. Some investigators [8] have suspected that the rate of microfiltration of blood is controlled by the concentration polarization of the platelet (another type of blood cell which is smaller than the red blood cell), such that the effective diffusivity of platelets is affected by the movements of red blood cells.

| 139

140

| 8 Membrane Processes 8.5 Reverse Osmosis

An explanation of the phenomenon of osmosis is provided in most textbooks of physical chemistry. Suppose that a pure solvent and the solvent containing some solute are separated by a membrane that is permeable only for the solvent. In order to obtain pure solvent from the solution by filtering the solute molecules with the membrane, a pressure which is higher than the osmotic pressure of the solution must be applied to the solution side. If the external (total) pressures of the pure solvent and the solution were equal, however, the solvent would move into the solution through the membrane. This would occur because, due to the presence of the solute, the partial vapor pressure (rigorously activity) of the solvent in the solution would be lower than the vapor pressure of pure solvent. The osmotic pressure is the external pressure that must be applied to the solution side to prevent movement of the solvent through the membrane. It can be shown that the osmotic pressure P(measured in atm) of a dilute ideal solution is given by the following van’t Hoff equation: PV ¼ RT

ð8:9Þ

where V (in liters) is the volume of solution containing 1 gmol of solute, T is the absolute temperature (K), and R is a constant that is almost identical with the familiar gas law constant (i.e., 0.082 atm l gmol1 K1). Equation 8.9 can also be written as P ¼ RTC

ð8:9aÞ

where C is solute concentration (gmol l1). Thus, the osmotic pressures of dilute solutions of a solute vary in proportion to the solute concentration. From the above relationship, the osmotic pressure of a solution containing 1 gmol of solute per liter should be 22.4 atm at 273.15 K. This concentration is called 1 osmol l1 (i.e., Osm l1), with one-thousandth of the unit being called a milli-osmol (i.e., mOsm l1). Thus, the osmotic pressure of a 1 mOsm solution would be 22.4 760/1000 ¼ 17 mmHg. In RO, the permeate flux JF (cm s1) is given as: JF ¼ PH ðDP PÞ

ð8:10Þ

where PH is the hydraulic permeability of the membrane (cm s1 atm1) for a solvent, and DP (atm) is the external pressure difference between the solution and the solvent sides, which must be greater than the osmotic pressure of the solution P(atm). There are cases where the concentration polarization of solute must be considered in RO. In such a case, the fraction of the solute that permeates through the

8.6 Membrane Modules

membrane by diffusion, and the solute flux through the membrane Js (gmol cm2 s1), is given by: Js ¼ JF Cs1 ð1 sÞ ¼ kM ðCs1 Cs2 Þ

ð8:11Þ

where JF is the flux (cm s1) of solution that reaches the feed side membrane surface, Cs1 and Cs2 are the solute concentrations (gmol cm3) at the feed side membrane surface and in the filtrate (permeate), respectively, s is the fraction of solute rejected by the membrane (–), and kM is the diffusive membrane permeability for the solute (cm s1). The flux of solute (gmol cm2 s1) that returns to the feed side by concentration polarization is given by: JF Cs1 s ¼ kL ðCs1 Cs0 Þ

ð8:12Þ

where kL is the liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient (cm s1) on the feed side membrane surface, and Cs0 is the solute concentration in the bulk of feed solution (gmol cm3). Reverse osmosis is widely used for the desalination of sea or saline water, in obtaining pure water for clinical, pharmaceutical and industrial uses, and also in the food processing industries. Example 8.1

Calculate the osmolar concentration and the osmotic pressure of the physiological sodium chloride solution (9 g l1 NaCl aqueous solution). Note: The osmotic pressure should be almost equal to that of human body fluids (ca. 6.7 atm). Solution

As the molecular weight of NaCl is 58.5, the molar concentration is 9=58:5 ¼ 0:154 mol l1 ¼ 154 mmol l1 As NaCl dissociates completely into Naþ and Cl, and the ions exert osmotic pressures independently, the total osmolar concentration is 154 2 ¼ 308 mOsm l1 The osmotic pressure at 273.15 is 17 308 ¼ 5236 mmHg ¼ 6.89 atm.

8.6 Membrane Modules

Although many types of membrane modules are used for various membrane processes, they can be categorized as follows. (It should be mentioned here that such membrane modules are occasionally used for gas–liquid systems.)

| 141

142

| 8 Membrane Processes 8.6.1 Flat Membrane

A number of flat membranes are stacked with appropriate supporters (spacers) between the membranes, making alternate channels for the feed (retentate) and the permeate. Meshes, corrugated spacers, porous plates, grooved plates, and so on, can be used as supporters. The channels for feed distribution and permeate collection are built into the device. Rectangular or square membrane sheets are common, but some modules use round membrane sheets. 8.6.2 Spiral Membrane

A flattened membrane tube, or two sheet membranes sealed at both edges (and with a porous backing material inside if necessary), is wound as a spiral with appropriate spacers, such as mesh or corrugated spacers, between the membrane spiral. One of the two fluids – that is, the feed (and retentate) or the permeate – flows inside the wound, flattened membrane tube, while the other fluid flows through the channel containing spacers, in cross flow to the fluid in the wound membrane tube. 8.6.3 Tubular Membrane

Both ends of a number of parallel membrane tubes or porous solid tubes lined with permeable membranes, are connected to common header rooms. One of the two headers serves as the entrance of the feed, while the other header serves as the outlet for the retentate. The permeate is collected in the shell enclosing the tube bundle. 8.6.4 Hollow-Fiber Membrane

Hollow fiber refers to a membrane tube of very small diameter (e.g., 200 mm). Such small diameters enable a large membrane area per unit volume of device, as well as operation at somewhat elevated pressures. Hollow-fiber modules are widely used in medical devices such as blood oxygenators and hemodialyzers. The general geometry of the most commonly used hollow-fiber module is similar to that of the tubular membrane, but hollow fibers are used instead of tubular membranes. Both ends of the hollow fibers are supported by header plates and are connected to the header rooms, one of which serves as the feed entrance and the other as the retentate exit. Another type of hollow-fiber module uses a bundle of hollow fibers wound spirally around a core.

Further Reading

" Problems

8.1 A buffer solution containing urea flows along one side of a flat membrane, while the same buffer solution without urea flows along the other side of the membrane, at an equal flow rate. At different flow rates the overall mass transfer coefficients were obtained as shown in Table P8.1. When the liquid film mass transfer coefficients of both sides increase by one-third power of the averaged flow rate, estimate the diffusive membrane permeability. Liquid flow rate (cm s1)

Overall mass transfer coefficient, KL (cm s1)

2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0

0.0489 0.0510 0.0525 0.0540

8.2 From the data shown in Figure 8.4, estimate the liquid film mass transfer coefficient of serum protein at each shear rate, and compare the dependence on the shear rate with Equation 8.6. 8.3 Blood cells are separated from blood (hematocrit 40%) by microfiltration, using hollow-fiber membranes with an inside diameter of 300 mm and a length of 20 cm. The average flow rate of blood is 5.5 cm s1. Estimate the filtrate flux. 8.4 Estimate the osmotic pressure of a 3.5 wt% sucrose solution at 293 K. 8.5 The apparent reflection coefficient ( ¼ (Cs0Csp)/Cs0 ; where Csp is the concentration of solute in the permeate) may depend on the filtrate flux, when the real reflection coefficient s is constant. Explain the possible reason for this.

References 1 Chen, W., Parma, F., Patkar, A., Elkin, A., and Sen, S. (2004) Chem. Eng. Prog. 102 (12), 12. 2 Okazaki, M. and Yoshida, F. (1976) Ann. Biomed. Eng. 4, 138. 3 Michaels, A.S. (1968) Chem. Eng. Prog. 64 (12), 31. 4 Porter, M.C. (1972) Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Des. Dev. 11, 234.

Further Reading 1 Zeman, L.J. and Zydney, A.L. (1996) Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration, Marcel Dekker.

5 Colton, C.K., Henderson, L.W., Ford, C.A., and Lysaght, M.J. (1975) J. Lab. Clin. Med. 85, 355. 6 Zydney, A.L. and Colton, C.K. (1982) Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs 28, 408. 7 Eckstein, E.C., Balley, D.G., and Shapiro, A.H. (1977) J. Fluid Mech. 79, 1191. 8 Malbrancq, J.M., Bouveret, E., and Jaffrin, M.Y. (1984) Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs J. 7, 16.

| 143

| 145

9 Cell–Liquid Separation and Cell Disruption

9.1 Introduction

Since, in bioprocesses, the initial concentrations of target products are usually low, separation and purification by the so-called downstream processing (cf. Chapters 11 and 13) are required to obtain the final products. In most cases, the first step in downstream processing is to separate the cells from the fermentation broth. In those cases where intracellular products are required, the cells are first ruptured to solubilize the products, after which a fraction containing the target product is concentrated by a variety of methods, including extraction, ultrafiltration, saltingout, and aqueous two-phase separation. The schemes used to separate the cells from the broth, and further treatment, are shown diagrammatically in Figure 9.1. The fermentation products may be cells themselves, components of the cells (intracellular products), and/or those materials secreted from cells into the fermentation broth (extracellular products). Intracellular products may exist as solutes in cytoplasm, as components bound to the cell membranes, or as aggregate particles termed inclusion bodies.

Figure 9.1 Cell–liquid separation and further treatments. Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

146

| 9 Cell–Liquid Separation and Cell Disruption The separation schemes vary with the state of the products. For example, intracellular products must first be released by disrupting the cells, while those products bound to cell membranes must be solubilized. As the concentrations of products secreted into the fermentation media are generally very low, the recovery and concentration of such products from dilute media represent the most important steps in downstream processing. In this chapter, several cell–liquid separation methods and cell disruption techniques will be discussed.

9.2 Conventional Filtration

The process of filtration separates the particles from a suspension, by forcing a fluid through a filtering medium, or by applying positive pressure to the upstream side or a vacuum to the downstream side. The particles retained on the filtering medium as a deposit are termed ‘‘cake,’’ while the fluid that has passed through the medium is termed the ‘‘filtrate.’’ Conventional filtration, which treats particles larger than several microns in diameter, is used for the separation of relatively large precipitates and microorganisms. Smaller particles can be effectively separated using either centrifugation or microfiltration (see Section 9.3). The two main types of conventional filter used for cell separation are plate filters (filter press) and rotary drum filters: . In the plate filter, a cell suspension is filtered through a flat filtering medium by applying a positive pressure, and the cake of deposited cells must be removed batchwise. . For larger-scale filtration, the continuously operated rotary drum filter is usually used. This type of filter has a rotating drum with a horizontal axis, which is covered with a filtering medium and is partially immersed in a liquid–solid feed mixture contained in a reservoir. The feed is filtered through the filtering medium by applying a vacuum to the interior of the drum. The formed cake is washed with water above the reservoir, and then removed using a scraper, knife, or other device as the drum rotates. The rate of filtration – that is, the rate of permeation of a liquid through a filtering medium – depends on the area of the filtering medium, the viscosity of the liquid, the pressure difference across the filter, and the resistances of the filtering medium and the cake. As liquid flow through a filter is considered to be laminar, the rate of filtration dVf/dt (m3 s1) is proportional to the filter area A (m2) and the pressure difference across the filtering medium Dp (Pa), and is inversely proportional to the liquid viscosity m (Pa s) and the sum of the resistances of the filtering medium RM (m1) and the cake RC (m1). Thus, the filtration flux JF (m s1) is given by:

9.3 Microfiltration

JF ¼

dVf Dp ¼ A dt mðRM þRC Þ

ð9:1Þ

The resistance of the cake can be correlated with the mass of cake per unit filter area: ar Vf Rc ¼ c ð9:2Þ A where Vf is the volume of filtrate (m3), rc is the mass of cake solids per unit volume of filtrate (kg m3), and a is the specific cake resistance (m kg1). In the case of an incompressible cake of relatively large particles (dpW10 mm), the Kozeny –Carman equation holds for the pressure drop through the cake layer, and the specific cake resistance a is given as: a¼

5a2 ð1 eÞ e3 rs

ð9:3Þ

where rS (kg m3) is the density of the particle, a is the specific particle surface area per unit cake volume (m2 m3), and e is the porosity of the cake (–). In many cases, the cakes from fermentation broths are compressible, and the specific cake resistance will increase with the increasing pressure drop through the cake layer, due to changes in the shape of the particles and decrease in the porosity. Thus, the filtration rate rapidly decreases with the progress of filtration, especially in the cases of a compressible cake. Further, fermentation broths containing high concentrations of microorganisms and other biological fluids usually show nonNewtonian behaviors, as stated in Section 2.3. These phenomena will complicate the filtration procedures in bioprocess plants.

9.3 Microfiltration

The cells and cell lysates (fragments of disrupted cells) can be separated from the soluble components by using microfiltration (see Chapter 8) with membranes. This separation method offers following advantages: . . . .

It does not depend on any density difference between the cells and the media. The closed systems used are free from aerosol formation. There is a high retention of cells (W99.9%). There is no need for any filter aid.

Depending on the size of cells and debris, and the desired clarity of the filtrate, microfiltration membranes with pore sizes ranging from 0.01 to 10 mm can be used. In cross-flow filtration (CFF; see Figure 9.2b), the liquid flows parallel to the membrane surface, and so provides a higher filtration flux than does dead-end filtration (Figure 9.2a), where the liquid path is solely through the membrane. In CFF, a lesser amount of the retained species will accumulate on the membrane surface, as some of retained species is swept from the membrane surface by the

| 147

148

| 9 Cell–Liquid Separation and Cell Disruption liquid flowing parallel to the surface. The thickness of the microparticle layer on the membrane surface depends on the balance between the particles transported by the bulk flow towards the membrane, and the sweeping-away of the particle by the cross-flow along the membrane. Similar to the concentration polarization model in ultrafiltration (as described in Section 8.3), an estimation of the filtration flux in microfiltration is possible by using Equation 8.5.

9.4 Centrifugation

In those cases where the particles are small and/or the viscosity of the fluid is high, filtration is not very effective. In such cases, centrifugation is the most common and effective method for separating microorganisms, cells and precipitates from the fermentation broth. Two major types of centrifuge – the tubular-bowl and the disk-stack – are used for continuous, large-scale operation. The tubular centrifuge, which is shown schematically in Figure 9.3a, incorporates a vertical, hollow cylinder with a diameter on the order of 10 cm, which rotates at between 15 000 and 50 000 r.p.m. A suspension is fed from the bottom of the cylinder, whereupon the particles, which are deposited on the inner wall of the cylinder under the influence of centrifugal force, are recovered manually in batchwise fashion. Meanwhile, the liquid flows upwards and is discharged continuously from the top of the tube. The main part of the disk-stack centrifuge is shown schematically in Figure 9.3b. The instrument consists of a stack of conical sheets which rotates on the vertical shaft, with the clearances between the cones being as small as 0.3 mm. The feed is supplied near the bottom center, and passes up through the matching holes in the cones (the liquid paths are shown in Figure 9.3b). The solid particles or

Figure 9.2 Alternative methods of filtration; (a) dead-end filtration, (b) cross-flow filtration.

9.4 Centrifugation

Figure 9.3 The two major types of centrifuge; (a) the tubular-bowl centrifuge, (b) the disk-stack centrifuge.

heavy liquids that are separated by the centrifugal force move to the edge of the discs, along their under-surfaces, and can be removed either continuously or intermittently, without stopping the machine. Occasionally, particle removal may be carried out in batchwise fashion. The light liquid moves to the central portion of the stack, along the upper surfaces of the discs, and is continuously removed. In the ‘‘sedimenter’’ or ‘‘gravity settler’’, the particles in the feed suspension settle due to differences in densities between the particles and the fluid. The settling particle velocity reaches a constant value – the terminal velocity – shortly after the start of sedimentation. The terminal velocity is defined by the following balance of forces acting on the particle: Drag force ¼ Weight force Buoyancy force

ð9:4Þ

When the Reynolds number (dp vt rL/m) is less than 2 – which is always the case for the cell separation – the drag force (kg m s2) can be given by Stokes law: drag force ¼ 3pdp vt m

ð9:5Þ

where dp is the diameter of particle (m), vt is the terminal velocity (ms1), and m is the viscosity of the liquid (Pa s). The weight force (kg m s2) and the buoyancy force (kg m s2) acting on a particle under the influence of gravity are given by

| 149

150

| 9 Cell–Liquid Separation and Cell Disruption Equations 9.6a and 9.6b, respectively. Weight force ¼ ðpd3p rP gÞ=6

ð9:6aÞ

Buoyancy force ¼ ðpd3p rL gÞ=6

ð9:6bÞ

where g is the gravity acceleration (m s2), rP is the density of the particle (kg m3), and rL is the density of the liquid (kg m3). The terminal velocity vt can then be estimated from Equations 9.4 to 9.6: vt ¼

d2p ðrp rL ÞgL 18 m

ð9:7Þ

In the case of a centrifugal separator (i.e., a centrifuge), the acceleration due to centrifugal force, which should be used in place of g, is given as ro2, where r is the radial distance from the central rotating axis (m) and o is the angular velocity of rotation (radian s1). Thus, the terminal velocity vt (m s1) is given as: vt ¼

d2p ðrp rL Þ 18 m

ro2

ð9:8Þ

The sedimentation coefficient, S, as defined by Equation 9.9, is sometimes used: vt ¼ Sro2

ð9:9Þ

where S (s) is the sedimentation coefficient in Svedberg units. The value obtained in water at 20 1C is 1013 s. Example 9.1

Using a tubular-bowl centrifuge rotating at 3600 r.p.m., determine the terminal velocity of E. coli in a saline solution (density rL ¼ 1.0 g cm3) at a radial distance 10 cm from the axis. The cell size of E. coli is approximately 0.8 mm 2 mm, with a volume of 1.0 mm3. Its density rP is 1.1 g cm3. In calculation, it can be approximated as a sphere of 1.25 mm diameter. Solution

Substitution of these values into Equation 9.8 gives vt ¼

ð1:25 104 Þ2 0:1 10 ð2p 60Þ2 ¼ 1:2 102 cm s1 18 0:01

In order to separate the particles in a suspension, the maximum allowable flow rate through the tubular-bowl centrifuge, as shown schematically in Figure 9.3a, can be estimated as follows [1]. A suspension is fed to the bottom of the bowl at a

9.5 Cell Disruption 3 1

volumetric flow rate of Q (m s ), and the clarified liquid is removed from the top. The sedimentation velocity of particles in the radial direction (vt ¼ dr/dt) can be given by Equations 9.7 and 9.8 with use of the terminal velocity under gravitational force vg (m s1) and the gravitational acceleration g (m s2): vt ¼

dr ro2 ¼ vg g dt

ð9:10Þ

When the radial distances from the rotational axis of a centrifuge to the liquid surface and the bowl wall are r1 and r2, respectively, the axial liquid velocity u (m s1) is given by u¼

dz Q ¼ dt pðr22 r12 Þ

ð9:11Þ

The separated particles should reach the wall when the feed leaves the top end of the tube, as shown by the locus of a particle in Figure 9.3a. The elimination of dt from Equations 9.10 and 9.11 and integration with boundary conditions (r ¼ r1 at z ¼ 0 and r ¼ r2 at z ¼ Z) give the maximum flow rate for perfect removal of particles from the feed suspension. Q ¼ vg

pZðr22 r12 Þo2 gln rr21

ð9:12Þ

The accumulated solids can then be recovered batchwise from the bowl.

9.5 Cell Disruption

In those cases where the intracellular products are required, the cells must first be disrupted. Some products may be present in the solution within the cytoplasm, while others may be insoluble and exist as membrane-bound proteins or small insoluble particles called inclusion bodies. In the latter case, these must be solubilized before further purification. Cell disruption methods can be classified as either nonmechanical and mechanical [2]. Cell walls vary greatly in their strength. Typical mammalian cells are fragile and can be easily ruptured by using a low shearing force or a change in the osmotic pressure. In contrast, many microorganisms such as E. coli, yeasts, and plant cells have rigid cell walls, the disruption of which requires high shearing forces or even bead milling. The most frequently used cell rupture techniques, with the mechanical methods arranged in order of increasing strength of the shear force acting on the cell walls, are listed in Table 9.1. Any method used should be sufficiently mild that the desired components are not inactivated. In general, nonmechanical methods are milder and may be used in conjunction with some mild mechanical methods.

| 151

152

| 9 Cell–Liquid Separation and Cell Disruption Table 9.1 Methods of cell disruption.

Method

Treatments

Mechanical methods Waring-type blender Ultrasonics Bead mills High-pressure homogenization

Homogenization by stirring blades Application of ultrasonic energy to cell suspensions by sonicator Mechanical grinding of cell suspensions with grinding media such as glass beads Abrupt pressure change and cell destruction by discharging the cell suspension flow through flow valves, under pressure

Nonmechanical methods Osmotic shock Freezing Enzymatic digestion Chemical solubilization

Introduction of cells to a solution of low osmolarity Repetition of freezing and melting Lysis of cell walls containing polysaccharides by lysozyme Solubilization of cell walls by surfactants, alkali, or organic solvents

Ultrasonication (on the order of 20 kHz) causes high-frequency pressure fluctuations in the liquid, leading to the repeated formation and collapse of bubbles. Although cell disruption by ultrasonication is used extensively on the laboratory scale, its use on the large scale is limited by the energy available for using a sonicator tip. Bead mills or high-pressure homogenizers are generally used for the large-scale disruption of cell walls. However, the optimum operating conditions must first be determined, using trial-and-error procedures, in order to achieve a high recovery of the desired components. The separation of cell debris (fragments of cell walls) and organelles from a cell homogenate by centrifugation may often be difficult, essentially because the densities of these are close to that of the solution, which may be highly viscous. Separation by microfiltration represents a possible alternative approach in such a case. Example 9.2

Using a tubular-bowl centrifuge, calculate the sedimentation velocity of a 70S ribosome (from E. coli, diameter 0.02 mm) in water at 20 1C. The rotational speed and distance from the center are 30 000 r.p.m. and 10 cm, respectively. Solution

By using Equation 9.9, the sedimentation velocity is vt ¼ 70 1013 10 ð2p 500Þ2 ¼ 6:9 104 cm s1

References

Because of the much smaller size of the ribosome, this value is much lower than that of E. coli obtained in Example 9.1.

" Problems

9.1 An aqueous suspension is filtered through a plate filter under a constant pressure of 0.2 MPa. After a 10 min filtration, 0.10 m3 of a filtrate is obtained. When the resistance of a filtering medium RM can be neglected, estimate the volumes of the filtrate after 20 and 30 min. 9.2 Albumin solutions (1, 2, and 5 wt%) are continuously ultrafiltered through a flat plate filter with a channel height of 2 mm. Under cross-flow filtration with a transmembrane pressure of 0.5 MPa, steady-state filtrate fluxes are obtained as given in Table P9.2. Liquid flow rate (cm s1)

Albumin concentration (wt%)

5 10

1 0.018 0.022

2 0.014 0.018

5 0.010 0.012

Determine the saturated albumin concentration at the gel-layer surface and the liquid film mass transfer coefficient. 9.3 Derive Equation 9.12. 9.4 A suspension of E. coli is to be centrifuged in a tubular-bowl centrifuge which has a length of 1 m and is rotating at 15 000 r.p.m. The radii to the surface (r1) and bottom (r2) of the liquid are 5 and 10 cm, respectively. A cell of E. coli can be approximated as a 1.25 mm diameter sphere with a density of 1.1 g cm3. Determine the maximum flow rate for the complete removal of cells. 9.5 How many times g should the centrifugal force be, in order to obtain a tenfold higher sedimentation velocity of a 70S ribosome than that obtained in Example 9.2? References 1 Doran, P.M. (1995) Bioprocess Engineering Principles, Academic Press. 2 Wheelwright, S.M. (1991) Protein Purification, Hanser.

| 153

This page intentionally left blank

| 155

10 Sterilization

10.1 Introduction

If a culture medium or a part of the equipment used for fermentation becomes contaminated by living foreign microorganisms, the target microorganisms must grow in competition with the contaminating microorganisms, which will not only consume nutrients but also may produce harmful products. Thus, not only the medium but also all of the fermentation equipment being used, including the tubes and valves, must be sterilized prior to the start of fermentation, so that they are perfectly free from any living microorganisms and spores. In the case of aerobic fermentations, air supplied to the fermentor should also be free from contaminating microorganisms. Sterilization can be accomplished by several means, including heat, chemicals, radiation [ultraviolet (UV) or g-ray], and microfiltration. Heat is widely used for the sterilization of media and fermentation equipment, while microfiltration, using polymeric microporous membranes, can be performed to sterilize the air and media that might contain heat-sensitive components. Among the various heating methods, moist heat (i.e., steam) is highly effective and very economical for performing the sterilization of fermentation set-ups.

10.2 Kinetics of the Thermal Death of Cells

In this section, we will discuss the kinetics of thermal cell death and sterilization. The rates of thermal death for most microorganisms and spores can be given by Equation 10.1, which is similar in form to the rate equation for the first-order chemical reaction, such as Equation 3.10.

dn ¼ kd n dt

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

ð10:1Þ

156

| 10 Sterilization where n is the number of cells in a system. The temperature dependence of the specific death rate kd is given by Equation 10.2, which is similar to Equation 3.6: kd ¼ kd0 eEa =RT

ð10:2Þ

Combining Equations 10.1 and 10.2, and integration of the resulting equation from time 0 to t, gives n ln ¼ kd0 n0

Zt

eEa =RT dt

ð10:3Þ

0

where Ea is the activation energy for thermal death. For example, Ea for E. coli is 530 kJ gmol1 [1]. In theory, reducing the number of living cells to absolute zero by heat sterilization would require an infinite time. In practical sterilization, the case of contamination must be reduced not to zero, but rather to a very low probability. For example, in order to reduce cases of contamination to 1 in 1000 fermentations, the final cell number nf must be less than 0.001. Sterilization conditions are usually determined on the basis on this criterion.

10.3 Batch Heat Sterilization of Culture Media

The batchwise heat sterilization of a culture medium contained in a fermentor consists of heating, holding, and cooling cycles. The heating cycle is carried out by direct steam sparging, electrical heating, or by heat exchange with condensing steam, as shown schematically in Figure 10.1, while the cooling cycle utilizes water. The time–temperature relationships during the heating, holding, and cooling cycles required to integrate Equation 10.3 can be obtained experimentally. In the case where experimental measurements are not practical, theoretical equations [2] can be used, depending on the method used for heating and cooling (Table 10.1). By applying Equation 10.3 to the heating, holding, and cooling cycles, the final number of viable cells nf can be estimated by: ln

nf nheat nhold nf ¼ ln þ ln þ ln n0 n0 nheat nhold

ð10:4Þ

where n0, nheat and nhold are the numbers of viable cells at the beginning and at the ends of heating and holding cycles, respectively. Since the temperature is kept constant during the holding cycle, ln

nheat ¼ kd0 eEa =RT thold nhold

ð10:5Þ

If the degree of sterilization (nf/n0) and the temperature during the holding cycle are given, the holding time can be calculated.

10.3 Batch Heat Sterilization of Culture Media

Figure 10.1 Modes of heat transfer for batch sterilization. (a) Direct steam sparging; (b) constant rate heating by electric heater; (c) heating by condensing steam (isothermal heat source); (d) cooling by water (nonisothermal heat sink).

Table 10.1 Temperature versus time relationships in batch

sterilization by various heating methods. Heating method

Temperature (T)–time (t) relationship

Heating by direct steam sparging

Hms t T ¼ T0 þ cp ðMþm s tÞ

Heating with a constant rate of heat flow, for example, electric heating Indirect heating by saturated steam

T ¼ T0 þ cpqtM UA T ¼ TN þ ðT0 TN Þexpð Mc Þt p

A ¼ area for heat transfer; cp ¼ specific heat capacity of medium; H ¼ heat content of steam relative to initial medium temperature; ms ¼ mass flow rate of steam; M ¼ initial mass of medium; q ¼ rate of heat transfer; t ¼ time; T ¼ temperature; T0 ¼ initial temperature of medium; TN ¼ temperature of heat source; U ¼ overall heat transfer coefficient.

Example 10.1

Derive an equation for the temperature–time relationship of a medium in a fermentor during indirect heating by saturated steam (Figure 10.1c). Use the nomenclature given in Table 10.1. Solution

The rate of heat transfer q to the medium at T 1K from steam condensing at TS 1K is q ¼ UAðTS TÞ

| 157

158

| 10 Sterilization Transferred heat raises the temperature of the medium (mass M and specific heat cp) at a rate dT/dt. Thus, Mcp

dT ¼ UAðTS TÞ dt

Integration and rearrangement give T ¼ TS þ ðT0 TS Þexpð

UA Þt Mcp

where T0 is the initial temperature of the medium.

10.4 Continuous Heat Sterilization of Culture Media

Two typical systems of continuous heat sterilization of culture media are shown schematically Figure 10.2a and b. In the system heated by direct steam injection (Figure 10.2a), the steam heats the medium to a sterilization temperature quickly, and the medium flows through the holding section at a constant temperature, if the heat loss in this section is negligible. The sterile medium is cooled by adiabatic expansion through an expansion valve. In the indirect heating system (Figure 10.2b), the medium is heated indirectly by steam, usually in a plate-and-frame-type heater, before entering the holding section. In both systems the medium is preheated in a heat exchanger by the hot medium leaving the holding section. In such continuous systems, the medium temperature can be raised more rapidly to the sterilizing temperature than in batch sterilization, and the residence time in the holding section mainly determines the degree of sterilization. If the flow of the medium in the holding section were an ideal plug flow, the degree of sterilization could be estimated from the average residence time thold in the holding section by Equation 10.6: ln

n0 ¼ kd0 eEa =RT thold nf

ð10:6Þ

The usual velocity distributions in a steady flow of liquid through a tube are shown in Figure 2.4. In either laminar or turbulent flow, the velocity at the tube wall is zero, but is maximum at the tube axis. The ratio of the average velocity to the maximum velocity v/umax is 0.5 for laminar flow, and approximately 0.8 for turbulent flow when the Reynolds number is 106. Thus, if design calculations of a continuous sterilization unit were based on the average velocity, some portion of a medium would be insufficiently sterilized and might contain living microorganisms. Deviation from the ideal plug flow can be described by the dispersion model, which uses the axial eddy diffusivity EDz (m2 s1) as an indicator of the degree of mixing in the flow direction. If a flow in a tube is plug flow, the axial dispersion is zero. On the other hand, if the fluid in a tube is perfectly mixed, the axial

10.4 Continuous Heat Sterilization of Culture Media

Figure 10.2 Continuous sterilizing systems.

dispersion is infinity. For turbulent flow in a tube, the dimensionless Peclet number (Pe) defined by the tube diameter (v d/EDz) is correlated as a function of the Reynolds number, as shown in Figure 10.3 [3]. Here, EDz is the axial eddy diffusivity, d is the tube diameter, and v is the velocity of liquid averaged over the cross-section of the flow channel.

Figure 10.3 Correlation for axial dispersion coefficient in pipe flow, (Pe)1 versus (Re).

| 159

160

| 10 Sterilization Figure 10.4 [4] shows the results for theoretical calculations [5] for the ratio n, the number of viable cells leaving the holding section of a continuous sterilizer, to n0, the number of viable cells entering the section, as a function of the Peclet number ¨hler number (Da), (Pe), as defined by Equation 10.7, and the dimensionless Damko as defined by Equation 10.8: ðPeÞ ¼ ðvL=EDz Þ

ð10:7Þ

ðDaÞ ¼ kd L=v

ð10:8Þ

where kd is the specific death rate constant (cf. Equation 10.2) and L is the length of the holding tube.

Example 10.2

A medium is to be continuously sterilized at a flow rate of 2 m3 h1 in a sterilizer by direct steam injection (Figure 10.2a). The temperature of a holding section is maintained at 120 1C, and the time for heating and cooling can be neglected. The bacterial count of the entering medium, 2 1012 m3, must be reduced to such an extent that only one organism can survive during 30 days of continuous operation. The holding section of the sterilizer is a tube, 0.15 m in the internal diameter. The specific death rate of bacterial spores in the medium is 121 h1 at 120 1C, the medium density r ¼ 950 kg m3; the medium viscosity m ¼ 1 kg m1 h1. Calculate the required length of the holding section of the sterilizer (a) Assuming ideal plug flow. (b) Considering the effect of the axial dispersion.

Solution

(a) ( ) n0 2 1012 ðm3 Þ 2ðm3 h1 Þ 24ðh=dayÞ 30ðdayÞ ln ¼ ln 1 n ¼ 35:6 Average holding time: thold ¼ ln

n0 =kd ¼ 0:294 h n

The average medium velocity in the holding section: v ¼ 2=ðp 0:0752 Þ ¼ 113 m h1

10.4 Continuous Heat Sterilization of Culture Media

The required length of the holding section: L ¼ 113 0:294 ¼ 33:2 m (b) The Reynolds number of the medium flowing through the holding tube is ðReÞ ¼

0:15 113 950 ¼ 1:64 104 1

From Figure 10.3 (Pe) is approximately 2.5 at (Re) ¼ 1.64 104, and EDz ¼ ð113 0:15Þ=2:5 ¼ 6:8 Assuming a length of the holding section of 36 m, the Peclet number is given as ðPeÞ ¼

vL 113 36 ¼ 598 ¼ EDz 6:8

ðDaÞ ¼

kd L 121 36 ¼ ¼ 38:5 v 113

and

From Figure 10.4, the value of n/n0 is approximately 3.5 1016, and almost equal to that required in this problem. Thus, the length of the holding section should be 36 m.

Figure 10.4 Theoretical plots of n/n0 as a function of (Pe) and (Da) [4].

| 161

162

| 10 Sterilization 10.5 Sterilizing Filtration

Microorganisms in liquids and gases can be removed by microfiltration; hence, air supplied to aerobic fermentors can be sterilized in this way. Membrane filters are often used for the sterilization of liquids, such as culture media for fermentation (especially for tissue culture), and also for the removal of microorganisms from various fermentation products, the heating of which should be avoided. Sterilizing filtration is usually performed using commercially available membrane filter units of standard design. These are normally installed in special cartridges that often are made from polypropylene. Figure 10.5 [6] shows the sectional views of a membrane filter of folding fan-like structure, which uses a pleated membrane to increase the membrane area. In selecting a membrane material, its pH compatibility and wettability should be considered. Some hydrophobic membranes require prewetting with a low-surfacetension solvent such as alcohol, whereas cartridges containing membranes are often presterilized using gamma irradiation. Such filter systems do not require assembly and steam sterilization. Naturally, the size of the membrane pores should depend on the size of microbes to be filtered. For example, membranes with 0.2 mm pores are often used to sterilize culture media, while membranes with 0.45 mm pores are often used for the removal of microbes from culture products. It should be noted here that the socalled ‘‘pore size’’ of a membrane is the size of largest pores on the membrane surface. The sizes of the pores on the surface are not uniform; moreover, the pore sizes usually decrease with increasing depth from the membrane surface. Such a pore size gradient will increase the total filter capacity, as smaller microbes and particles are captured within the inner pores of the membrane. The so-called ‘‘bubble point’’ of a membrane – a measure of the membrane pore size – can be determined by using standard apparatus. When determining the bubble point of small, disk-shaped membrane samples (47 mm in diameter), the membrane is supported from above by a screen. The disk is then flooded with a liquid, so that a pool of liquid is left on top. Air is then slowly introduced from

Figure 10.5 A membrane filter of folding fan-like structure.

10.5 Sterilizing Filtration

below, and the pressure increased in stepwise manner. When the first steady stream of bubbles to emerge from the membrane is observed, that pressure is termed the ‘‘bubble point.’’ The membrane pore size can be calculated from the measured bubble point Pb by using the following, dimensionally consistent Equation 10.9. This is based on a simplistic model (see Figure 10.6) which equates the air pressure in the cylindrical pore to the cosine vector of the surface tension force along the pore surface [7]: Pb ¼ K2prscosy=ðpr 2 Þ ¼ Kð2sÞcosy=r

ð10:9Þ

where K is the adjustment factor, r is the maximum pore radius (m), s is the surface tension (N m1), and y the contact angle. The higher the bubble point, the smaller the pore size. The real pore sizes at the membrane surface can be measured using electron microscopy, although in practice the bubble point measurement is much simpler. The degree of removal of microbes of a certain size by a membrane is normally expressed by the reduction ratio, R. For example, if a membrane of a certain pore size is fed 107 microbes per cm2 and stops them all except one, the value of log reduction ratio log R is 7. It has been shown [8] that a log–log plot of R (ordinate) against the bubble points (abscissa) of a series of membranes will produce a straight line with a slope of 2. The rates of filtration of microbes (particles) at a constant pressure difference decrease with time, due to an accumulation of filtered microbes on the surface and inside the pores of the membrane. Hence, in order to maintain a constant filtration rate, the pressure difference across the membrane should be increased with

Figure 10.6 Pore size estimation by bubble point measurement.

| 163

164

| 10 Sterilization time due to the increasing filtration resistance. Such data as are required for practical operation can be obtained with fluids containing microbes with the use of real filter units.

" Problems

10.1 A culture medium that is contaminated with 1010 m3 microbial spores of microorganisms will be heat-sterilized with steam of 121 1C. At 121 1C, the specific death rate of the spores can be assumed to be 3.2 min1 [1]. When the contamination must be reduced to one in 1000 fermentations, estimate the required sterilization time. 10.2 A culture medium weighing 10 000 kg (25 1C) contained in a fermentor is to be sterilized by the direct sparging of saturated steam (0.285 MPa, 132 1C). The flow rate of the injected steam is 1000 kg h1, and the enthalpies of saturated steam (132 1C) and water (25 1C) are 2723 kJ kg1 and 105 kJ kg1, respectively. The heat capacity of the medium is 4.18 kJ kg1 K1. Estimate the time required to heat the medium from 25 1C to 121 1C. 10.3 When a culture medium flows in a circular tube as a laminar flow, determine the fraction of the medium that passes through the tube with a higher velocity than the averaged linear velocity. 10.4 A medium, which flows through an 80 mm i.d. stainless tube at a flow rate of 1.0 m3 h1, is to be continuously sterilized by indirect heating with steam. The temperature of the holding section is maintained at 120 1C. The number of bacterial spores of 1011 m3 in the entering medium must be reduced to 0.01 m3. The specific death rate of the bacterial spores in the medium, medium density and medium viscosity at 120 1C are 180 h1, 950 kg m3 and 1.0 kg m1 h1, respectively. Calculate the required length of the holding section considering the effect of the axial dispersion. References 1 Aiba, S., Humphrey, A.E., and Millis, N.F. (1973) Biochemical Engineering, 2nd edn, University of Tokyo Press. 2 Deindoerfer, F.H. and Humphrey, A.E. (1959) Appl. Microbiol., 7, 256. 3 Levenspiel, O. (1958) Ind. Eng. Chem., 50, 343. 4 Aiba, S., Humphrey, A.E., and Millis, N.F. (1973) Biochemical Engineering, 2nd edn, University of Tokyo Press, p. 242.

5 Yagi, S. and Miyauchi, T. (1953) Kagakukogaku (in Japanese), 17, 382. 6 Cardona, M. and Blosse, P. (2005) Chem. Eng. Prog., 101, 34. 7 Zeman, I.J. and Zydney, A.L. (1996) Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration, Marcel Dekker. 8 Johnston, P.R. (2003) Fluid Sterilization by Filtration, 3rd edn, Interpharm Press.

| 165

11 Adsorption and Chromatography

11.1 Introduction

Adsorption is a physical phenomenon in which some components (adsorbates) in a fluid (liquid or gas) move to, and accumulate on, the surface of an appropriate solid (adsorbent) that is in contact with the fluid. With use of suitable adsorbents, desired components or contaminants in fluids can be separated. In bioprocesses, the adsorption of a component in a liquid is widely performed by using a variety of adsorbents, including porous charcoal, silica, polysaccharides, and synthetic resins. Such adsorbents of high adsorption capacities usually have very large surface areas per unit volume. The adsorbates in the fluids are adsorbed at the adsorbent surfaces due to van der Waals, electrostatic, biospecific or other interactions, and thus become separated from the bulk of the fluid. In practice, adsorption can be operated either batchwise in mixing tanks, or continuously in fixed-bed or fluidized-bed adsorbers. In adsorption calculations, both equilibrium relationships and adsorption rates must be considered. In gas or liquid column chromatography, the adsorbent particles are packed into a column, after which a small amount of fluid containing several solutes to be separated is applied to the top of the column. Each solute in the applied fluid moves down the column at a rate, which is determined by the distribution coefficient between the adsorbent and the fluid, and emerges at the outlet of the column as a separated band. Liquid column chromatography is the most common method used in the separation of proteins and other bioproducts.

11.2 Equilibria in Adsorption 11.2.1 Linear Equilibrium

The simplest expression for adsorption equilibrium, for an adsorbate A, is given as rs qA ¼ K C A Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

ð11:1Þ

166

| 11 Adsorption and Chromatography where rs is the mass of a unit volume of adsorbent particles (kg-adsorbent m3), qA is the adsorbed amount of A averaged over the inside surface of the adsorbent (kmol-adsorbate/kg-adsorbent), CA is the concentration of adsorbate A in the fluid phase (kmol m3), and K is the distribution coefficient between the fluid and solid phases (–), which usually decreases with increasing temperature. The adsorption equilibria for a constant temperature are known as adsorption isotherms. 11.2.2 Adsorption Isotherms of Langmuir-Type and Freundlich-Type

Some components in a gas or liquid interact with sites, termed adsorption sites, on a solid surface by virtue of van der Waals forces, electrostatic interactions, or chemical binding forces. The interaction may be selective to specific components in the fluids, depending on the characteristics of both the solid and the components, and thus the specific components are concentrated on the solid surface. It is assumed that adsorbates are reversibly adsorbed at adsorption sites with homogeneous adsorption energy, and that adsorption is under equilibrium at the fluid– adsorbent interface. Let Ns (m2) be the number of adsorption sites, and Na (m2) the number of molecules of A adsorbed at equilibrium, both per unit surface area of the adsorbent. Then, the rate of adsorption r (kmol m3 s1) should be proportional to the concentration of adsorbate A in the fluid phase and the number of unoccupied adsorption sites. Moreover, the rate of desorption should be proportional to the number of occupied sites per unit surface area. Here, we need not consider the effects of mass transfer, as we are discussing equilibrium conditions at the interface. At equilibrium, these two rates should balance. Thus, r ¼ kCA ðNs Na Þ ¼ k0 Na

ð11:2Þ

where k (s1) and ku (kmol m3 s1) are the adsorption and desorption rate constants, respectively. The ratio of the amount of adsorbed adsorbate qA (kmoladsorbate/kg-adsorbent) at equilibrium to the maximum capacity of adsorption qAm (kmol-adsorbate/kg-adsorbent) corresponding to complete coverage of adsorption sites is given as the ratio Na/Ns. Then, from Equation 11.2 Na qA a CA ¼ ¼ Ns qAm 1 þ a CA

ð11:3Þ

where a ¼ k/ku (m3 kmol1). This equation is known as the Langmuir-type isotherm, which is shown in Figure 11.1. This isotherm should hold for monolayer adsorption in both gas and liquid phases. In practice, the following Freundlich-type empirical isotherm can be used for many liquid–solid adsorption systems: rs qA ¼ K 00 CAb where Kv and b are the empirical constants independent of CA.

ð11:4Þ

11.3 Rates of Adsorption into Adsorbent Particles

Figure 11.1 The Langmuir-type adsorption isotherm.

The isotherms given by Equations 11.1, 11.3 and 11.4, or other types of isotherms, can be used to calculate the equilibrium concentrations of adsorbates in fluid and solid phases in the batch and fixed-bed adsorption processes discussed below.

11.3 Rates of Adsorption into Adsorbent Particles

The apparent rates of adsorption into adsorbent particles usually involve the resistances for mass transfer of adsorbate across the fluid film around adsorbent particles and through the pores within particles. Adsorption per se at adsorption sites occurs very rapidly, and is not the rate-controlling step in most cases. Now, we consider a case where an adsorbate in a liquid is adsorbed by adsorbent particles. If the mass transfer across the liquid film around the adsorbent particles is rate-controlling, then the adsorption rate is given as: rs

dqA ¼ kL a ðCA CAi Þ dt

ð11:5Þ

where rs is mass of adsorbent particles per unit volume (kg m3), kL is the liquidphase mass transfer coefficient (m h1), a is the outside surface area of adsorbent particles per unit liquid volume (m2 m3), CA is the adsorbate concentration in the liquid main body, and CAi is the liquid phase adsorbate concentration at the liquid–particle interface (kmol m3). The mass transfer coefficient kL can be estimated, for example, by Equation 6.28.

| 167

168

| 11 Adsorption and Chromatography In the case where the mass transfer within the pores of adsorbent particles is rate-controlling, the driving force for adsorption based on the liquid phase is given as (CACA ), where CA (kmol m3) (¼ rs qA =K) is the liquid phase concentration of adsorbate A in equilibrium with the averaged amount of adsorbed A in adsorbent particles qA (kmol/kg-adsorbent) [1]. In adsorption systems, the rate-controlling step usually changes from the mass transfer across the liquid-film around the adsorbent particles to the diffusion through the pores of particles as adsorption proceeds. In such cases, the rate of adsorption can be approximated with use of the overall mass transfer coefficient KL (m h1) based on the liquid phase concentration driving force, which is termed the linear driving force assumption: rs

d qA ¼ KL aðCA CA Þ dt

ð11:6Þ

In some cases, surface diffusion – that is, the diffusion of adsorbate molecules along the interface in the pores – may contribute substantially to the mass transfer of the adsorbate, and in such cases the effective diffusivity may become much larger than the case with pore diffusion only.

11.4 Single- and Multi-Stage Operations for Adsorption

In practical operations, a component in a liquid can be adsorbed either batchwise in one mixing tank, or in several mixing tanks in series. Such operations are termed single-stage and multi-stage operations, respectively. For this, the feed liquid containing a component to be separated is mixed with an adsorbent in the tank(s), and equilibrium is reached after sufficient contact time. In this section, we consider both single- and multi-stage adsorption operations. Suppose that V m3 of a feed containing A at a concentration CA0 and w kg of adsorbent (qA ¼ qA0) are contacted batchwise. The material balance for the solute at adsorption equilibrium is given as w ðqA qA0 Þ ¼ VðCA0 CA Þ

ð11:7Þ

where qA is the amount of A adsorbed by unit mass of adsorbent (kmol-adsorbate/ kg-adsorbent), and CA is the equilibrium concentration of adsorbate A in the liquid (kmol m3). As shown in Figure 11.2, this relationship is represented by a straight line with a slope of V/w passing through the point, CA0, qA0, while the intersection of the straight line with the equilibrium curve gives values of qA and CA. With use of a large amount of adsorbent, most of the solute can be adsorbed. In order to increase the recovery of adsorbate by adsorption, and to reduce the amount of adsorbent required to attain a specific recovery, a multistage adsorption operation can be used. In such an operation (as shown in Figure 11.3), a liquid

11.4 Single- and Multi-Stage Operations for Adsorption

Figure 11.2 Single-stage adsorption process.

Figure 11.3 Multistage adsorption.

solution is successively contacted at each stage with adsorbent. In such a scheme, the relationship given by Equation 11.7 can be applied to each stage, with assumptions similar to the single-stage case, and the concentration of the adsorbate in the liquid from the Nth stage is given by the following equation, if an equal amount (w/N) of fresh adsorbent (qA ¼ 0) is used in each stage: CA;N ¼

CA0 f1 þ Kðw=NVÞgN

ð11:8Þ

Adsorbate recovery increases with increasing number of stages, as shown below. Example 11.1

For an adsorption system, the distribution coefficient of Equation 11.1 is 3.0 and the feed concentration is CA0. Assuming equilibrium, compare the exit concentrations CA1 and CA3 in cases (a) and (b). (a) Single-stage adsorption in which the amount of adsorbent used per unit feed volume is 1.0 kg m3. (b) Three-stage adsorption in which the amount of adsorbent used in each stage per unit feed volume is 1/3 kg m3.

| 169

170

| 11 Adsorption and Chromatography Solution

The concentration of the adsorbate in the liquid from the third stage can be obtained by Equation 11.8 CA3 ¼ CA0 =ð1 þ 3=3Þ3 ¼ CA0 =8 For single-stage adsorption, CA1 is given as CA1 ¼ CA0 =ð1 þ 3Þ Thus, CA3/CA1 ¼ 1/2

11.5 Adsorption in Fixed Beds 11.5.1 Fixed-Bed Operation

A variety of adsorber types exists, including stirred tanks (see Section 7.4), fixedbed adsorbers, and fluidized-bed adsorbers. Among these, the fixed-bed adsorbers are the most widely used. In the downflow fixed-bed adsorber (see Figure 11.4), a feed solution containing adsorbate(s) at a concentration of CA0 is fed continuously to the top of a column packed with adsorbent particles, and flows down at an interstitial liquid velocity u (m s1); that is, the liquid velocity through the void of the bed. Initially, adsorption takes place in the adsorption zone in the upper region of the bed, but as the saturation of the adsorbent particles progresses, the adsorption zone moves downwards with a velocity which is much slower than that of the feed flowing down the column. When the adsorption zone reaches the bottom of the bed, the adsorbate concentration in the solution coming from the column bottom (i.e., the effluent) begins to increase, and finally becomes equal to the feed concentration CA0. The curve showing the adsorbate concentrations in the effluent plotted against time or the effluent volume – the breakthrough curve – is shown schematically in Figure 11.5. Usually, the supply of the feed solution is stopped when the ratio of the adsorbate concentration in the effluent to that in the feed has reached a predetermined value (the ‘‘break point’’). Then, in the elution operation the adsorbate bound to the adsorbent particles is desorbed (i.e., eluted) by supplying a suitable fluid (eluent) that contains no adsorbates. In this way, adsorbent particles are regenerated to their initial conditions. However, in some cases the column may be re-packed with new adsorbent particles. As can be understood from Figure 11.5, the amount of adsorbate lost in the effluent, and the extent of the adsorption capacity of the fixed-bed utilized at the break point, depends on the shape of the breakthrough curve and on the

11.5 Adsorption in Fixed Beds

Figure 11.4 Adsorption in a fixed bed.

selected break point. In most cases, the time required from the start of feeding to the break point is a sufficient index of the performance of a fixed-bed adsorber. A simplified method to predict the break time will be discussed in the following section.

Figure 11.5 Breakthrough curve of a fixed-bed adsorber.

| 171

172

| 11 Adsorption and Chromatography 11.5.2 Estimation of the Break Point

With favorable adsorption isotherms, in which the slope of adsorption isotherms dq/dc decreases with increasing adsorbate concentration (as shown in Figure 11.1), the moving velocity of the adsorption zone is faster at high concentrations of the adsorbed component – that is, near the inlet of the bed. Thus, the adsorption zone becomes narrower as adsorption in the bed progresses. On the other hand, a finite rate of mass transfer of the adsorbed component and flow irregularity will broaden the width of the zone. These two compensating effects cause the shape of the adsorption zone to be unchanged through the bed, except in the vicinity of the inlet. This situation is termed the ‘‘constant pattern of the adsorption zone.’’ When the constant pattern of the adsorption zone holds, and the amount of an adsorbate is much larger than its concentration in the feed solution, then the velocity of movement of the adsorption zone va is given as follows: va ¼

e u CA0 rb qA0

ð11:9Þ

where e is the void fraction of the particle bed (–), u is the interstitial liquid velocity (i.e., the liquid velocity through the void of the bed, m s1), rb is the packed density of the bed (kg m3), and qA0 is the adsorbed amount of adsorbate equilibrium with the feed concentration CA0 (kmol/kg-adsorbent). Under the constant pattern, the term dq/dc should be constant. The integration of dqA/dCA ¼ constant with the boundary conditions CA ¼ 0

qA ¼ 0

CA ¼ CA0

qA ¼ qA0

gives the following relationship: qA ¼

qA0 CA CA0

ð11:10Þ

The time required from the start of feeding to the break point can be estimated with the assumption of the constant pattern stated above. Thus, substitution of Equation 11.10 into Equation 11.6 gives the following equation for the rate of adsorption: rb

d qA rb qA0 dCA ¼ ¼ KL aðCA CA Þ dt CA0 dt

ð11:11Þ

Integration of this equation between the break point and exhaustion point, where the ratio of the adsorbate concentration in the effluent to that in the feed becomes a value of (1 – the ratio at the break point), gives r qA0 tE tB ¼ b KL a CA0

C ZAE CAB

dCA CA CA

ð11:12Þ

11.5 Adsorption in Fixed Beds

where the subscripts B and E indicate the break and exhaustion points, respectively. The averaged value of the overall volumetric coefficient KL a can be used for practical calculation, although this varies with the progress of adsorption. The velocity of the movement of the adsorption zone under the constant pattern conditions is given by Equation 11.9, and thus the break time tB is given by approximating that the fractional residual capacity of the adsorption zone is 0.5. 2 3 ZCE Z za eu dCA 7 2 ¼ rb qA0 6 ð11:13Þ tB ¼ 4Z 5 2KL a e u CA0 CA CA va CB

where za is the length of the adsorption zone given as va (tEtB). Numerical integration of the above equation is possible in cases where the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms hold. Example 11.2

An adsorbate A is adsorbed in a fixed-bed adsorber that is 25 cm high and packed with active charcoal particles of 0.6 mm diameter. The concentration of A in a feed solution CA is 1.1 mol m3, and the feed is supplied to the adsorber at an interstitial velocity of 1.6 m h1. The adsorption equilibrium of A is given by the following Freundlich-type isotherm. rbq ¼ 1270 CA0:11 where the units of rb, q, and CA are kg m3, mol kg1, and mol m3, respectively. The packed density of the bed, the void fraction of the particle bed, and the density of the feed solution are 386 kg m3, 0.5 and 1000 kg m3, respectively. The averaged overall volumetric coefficient of mass transfer KLa is 9.2 h1, and a constant pattern of the adsorption zone can be assumed in this case. Estimate the break point at which the concentration of A in the effluent becomes 0.1 CA0. Solution

From the Freundlich-type isotherm 0:11 qA CA ¼ qA0 CA0 where CA is the liquid phase concentration of A in equilibrium with qA. Since the assumption of the constant pattern holds, Equation 11.10 is substituted in the above equation. CA ¼ CA0

CA CA0

1 0:11

| 173

174

| 11 Adsorption and Chromatography Substitution of CA into the integral term of Equation 11.13 and integration from CAB ¼ 0.1 CA0 to CAE ¼ 0.9 CA0 gives 2 3 ZCE 8:1 d CA 1 0:1 6 7 ¼ lnð0:9=0:1Þ þ ð0:11=0:89Þ ln 4 5 ¼ 2:26 CA CA 1 0:98:1 CB

Substitution of the above and other known values into Equation 11.13 gives 1283 0:5 1:6 2:26 tB ¼ 0:25 ¼ 221 h 0:5 1:6 1:1 2 9:2

11.6 Separation by Chromatography 11.6.1 Chromatography for Bioseparation

Liquid column chromatography is the most commonly used method in bioseparation. As shown in Figure 11.6, the adsorbent particles are packed into a column as the stationary phase, and a fluid is continuously supplied to the column as the mobile phase. For separation, a small amount of solution containing several solutes is supplied to the column (Figure 11.6, I). Each solute in the applied solution moves down the column with the mobile phase liquid at a rate determined by the distribution coefficient between the stationary and mobile phases (Figure 11.6, II), and then emerges from the column as a separated band (Figure 11.6, III). Depending on the type of adsorbent packed as the stationary phase, and on the nature of the interaction between the solutes and the stationary phase, several types of chromatography may be used for bioseparations, as listed in Table 11.1. Chromatography is operated in several ways, depending on the strength of the interaction (affinity) between the solutes and the stationary phase. In the case where the interaction is relatively weak – as in gel chromatography (see Section 11.6.3) – the solutes are eluted by a mobile phase of a constant composition (isocratic elution). With increasing interaction – that is, with increasing distribution coefficient – it becomes necessary to alter the composition of the mobile phase in order to decrease the interaction, because elution with an isocratic elution requires a very long time. Subsequent changes in the ionic strength, pH, and so on, of the mobile phase can be either stepwise (stepwise elution) or continuous (gradient elution). In the case when the interaction is high and selective (as in bioaffinity chromatography), a specific solute can be selectively adsorbed by the stationary phase until the adsorbent is almost saturated, and can then be eluted by a stepwise change of the mobile phase to weaken the interaction between the solute and stationary phase. Such an operation can be regarded as selective adsorption and desorption in a fixed-bed adsorber, as noted in Section 11.5.

11.6 Separation by Chromatography

Figure 11.6 Schematic diagram showing the chromatographic separation of solutes with different distribution coefficients.

Table 11.1 Liquid column chromatography used in bioseparation.

Chromatographic process

Mechanism of partition

Elution method

Characteristics

Gel filtration chromatography (GFC)

Size and shape of molecule

Isocratic

Relatively long column for separation; separation under mild condition; high recovery

Ion-exchange chromatography (IEC)

Electrostatic interaction

Gradient

Short column; wide applicability; stepwise separation depending on elution conditions; high capacity

Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC)

Hydrophobic interaction

Gradient stepwise

Adsorption at high salt concentration

Affinity chromatography (AFC)

Biospecific interaction

Stepwise

High selectivity; high capacity

| 175

176

| 11 Adsorption and Chromatography The performance of a chromatographic system is generally evaluated by the time required for the elution of each solute (retention time) and the width of the elution curve (peak width), which represents the concentration profile of each solute in the effluent from a column. Although several models are used for evaluation, the equilibrium, stage and rate models are discussed here. 11.6.2 General Theories on Chromatography 11.6.2.1 Equilibrium Model In this model, the rate of migration of each solute along with the mobile phase through the column is obtained on the assumptions of instantaneous equilibrium of solute distribution between the mobile and stationary phases, with no axial mixing. The distribution coefficient K is assumed to be independent of the concentration (linear isotherm), and given by the following equation:

Cs ¼ K C

ð11:14Þ

where CS (kmol m3-bed) and C (kmol m3) are the concentrations of a solute in the stationary and mobile phases, respectively. The fraction of the total solute that exists in the mobile phase is given by Xs ¼

Ce 1 ¼ C e þ Cs ð1 eÞ 1 þ E K

ð11:15Þ

where e (-) is the interparticle void fraction, and E ¼ (1e)/e. The moving rate of the solute dz/dt (m s1) along with the mobile phase through the column is proportional to Xs and the interstitial fluid velocity u (m s1): dz u ¼ Xs u ¼ dt 1þEK

ð11:16Þ

If the value of K is independent of the concentration, then the time required to elute the solute from a column of length Z (m) (retention time tR) is given as tR ¼

Zð1 þ E KÞ u

ð11:17Þ

The volume of the mobile phase fluid that flows out of the column during the time tR; that is, the elution volume VR (m3), is given as: VR ¼ V0 þ KðVt V0 Þ ¼ V0 ð1 þ EKÞ

ð11:18Þ

where V0 (m3) is the interparticle void volume, and Vt (m3) is the total bed volume. Solutes flow out in the order of increasing distribution coefficients, and thus can be separated. Although a sample is applied as a narrow band, the effects of finite mass transfer rate and flow irregularities in practical chromatography result in band broadening, which may make the separation among eluted bands of solutes

11.6 Separation by Chromatography

insufficient. These points must be taken into consideration when evaluating separation among eluted bands, and can be treated by one of the following two models, namely the stage model or the rate model. 11.6.2.2 Stage Model The performance of a chromatography column can be expressed by the concept of the theoretical stage at which the equilibrium of solutes distribution between the mobile and stationary phases is reached. For chromatography columns, the height of packing equivalent to one equilibrium stage (i.e., the column height divided by the number of theoretical stages N) is defined as the Height Equivalent to an Equilibrium Stage, Hs (m). However, in this text, the term HETP (height equivalent to the theoretical plate) is not used in order to avoid confusion with the HETP of packed columns for distillation and absorption. The shape of the elution curve for a pulse injection can be approximated by the Gaussian error curve for NW100, which is almost the case for column chromatography [2]. The value of N can be calculated from the elution volume VR (m3) and the peak width W (m3), which is obtained by extending tangents from the sides of the elution curve to the baseline and is equal to four times the standard deviation sv (m3) ¼ (VR2/N)1/2, as shown in Figure 11.7.

Hs ¼

Z Z Z ¼ 2 ¼ N VR 16ðVR =WÞ2

ð11:19Þ

sv

With a larger N, the width of the elution curve becomes narrower at a given VR, and a better resolution will be attained. The dependence of the value of N on the

Figure 11.7 Elution curve and parameters for the evaluation of N.

| 177

178

| 11 Adsorption and Chromatography characteristics of packing material and operating conditions is not clear with the stage model, because the value of N is obtained empirically. The dependence of Hs on these parameters can be obtained by the following rate model. 11.6.2.3 Rate Model This treatment is based on the two differential material balance equations on a fixed-bed and packed particles. Although these equations, together with an adsorption isotherm and suitable boundary and initial conditions, describe precisely the performance of chromatography, the complexity of their mathematical treatment sometimes makes them insolvable. If the distribution coefficient K given by Equation 11.1 is constant, then Hs can be correlated to several parameters by use of the first absolute moment and the second central moment, as given by Equation 11.20 [3].

Hs ¼

Z 2Dz 2u r02 EK 1 5K þ þ ¼ u N 15ð1 þ EKÞ2 Deff kL r0

ð11:20Þ

where Dz is the axial eddy diffusivity (m2 s1), which is a measure of mixing along the axial direction of a column, Deff is the effective diffusivity of the solute in adsorbent particles (m2 s1), kL is the liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient outside particles (m h1), and r0 is the radius of particles of the stationary phase (m). The first term of the right-hand side of Equation 11.20 shows the contribution of axial mixing of the mobile phase fluid to band broadening, and is independent of the fluid velocity and proportional to r0 in the range of the packed particle Reynolds number below 2. The second term is the contribution of mass transfer, and decreases in line with a decrease in the fluid velocity and r0. Therefore, columns packed with particles of a smaller diameter show a higher resolution, which leads to the high efficiency associated with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). 11.6.3 Resolution Between Two Elution Curves

Since the concentration profile of a solute in the effluent from a chromatography column can be approximated by the Gaussian error curve, the peak width W (m3) can be obtained by extending tangents at inflection points of the elution curve to the base line and is given by W ¼ 4VR =ðNÞ1=2 ¼ 4 sV

ð11:21Þ

where VR (m3) is the elution volume, N is the number of theoretical plates, and sV is the standard deviation based on elution volume (m3). The separation of successive two curves of solutes 1 and 2 can be evaluated by the resolution RS,

11.6 Separation by Chromatography

as defined by the following equation: RS ¼

VR;2 VR;1 ðW1 þ W2 Þ=2

ð11:22Þ

Values of VR,2 and VR,1 given by Equation 11.18 are substituted into Equation 11.22 and, if W1 is approximated as equal to W2, then substitution of Equation 11.21 into Equation 11.22 gives RS ¼

EðK2 K1 ÞN 1=2 4ð1 þ EK1 Þ

ð11:23Þ

Thus, resolution increases in proportion to N1/2. In order to attain good resolution between two curves, the differences in the distribution coefficients of two solutes and/or the number of theoretical plates should be large. As seen from Equation 11.19, resolution is proportional also to (Z/Hs)1/2. The separation behaviors of two curves with changes in the number of theoretical plates are shown in Figure 11.8 [4]. For any given difference between the values of K1 and K2 in Equation 11.23, larger values of N lead to a higher resolution, as shown in Figure 11.8. In order to attain good separation in chromatography – that is, a good recovery and a high purity of a target – the value of the resolution between the target and a contaminant must be above 1.2.

Figure 11.8 Resolution of two elution curves at three numbers of theoretical plates; the interparticle void fraction ¼ 0.36 [4].

| 179

180

| 11 Adsorption and Chromatography 11.6.4 Gel Chromatography

Gel chromatography, as a separation method, is based on the size of molecules, which in turn determines the extent of their diffusion into the pores of gel particles packed as a stationary phase. Large molecules are excluded from most of the pores, whereas small molecules can diffuse further into the stationary phase. Thus, smaller molecules take a longer time to move down the column and are retarded in terms of their emergence from the column. In gel chromatography, the distribution coefficient K is little affected by the concentration of solutes, pH, ionic strength, and so on, and is considered to be constant. Therefore, the results obtained in Section 11.6.2 for constant K can be applied to evaluate the performance of gel chromatography. Figure 11.9 shows the increase in Hs with the liquid velocity in gel chromatography packed with gel particles of 44 mm in diameter [4]. The values of Hs increase linearly with the velocity, and the slopes of the lines become steeper with an increase in molecular weights, as predicted by Equation 11.20. Gel chromatography can be applied to desalting and buffer exchange, in which the composition of electrolytes (small molecules) in a buffer containing proteins or other bioproducts (large molecules) is changed. It can also be used for the separation of bioproducts with different molecular sizes, and for determining molecular weights. Gel chromatography is operated by isocratic elution, and the recovery of products is generally high, although it has the disadvantage of the eluted products being diluted. Consequently, processes which have a more concentrating effect, such as ultrafiltration and ion-exchange chromatography, are generally combined with gel chromatography for bioseparation.

Figure 11.9 Effects of liquid velocity and molecular weight on Hs in gel chromatography (dp ¼ 44 mm, 1.6 30 cm column).

11.6 Separation by Chromatography

Example 11.3

A chromatography column of 10 mm i.d. and 100 mm height was packed with particles for gel chromatography. The interparticle void fraction e was 0.20. A small amount of a protein solution was applied to the column, and elution performed in isocratic manner with a mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.5 ml min1. The distribution coefficient K of a protein was 0.7. An elution curve of the Gaussian type was obtained, and the peak width W was 1.30 cm3. Calculate the Hs value of this column for this protein sample. Solution

The elution volume of the protein is calculated by Equation 11.18 with the values of K and E ¼ (1e)/e. VR ¼ 1:57ð1 þ 4 0:7Þ ¼ 5:97 cm3 Equation 11.23 gives the Hs value as follows: Hs ¼

10 16ð5:97=1:3Þ2

¼ 0:030 cm

11.6.5 Affinity Chromatography

Complementary structures of biological materials, especially those of proteins, often result in specific recognitions and various types of biological affinity. These include many pairs of substances, such as enzyme–inhibitor, enzyme–substrate (analogue), enzyme–coenzyme, hormone–receptor, and antigen–antibody, as summarized in Table 11.2. Thus, bioaffinity represents a useful approach to separating specific biological materials. When separating by affinity chromatography (which utilizes specific bioaffinity), one of the interacting components (the ligand) is immobilized onto an insoluble, porous support as a specific adsorbent, whereupon the other component is selectively adsorbed onto the ligand. Polysaccharides, such as agarose, dextran and cellulose, are widely used as supports. Affinity chromatography (which is shown schematically in Figure 11.10) generally uses a fixed-bed which is packed with the specific adsorbent thus formed. When equilibration with a buffer solution has been reached in a packed column, a crude solution is applied to the column. Any component which interacts with the coupled ligand will be selectively adsorbed by the adsorbent, while contaminants in the feed solution will flow through the column; this is the adsorption step. As the amount of the adsorbed component increases, the component will begin to appear in the effluent solution from the column (breakthrough). The supply of the feed solution is generally stopped at a predetermined ratio (0.1 or 0.05, at the break point) of the concentration of the adsorbed component in the effluent to that in the feed. The column is then washed

| 181

182

| 11 Adsorption and Chromatography Table 11.2 Pairs of biomaterials interacting with bioaffinity.

Target

Ligand

Enzyme

Inhibitor Substrate Substrate-analogue Coenzyme Receptor Antibody Protein A, protein G Lectin Heparin Complementary DNA (RNA) Synthetic dye Chelated heavy-metal

Hormone Antigen Antibody Polysaccharide Coagulation factor DNA (RNA) NAD(P)-dependent enzyme Histidine-containing protein

with a buffer solution (washing step). Finally, the adsorbed component is eluted by altering the pH or ionic strength, or by using a specific eluent (elution step). As shown in Figure 11.10, the operations in affinity chromatography are regarded as highly specific adsorption and desorption steps. Thus, the overall performance is much affected by the break point, an estimation of which can be made as described in Section 11.5.2.

Figure 11.10 Scheme of affinity chromatography.

References

" Problems

11.1 A solution of 1 m3 of A at a concentration of 200 g m3 is contacted batchwise with 1.0 kg of fresh adsorbent (qA0 ¼ 0). Estimate the equilibrium concentration of the solution. An adsorption isotherm of the Freundlich-type is given as qA ðg adsorbate=kg adsorbentÞ ¼ 120 CA0:11 where CA (g m3) is the equilibrium concentration of A. 11.2 By single- or three-stage adsorption with an adsorbent, 95% of an adsorbate A in an aqueous solution of CA0 needs to be recovered. When the linear adsorption equilibrium is given as qA ¼ 2:5 CA obtain the ratio of the required amount of adsorbent in single-stage adsorption to that for three-stage adsorption. 11.3 Derive the following adsorption isotherm for an A–B gas mixture of two components, each of which follows the Langmuir-type isotherm: qA ¼

qAm apA 1 þ apA þ bpB

where pA and pB are the partial pressure of A and B, respectively, and a and b are constants. 11.4 When the height of an adsorbent bed is 50 cm, under the same operating conditions given in Example 11.2, estimate the break point (CA ¼ 0.1 CA0) and the length of the adsorption zone za. 11.5 A 1.0 cm-i.d., 50 cm-long chromatography column is packed with gel beads that are 100 mm in diameter. The interparticle void fraction e is 0.27, and the flow rate of the mobile phase is 20 ml h1. A retention volume of 20 ml and a peak width W of 1.8 cm3 were obtained for a protein sample. Calculate the distribution coefficient K and the Hs value for this protein sample. References 1 Hall, K.R., Eagleton, L.C., Acrivos, A., and Vermeulen, T. (1944) Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 5, 212. 2 van Deemter, J.J. (1956) Chem. Eng. Sci., 5, 271.

3 Kubin, M. (1975) J. Chromatogr., 108, 1. 4 Yamamoto, S., Nomura, M., and Sano, Y. (1987) J. Chromatogr., 394, 363.

| 183

184

| 11 Adsorption and Chromatography Further Reading 1 King, C.J. (1974) Separation Processes, McGraw-Hill. 2 Scopes, R.K. (1994) Protein Purification – Principles and Practice, 3rd edn, SpringerVerlag.

´, J. (1978) Affinity Chromato3 Turkova graphy, Elsevier. 4 Wheelwright, S.M. (1991) Protein Purification, Hanser.

Part III Practical Aspects in Bioengineering

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

This page intentionally left blank

| 187

12 Fermentor Engineering

12.1 Introduction

The term ‘‘fermentation,’’ as originally defined by biochemists, means ‘‘anaerobic microbial reactions’’; hence, according to this original definition, the microbial reaction for wine making is a fermentation. However, within the broader industrial sense of the term, fermentation is taken to mean anaerobic as well as aerobic microbial reactions for the production of a variety of useful substances. In this chapter, we will use the term fermentation in the broader sense, and include for example processes such as the productions of antibiotics, of microbial biomass as a protein source, and of organic acids and amino acids using microorganisms. All of these are regarded as fermentations, and so the bioreactors used for such processes can be called ‘‘fermentors.’’ Although the term ‘‘bioreactor’’ is often considered to synonymous with fermentor, not all bioreactors are fermentors. The general physical characteristics of bioreactors are discussed in Chapter 7. As with other industrial chemical processes, the types of laboratory apparatus used for basic research in fermentation or for seed culture, are often different from those of industrial fermentors. For microbial cultures with media volumes of up to perhaps 30 l, glass fermentors equipped with a stirrer (which often is magnetically driven to avoid contamination), and with an air sparger in the case of aerobic fermentation, are widely used. Visual observation is easy with such glass fermentors, the temperature can be controlled by immersing the fermentor in a water bath, and the sparging air can be sterilized using a glass-wool filter or a membrane filter. This type of laboratory fermentor is capable of providing basic biochemical data, but is not large enough to provide the engineering data that are valuable for design purposes. Fermentors of the pilot plant-scale – that is, sized between basic research and industrial fermentors – are often used to obtain the engineering data required when designing an industrial fermentor. Two major types of fermentor are widely used in industry. The stirred tank, with or without aeration (e.g., air sparging) is most widely used for aerobic and anaerobic fermentations, respectively. The bubble column (tower fermentor) and its modifications, such as airlifts, are used only for aerobic fermentations, especially

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

188

| 12 Fermentor Engineering of a large scale. The important operating variables of the sparged (aerated) stirred tank are the rotational stirrer speed and the aeration rate, whereas for the bubble column it is the aeration rate that determines the degree of liquid mixing, as well as the rates of mass transfer. Stirred tanks with volumes up to a few hundreds cubic meters are frequently used. The bubble columns are more practical as large fermentors in the case of aerobic fermentations. The major types of gas sparger include, among others, the single nozzle and the ring sparger (i.e. a circular, perforated tube). Some stirredtank fermentors will incorporate a mechanical foam breaker which rotates around the stirrer shaft over the free liquid surface. Occasionally, an antifoam agent is added to the broth (i.e., the culture medium containing microbial cells) in order to lower its surface tension. Some bubble columns and airlifts will have large empty spaces above the free liquid surface so as to reduce entrainment of any liquid droplets carried over by the gas stream. The main reasons for mixing the liquids in the fermentors with a rotating stirrer and/or gas sparging are to . equalize the composition of the broth as much as possible; . enhance heat transfer between the heat-transfer surface and the broth, and to equalize the temperature of the broth as much as possible. Depending on whether the bioreaction is exothermic or endothermic, the broth should be cooled or heated via a heat-transfer medium, such as cold water, steam, and other heat-transfer fluids; . increase the rates of mass transfer of substrates, dissolved gases and products between the liquid media and the suspended fine particles, such as microbial cells, or immobilized cells or enzymes suspended in the medium; . increase the rates of gas–liquid mass transfer at the bubble surfaces in the case of gas-sparged fermentors. Details of the mixing time in stirred tanks, and its estimation, are provided in Section 7.4.4. Most industrial fermentors incorporate heat-transfer surfaces, which include: (i) an external jacket or external coil; (ii) an internal coil immersed in the liquid; and (iii) an external heat exchanger, through which the liquid is recirculated by a pump. With small-scale fermentors, approach (i) is common, whereas approach (iii) is sometimes used with large-scale fermentors. These heat transfer surfaces are used for . heating the medium up to the fermentation temperature at the start of fermentation; . keeping the fermentation temperature constant by removing the heat produced by reaction, as well as by mechanical stirring; . batch medium sterilization before the start of fermentation. Normally, steam is used as the heating medium, and water as the cooling medium. Details of heat transfer in fermentors are provided in Chapter 5.

12.2 Stirrer Power Requirements for Non-Newtonian Liquids

Industrial fermentors, as well as pipings, pipe fittings, and valves, and all parts which come into contact with the culture media and sterilized air, are usually constructed from stainless steel. All of the inside surfaces should be smooth and easily polished in order to help maintain aseptic conditions. All fermentors (other than the glass type) must incorporate glass windows for visual observation. Naturally, all fermentors should have a variety of fluid inlets and outlets, as well as ports for sampling and instrument insertion. Live steam is often used to sterilize the inside surfaces of the fermentor, pipings, fittings, and valves. Instrumentation for measuring and controlling the temperature, pressure, flow rates, and fluid compositions, including oxygen partial pressure, is necessary for fermentor operation. (Details of these are available in specialty books or catalogues.)

12.2 Stirrer Power Requirements for Non-Newtonian Liquids

Some fermentation broths are highly viscous, and many are non-Newtonian liquids, that follow Equation 2.6. For liquids with viscosities up to approximately 50 Pa s, impellers (see Figure 7.7a–c) can be used, but for more viscous liquids special types of impeller, such as the helical ribbon-type and anchor-type, are often used. When estimating the stirrer power requirements for non-Newtonian liquids, correlations of the Power number versus the Reynolds number (Re; see Figure 7.8) for Newtonian liquids are very useful. In fact, Figure 7.8 for Newtonian liquids can be used at least for the laminar range, if appropriate values of the apparent viscosity ma are used in calculating the Reynolds number. Experimental data for various non-Newtonian fluids with the six blade-turbine for the range of (Re) below 10 were correlated by the following empirical Equation 12.1 [1]: NP ¼ 71=ðReÞ

ð12:1Þ

where NP is the dimensionless power number, that is, Np ¼ P=ðr N 3 d5 Þ

ð12:2Þ

ðReÞ ¼ N d2 r=ma

ð12:3Þ

and

where P is the power requirement (ML2T3), d is the impeller diameter (L), N is the impeller rotational speed (T1), r is the liquid density (M L3), and ma is the apparent liquid viscosity as defined by Equation 2.6 (all in consistent units). From the above equations P ¼ 71 ma d3 N 2

ð12:4Þ

| 189

190

| 12 Fermentor Engineering Although local values of the shear rate in a stirred liquid may not be uniform, the effective shear rate Seff (s1) was found to be a sole function of the impeller rotational speed N (s1), regardless of the ratio of the impeller diameter to tank diameter (d/D), and was given by the following empirical equation [1]: Seff ¼ ks N

ð12:5Þ 1

where Seff is the effective shear rate (s ), and ks is a dimensionless empirical constant. (Note that ks is different from the consistency index K in Equation 2.6.) The values of ks vary according to different authors; values of 11.5 for the disc turbine, 11 for the straight-blade turbine and pitched-blade turbine, 24.5 for the anchor-type impeller (d/D ¼ 0.98), and 29.4 for the helical ribbon-type impeller (d/ D ¼ 0.96) have been reported [2]. The substitution of Seff for (du/dn) in Equation 2.6 gives Equation 12.6 for the apparent viscosity ma: ma ¼ KðSeff Þn1

ð12:6Þ

Values of the consistency index K and the flow behavior index n for a nonNewtonian fluid can be determined experimentally. For pseudoplastic fluids, no1.

Example 12.1

Estimate the stirrer power requirement P for a tank fermentor, 1.8 m in diameter, containing a viscous non-Newtonian broth, of which consistency index K ¼ 124, flow behavior index n ¼ 0.537, density r ¼ 1,050 kg m3, stirred by a pitched-blade, turbine-type impeller of diameter d ¼ 0.6 m, with a rotational speed N of 1 s1.

Solution

Since ks for pitched blade turbine is 11, the effective shear rate Seff is given by Equation 12.5 as Seff ¼ 11 1 ¼ 11 s1 Equation 12.6 gives the apparent viscosity ma ¼ 124 11ð0:5371Þ ¼ 124=3:04 ¼ 40:8 Pa s Then, ðReÞ ¼ 0:62 1 1050=40:8 ¼ 9:26 This is in the laminar range. The power requirement P is given by Equation 12.4: P ¼ 71 40:8 0:63 12 ¼ 625 W

12.3 Heat Transfer in Fermentors

12.3 Heat Transfer in Fermentors

Heat transfer is an important aspect of fermentor operation. In the case where a medium is heat-sterilized in situ within the fermentor, live steam is either bubbled through the medium, or is passed through the coil or the outer jacket of the fermentor. In the former case, an allowance should be made for dilution of the medium by the steam condensate. In either case, the sterilization time consists of the three periods: (i) a heating period; (ii) a holding period; and (iii) a cooling period. The temperature is held constant during the holding period. Sterilization rates during these three periods can be calculated using the equations given in Chapter 10. At the start of batch fermentor operation, the broth must be heated to the fermentation temperature, which is usually in the range of 30–37 1C, by passing steam or warm water through the coil or the outer jacket. During fermentation, the broth must be maintained at the fermentation temperature by removing any heat generated by the biochemical reaction(s), or which has dissipated from the mechanical energy input associated with stirring. Such cooling is usually achieved by passing water through the helical coil or the external jacket. The rates of heat transfer between the fermentation broth and the heat-transfer fluid (such as steam or cooling water flowing through the external jacket or the coil) can be estimated from the data provided in Chapter 5. For example, the film coefficient of heat transfer to or from the broth contained in a jacketed or coiled stirred tank fermentor can be estimated using Equation 5.13. In the case of nonNewtonian liquids, the apparent viscosity, as defined by Equation 2.6, should be used. Although the effects of gas sparging and the presence of microbial cells or minute particles on the broth film coefficient are not clear, they are unlikely to decrease the film coefficient. The film coefficient for condensing steam is relatively large, and can simply be assumed (as noted in Section 5.4.4). The film coefficient for cooling water can be estimated from the relationships provided in Section 5.4.1. The resistance of the metal wall of the coil or tank is not large, unless the wall is very thick. However, resistances due to dirt (cf. Table 5.1) are often not negligible. From these individual heat-transfer resistances, the overall heat transfer coefficient U can be calculated using Equation 5.15. It should be noted that the overall resistance 1/U is often controlled by the largest individual resistance, in case other individual resistances are much smaller. For example, with a broth the film resistance will be much larger than other individual resistances, and the overall coefficient U will become almost equal to the broth film heat transfer coefficient. In such cases, it is better to use U-values that are based on the area for larger heat transfer resistance. It should be mentioned here that the cooling coil can also be used for in situ media sterilization, by passing steam through its structure.

| 191

192

| 12 Fermentor Engineering Example 12.2

A fermentation broth contained in a batch-operated, stirred-tank fermentor, with 2.4 m inside diameter D, is equipped with a paddle-type stirrer of diameter (L) of 0.8 m that rotates at a speed N ¼ 4 s1. The broth temperature is maintained at 30 1C with cooling water at 15 1C, which flows through a stainless steel helical coil that has a 50 mm outside diameter and is 5 mm thick. The maximum rate of heat evolution by biochemical reactions, plus dissipation of mechanical energy input by the stirrer, is 51 000 kcal h1, although this rate varies with time. The physical properties of the broth at 30 1C were: density r ¼ 1000 kg m3, viscosity m ¼ 0.013 Pa s, specific heat cp ¼ 0.90 kcal kg1 1C1, thermal conductivity k ¼ 0.49 kcal h1 m1 1C1 ¼ 0.000136 kcal s1 m1 1C1. Calculate the total length of the stainless steel helical coil that should be installed in the fermentor.

Solution

In case where the exit temperature of the cooling water is 25 1C, the flow rate of water is 51 000=ð25 15Þ ¼ 5100 kg h1 and the average water temperature is 20 1C. As the inside sectional area of the tube is 12.56 cm2, the average velocity of water through the coil tube is 5100 1000=ð12:56 360Þ ¼ 113 cm s1 ¼ 1:13 m s1 The water-side film coefficient of heat transfer hw is calculated by Equation 5.8b. hw ¼ ð3210 þ 43 20Þ1:130:8 =40:2 ¼ 3400 kcal h1 m2 C1 The broth side film coefficient of heat transfer hB is estimated by Equation 5.13 for coiled vessels. Thus ðNuÞ ¼ 0:87ðReÞ2=3 ðPrÞ1=3 ðReÞ ¼ ðL2 Nr=mÞ ¼ 0:82 4 1000=0:013 ¼ 197 000 ðReÞ2=3 ¼ 3400 ðPrÞ ¼ ðcp m=kÞ ¼ 0:90 0:013=0:000136 ¼ 86 ðPrÞ1=3 ¼ 4:40 ðNuÞ ¼ ðhB D=kÞ ¼ 0:87 3400 4:40 ¼ 13 020 hB ¼ 13 020 0:49=2:4 ¼ 2660 kcal h1 m2 C1

12.4 Gas–Liquid Mass Transfer in Fermentors

As the thermal conductivity of stainless steel is 13 kcal h transfer resistance of the tube wall is

1

m

1

1

1C , the heat

0:005=13 ¼ 0:00038 C h m2 kcal1 The fouling factor of 2000 kcal h1 m2 1C1 is assumed. The overall heat transfer resistance 1/U based on the outer tube surface is 1=U ¼ 1=2660 þ 0:00038 þ 1=½3400ð4=5Þ þ 1=2000 ¼ 0:00162 U ¼ 616 kcal h1 m2 C1 The log mean of the temperature differences 15 1C and 5 1C at both ends of the cooling coil is Dtlm ¼ ð15 5Þ=lnð15=5Þ ¼ 9:1 C The required heat transfer area (outer tube surface) A is A ¼ 51 000=ð616 9:1Þ ¼ 9:10 m2 The required total length L of the coil is L ¼ 9:10=ð0:05 pÞ ¼ 58:0 m

12.4 Gas–Liquid Mass Transfer in Fermentors

Gas–liquid mass transfer plays a very important role in aerobic fermentation. The rate of oxygen transfer from the sparged air to the microbial cells suspended in the broth, or the rate of transfer of carbon dioxide (produced by respiration) from the cells to the air, often controls the rate of aerobic fermentation. Thus, a correct knowledge of such gas–liquid mass transfer is required when designing and/or operating an aerobic fermentor. Resistances to the mass transfer of oxygen and carbon dioxide (and also of substrates and products) at the cell surface can be neglected because of the minute size of the cells, which may be only a few microns. The existence of liquid films or the renewal of a liquid surface around these fine particles is inconceivable. The compositions of the broths in well-mixed fermentors can, in practical terms, be assumed uniform. In other words, mass transfer resistance through the main body of broth may be considered negligible. Thus, when dealing with gas transfer in aerobic fermentors, it is important to consider only the resistance at the gas–liquid interface, usually at the surface of gas bubbles. As the solubility of oxygen in water is relatively low (cf. Section 6.2 and Table 6.1), we can neglect the gas-phase resistance when dealing with oxygen absorption into the aqueous media, and consider only the liquid film mass transfer coefficient kL and the volumetric coefficient kLa, which are practically equal to KL

| 193

194

| 12 Fermentor Engineering and KLa, respectively. Although carbon dioxide is considerably more soluble in water than oxygen, we can also consider that the liquid film resistance will control the rate of carbon dioxide desorption from the aqueous media. Standard correlations for kLa in an aerated stirred tank and the bubble column were provided in Chapter 7. However, such correlations were obtained under simplified conditions, and may not be applicable to real fermentors without modifications. Various factors that are not taken into account in those standard correlations may influence the kLa values in aerobic fermentors used in practice. 12.4.1 Special Factors Affecting kLa 12.4.1.1 Effects of Electrolytes It is a well-known fact that bubbles produced by mechanical force in electrolyte solutions are much smaller than those produced in pure water. This can be explained by a reduction in the rate of bubble coalescence due to an electrostatic potential at the surface of aqueous electrolyte solutions. Thus, kLa values in aerated stirred tanks obtained by the sulfite oxidation method are larger than those obtained by physical absorption into pure water, in the same apparatus, and at the same gas rate and stirrer speed [3]. Quantitative relationships between kLa values and the ionic strength are available [4]. Recently published data on kLa were obtained mostly by physical absorption or desorption with pure water. The culture media usually contain some electrolytes, and in this respect the values of kLa in these media might be closer to those obtained by the sulfite oxidation method than to those obtained by experiments with pure water. 12.4.1.2 Enhancement Factor Since respiration by microorganisms involves biochemical reactions, oxygen absorption into fermentation broth can be regarded as a case of gas absorption with a chemical reaction (as discussed in Section 6.5). If the rate of respiration reaction were to be fairly rapid, we should multiply kL by the enhancement factor E (–). However, theoretical calculations and experimental results [5] with aerated stirred fermentors on oxygen absorption into fermentation broth containing resting and growing cells have shown that the enhancement factor is only slightly or negligibly larger than unity, even when an accumulation of microorganisms at or near the gas–liquid interface is assumed. Thus, except for extreme cases, the effect of respiration of microorganisms on kLa can, in practical terms, be ignored. 12.4.1.3 Presence of Cells Fermentation broths are suspensions of microbial cells in a culture media. Although we need not consider the enhancement factor E for respiration reactions (as noted above), the physical presence per se of microbial cells in the broth will affect the kLa values in bubbling-type fermentors. The rates of oxygen absorption into aqueous suspensions of sterilized yeast cells were measured in: (i) an unaerated stirred tank with a known free gas–liquid interfacial area; (ii) a bubble

12.4 Gas–Liquid Mass Transfer in Fermentors

column; and (iii) an aerated stirred tank [6]. Data acquired with scheme (i) showed that the kL values were only minimally affected by the presence of cells, whereas for schemes (ii) and (iii), the gas holdup and kLa values were decreased somewhat with increasing cell concentrations, because of smaller a due to increased bubble sizes. 12.4.1.4 Effects of Antifoam Agents and Surfactants In order to suppress excessive foaming above the free liquid surface in fermentors, due materials such as proteins being produced during culture, antifoam agents (i.e., surfactants which reduce the surface tension) are often added to culture media. The use of mechanical foam breakers is preferred in the case of stirred tank fermentors, however. The effects on kLa and gas holdup of adding antifoam agents were studied with the same apparatus as was used to study the effects of sterilized cells [6]. Values of kL obtained in the stirred vessel with a free liquid surface varied little with the addition of a surfactant. In contrast, the values of kLa and gas holdup in the bubble column and in the aerated stirred tank were decreased greatly on adding very small amounts (o10 ppm) of surfactant (see Figure 12.1a). Photographic studies conducted with the bubble column showed that bubbles in pure water were relatively uniform in size, whereas in water which contained a surfactant a small number of very large bubble mingled with a large number of very fine bubbles. As large bubbles rise fast, while fine bubbles rise very slowly, the contribution of the very fine bubbles to mass transfer seems negligible because of their very slow rising velocity and long residence time. Thus, the kLa for a mixture of few large bubbles and many fine bubbles should be smaller than for bubbles of a uniform size. The same can be said about the gas holdup. Variations in kLa and gas holdup in sterilized cell suspensions following the addition of a surfactant are shown in Figure 12.1b and c, respectively [6]. When a very small amount of surfactant was added to the cell suspension, both the kLa and gas holdup were seen to increase in line with cell concentration. This situation occurred because the amount of surfactant available at the gas–liquid interface was reduced due to it having been adsorbed by the cells. However, when a sufficient quantity of surfactant was added, there was no effect of cell concentration on either kLa or gas holdup. 12.4.1.5 kLa in Emulsions The volumetric coefficient kLa for oxygen absorption into oil-in-water emulsions is of interest in connection with fermentation using hydrocarbon substrates. Experimental results [7] have shown that such emulsions can be categorized into two major groups, depending on their values of the spreading coefficient s (dyne cm1) defined as

s ¼ sw ðsh þ shw Þ

ð12:7Þ

where sw is the water surface tension (dyne cm1), sh is the oil surface tension (dyne cm1), and shw the oil–water interfacial tension (dyne cm1).

| 195

196

| 12 Fermentor Engineering

Figure 12.1 (a) Relative values of kLa and gas holdup for water in a bubble column; (b) kLa for cell suspensions in a bubble column; (c) gas holdup for cell suspensions in a bubble column.

In the group with negative spreading coefficients (e.g., kerosene-in-water and paraffin-in-water emulsions), the values of kLa in both stirred tanks and bubble columns decrease linearly with an increasing oil fraction. This effect is most likely due to the formation of lens-like oil droplets over the gas–liquid interface. A subsequent slower oxygen diffusion through the droplets, and/or slower rates of surface renewal at the gas–liquid surface, may result in a decrease in kLa. In the group with positive spreading coefficients (e.g., toluene-in-water and oleic acid-in-water emulsions), the values of kLa in both stirred tanks and bubble columns decrease upon the addition of a very small amount of ‘‘oil,’’ and then increase with increasing oil fraction. In such systems, the oils tend to spread over the gas–liquid interface as thin films, providing additional mass transfer resistance and consequently lower kL values. Any increase in kLa value upon the further

12.4 Gas–Liquid Mass Transfer in Fermentors

addition of oils could be explained by an increased specific interfacial area a due to a lowered surface tension and consequent smaller bubble sizes. 12.4.1.6 kLa in Non-Newtonian Liquids The effects of broth viscosity on kLa in aerated stirred tanks and bubble columns is apparent from Equations 7.37 and 7.41, respectively. These equations can be applied to ordinary non-Newtonian liquids with the use of apparent viscosity ma, as defined by Equation 2.6. Although, liquid-phase diffusivity generally decreases with increasing viscosity, it should be noted that at equal temperatures, the gas diffusivities in aqueous polymer solutions are almost equal to those in water. Some fermentation broths are non-Newtonian due to the presence of microbial mycelia or fermentation products, such as polysaccharides. In some cases, a small amount of water-soluble polymer may be added to the broth to reduce stirrer power requirements, or to protect the microbes against excessive shear forces. These additives may develop non-Newtonian viscosity or even viscoelasticity of the broth, which in turn will affect the aeration characteristics of the fermentor. Viscoelastic liquids exhibit elasticity superimposed on viscosity. The elastic constant, an index of elasticity, is defined as the ratio of stress (Pa) to strain (), while viscosity is shear stress divided by shear rate (see Equation 2.4). The relaxation time (s) is viscosity (Pa s) divided by the elastic constant (Pa). Values of kLa for viscoelastic liquids in aerated stirred tanks are substantially smaller than those in inelastic liquids. Moreover, less breakage of gas bubbles in the vicinity of the impeller occurs in viscoelastic liquids. The following dimensionless equation [8] (a modified form of Equation 7.37) can be used to correlate kLa in sparged stirred tanks for non-Newtonian (including viscoelastic) liquids:

ðkL a d2 =DL Þ ¼ 0:060ðd2 N r=ma Þ1:5 ðd N 2 =gÞ0:19 ðma =r DL Þ0:5 ðma UG =sÞ0:6 ðN d=UG Þ0:32 ½1 þ 2:0ðlNÞ0:5 0:67

ð12:8Þ

in which l is the relaxation time, all other symbols are the same as in Equation 7.37, The dimensionless product (l N) can be called the Deborah number or the Weissenberg number. Correlations for kLa in bubble columns such as Equation 7.41 should hold for non-Newtonian fluids with use of apparent viscosity ma. To estimate the effective shear rate Seff (s1), which is necessary to calculate ma by Equation 2.6 the following empirical equation [9] is useful. Seff ¼ 50 UG

ðUG 44 cm s1 Þ

ð12:9Þ

in which UG (cm s1) is the superficial gas velocity in the bubble column. Values of kLa in bubble columns decrease with increasing values of liquid viscoelasticity. In viscoelastic liquids, relatively large bubbles mingle with a large number of very fine bubbles less than 1 mm in diameter, whereas most bubbles in water are more uniform in size. As very fine bubble contribute less to mass transfer, the kLa values in viscoelastic liquids are smaller than in inelastic liquids.

| 197

198

| 12 Fermentor Engineering Equation 12.10 [10], which is a modified form of Equation 7.45, can correlate kLa values in bubble columns for non-Newtonian liquids, including viscoelastic liquids. kL a D2 =DL ¼ 0:09ðScÞ0:5 ðBoÞ0:75 ðGaÞ0:39 ðFrÞ1:0 ½1 þ 0:13ðDeÞ0:55 1 ðDeÞ ¼ l UB =dvs

ð12:10Þ ð12:11Þ

in which (De) is the Deborah number, l is the relaxation time (s), UB is the average bubble rise velocity (cm s1), and dvs is the volume-surface mean bubble diameter (cm) calculated by Equation 7.42. All other symbols are the same as in Equation 7.45. The average bubble rise velocity UB (cm s1) in Equation 12.11 can be calculated by the following relationship: UB ¼ UG ð1 þ ee Þ=ee

ð12:12Þ

where UG is the superficial gas velocity (cm s1) and ee is the gas holdup (–). It should be noted that kLa in both Equation 12.10 and in Equation 7.45 are based on the clear liquid volume, excluding bubbles. 12.4.2 Desorption of Carbon Dioxide

Carbon dioxide produced in an aerobic fermentor should be desorbed from the broth into the exit gas. Figure 12.2 [11] shows, as an example, variations with time of the dissolved CO2 and oxygen concentrations in the broth, CO2 partial pressure in the exit gas, and the cell concentration during a batch culture of a bacterium in a stirred fermentor. It can be seen that the CO2 levels in the broth and in the exit gas each increase, while the dissolved oxygen concentration in the broth decreases. Carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions exist in three forms: (i) physically dissolved CO2; (ii) bicarbonate ions HCO3; and (iii) carbonate ions CO32. In the physiological range of pH, the latter form can be neglected. The bicarbonate ion HCO3 is produced by the following hydration reaction: þ H2 O þ CO2 ! HCO 3 þH

This reaction is rather slow in the absence of the enzyme carbonic anhydrase, which is usually the case with fermentation broths, although this enzyme exists in red blood cells. Thus, any increase in kL for CO2 desorption from fermentation broths due to the simultaneous diffusion of HCO3 seems negligible. The partial pressure of CO2 in the gas phase can be measured by, for example, using an infrared CO2 analyzer. The concentration of CO2 dissolved in the broth can be determined indirectly by the so-called ‘‘tubing method,’’ in which nitrogen gas is passed through a coiled small tube, made from a CO2-permeable material, immersed in the broth; the CO2 partial pressure in the emergent gas can then be analyzed. If a sufficient quantity of nitrogen is passed through the tube, the amount of CO2 diffusing into the nitrogen stream should be proportional to the

12.5 Criteria for Scaling-Up Fermentors

Figure 12.2 Concentration changes during the batch culture of a bacterium.

dissolved CO2 concentration in the broth, and independent of the bicarbonate ion concentration. The values of kLa for CO2 desorption in a stirred-tank fermentor, calculated from the experimental data on physically dissolved CO2 concentration (obtained by the above-mentioned method) and the CO2 partial pressure in the gas phase, agreed well with the kLa values estimated from the kLa for O2 absorption in the same fermentor, but corrected for any differences in liquid-phase diffusivities [11]. Perfect mixing in the liquid phase can be assumed when calculating the mean driving potential. In the case of large industrial fermentors, it can practically be assumed that the CO2 partial pressure in the exit gas is in equilibrium with the concentration of CO2 that is physically dissolved in the broth. The assumption of either a plug flow or perfect mixing in the gas phase does not have any major effect on the calculated values of the mean driving potential, and hence in the calculated values of kLa.

12.5 Criteria for Scaling-Up Fermentors

Few steps are available for the so-called ‘‘scale-up’’ of fermentors, starting from the glass apparatus used in fundamental research investigations. Usually, chemical

| 199

200

| 12 Fermentor Engineering engineers are responsible for building and testing pilot-scale fermentors (usually with capacities of 100–1000 l), and subsequently for designing industrial-scale fermentors based on data acquired from the pilot-scale system. In most cases, the pilot-scale and industrial fermentors will be of the same type, but with a several hundred-fold difference in terms of their relative capacities. The size of the stirred tank, whether unaerated or aerated, or of the bubble column to obtain engineering data that would be useful for design purposes, should be at least 20 cm in diameter, and preferably larger. For anaerobic fermentation, the unaerated stirred tank discussed in Section 7.4 is used almost exclusively. One criterion for scaling-up this type of bioreactor is the power input per unit liquid volume of geometrically similar vessels, which should be proportional to N3 L2 for the turbulent range and to N2 for the laminar range, where N is the rotational stirrer speed and L is the representative length of the vessel. In order to minimize any physical damage to the cells, the product of the diameter d and the rotational speed N of the impeller – which should be proportional to the tip speed of the impeller and hence to the shear rate at the impeller tip – becomes an important criterion for scale-up. If the rate of heat transfer to or from the broth is important, then the heat transfer area per unit volume of broth should be considered. As the surface area and the liquid volume will vary in proportion to the square and cube of the representative length of vessels, respectively, the heat transfer area of jacketed vessels may become insufficient with larger vessels. Thus, the use of internal coils, or perhaps an external heat-exchanger, may become necessary with larger fermentors. Aerated stirred tanks, bubble columns and airlifts are normally used for aerobic fermentations. One criterion of scaling-up an aerated stirred tank fermentor is kLa, an approximate value of which can be estimated using Equations 7.36 or 7.36a. For the turbulent range, a general correlation for kLa in aerated stirred fermentors is of the following type [3]: kL a ¼ c UGm ðN 3 L2 Þn

ð12:13Þ

where UG is the superficial gas velocity over the cross-sectional area of the tank, N is the rotational stirrer speed, and L is the representative length of geometrically similar stirred tanks. For the turbulent regime, (N3L2) should be proportional to the power requirement per unit liquid volume. One practice in scaling-up this type of fermentor is to keep the superficial gas velocity UG equal in both fermentors. In general, a UG value in excess of 0.6 m s1 should be avoided so as not to allow excessive liquid entrainment [12]. The so-called VVM (gas volume per volume of liquid per minute), which sometimes is used as a criterion for scaleup, is not necessarily reasonable, because an equal VVM might result in an excessive UG in larger fermentors. Keeping (N3L2) equal might also result in an excessive power requirement and cause damage to the cells in large fermentors. In such cases, the product (NL), which is proportional to the impeller tip speed, can be made equal if a reduction in kLa values is permitted. Maintaining the oxygen transfer rate per unit liquid volume (i.e., kLa multiplied by the mean liquid concentration driving potential DCm) seems equally reasonable. To attain

12.5 Criteria for Scaling-Up Fermentors

this criterion, many combinations of the agitator power per unit liquid volume and the gas rate are possible. For a range of gas rates, the sum of gas compressor power plus agitator power becomes almost minimal [12]. The main operating factor of a bubble column fermentor is the superficial gas velocity UG over the column cross-section, which should be kept equal when scaling-up. As mentioned in connection with Equation 7.41, kLa in bubble columns less than 60 cm in diameter will increase with the column diameter D to the power of 0.17. As this trend levels off with larger columns, however, it is recommended that kLa values estimated for a 60 cm column are used. If heat transfer is a problem, then heat transfer coils within the column, or even an external heat exchanger, may become necessary when operating a large, industrial bubble column-type fermentor. Scale-up of an internal loop airlift-type fermentor can be achieved in the same way as for bubble column-type fermentors, and for external loop airlifts see Section 7.7.

Example 12.3

Two geometrically similar stirred tanks with flat-blade turbine impellers of the following dimensions are to be operated at 30 1C as pilot-scale and productionscale aerobic fermentors. Tank diameter and liquid depth (m) Impeller diameter (m) Liquid volume (m3)

Scale

Pilot 0.6 Production 2.0

0.24 0.8

0.170 6.28

Satisfactory results were obtained with the pilot-scale fermentor at a rotational impeller speed N of 1.5 s1 and an air rate (30 1C) of 0.5 m3 min1. The density and viscosity of the broth are 1050 kg m3 and 0.002 Pa s, respectively. Data from the turbine impellers [3] showed that kLa can be correlated by Equation 12.13, with values m ¼ n ¼ 2/3. Using kLa as the scale-up criterion, estimate the impeller speed and the air rate for the production-scale fermentor that will give results comparable with the pilot-scale data. Solution

In the pilot-scale fermentor: UG ¼ 0.5/[(p/4) (0.6)2 60] ¼ 0.0295 m s1 At equal UG, the air rate to the production fermentor should be 0:0295 60 ðp=4Þð2:0Þ2 ¼ 5:56 m3 min1 With the pilot fermentor N3L2 ¼ 1.53 0.62 ¼ 1.215 With this equal value of N3L2 and L2 ¼ 2.02 ¼ 4 for the production fermentor, the production fermentor should be operated at N 3 ¼ 1:215=4 ¼ 0:304 N ¼ 0:672 s1

| 201

202

| 12 Fermentor Engineering Incidentally, the impeller tip speeds in the pilot and production fermentors are calculated as 1.13 m s1 and 1.69 m s1, respectively. A survey [13] of almost 500 industrial stirred-tank fermentors revealed the following overall averages: tank height/diameter ratio ¼ 1.8; working volume/ total volume ¼ 0.7; agitator power/unit liquid volume ¼ 6 kW m3 (2 kW m3 for larger fermentors); impeller diameter/tank diameter ¼ 0.38; and impeller tip speed ¼ 5.5 m s1. These data were mainly for microbial fermentors, but included some data for animal cell culture fermentors. According to the same authors, the averages for animal cell culture fermentors were as follows: average impeller tip speed ¼ 0.5–2 m s1; stirrer power per unit liquid volume ¼ one order-of-magnitude smaller than those for microbial fermentors.

12.6 Modes of Fermentor Operation

The batch operation of fermentors is much more common than continuous operation, although theories for continuous operation are well established (as will be indicated later in this section). The reasons for this are: (a) The operating conditions of batch fermentors can be more easily adjusted to required specific conditions, as the fermentation proceeds. (b) The capacities of batch fermentors are usually large enough, especially in case where the products are expensive. (c) In case of batch operation, damages by so-called ‘‘contamination’’ – that is, the entry of unwanted organisms into the systems, with resultant spoilage of the products – is limited to the particular batch that was contaminated. In the fed-batch operation of fermentors (which is also commonly practiced), the feed is added either continuously or intermittently to the fermentor, without any product withdrawal, the aim being to avoid any excessive fluctuations of oxygen demand, substrate consumption, and other variable operating conditions.

12.6.1 Batch Operation

In addition to the several phases of batch cell culture discussed in Chapter 4, the practical operation of a batch fermentor includes the pre-culture operations, such as cleaning and sterilizing the fermentor, charging the culture medium, feeding the seed culture, and post-culture operations, such as discharging the fermentor content for product recovery. Consequently, the total operation time for a batch fermentor will be substantially longer than the culture time per se. Procedures for sterilizing the medium and sparging air are provided in Chapter 10.

12.6 Modes of Fermentor Operation

The kinetics of cell growth was discussed in Chapter 4. By combining Equation 4.2 and Equation 4.6, we obtain: dCx =dt ¼ m Cx ¼ ½mmax Cs =ðKs þ Cs ÞCx

ð12:14Þ

This equation provides the rate of cell growth as a function of the substrate concentration Cs. In case the cell mass is the required product (an example is baker’s yeast), the cell yield with respect to the substrate, Yxs, as defined by Equation 4.4, is of interest. In the case where a product (e.g., ethanol) is required, then the rate of product formation, rp (kmol h1 (unit mass of cell)1), and the product yield with respect to the substrate Yps, as well as the cell yield, should be of interest. Then, for unit volume of the fermentor, dCs =dt ¼ ðm=Yxs þ rp =Yps ÞCx

ð12:15Þ

in which Cx, a function of time, is given for the exponential growth phase by Cx ¼ Cx0 expðmmax tÞ

ð4:5Þ

where Cx0 is the initial cell concentration. A combination of the above two equations, and integration, gives the following equation for the batch culture time for the exponential growth phase tb: tb ¼ ð1=mmax Þ ln½1 þ ðCs0 Csf Þ=fð1=Yxs þ rp =mmax Yps ÞCx0 g

ð12:16Þ

where Cs0 and Csf are the initial and final substrate concentrations, respectively. In case only cells are the required product, Equation 12.16 is simplified to tb ¼ ð1=mmax Þ ln½1 þ ðCs0 Csf ÞYxs =Cx0

ð12:17Þ

12.6.2 Fed-Batch Operation

In fed-batch culture, a fresh medium which contains a substrate but no cells is fed to the fermentor, without product removal. This type of operation is practiced in order to avoid excessive cell growth rates with too-high oxygen demands and catabolite repression with high glucose concentration, or for other reasons. Fedbatch operations are widely adopted in the culture of baker’s yeast, for example. In fed-batch culture, the fresh medium is fed to the fermentor either continuously or intermittently. The feed rate is controlled by monitoring, for example, the dissolved oxygen concentration, the glucose concentration, and other parameters. Naturally, the volume of the liquid in the fermentor V (m3) increases with time. The feed rate F (m3 h1), though not necessarily constant, when divided by V is defined as the dilution rate D (h1). Thus,

| 203

204

| 12 Fermentor Engineering D ¼ F=V

ð12:18Þ

F ¼ dV=dt

ð12:19Þ

where

Usually, D decreases with time, but not necessarily at a constant rate. The increase in the total cell mass per unit time is given as dðCx VÞ=dt ¼ Cx dV=dt þ V dCx =dt ¼ m Cx V

ð12:20Þ

where Cx is the cell concentration (kg m3), and m is the specific growth rate defined by Equation 4.2. Combining Equations 12.19 and 12.20 and dividing by V, we obtain dCx =dt ¼ Cx ðm DÞ

ð12:21Þ

Thus, if D is made equal to m, the cell concentration would not vary with time. For a given substrate concentration in the fermentor Cs, m is given by the Monod equation (i.e., Equation 4.6). Alternatively, we can adjust the substrate concentration Cs for a given value of m. Practical operation usually starts as batch culture and, when an appropriate cell concentration is reached, the operation is switched to a fed-batch culture. The total substrate balance for the whole fermentor is given as: dðCs VÞ=dt ¼ ðV dCs =dt þ Cs dV=dtÞ ¼ F Csi ðm=Yxs þ rp =Yps ÞCx V

ð12:22Þ

where Csi is the substrate concentration in the feed, which is higher than the substrate concentration in the fermentor content Cs. Combining Equations 12.19 and 12.22 and dividing by V, we obtain dCs =dt ¼ DðCsi Cs Þ ðm=Yxs þ rp =Yps ÞCx

ð12:23Þ

Fed-batch culture is not a steady-state process, as the liquid volume in the fermentor increases with time and withdrawal of products is not continuous. However, the feed rate, and the concentrations of cells and substrate in the broth can be made steady. 12.6.3 Continuous Operation

Suppose that a well-mixed, stirred tank is being used as a fed-batch fermentor at a constant feed rate F (m3 h1), substrate concentration in the feed Csi (kg m3), and at a dilution rate D equal to the specific cell growth rate m. The cell concentration Cx (kg m3) and the substrate concentration Cs (kg m3) in the fermentor do not vary with time. This is not a steady-state process, as aforementioned. Then, by switching the mode of operation, part of the broth in the tank is continuously

12.6 Modes of Fermentor Operation 3

1

withdrawn as product at a rate P (m h ) equal to the feed rate F. The values of Cx and Cs in the withdrawn product should be equal to those in the tank, as the content of the tank is well mixed. The volume of the broth in the tank V becomes constant, as P equals F. The operation has now become continuous, and steady. As mentioned in Section 7.2.1, a well-mixed, stirred tank reactor, when used continuously, is termed a continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR). Similarly, a wellmixed, stirred tank fermentor used continuously is termed a continuous stirred tank fermentor (CSTF). If cell death is neglected, the cell balance for a CSTF is given as: P Cx ¼ F Cx ¼ m Cx V

ð12:24Þ

From Equations 12.24 and 12.18 m¼D

ð12:25Þ

The reciprocal of D is the residence time t of the liquid in the fermentor: 1=D ¼ V=F ¼ t

ð12:26Þ

Combination of Equation 12.25 and the Monod equation: m ¼ mmax Cs =ðKs þ Cs Þ

ð4:6Þ

Cs ¼ Ks D=ðmmax DÞ

ð12:27Þ

gives

The cell yield Yxs is defined as Yxs ¼ Cx =ðCsi Cs Þ

ð12:28Þ

From Equations 12.28 and 12.27, we obtain Cx ¼ Yxs ½Csi Ks D=ðmmax DÞ

ð12:29Þ

The cell productivity DCx – that is, the amount of cells produced per unit time per unit fermentor volume – can be calculated from the above relationship. In the situation where the left-hand side of Equation 12.24 (i.e., the amount of cells withdrawn from the fermentor per unit time) is greater than the right-hand side (i.e., the cells produced in the fermentor per unit time), then continuous operation will become impossible. This is the range where D is greater than m, as can be seen by dividing both sides of Equation 12.21 by P ( ¼ F); such a condition is referred to as a ‘‘washout.’’ Figure 12.3 shows how concentrations of cells and the substrate and the productivity vary with the dilution rate under steady conditions. Here, the calculated values (all made dimensionless) of the substrate concentration, Cs ¼ Cs/Csi, cell concentration Cx ¼ Cx/(Yxs Csi), and productivity DCx /mmax at k ¼ Ks/Csi ¼ 0.01 are plotted against the dimensionless dilution rate D/mmax. Although it can be seen that productivity is highest in the region where D nears mmax, the operation becomes unstable in this region.

| 205

206

| 12 Fermentor Engineering

Figure 12.3 Dimensionless concentrations of cells and the substrate and the productivity at k ¼ 0.01.

There are two possible ways of operating a CSTF: . In the chemostat, the dilution rate is set at a fixed value, and the rate of cell growth then adjusts itself to the set dilution rate. This type of operation is relatively easy to carry out, but becomes unstable in the region near the washout point. . In the turbidostat, P and F are kept equal but the dilution rate D is automatically adjusted to a preset cell concentration in the product by continuously measuring its turbidity. Compared to chemostat, turbidostat operation can be more stable in the region near the washout point, but requires more expensive instruments and automatic control systems. 12.6.4 Operation of Enzyme Reactors

Bioreactors that use enzymes but not microbial cells could be regarded as fermentors in the broadest sense. Although their modes of operation are similar to those of microbial fermentors, fed-batch operation is not practiced for enzyme reactors, because problems such as excessive cell growth rates and resultant high oxygen transfer rates do not exist with enzyme reactors. The basic equations for batch and continuous reactors for enzyme reactions can be derived by combining material balance relationships and the Michaelis–Menten equation for enzyme reactions.

12.7 Fermentors for Animal Cell Culture

For batch enzyme reactors, we have dCs =dt ¼ Vmax Cs =ðKm þ Cs Þ

ð12:30Þ

where Cs is the reactant concentration, Vmax is the maximum reaction rate, and Km is the Michaelis constant. For continuous enzyme reactors (i.e., CSTR for enzyme reactions), we have Equations 12.31 and 12.32: FðCsi Cs Þ ¼ Vmax Cs =ðKm þ Cs Þ

ð12:31Þ

DðCsi Cs Þ ¼ Vmax Cs =ðKm þ Cs Þ

ð12:32Þ

where F is the feed rate, V is the reactor volume, and D the dilution rate. In the case where an immobilized enzyme is used, the right-hand sides of Equations 12.31 and 12.32 should be multiplied by the total effectiveness factor Ef.

12.7 Fermentors for Animal Cell Culture

Animal cells, and in particular mammalian cells, are cultured on industrial scale to produce vaccines, interferons, monoclonal antibodies for diagnostic and therapeutic uses, among others materials. Animal cells are extremely fragile as they do not possess a cell wall, as do plant cells, and grow much more slowly than microbial cells. Animal cells can be allocated to two groups: (i) anchorage-independent cells, which can grow independently, without attachment surfaces; and (ii) anchorage-dependent cells, which grow on solid surfaces. Tissue cells belong to the latter group. For industrial-scale animal cell culture, stirred tanks can be used for both anchorage-independent and anchorage-dependent cells. The latter are sometimes cultured on the surface of so-called ‘‘microcarriers’’ suspended in the medium, a variety of which are available commercially. These microcarriers include solid or porous spheres (0.1 to a few mm in diameter) composed of polymers, cellulose, gelatin, and other materials. Anchorage-dependent cells can also be cultured in stirred tanks without microcarriers, although the cell damage caused by shear forces and bubbling must be minimized by using a very low impeller tip speed (0.5–1 m s1) and reducing the degree of bubbling by using pure oxygen for aeration. One method of culturing anchorage-dependent tissue cells is to use a bed of packings, on the surface of which the cells grow and through which the culture medium can be passed. Hollow fibers can also be used in this role; here, as the medium is passed through either the inside or outside of the hollow fibers, the cells grow on the other side. These systems have been used to culture liver cells to create a bioartificial liver (see Section 14.4.2).

| 207

208

| 12 Fermentor Engineering

" Problems

12.1 A fermentation broth contained in a batch-operated, stirred-tank fermentor, with a diameter D of 1.5 m, equipped with a flat-blade turbine with a diameter of 0.5 m, is rotated at a speed N ¼ 3 s1. The broth temperature is maintained at 30 1C with cooling water at 15 1C, which flows through a stainless steel helical coil, with an outside diameter of 40 mm and a thickness of 5 mm. The heat evolution by biochemical reactions is 2.5 104 kJ h1, and dissipation of mechanical energy input by the stirrer is 3.5 kW. Physical properties of the broth at 30 1C: density r ¼ 1,050 kg m3, viscosity m ¼ 0.004 Pa s, specific heat cp ¼ 4.2 kJ kg1 1C1, thermal conductivity k ¼ 2.1 kJ h1 m1 1C1. The thermal conductivity of stainless steel is 55 kJ h1 m1 1C1. Calculate the total length of the helical stainless steel coil that should be installed for the fermentor to function adequately. 12.2 Estimate the liquid-phase volumetric coefficient of oxygen transfer for a stirred-tank fermentor with a diameter of 1.8 m, containing a viscous nonNewtonian broth, with consistency index K ¼ 0.39, flow behavior index n ¼ 0.74, density r ¼ 1020 kg m3, superficial gas velocity UG ¼ 25 m h1, stirred by a flatblade turbine of diameter d ¼ 0.6 m, with a rotational speed N of 1 s1. 12.3 Estimate the liquid-phase volumetric coefficient of oxygen transfer for a bubble column fermentor, 0.8 m in diameter 9.0 m in height (clear liquid), containing the same liquid as in Problem 12.2. The superficial gas velocity is 150 m h1. 12.4 For an animal cell culture, satisfactory results were obtained with a pilot fermentor, 0.3 m in diameter, with a liquid height of 0.3 m (clear liquid), at a rotational impeller speed N of 1.0 s1 (impeller diameter 0.1 m) and an air rate (30 1C) of 0.02 m3 min1. The density and viscosity of the broth are 1020 kg m3 and 0.002 Pa s, respectively. The kLa value can be correlated by Equation 7.36. When kLa is used as the scale-up criterion, and the allowable impeller tip speed is 0.5 m s1, estimate the maximum diameter of a geometrically similar stirred tank. 12.5 Saccharomyces cerevisiae can grow at a constant specific growth rate of 0.24 h1 from 2.0 to 0.1 wt% glucose in YEPD medium. It is inoculated at a concentration of 0.01 kg dry-cell m3, and the cell yield is constant at 0.45 kg dry-cell kg-glucose–1. For how long does the exponential growth phase continue, starting from 2 wt% glucose? 12.6 Determine a value of the dilution rate where the maximum cell productivity is obtained in chemostat continuous cultivation.

Further Reading

References 1 Metzner, A.B. and Otto, R.E. (1957) AIChE J., 3, 3. 2 Bakker, A. and Gates, L.E. (1995) Chem. Eng. Prog., 91 (12), 25. 3 Yoshida, F., Ikeda, A., Imakawa, S., and Miura, Y. (1960) Ind. Eng. Chem., 52, 435. 4 Robinson, C.W. and Wilke, C.R. (1973) Biotech. Bioeng., 15, 755. 5 Yagi, H. and Yoshida, F. (1975) Biotech. Bioeng., 17, 1083. 6 Yagi, H. and Yoshida, F.J. (1974) Ferment. Technol., 52, 905. 7 Yoshida, F., Yamane, T., and Miyamoto, Y. (1970) Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 9, 570.

Further Reading 1 Aiba, S., Humphrey, A.E., and Mills, N.F. (1973) Biochemical Engineering, University of Tokyo Press. 2 Doran, P.M. (1995) Bioprocess Engineering Principles, Academic Press.

8 Yagi, H. and Yoshida, F. (1975) Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 14, 488. 9 Nishikawa, M., Kato, H., and Hashimoto, K. (1977) Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 16, 133. 10 Nakanoh, M. and Yoshida, F. (1980) Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 19, 190. 11 Yagi, H. and Yoshida, F. (1977) Biotech. Bioeng., 19, 801. 12 Benz, G.T. (2003) Chem. Eng. Prog., 99(5), 32. 13 Murakami, S., Nakamoto, R., and Matsuoka, T. (2000) Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu (in Japanese), 26, 557.

| 209

This page intentionally left blank

| 211

13 Downstream Operations in Bioprocesses

13.1 Introduction

Certain foodstuffs and pharmaceutical materials are produced by fermentations which include the culture of cells or microorganisms. When the initial concentrations of these products are low, a subsequent separation and purification by the so-called ‘‘downstream processing’’ is required to obtain them in their final form. In many cases, a high level of purity and biological safety are essential for these products. It is also vital that their biological properties are retained, as these may be lost if the processes were to be conducted at an inappropriate temperature or pH, or under incorrect ionic conditions. Consequently, only a limited number of techniques and operating conditions can be applied to the separation of these bioactive materials. Very often, many separation steps (as shown schematically in Figure 13.1) are required to achieve the requirements of high purity and biological safety during industrial bioprocessing. Thus, downstream processing may often account for a large proportion of the production costs. It should be pointed out here that most biochemical separation methods that have been developed in research laboratories cannot necessarily be practiced on an industrial scale, so as to achieve high recovery levels. Rather, innovative approaches are often necessary in these industrial processes to achieve separations that ensure a high purity and good recovery of the target product. Figure 13.2 [1] shows, as an example, several steps in the production of interferon a. In the first step, Escherichia coli (which actually produces the interferon) is obtained genetically, and a strain with high productivity is then selected (screened). Next, the strain is cultivated first on a small scale (flask culture), and then increasingly on larger scales, usually with approximately 10-fold increases in culture volume at each step. For large-scale cultivation, the fermentors such as have been described in Chapters 7 and 12 are used. Following fermentation, a series of procedures which, collectively, are referred to as ‘‘downstream processing,’’ are introduced which involve the ultimate separation and purification of the interferon. Through these stages, the various unit operations that have been described in Chapters 8, 9, and 11 are utilized, the aim being to satisfy the

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

212

| 13 Downstream Operations in Bioprocesses

Figure 13.1 The main steps in downstream processing.

requirements of both high purity and biological safety of the product. The interferon is produced within the E. coli cells, which must first be separated from the culture media by using centrifugation. The isolated cells are then solubilized by cell disruption, after which the fraction containing interferon is concentrated by salting-out. Two subsequent procedures using immunoaffinity and cationexchange chromatography raise the purity of the interferon 1000-fold. An alternative approach is taken in the production of monosodium glutamate (MSG) which, unlike interferon, is secreted into the fermentation broth. The

13.1 Introduction Genetic engineering Screening of microorganisms

Genetic manipulation of microorganism (E. coli) for production of interferon

Screening of strain Culture conditions

Fermentation (Bioreactions)

Seed culture

preculture(1L)

Fermentation (10L)

Separation and purification (Downstream processes)

amounts Cell separation (Centrifuge)

specific activity of interferon units/mg

1 kg (wet cell)

Cell disruption (High pressure homogenization) Centrifuge Sedimentation of product (Salting-out)

37.1 g(protein) 2.0 x 105

Centrifuge and dissolution Immunoaffinity chromatography

Cation exchange chromatography

30 mg

2.3 x 108

20 mg

3.0 x 108

Drying

Interferon

Figure 13.2 The steps of interferon a production.

stages of downstream processing for MSG are shown in Figure 13.3. Again, a variety of unit operations, including centrifugation, crystallization, vaporization, and fixed-bed adsorption, are used in this process. When planning an industrial-scale bioprocess, the main requirement is to scaleup each of the process steps. As the principles of the unit operations used in these downstream processes have been outlined in previous chapters, at this point we will discuss only examples of practical applications and scaling-up methods of two unit operations that are frequently used in downstream processes: (i) cell separation by filtration and microfiltration; and (ii) chromatography for fine purification of the target products.

| 213

214

| 13 Downstream Operations in Bioprocesses

Figure 13.3 The separation steps for monosodium glutamate.

13.2 Separation of Microorganisms by Filtration and Microfiltration 13.2.1 Dead-End Filtration

In conventional filtration systems used for cell separation, plate filters (e.g., a filter press) and/or rotary drum filters are normally used (cf. Chapter 9). The filtrate fluxes in these filters decrease with time due to an increase in the resistance of the cake RC (m1), as shown by Equation 9.1. If the cake on the filtering medium is incompressible, then RC can be calculated using Equation 9.2, with the value of the specific cake resistance a (m kg1) given by the Kozeny–Carman equation (Equation 9.3). For many microorganisms, however, the values of a obtained by dead-end filtration (cf. Section 9.3) are larger than those calculated by Equation 9.3, as shown

13.2 Separation of Microorganisms by Filtration and Microfiltration

in Figure 13.4 [2]. The volume–surface diameter (the abscissa of Figure 13.4) can be obtained as: (6 volume of microorganism/surface area of microorganism). Bacillar (rod-like shaped) microorganisms such as Bacillus and Escherichia show larger values of a than do cocci (microorganisms of spherical shape, such as baker’s yeast and Corynebacterium), because the porosities of the cake e (–) of the former microorganisms are smaller than those of the latter. In many cases, the cakes prepared from microorganisms are compressible, such that the pressure drop through the cake layer increases with increasing specific cake resistance, due to change in the shape of the particles. If the resistance of the filtering medium RM (m1) is small compared to RC, then the value of the specific cake resistance a (m kg1) will be approximately constant under a constant filtration pressure drop DP (Pa). Then, Equation 9.2 is substituted into Equation 9.1, and integration from the start of filtration to time t (s) gives 2 Vf 2RM Vf 2Dp þ ¼ t ð13:1Þ A arc A arc m where Vf is the volume of filtrate (m3), A is the filter area (m2), rc is the mass of cake solids per unit volume of filtrate (kg m3), and m is the liquid viscosity (Pa s). By this equation, the filtrate flux at time t (s) can be estimated for dead-end conventional filtration and microfiltration.

Figure 13.4 Specific cake resistance of several microorganisms, measured using dead-end filtration [2].

| 215

216

| 13 Downstream Operations in Bioprocesses Example 13.1

A suspension of baker’s yeast (rc ¼ 10 kg m3, m ¼ 0.001 kg m1 s1) is filtered with a dead-end filter (filter area ¼ 1 m3) at a constant filtration pressure difference of 0.1 MPa. Calculate the volume of filtrate versus time relationship, when the specific cake resistance of baker’s yeast a and the resistance of the filtering medium RM are 7 1011 m kg1 and 3.5 1010 m1, respectively. How long does it take to obtain 0.5 m3 of filtrate? Solution

Equation 13.1 gives 2 Vf 2 3:5 1010 Vf 2 105 þ t ¼ A 7 1011 10 A 7 1011 10 103 As shown in Figure 13.5, a plot of the filtrate volume Vf versus time t gives a parabolic curve. When Vf ¼ 0.5 m3, t is given as 2.48 h ¼ 149 min. The average filtrate flux from the start of filtration to 149 min is 5.6 105 m3 m2 s1.

Figure 13.5 Volume of filtrate plotted against time. Constant filtration pressure ¼ 0.1 MPa; concentration of baker’s yeast suspension ¼ 10 kg m3.

13.2.2 Cross-Flow Filtration

As stated in Chapter 9, cross-flow filtration (CFF) provides a higher efficiency than dead-end filtration, as some of particles retained on the membrane surface are

13.2 Separation of Microorganisms by Filtration and Microfiltration

swept off by the liquid flowing parallel to the surface. As shown by a solid line in Figure 13.6 [3], the filtrate flux decreases with time from the start of filtration due to an accumulation of filtered particles on the membrane surface, as in the case of dead-end filtration. The flux then reaches an almost constant value, where the accumulation of filtered particles on the membrane surface due to filtration is balanced by a sweeping-off of the particles. Whilst the earlier stage can be treated similarly to dead-end filtration, in the later stages the filtrate flux JF in CFF modules often depends on the shear rate, and can be expressed by Equation 13.2: JF / gnw

ð13:2Þ

where n ¼ 0.63 to 0.88 for suspensions of yeast cells [4]. The estimation of a steady-state value of the CFF filtrate flux in general is difficult, because it is affected by many factors, including the type of membrane module, the characteristics of the membranes and suspensions, and the operating conditions. For example, it has been reported that the specific cake resistance of cocci in CFF was equal to the value obtained by dead-end filtration. However, the cake resistance became much larger in the CFF of bacillar microorganisms

Figure 13.6 Cross-flow filtration flux of baker’s yeast suspension [3]. Cell concentration ¼ 7%; transmembrane pressure ¼ 0.49 bar; flow rate ¼ 0.5 m s1.

| 217

218

| 13 Downstream Operations in Bioprocesses because the cells became aligned along the streamline of the liquid. This leads to the porosity of the cake being less than that of a cake composed of randomly stacked cells. Furthermore, particulate contaminants and antifoam agents in the cell suspensions may increase the specific cake resistance. Thus, in many cases the filtrate fluxes must be measured experimentally using small-scale membrane modules in order to obtain basic data for the scale-up of CFF modules. Several methods to increase the steady-state filtrate flux of cell suspensions in CFF have been reported. Among these, backwashing with pressurized air during CFF is most common. It has been reported that the average filtrate flux was increased from 8.3 106 to 1.2 105 m s1 by backwashing for 5 s every 5 min during the CFF of E. coli [5]. The periodic stopping of permeation flow during CFF is also effective to increase the flux, as shown in Figure 13.6 [3]. In such an operation, a valve at the filtrate outlet was periodically closed, with or without introduction of air bubbles into the filtration module. The filtrate flux after 3 h was fourfold higher than that without periodic stopping.

13.3 Separation by Chromatography 13.3.1 Factors Affecting the Performance of Chromatography Columns

Liquid chromatography can be operated under mild conditions in terms of pH, ionic strength, polarity of liquid, and temperature. The apparatus used is simple in construction and easily scaled-up. Moreover, many types of interaction between the adsorbent (the stationary phase) and solutes to be separated can be utilized, as shown in Table 11.1. Liquid chromatography can be operated isocratically, stepwise, and with gradient changes in the mobile phase composition. Since the performance of chromatography columns was discussed, with use of several models and on the basis of retention time and the width of elution curves, in Chapter 11, we will at this point discuss some of the factors that affect the performance of chromatography columns. In order to estimate resolution among peaks eluted from a chromatography column, those factors which affect N must first be elucidated. By definition, a low value of Hs will result in a large number of theoretical plates for a given column length. As discussed in Chapter 11, Equation 11.20 obtained by the rate model shows the effects of axial mixing of the mobile phase fluid and mass transfer of solutes on Hs. 13.3.1.1 Velocity of Mobile Phase and Diffusivities of Solutes As the first term of the right-hand side of Equation 11.20 is independent of fluid velocity and proportional to the radius r0 (m) of particles packed as the stationary phase under normal conditions in chromatographic separation, Hs (m) will increases linearly with the interstitial velocity of the mobile phase u (m s1), as shown in Figure 11.9. With a decrease in the effective diffusivities of solutes Deff (m2 s1),

13.3 Separation by Chromatography

Hs for a given velocity will increase, while the intercept of the straight lines on the yaxis, which corresponds to the value of the first term of Equation 11.20, is constant for different solutes. The value of the intercept will depend on the radius of packed particles, but does not vary with the effective diffusivity of the solute. 13.3.1.2 Radius of Packed Particles To clarify the effect of the radius of packed particles on Hs, Equation 11.20 can be rearranged as follows, in case the liquid film mass transfer resistance is negligible:

Hs Dz 2ur0 EK ¼ þ 2r0 ur0 30ð1 þ EKÞ2 Deff

ð13:3Þ

When the effective difusivity of solutes Deff can be approximated by the diffusivity in water, D, multiplied by a constant which includes the effects of particle porosity and tortuosity of pores in particles, Equation 13.3 can be written as follows: Hs ¼ A þ Bn 2r0

ð13:4Þ

where n ¼ (2 r0 u)/D. In Figure 13.7, the left-hand side of Equation 13.4 is plotted against n for several diameters of gel particles [6]. The intercept is approximately 2 – that is, twice the particle diameter. The Hs for various solutes with different diffusivities can be correlated by this equation, which indicates effects of velocity of mobile phase, solute diffusivity, and radius of packed particles on Hs. This correlation indicates that packed particles with a small diameter are useful for attaining a high separation efficiency, because operation at high velocity without any loss of resolution is possible. A high-performance liquid chromatography

Figure 13.7 Hs/2r0 plotted against 2r0 u/Deff. r0 ¼ 17–37 mm; solute ¼ myoglobin, ovalbumin, bovine serum albumin; temperature ¼ 10, 20, 40 1C.

| 219

220

| 13 Downstream Operations in Bioprocesses (HPLC) analysis, in which particles with diameters of 3–5 mm are used as the stationary phase, shows the high resolution of eluted curves at relatively high velocities of the mobile phase. 13.3.1.3 Sample Volume Injected In industrial-scale chromatography, one very desirable aspect is the ability to handle large amounts of samples, without any increase in Hs. For sample volumes of up to a few percent of the total column volume, Hs remains constant, but it then increases with the sample volume. It has been reported that the effect of sample volume on Hs should rather be treated as the effect of the sample injection time t0 (s) [7].

Hs ¼ Zðs2t þ t20 =12Þ=ðtR þ t0 =2Þ2

ð13:5Þ

where Z is the column height (m), s2t is the dispersion of the elution curve at a small sample volume (s2), and tR is the retention time (s). The dispersion s2t is obtained from the peak width (4st) of an elution curve on the plot of solute concentrations versus time. From the relative magnitudes of s2t and t20 =12, a suitable injection time t0 without significant loss of resolution can be determined. 13.3.1.4 Column Diameter The effect of the column diameter on the shapes of elution curves was studied with use of hard particles (Toyopearl HW55F) for gel chromatography [7] and soft particles (Matrex Blue A) for affinity chromatography [8]. The results showed that Hs did not vary for column diameters of 1.0–9.0 cm in the former case, nor for column diameters of 1.65–18.4 cm in the latter case. When soft compressible particles are used, the pressure drop increases substantially with the velocity of the mobile phase above a certain velocity because of compression of the particles, thus limiting allowable velocity. Such compression of particles becomes significant with increases in the column diameter.

Example 13.2

In a gel chromatography column packed with particles of average radius 22 mm at an interstitial velocity of the mobile phase 1.2 cm min1, two peaks show poor separation characteristics, that is, RS ¼ 0.85. (a) What velocity of the mobile phase should be applied to attain good separation (RS above 1.2) with the same column length? (b) What length of a column should be used to obtain RS ¼ 1.2 at the same velocity? The linear correlation of h ¼ Hs/2r0 versus n shown Figure 13.7 can be applied to this system, and the diffusivities of these solutes of 7 107 cm2 s1 can be used.

13.3 Separation by Chromatography

Solution

Under the present conditions n ¼ ð2r0 uÞ=D ¼ ð2 0:0022 1:2Þ=ð60 7 107 Þ ¼ 125 From Figure 13.7 h ¼ Hs=ð2 0:0022Þ ¼ 9:0 Hs ¼ 0:040 1. RS increases in proportion to (Hs)1/2. Thus, the value of Hs must be lower than 0.020 to obtain the resolution RS larger than 1.2. Again, from Figure 13.7 n ¼ 46 Then, u ¼ 0:0073 cm s1 ¼ 0:44 cm min1 2. At the same value of Hs, RS increases in proportion to N1/2, that is, Z1/2. To increase the value of RS from 0.85 to 1.2, the column should be (1.2/0.85)2 ¼ 2.0 times longer.

13.3.2 Scale-Up of Chromatography Columns

The scale-up of chromatography separation means increasing the recovered amount of a target which satisfies a required purity per unit time. This can be achieved by simply increasing the column diameter, and also by shortening the time required for separation, and/or by increasing the sample volume applied to a column [9]. The scale-up of chromatography operated in isocratic elution can be carried out as follows. When particles of the same dimension and characteristics are packed in a largerscale column, the linear velocity and the sample volume per unit cross-sectional area should be kept unchanged. When the radius of particles packed and/or the column height are changed, the number of theoretical plates of a large-scale column must be kept equal to that of a small column; that is: NL ¼ NS ¼ ðZ=HsÞL or S

ð13:6Þ

From a correlation similar to Figure 13.7, the velocity of the mobile phase for the larger column to obtain the equal value of NL can be determined. The resolution between a target and a contaminant can be estimated by Equation 11.23 to calculate the purity and recovery of the target.

| 221

222

| 13 Downstream Operations in Bioprocesses In chromatography separations operated under gradient elution, one simple method of obtaining an equal peak width of a specific solute in columns of different dimensions is to keep the numbers of theoretical stages of both columns equal. 13.4 Separation in Fixed Beds

In the downstream processing of bioprocesses, fixed-bed adsorbers are used extensively both for the recovery of a target and the removal of contaminants. Moreover, their performance can be estimated from the breakthrough curve, as stated in Chapter 11. The break time tB is given by Equation 11.13, and the extent of the adsorption capacity of the fixed bed utilized at the break point and loss of adsorbate can be calculated from the break time and the adsorption equilibrium. Affinity chromatography, as well as some ion-exchange chromatography, are operated as specific adsorption and desorption steps, and the overall performance is affected by the column capacity available at the break point and the total operation time. The scale-up of a fixed-bed separation may be carried out by increasing the diameter of a column, the length of the packed bed, and/or the flow rate of the feed solution. The pressure drop through the column limits the length of the packed bed. The amount of adsorbate treated per unit time and the unit sectional area of a column will increase with the linear velocity of the feed. However, the slope of the breakthrough curve becomes gentle with an increase in the velocity, when the intraparticle resistance of solute transfer is dominant, and thus the fraction of the column capacity available at the break point will decrease. Therefore, the linear

Figure 13.8 Calculated purification rates with two support materials. Concentration of BSA in feed ¼ 0.05 mg ml1; adsorption capacity ¼ 0.9 mg-BSA ml1-bed; column size ¼ 4.6 100 mm.

13.4 Separation in Fixed Beds

velocity at which the maximum rate of treatment is reached depends on the column length. When soft compressible particles are used, the maximum velocity is limited due to a rapid increase in the pressure drop. Figure 13.8 shows the purification rates (mg h1) of bovine serum albumin by affinity chromatography with antibody ligands coupled to two different packed materials, namely soft particles made from agarose, and hard particles as used in HPLC [10]. The purification rate increases with the linear velocity of the mobile phase, while the maximum rate depends on the characteristics of the packed particles.

Example 13.3

Calculate the fractional residual capacity at the break point for the fixed bed of Example 11.2. The fractional residual capacity of the adsorption zone can be approximated as 0.5. Estimate the residual capacity, when the interstitial velocity is doubled. It can be assumed that the averaged overall volumetric coefficient increases with the interstitial velocity to the power of 0.2. Solution

The length of the adsorption zone is given as eu za ¼ KL a

za ¼

ZCE CB

dCA CA CA

0:5 1:6 2:26 ¼ 0:196 m 9:2

Since the fractional residual capacity of the adsorption zone is 0.5 and the bed height is 0.25 m, the residual capacity is given as ð0:196 0:5Þ=0:25 100 ¼ 39:3% At the interstitial velocity of 3.2 m h1 the overall volumetric coefficient is 9:2 20:2 ¼ 10:7 h1 Thus, za ¼

0:5 3:2 2:26 ¼ 0:338 m 10:7

The residual capacity is ð0:338 0:5Þ=0:25 100 ¼ 67:6% Two-thirds of the adsorption capacity is not utilized at the break point in this case.

| 223

224

| 13 Downstream Operations in Bioprocesses 13.5 Sanitation in Downstream Processes

As bioproducts must be pure and safe, they must be free from contamination with viruses, microorganisms and pyrogens; an example of the latter is the lipopolysaccharides from Gram-negative bacteria, which cause fevers to develop in mammals. In downstream processes, these types of contaminant must be avoided and eliminated. The equipment used, including the tubes, tube fittings, valves and gaskets, must be made from safe materials, and be easily cleaned by washing and sterilization in place. In case these materials are not resistant to steam sterilization, then sanitizing chemicals, such as 0.1–0.5 mol l1 NaOH solution, sodium hypochlorite, and detergents, can be used for the sterilization of microorganisms, the inactivation of viruses, and the removal of any proteins that have adsorbed onto the equipment surfaces. In these procedures, the design details and materials to be used, as well as the actual operations, must follow any authoritative regulations.

" Problems

13.1 A suspension of baker’s yeast (rc ¼ 20 kg m3, m ¼ 0.0012 kg m1 s1) is filtered with a dead-end filter (filter area ¼ 1 m3) at a constant filtration pressure. Neglecting the resistance of the filtering medium, determine the filtration pressure difference DP to obtain 0.5 m3 of filtrate after 2.5 h. 13.2 In the case where only the length of a gel chromatography column is doubled, how is the resolution of two solutes changed under the same operating conditions with the same packed beads? 13.3 Derive Equation 13.5. 13.4 For a scale-up of gel chromatography, the diameter of the packed beads will be increased from 44 to 75 mm. How much should the velocity of the mobile phase in the scaled-up column be reduced to attain a resolution the same as the small column (Hs ¼ 0.22 mm) with the same column length? The linear correlation of h versus n shown in Figure 13.7 can be applied to this system. 13.5 When the height of the adsorbent bed is 50 cm under the same operating conditions given in Example 11.2, estimate the residual capacity.

Further Reading

References 1 Staehelin, T., Hobbs, D.S., Kung, H., Lai, C.-Y., and Pestka, S. (1981) J. Biol. Chem., 256, 9750. 2 Nakanishi, K., Tadokoro, T., and Matsuno, R. (1987) Chem. Eng. Commun., 62, 187. 3 Tanaka, T., Itoh, H., Itoh, K., and Nakanishi, K. (1995) Biotechnol. Bioeng., 47, 401. 4 Tanaka, T., Tsuneyoshi, S., Kitazawa, W., and Nakanishi, K. (1997) Sep. Sci. Technol., 32, 1885. ¨tte, H., Hustedt, H., 5 Kroner, K.H., Schu and Kula, M.R. (1987) Process Biochem., April, 67.

6 Yamamoto, S., Nomura, M., and Sano, Y. (1987) J. Chromatogr., 394, 363. 7 Yamamoto, S., Nomura, M., and Sano, Y. (1986) J. Chem. Eng. Japan, 19, 227. 8 Katoh, S. (1987) Trends Biotechnol., 5, 328. 9 Janson, J.-C. and Hedman, P. (1982) Adv. Biochem. Eng., 25 (Chromatography Special Edition), 43. 10 Katoh, S., Terashima, M., Majima, T. et al. (1994) J. Ferment. Bioeng., 78, 246.

Further Reading 1 King, C.J. (1971) Separation Processes, McGraw-Hill. 2 LeRoith, D., Shiloach, J., and Leahy, T.M. (eds) (1985) Purification of Fermentation Products – Application to Large-Scale Processes, ACS Symposium Series No. 271, American Chemical Society.

3 Scopes, R.K. (1994) Protein Purification – Principles and Practice, Springer-Verlag. 4 Turkova, J. (1978) Affinity Chromatography, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co. 5 Wheelwright, S.M. (1991) Protein Purification, Hanser.

| 225

This page intentionally left blank

| 227

14 Medical Devices

14.1 Introduction

One type of medical device – the so-called artificial organs – can be designed and/ or evaluated on the basis of chemical engineering principles. For example, the ‘‘artificial kidney’’ is a membrane device, mainly a dialyzer, which is capable of cleaning the blood of patients with chronic kidney diseases. Likewise, a ‘‘blood oxygenator’’ is used outside the body during surgery for oxygen transfer to, and CO2 removal from, the blood. The ‘‘bioartificial liver’’ is a bioreactor which performs the liver functions of patients with liver failure, by using liver cells. For details of the physiology and anatomy of human internal organs, the reader should refer to medical textbooks (e.g., [1, 2]).

14.2 Blood and Its Circulation 14.2.1 Blood and Its Components

Roughly speaking, 60% of a human being’s body weight is water, of which 40% is contained within the cells (intracellular fluid) and 20% outside the cells (extracellular fluid). The extracellular water consists of the water in the interstitial fluids (15% of body weight) – that is, fluid in the interstices between cells and blood vessels – and the water in the blood plasma (5% of the body weight). Plasma, the liquid portion of the blood, is an aqueous solution of very many organic and inorganic substances. Blood is a suspension in plasma of various blood corpuscles, such as erythrocytes (red blood cells), leukocytes (white blood cells), platelets, and others. The volumetric percentage of erythrocytes in whole blood is called the hematocrit, the values of which are 42–45% in healthy men and 38–42% in woman. In man, a 1 ml blood sample will contain approximately 5 106 erythrocytes, with Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

228

| 14 Medical Devices leukocyte and platelet numbers being approximately 1/600 and 1/20 that of erythrocytes, respectively. The erythrocyte is disc-shaped, 7.5–8.5 mm in diameter, and 1–2.5 mm thick, but is thinner at its central region. Functionally, erythrocytes contain hemoglobin, which combines very rapidly with oxygen (as will be discussed later). There are various types of leukocyte, the main function of which are to protect against infection. One type of leukocyte, the macrophages, engulf and digest various foreign particles and bacteria that have passed into the interstitial spaces. Lymphocytes exist as two types: (i) B cells, which produce antibodies (i.e., various immunoglobulins); and (ii) T cells, which destroy foreign cells, activate macrophages, and regulate the production of antibodies by B cells. Complements are proteins in plasma that assist the functions of antibodies in a variety of ways. Clotting – the coagulation of blood – involves a series of very complicated chain reactions that are assisted by enzymes. In the final stage of blood clotting, the protein fibrinogen, which is soluble in plasma, becomes insoluble fibrin, which encloses the red cells and platelets, with the latter component playing an important role in the clotting process. If a blood vessel is injured, clotting must occur to stop further bleeding. However, clotting must not occur in blood which is flowing through the blood vessels, or through artificial organs. Within the blood vessels, blood does not coagulate due to the existence of antithrombin and other anticoagulants. Serum is plasma from which the fibrinogen has been removed during the process of clotting, and can be obtained by stirring and then centrifuging the clotted blood. Heparin, an anticoagulant which is widely used for blood flowing through artificial organs, is a mucopolysaccharide that is obtained from the liver or lung of animals. It is also possible to prevent blood clotting in vitro by the addition of oxalic acid or citric acid; these combine with the Ca2 þ ions that are required in clotting reactions, and block the process. Hemolysis is the leakage of hemoglobin into liquid such as plasma, and is due to disruption of the erythrocytes. Within the body, hemolysis may be caused by some diseases or poisons, whereas hemolysis outside the body, as in artificial organs, is caused by physical or chemical factors. If erythrocytes are placed in water, hemolysis will occur as the cells rupture due to the difference in osmotic pressure between water and the intracellular liquid. Hemolysis in artificial organs and their accessories occurs due to a variety of physical factors, including turbulence, shear, and changes of pressure and velocity. It is difficult, however, to obtain any quantitative correlation between the rates of hemolysis and such physical factors. The body fluids can be regarded as buffer solutions, with the normal pH values of the extracellular fluids (including blood) and intracellular fluids being 7.4 and 7.2, respectively. Plasma or serum can be regarded as a Newtonian fluid. The viscosity of plasma at 37 1C is approximately 1.2 cp. In contrast, whole blood shows non-Newtonian behavior, its viscosity decreasing with an increasing shear rate, but with a decreasing hematocrit.

14.2 Blood and Its Circulation

14.2.2 Blood Circulation

The circulation of blood was discovered and reported by W. Harvey, in 1628. Figure 14.1 is a simplified diagram showing the main flows of blood in the human body. The heart consists of four compartments, but for simplicity we can consider the heart as a combination of two blood pumps, the right heart and the left heart. The blood coming from various parts of the body is propelled by the right heart pump through the lung (pulmonary) artery to the lungs, where the blood absorbs oxygen from the air and desorbs carbon dioxide into the air. The oxygenated blood returns from the lungs through the pulmonary vein to the left heart. This blood circulation through the lungs is called the ‘‘lesser circulation.’’ The blood vessels which carry blood toward the various organs and tissues are known as arteries, whereas blood vessels carrying blood from the organs and tissues towards the heart are called veins. As shown in the figure, the blood from the left heart is pumped through the arteries to the various organs and tissues from where, after exchanging various substances, it is returned through the veins to the right heart. This blood circulation is called the ‘‘major circulation.’’ In Figure 14.1 only the large arteries and veins are shown. However, in the organs and tissues the arteries branch into many smaller blood vessels – the

Figure 14.1 A simplified blood flow diagram in humans.

| 229

230

| 14 Medical Devices arterioles – which further branch into many fine blood vessels that range from 5 to 20 mm in inner diameter, and are termed capillaries. Various nutrients and other required substances are transported from the arterial blood through the walls of the arterial capillaries into tissues and organs. In contrast, waste products and unrequired substances produced by the organs and tissues are transported to the venous blood through the walls of the venous capillaries, which combine into venules, and then into larger veins. The spleen is an organ, the main functions of which are formation and purification of blood. Blood from the spleen and intestine is passed through the portal vein to the liver for further reactions. The functions of the lungs, kidneys, and liver will be described later in the chapter. The coronary arteries, which branch from the aorta, supply blood to the muscles of the heart. The flow rate of blood through the heart is approximately 4–5 l min1 for adults. The typical mean blood velocity through the aorta (which is the largest artery, with a diameter of 2–3 cm), when pumped from the left heart, is approximately 25 cm s1 (mean); the maximum velocity is approximately 60 cm s1. The Reynolds number for the maximum velocity is about 3000. In general, the blood flow through the arteries and veins is laminar in nature. In capillaries, the typical blood velocity is 0.5–1 mm s1, and the Reynolds number is on the order of 0.001. 14.3 Oxygenation of Blood 14.3.1 Use of Blood Oxygenators

The function of the lung is to absorb oxygen into the blood for distribution to the various parts of the body, while simultaneously desorbing carbon dioxide from the venous blood that is received from the organs and tissues. The lungs consist of a pair of spongy, sac-like organs, in which the air passages end in very small hemispherical sacs known as alveoli. The total surface area of the alveolar walls in both lungs is approximately 90 m2. The alveolar walls are surrounded by capillaries, such that the gas transfer between the blood and the alveolar gas occurs through the alveolar wall, the interstitial fluid, capillary membrane, plasma, and the erythrocyte membrane. The term ‘‘artificial lung,’’ which often is used as the synonym for a blood oxygenator, is sometimes confused by laymen with the ‘‘respirator,’’ which is a mechanical device used for artificial respiration. For this reason, we will not use the term artificial lung in this book. As the human lungs are very closely connected to the heart, it is difficult to bypass only the heart during heart surgery. The socalled ‘‘heart–lung machine,’’ which performs the functions of the heart and lungs, may be used for several hours during heart surgery. The system consists of a blood pump, a blood oxygenator, and a heat exchanger, where the blood

14.3 Oxygenation of Blood

oxygenator performs the functions of lungs – that is, to absorb oxygen into, and desorb carbon dioxide from, the blood. Occasionally, the blood oxygenator may be used continuously for several days, or even for few weeks, to assist the lung functions of patients suffering from acute severe respiratory diseases. 14.3.2 Oxygen in Blood

The absorption of oxygen into the blood is not a simple physical gas absorption. Rather, it is gas absorption with chemical reactions, known as ‘‘oxygenation.’’ Oxygenation is not oxidation, as the Fe2 þ in hemoglobin is not oxidized. Oxygenation involves very rapid, reversible, loose reactions between oxygen and the hemoglobin contained in the erythrocytes. Typically, the hemoglobin concentration in blood is 15 g dl1, when the hematocrit is 42%. Hemoglobin, a protein with a molecular weight of 68 000 Da, consists of four subunits each with a molecular weight of 17 000 Da. Oxygenation proceeds in the following four steps: 1. 2. 3. 4.

hb4 þ O2 ¼ hb4O2 hb4O2 þ O2 ¼ hb4O4 hb4O4 þ O2 ¼ hb4O6 hb4O6 þ O2 ¼ hb4O8

where hb indicates one subunit of the hemoglobin molecule. From the above relationships and the law of mass action, the following Adair equation [3] was obtained: y=100 ¼

K1 p þ 2K1 K2 p2 þ 3K1 K2 K3 p3 þ 4K1 K2 K3 K4 p4 4ð1 þ K1 p þ K1 K2 p2 þ K1 K2 K3 p3 þ K1 K2 K3 K4 p4 Þ

ð14:1Þ

where y is the oxygen saturation (%), p is the oxygen partial pressure (mmHg), the Ks are the equilibrium constants (–) of the above four reactions: (1) to (4). Their values at pH ¼ 7.4 are K1 ¼ 0.066, K2 ¼ 0.018, K3 ¼ 0.010, and K4 ¼ 0.36 [4]. The increase of K values with pH is given by Equation 14.2 [5]: log K ¼ log Kðat pH ¼ 7:2Þ þ 0:48ðpH 7:2Þ

ð14:2Þ

in which K values at pH ¼ 7.2 are as follows: K1 ¼ 0:0415; K2 ¼ 0:0095; K3 ¼ 0:0335; K4 ¼ 0:103 From the practical point of view, the following empirical equation of Hill [6] is more convenient. y=100 ¼ Hpn =ð1 þ Hpn Þ

ð14:3Þ

| 231

232

| 14 Medical Devices where y is oxygen saturation (%), and p is oxygen partial pressure (mmHg). Values of the empirical constants H and n vary with pCO2 (hence pH) and temperature. Equation 14.3 can be transformed into Equation 14.3a log½y=ð1 yÞ ¼ log H þ n log p

ð14:3aÞ

Thus, plotting experimental values of the left-hand side of Equation 14.3a against those of log p gives the values of H and n, that are functions of pH and temperature. Figure 14.2 [7] is the so-called ‘‘oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve’’ which correlates hemoglobin saturation y (%) with the oxygen partial pressure pO2 (mmHg). Hemoglobin is approximately 75% saturated at a pO2 of 40 mmHg (venous blood) and approximately 97% saturated at a pO2 of 90 mmHg (arterial blood). As shown in Figure 14.2, a lower pH (higher pCO2) in tissues makes y smaller for a given pO2, resulting in more oxygen transfer from blood to tissues (the Bohr effect).

Figure 14.2 The oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve. Table 14.1 Partial pressures of gases in the body (mmHg).

Gases

O2

CO2

H2O

N2

Inspired air Expired gas Alveolar gas Arterial blood Blood in tissue Venous blood

158 116 100 95 40 40

0.3 32 40 40 46 46

5.7 47 47 47 47 47

596 565 573 578 627 627

14.3 Oxygenation of Blood

Table 14.1 lists the partial pressures (mmHg) of oxygen, carbon dioxide, water, and nitrogen in the inspired air, expired air, air in alveoli, arterial blood, blood in tissues, and venous blood. 14.3.3 Carbon Dioxide in Blood

When the partial pressure of CO2 is 40 mmHg, 100 ml of blood at 37 1C contains 50 cm3 of CO2, 44 cm3 of which as bicarbonate ions HCO3, 3 cm3 as physically dissolved CO2, and the remainder as compounds with proteins such as hemoglobin. The bicarbonate ion is produced by the following reversible reactions: CO2 þ H2 O $ H2 CO3 $ Hþ þ HCO 3 ðAÞ

ðBÞ

Reaction (B) is very rapid. Reaction (A) is slow, but becomes very rapid in the presence of the enzyme carbonic anhydrase, which exists in the erythrocytes. Carbon dioxide produced by the gas exchange in tissues moves into erythrocytes, while bicarbonate ions produced by reactions (A) and (B) in the erythrocytes move out into the plasma. Carbonic acid, H2CO3, is a weak acid that dissociates by the above reaction (B). In general, a solution of a weak acid HA which dissociates into H þ and A will serve as a buffer solution. Thus, respiration in lungs contributes to physiological buffering actions. The normal pH value of the extracellular fluids at 37 1C is about 7.4, while that of the intracellular fluids is about 7.2. This can be explained by the buffering action of carbonic acid. In general, when a weak acid HA dissociates into H þ and A, the following relationship holds: ½Hþ ½A =½HA ¼ K where K is the dissociation equilibrium constant. From this relationship the following Henderson–Hasselbalch equation for pH is obtained: pH ¼ log½Hþ ¼ log½1=K þ logf½A =½HAg

ð14:4Þ

Most of the CO2 in blood exists as HCO3 produced by the dissociation of H2CO3. For this dissociation reaction, the value of log [1/K] ¼ pK at 37 1C is 6.10. The ratio [HCO3]/[H2CO3] at 37 1C is maintained at approximately 20 by the respiration in the lungs. Then, Equation 14.4 gives pH ¼ 7.4. Most of the CO2 which is physically absorbed by the blood becomes H2CO3 by the above-mentioned reaction (A), in the presence of carbonic anhydrase. Thus, [H2CO3] is practically equal to [CO2], which should be proportional to the partial pressure of CO2, that is, pCO2. Even if H þ is added to blood, it decreases HCO3 producing H2CO3, which is expired in the lungs as CO2 and H2O. The total CO2 concentration, which can be

| 233

234

| 14 Medical Devices determined by chemical analysis, is the sum of [HCO3] and [CO2], and the latter should be proportional to the partial pressure of CO2, that is, pCO2. ½CO2 ¼ s pCO2 where the value of s at 37 1C is (0.0314 mmol l1)/(pCO2 Hg). Thus, the following equation is obtained from Equation 14.4 for pH of blood at 37 1C: pH ¼ 6:10 þ logf½total CO2 s pCO2 =s pCO2 g

ð14:5Þ

14.3.4 Types of Blood Oxygenator

Blood oxygenators are gas–liquid bioreactors. During heart surgery, the blood which flows through the heart and lungs is bypassed through the heart–lung machine, which is used outside the body and consists mainly of a blood oxygenator and blood pump. Since about 1950, many types of blood oxygenator have been developed and used. The early models of blood oxygenator included: (i) the bubbletype, in which oxygen was bubbled through the blood; (ii) the blood film-type, in which blood films formed on the surface of rotating disks were brought into contact with oxygen; and (iii) the sheet-type, in which blood and oxygen flowed through channels which were separated by flat sheets of gas-permeable membranes. Each of these early models had to be assembled and sterilized every time before use. The bubble-type also required a section for the complete removal of any fine gas bubbles remaining in the blood, while the sheet-type was quite large because of the poor gas permeability of the early membranes. For all of these early blood oxygenators, separate heat exchangers were required to control the blood temperature. Recently developed blood oxygenators are disposable, used only once, and can be presterilized and coated with anticoagulant (e.g., heparin) when they are constructed. Normally, membranes with high gas permeabilities, such as silicone rubber membranes, are used. In the case of microporous membranes, which are also used widely, the membrane materials themselves are not gas permeable, but gas–liquid interfaces are formed in the pores of the membrane. The blood does not leak from the pores for at least for several hours, due to its surface tension. Composite membranes consisting of microporous polypropylene and silicone rubber have also been developed. Hollow-fiber (capillary)-type membrane oxygenators are the most widely used today, and comprise two main types: (i) those where blood flow occurs inside the capillaries; and (ii) those where there is a cross-flow of blood outside the capillaries. Although in the first type the blood flow is always laminar, the second type has been used more extensively in recent times, as the mass transfer coefficients are higher due to blood turbulence outside capillaries and hence the membrane area can be smaller. Figure 14.3 shows an example of the cross-flow type membrane oxygenator, with a built-in heat exchanger for controlling the blood temperature.

14.3 Oxygenation of Blood

Figure 14.3 Schematic representation of a hollow-fiber-type membrane oxygenator.

All of the above-mentioned blood oxygenators are used outside the body, and hence are referred to as ‘‘extracorporeal’’ oxygenators. They are mainly used for heart surgery, which can last for up to several hours. However, blood oxygenators are occasionally used extracorporeally to assist the pulmonary function of the patients in acute respiratory failure (ARF) for an extended periods of up to a few weeks. This use of extracorporeal oxygenators is known as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Intracorporeal oxygenators are an entirely different type of blood oxygenator that can be used within the body to temporarily and partially assist the lung functions of patients with serious pulmonary diseases. No blood pump is necessary, but a supply of oxygen-rich gas is required. Some suggestions have also been made regarding the implantation of an oxygenator within the body; in the case of the VOX (intravascular oxygenator), a series of clinical tests was performed, whereby woven capillaries of hollow fibers were inserted into the lower large vein leading to the right heart, and oxygen gas was passed through the capillaries and blood flows outside the capillaries. Although these devices might be referred to as ‘‘artificial lungs,’’ they cannot totally substitute for the functions of natural lungs.

| 235

236

| 14 Medical Devices 14.3.5 Oxygen Transfer Rates in Blood Oxygenators

The gas-phase resistance for oxygen transfer in blood oxygenation is always negligible. With modern membrane-type blood oxygenators, the mass transfer resistance of membranes is usually much smaller than that of the blood phase. Hence, we need to consider only the blood phase mass transfer. 14.3.5.1 Laminar Blood Flow In the case where the blood flow is laminar, as within hollow-fiber oxygenators, the rates of blood oxygenation can be predicted on a theoretical basis. Due to the shape of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve, and the fact that the oxygen partial pressure in most blood oxygenators is normally about around 700 mmHg, the oxygenation reaction in such blood oxygenators is completed within the extremely thin reaction front, which advances into the unreacted zone as the reaction proceeds, with the necessary oxygen being supplied by diffusion through the oxygenated blood. Based on the advancing-front model, Lightfoot [8] obtained some useful solutions. For laminar blood flow through hollow fibers:

zþ ¼

3 1 2 Z4 Z4 ðZ Þ þ ðZ2 Þln Z 8 2 4 4

ð14:6Þ

where z þ is the dimensionless fiber length defined by zþ ¼

ðCW CS Þ D02 z ðCW CS Þz ¼ d2 u CHb ðReÞðScÞd CHb

ð14:7Þ

in which CW and CS are oxygen concentrations at the fiber wall and at the reaction front, respectively, CHb is the hemoglobin concentration, DO2 is the oxygen diffusivity through saturated blood, z is the fiber length, d is the inside fiber diameter, and u the average blood velocity through the follow fiber (all in consistent units). Z is the ratio of the distance r of the reaction front from the fiber axis to the inside radius of the fibers R; that is, Z ¼ r/R. In the case where blood flows through the hollow fibers, the ratio f of the decrease in unreacted hemoglobin to the hemoglobin entering the fiber is given by f ¼ 1 2Z2 þ Z4

ð14:8Þ

f ¼ ðQ0 QÞ=Q0

ð14:9Þ

where

where Q is the flow rate of unreacted hemoglobin, and Q0 is its value at the fiber entrance. Oxygen diffusivity through oxygenated blood DO2 at 37 1C can be estimated, for example, by Equation 14.10 [9] or by Figure 14.4a DO2 ðcm2 s1 Þ ¼ ð2:13 0:0092 HtÞ 105 where Ht is the hematocrit (%).

ð14:10Þ

14.3 Oxygenation of Blood

Figure 14.4 (a) Diffusivity of oxygen in blood DB; (b) kinematic viscosity of blood nB, at 37 1C.

14.3.5.2 Turbulent Blood Flow In the case where the blood flow is turbulent, we can use the concept of enhancement factor E for the case of liquid-phase mass transfer with a chemical reaction (see Section 6.5). Thus,

k B ¼ E kB

ð14:11Þ

The value of the liquid phase mass transfer coefficient kB can be obtained from the experimental data for physical absorption of oxygen into blood saturated with oxygen, or estimated from the data with the same apparatus for physical oxygen absorption into water or a reference liquid or solution with known physical properties. Mass transfer coefficients for liquids flowing through or across tubes or hollow fibers can usually be correlated by equations, such as Equation 6.26 for

| 237

238

| 14 Medical Devices laminar flow through tubes, and Equation 6.27 for turbulent flow outside and across tubes. For the latter case kB =k0 ¼ ðDO2B =DO20 Þ2=3 ðvB =v0 Þ1=3

ð14:12Þ

in which DO2 is the oxygen diffusivity (cm2 s1), n is the kinematic viscosity (cm2 s1), and subscript B for blood, subscript O for reference liquid. Experimental values of kinematic viscosity of blood nB at 37 1C are shown in Figure 14.4b [9] as a function of the hematocrit (%). Experimental values of the enhancement factor E for blood oxygenation under turbulent conditions are shown in Figure 14.5 [9]. Note that values of E shown in this figure were obtained with completely deoxygenated blood and hemoglobin solutions at the oxygen pressure at the interface pi of 714 mmHg. The concentration of unsaturated hemoglobin should decrease as oxygenation proceeds. Taking this into account, the following concept of the effective hematocrit Ht was proposed [10, 11]. Ht ¼ ð1 yÞHt

ð14:13Þ

in which y is the fractional oxygen saturation of blood (–). Thus, the effective hematocrit is the hematocrit corresponding to the unreacted fraction of hemoglobin conceived for convenience. It is reasonable to assume that, for partially saturated blood, the correlation shown in Figure 14.5 holds for Ht rather than for Ht. The correlation of Figure 14.5 can be represented by the following empirical equation [10, 11]: E 714 ¼ 1 þ 11:8ðHt =100Þ0:8 8:9ðHt =100Þ

ð14:14Þ

in which E714 is the E-value for the oxygen partial pressure at the interface pi of 714 mmHg. It can be shown that E-values for other pi values can be estimated by the following relationship [9]: E ¼ E714 ð714=pi Þ1=3

ð14:15Þ

The overall coefficient of oxygen transfer based on the blood phase KB (cm s1), neglecting the gas phase resistance, is given as 1=KB ¼ a=KG ¼ 1=kM þ 1=k B

ð14:16Þ

where KG is the overall oxygen transfer coefficient based on gas phase (mol or cm3 min1 cm2 atm1 or mmHg1), a is the physical oxygen solubility in blood (mol or cm3 cm3 atm1 or mmHg1), and kM is the diffusive oxygen permeability of the membrane (cm min1). The flux of oxygen transfer per unit membrane area JO2 (mol or cm3 min1 cm2) is given by JO2 ¼ KB ðC CÞ ¼ KG ðp p Þ

ð14:17Þ

14.3 Oxygenation of Blood

Figure 14.5 Enhancement factor for blood oxygenation.

in which C is the oxygen concentration in blood (mol or cm3 cm3), C is the fictitious value of C in equilibrium with the oxygen partial pressure in the gas phase p (atm or mmHg), and p is the fictitious value of p in equilibrium with C. As the overall driving potentials (C C) as well as (pp ) vary over the membrane surface, some appropriate mean driving potential (C C)m or (p p)m should be used in calculating total rate of oxygen transfer IO2 (mol or cm3 min1). Thus, IO2 ¼ KB AðC CÞm ¼ KG Aðp pÞm

ð14:18Þ

For physical oxygen absorption into an inert liquid (e.g., water), the logarithmic mean, or even the arithmetic mean if the ratio of the driving potentials at both ends is less than 2, driving potentials can be used. This is not appropriate in calculating the rate of oxygen transfer in membrane oxygenators, as the slope of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve varies greatly with the oxygen partial pressure, and values of the enhancement factor E and hence the blood phase mass transfer coefficient k B ¼ E kB will vary as the oxygenation proceeds. The following rigorous method [10, 11] of calculating required membrane area can be applied to any type of membrane oxygenator. Let A be the total membrane area (m2), and dA an infinitesimal increase of A in the blood flow direction. Oxygen saturation y (–) and oxygen partial pressure p (mmHg) increase by dy and dp, respectively, in the membrane area dA. The increase in the oxygen content of blood dN (cm3 cm3 min1) on dA is given by dN ¼ QB ½bðHt=100Þdy þ a dp

ð14:19Þ

where QB is the blood flow rate (ml min1), Ht is the hematocrit (%), b is the amount of oxygen which combines chemically with the unit volume of red blood

| 239

240

| 14 Medical Devices cells (0.451 cm3 cm3 at 37 1C), and a is the physical oxygen solubility in blood (2.82 105 cm3 cm3 mmHg1) at 37 1C. The rate of oxygen transfer to blood through the membrane area dA should be equal to dN ¼ E kB aðpi pÞdA

ð14:20Þ

where pi is the pO2 at the membrane surface. From Equations 14.19 and 14.20, we obtain A¼

QB kB

Zp2 p1

bðHt=100Þ ðdy=dpÞ þ a dp Eaðpi pÞ

ð14:21Þ

where p1 and p2 are pO2 of blood entering and leaving the membrane surface, respectively. Values of (dy/dp) can be obtained by differentiating Equation 14.1 or Equation 14.3. In case the membrane resistance is not negligible, pi can be estimated by the following relationship and Equation 14.14: ðp pi Þ kM ¼ E kB ðpi pÞ

ð14:22Þ

where p is the pO2 in the gas phase and kM is the diffusive membrane permeability. The integral of Equation 14.21 can be called the ‘‘number of transfer units’’ (NM) of the membrane blood oxygenator [10, 11]. Thus, Equation 14.21 can be written as A=ðNM Þ ¼ ATU ¼ QB =kB

ð14:21aÞ

which defines ATU as the ‘‘area per transfer unit’’ of the membrane oxygenator [11]. The smaller the value of ATU, the more efficient the blood oxygenator. Rigorous calculations using the NTU and ATU concepts give rigorous results, but involve graphical integrations. An approximate method, such as that given in Example 14.1, would be simpler. Both, rigorous and approximate methods require experimental data on physical oxygen absorption into water, or into a reference liquid (e.g., 0.1% CMC solution) which shows kinematic viscosity almost equal to that of blood. The liquid-phase physical oxygen transfer coefficient kL (cm min1) for a reference liquid can be obtained as (cf. Section 6.2): kL ¼ QL aðp2 p1 Þ=½AðDpÞm a

ð14:23Þ

where QL is the liquid flow rate (ml min1), p2 and p1 are the outlet and inlet oxygen partial pressures (mmHg) in the reference liquid, respectively, A is the liquid side membrane area (cm2), (Dp)m is the logarithmic mean oxygen partial pressure difference (mmHg), and a is the physical oxygen solubility in liquid (cm3 cm3 mmHg1). Example 14.1

In a hollow-fiber-type membrane blood oxygenator, the blood flows outside and across the hollow fibers. The total membrane area (outside fibers) is 4 m2. From the data of physical oxygen absorption into water at 20 1C, the following

14.3 Oxygenation of Blood

empirical equation (a) for the water-phase oxygen transfer coefficient kw (cm min1) in this particular oxygenator at 20 1C was obtained: kw ¼ 0:106 Qw0:6

ðaÞ

where Qw is the water flow rate (l min1). The oxygen partial pressure in the gas phase is 710 mmHg, and the diffusive membrane resistance can be neglected. Estimate how much venous blood (Ht ¼ 40%, y ¼ 0.70) can be oxygenated to arterial blood (y ¼ 0.97) with use of this oxygenator. Solution

The required total membrane area is subdivided into three zones 1, 2, and 3, by the ranges of oxygen saturation y. The blood-phase oxygen transfer coefficient kB is estimated by Equations 14.11 to 14.13. Oxygen diffusivity in water at 20 1C, DO2 W ¼ 2.07 105 cm2 s1; kinematic viscosity of water at 20 1C, nw ¼ 0.010 cm2 s1; oxygen diffusivity in blood at 37 1C, DO2 B ¼ 1.76 106 cm2 s1; kinematic viscosity of blood at 37 1C, nB ¼ 0.0256 cm2 s1. By Equation 14.12 kB =kw ¼ ð1:76=2:07Þ2=3 =ð0:0256=0:010Þ1=3 ¼ 0:656

ðbÞ

The enhancement factor E for each zone is estimated by Equations 14.13 and 14.14. After several trials, a blood flow rate of 5 l min1 is assumed. Then, by Equation a kw ¼ 0:278 cm min1 and by Equation b kB ¼ 0:278 0:656 ¼ 0:182 cm min1 Calculations for the three zones are summarized as follows:

y ym pO2 at ym (mmHg) Effective Htn (%) E EkB KG ¼ aE kB (Dp)m (mmHg) O2 transfer (cm3 min1) A ¼ Qo/KG (Dp)m (m2)

Zone 1

Zone 2

Zone 3

0.70–0.80 0.75 40 10 1.98 0.306 10.015 104 670 84.0 1.25

0.80–0.90 0.85 52 6 1.71 0.311 8.77 104 658 84.0 1.46

0.90–0.97 0.94 70 2.8 1.43 0.260 7.33 104 640 58.8 1.25

| 241

242

| 14 Medical Devices The total membrane area required is 3.96 m2. Thus, this oxygenator with 4 m2 membrane area can oxygenate 5 l min1 of blood, as assumed.

14.3.6 Carbon Dioxide Transfer Rates in Blood Oxygenators

As mentioned in Section 14.3.3, most CO2 in blood exists as HCO3. In evaluating the CO2 desorption performance of blood oxygenators, we must always consider the simultaneous diffusion of HCO3, the rate of which is greater than that of physically dissolved CO2. Experimental data on the rates of CO2 desorption from blood and hemoglobin solutions in membrane oxygenators agreed well with the values that were theoretically predicted, taking into account the simultaneous diffusion of HCO3 [12]. The driving potential for CO2 transfer in the natural lung is the difference between the pCO2 of the venous blood (46 mmHg) and that in the alveolar gas (40 mmHg), as can be seen from Table 14.1. The CO2 transfer rates in blood oxygenators should correspond to those of oxygen transfer, the driving force for which is much larger than in the natural lung, because the pO2 in the gas phase is usually over 700 mmHg. However, the physical solubility of CO2 in blood is about 20-fold larger than that of oxygen, and more CO2 is transferred as HCO3. At the blood–gas interface, HCO3 is desorbed as CO2 gas. Thus, the usual practice with gas–liquid, direct contact-type oxygenators, such as the bubble-type, would be to add some CO2 gas to the gas supplied to the oxygenator in order to suppress excessive CO2 desorption. In membrane-type oxygenators, the CO2 passes through the membrane only as CO2. Although the CO2 permeabilities of most membranes are several-fold greater than those for O2, the driving potential for CO2 transfer is much smaller than that for O2 transfer. Thus, if the membrane permeability for CO2 is not high enough, then an insufficient CO2 removal rate would become a problem. However, this is not the case with most membranes used today, including microporous membranes. Difficulties in CO2 removal reported with membrane oxygenators are often due to too-low gas rates, resulting in a too-high CO2 content in the gas phase and hence too-small a driving potential for CO2 transfer. In such a case, increasing the gas flow rates would solve the problem. In most cases, membrane-type oxygenators with sufficient membrane areas for oxygen transfer encounter no problems with CO2 removal.

14.4 Artificial Kidney

The hemodialyzer, also known as the artificial kidney, is a device that is used outside the body to remove so-called the uremic toxins, such as urea and creatinine, from the blood of patients with kidney disease. Whilst it is a crude device

14.4 Artificial Kidney

compared to the exquisite human kidney, many patients who are unable to receive a kidney transplant can survive for long periods with use of this device. 14.4.1 Human Kidney Functions

The main functions of the human kidney are the formation and excretion of urine, and control of the composition of body fluids. Details of the structure and functions of the human kidney may be found in textbooks of physiology (e.g., [1]) or biomedical engineering (e.g., [13]). Each of the two human kidneys contains approximately one million units of tubules (nephrons), each 20–30 mm in diameter, and with a total length of 4–7 cm. Each tubule begins blindly with a renal corpuscle which consists of the glomerulus (ca. 200 mm in diameter) and the surrounding capsule, which is connected to the proximal convoluted tubule, the descending and ascending limbs of the hairpin-shaped loop of Henle, the distal convoluted tubule, and finally to the collecting tubule. The glomerulus, a tuft of arterial capillaries, acts as a blood filter, and the composition of the glomerular filtrate changes as the filtrate flows through the above-mentioned sections of the tubule, and finally becomes urine. Changes in filtrate compositions occur due to the exchange of components with the blood coming from the glomerulus that flows through the capillaries surrounding tubule and hairpin-shaped capillaries alongside the loop of Henle. The total blood flow rate through the two kidneys is approximately 1200 ml min1, which is about one-fourth of the total cardiac output. The glomeruli filter out all blood corpuscles and most molecules with molecular weight above 70 000– 80 000 Da. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is approximately 125 ml min1 (i.e., 180 l per day), which is approximately one-fifth of the rate at which plasma enters the kidneys. As the volume of urine excreted daily is approximately 1–1.5 l, most of water in the glomerular filtrate is reabsorbed into the blood. Not only the filtrate volume but also the concentrations of all components of the filtrate undergo adjustments as the filtrate flows through the tubules, with unrequired metabolic products (such as urea) being excreted into urine. Thus, it can be said that the general function of the kidney is to finely control the compositions of the body fluids at appropriate levels. The mechanisms of transfer of molecules and ions across the wall of tubules are more complicated than in the artificial apparatus. In addition to osmosis and simple passive transport (viz., ordinary downhill mass transfer due to concentration gradients), renal mass transfer involves active transport (viz., uphill mass transport against gradients). The mechanism of active transport, which often occurs in living systems, is beyond the scope of this text. Active transport requires a certain amount of energy, as can be seen from the fact that live kidneys require an efficient oxygen supply. As is evident from the major difference between the GFR and the rate of urine production, the majority of the water in the filtrate is reabsorbed into the blood in the capillaries, by osmosis through the wall of tubule and the interstitial fluid.

| 243

244

| 14 Medical Devices This reabsorption of water occurs mostly in the proximal tubule, though some is also reabsorbed in the distal tubule and collecting duct. At the proximal tubule, the concentrations of glucose, proteins, and amino acids decrease greatly due to reabsorption by active transport into the capillary blood. Na þ , K þ , Cl, and HCO3 are also reabsorbed by active transport, although their concentrations vary minimally due to the large decrease in the water flow rate. The loop of Henle consists of a descending limb which connects to the proximal tubule, and an ascending limb that connects to the distal tubule. The wall of the descending limb is water-permeable, whereas the wall of the ascending limb is not. Na þ , K þ , Cl, and HCO3 that are reabsorbed by active transport across the wall of the ascending limb diffuse through the interstitial fluid into the fluid in the descending limb by passive transport. The concentrations of these ions are decreased substantially in the ascending limb, but are increased in the descending limb. In the distal tubule and collecting duct, some Na þ is either actively transported out or exchanged for K þ , H þ , NH4 þ and water moves out by osmosis. Thus, the ion concentrations and pH of the body fluids are maintained at appropriate levels. A 1-l volume of urine from a healthy person contains approximately 1800 mg of urea, 200 mg of creatinine, 130 mEq of Na þ , 130 mEq of Cl, and lesser amounts of other ions. The concentrations of urea and creatinine, both of which are breakdown products of protein metabolism, are increased in the tubular fluid during flow through the tubule, due to a decrease in water flow rate. The GFR can be measured by injecting into blood vessel a substance x, which is neither reabsorbed nor secreted in the tubule, and measuring its concentration in the urine. Inulin, a polymer of fructose, is used extensively to measure the GFR. Let V be the urine flow rate (ml min1), Ux the concentration of x in the urine, and Px the concentration of x in the plasma. Then, GFR ¼ Ux V/Px. This is the volume of plasma per unit time (ml min1), from which x is totally removed, leading to the following concept of clearance. Clearance of the kidney with respect to some particular substance (e.g., urea) is defined as the conceptual volume of plasma per unit time (ml min1) from which the substance is completely removed. Thus, clearance for x, Clx (ml min1) is defined as Clx ¼ Ux V=Px

ð14:24Þ

where Ux is the concentration of x in urine (mg dl1), V is the urine flow rate (ml min1), and Px is the concentration of x in the plasma (mg dl1). For example, if the urea concentrations in plasma and urine are 34 mg dl1 and 1450 mg dl1, respectively, and the urinary flow rate is 1.3 ml min1, then the urea clearance can be calculated as follows: Clx ¼ 1450 1:3=34 ¼ 55 ml min1 Clearance for a substance is equal to the GFR, only if neither reabsorption nor secretion of the substance occurs during its flow through the tubule. Clearance for a substance decreases with increasing reabsorption of the substance in the tubule.

14.4 Artificial Kidney

In the cases of kidney disease, due to the impaired function of the glomeruli and/or tubules, urea, creatinine, and other substances that would normally be excreted into the urine would accumulate in blood of the patient, causing various symptoms and disorders. 14.4.2 Artificial Kidneys 14.4.2.1 Hemodialyzer The main form of artificial kidney is the hemodialyzer, which uses semipermeable membranes to remove urea and other metabolic wastes, as well as some water and ions, from the blood of patients with kidney diseases. Compared to the human kidney, the hemodialyzer is a very crude device for use outside the body. Unlike the kidney, in which both active and passive transport of various substances occurs, the hemodialyzer depends only on the passive transport of substances between the blood and the dialysate solution, across an artificial semipermeable membrane. Urea, creatinine, and other metabolic products move into the dialysate by diffusive mass transfer, that is, by concentration difference. Some water must be removed from the body fluid into the dialysate. This can be achieved either by: (i) making the hydrostatic pressure of the blood side slightly higher than that of the dialysate side; or (ii) adding glucose or another sugar to the dialysate to make its osmolarity slightly higher than that of the body fluid, so that water moves into the dialysate by osmosis (cf. Section 8.5). Although the initial proposals and studies of hemodialyzers date back to the early twentieth century, it was not until 1945 that Kolff used a hemodialyzer in a clinical situation. This was a long cellophane tube wound around a rotating drum that was immersed in a dialysate solution. The earlier models of hemodialyzers, such as the rotating-drum and flat-membrane types, were bulky and nondisposable. A pre-sterilized, disposable dialyzer of the coil (Kolff)-type, in which blood flowed through a coil of flattened membrane tube, while the dialysate flowed through the interstices between the coil in the axial direction, first appeared in 1956. Disposable hemodialyzers of the hollow-fiber and flat-membrane types were first marketed during the early 1970s. Today, the hollow-fiber hemodialyzer is the most widely used, due mainly to its compactness and high efficiency. For example, a dialyzer of this type uses approximately 10 000 hollow fibers, each some 200 mm internal diameter and 100–250 mm in length. In this system, the blood flows through the fibers, and the dialysate outside the fibers. The blood of the patient, withdrawn from an artery near the wrist, is allowed to flow through the blood circuit, which includes the dialyzer, usually a blood pump plus monitoring instruments, and is returned to a nearby vein. The connections to the blood vessels are made via the so-called ‘‘subcutaneous arteriovenous shunt’’; this involves an artificial tube which connects the artery and vein underneath the wrist skin. A dialysate solution of a composition appropriate to the patient is first prepared by diluting with water one of concentrated dialysates of standard compositions that

| 245

246

| 14 Medical Devices are available commercially. The typical compositions of diluted dialysates are as follows: Na þ : 130–140 mEq l1, K þ : 2–2.5 mEq l1, Ca2 þ : 2.5–3.5 mEq l1, Mg2 þ : 1.0–1.5 mEq l1, Cl: 100–110 mEq l1, HCO3: 30–35 mEq l1, glucose: 0 or 1–2 g l1, osmolarity: 270–300 mOsm l1. Electrolytes are added to the dialysate, mainly to prevent electrolytes in the body fluid from moving into the dialysate, and sometimes to control the concentration of some ions such as Na þ in the body fluid at an appropriate level. The dialysate solution is recirculated through the hemodialyzer system. In hospitals where multiple patients are treated, central dialysate supply systems are normally used. The flow rates of blood and dialysate through a hollow-fiber-type dialyzer are approximately 200–300 ml min1 and 500 ml min1, respectively. The more recently developed hemodialyzers have all been disposable; that is, they are presterilized and used only once. Normally, a patient will undergo dialysis for 4–5 h per day, for three days each week. Operationally, dialysis (cf. Section 8.2) utilizes differences in the diffusion rates of various substances across a membrane between two liquid phases. The diffusivities of substances in the membrane and liquid phases (particularly the former) decrease with the increasing molecular sizes of the diffusing substances. Thus, with any hemodialyzer, the rates of removal of uremic toxins from the blood will decrease with increasing molecular size, though a sharp separation at a particular molecular weight is difficult. In contrast, proteins (e.g., albumin) should be retained in the patient’s blood. In the human kidney, small amounts of albumin present in the glomerular filtrate are reabsorbed in the proximal tubule. Hemodialysis which involves some transfer of water due to differences in the hydrostatic or osmotic pressure is often referred to as hemodiafiltration (HDF). 14.4.2.2 Hemofiltration In the hemofiltration (HF) (i.e., ultrafiltration; see Section 8.3) of blood, using an appropriate membrane, all of the solutes in plasma below a certain molecular weight will pass into the filtrate at the same rate, irrespective of their molecular sizes, as occurs in the human kidney glomeruli. Since its first proposal in 1967 [14], hemofiltration has been studied extensively [15–17]. Although a dialysate solution is not used in hemofiltration, the correct amount of substitution fluid must be added to the blood of the patient, either before or after filtration, to replace all the necessary blood constituents that are lost in the filtrate. This substitution fluid must be absolutely sterile, as it is mixed with the patient’s blood. For these reasons, hemofiltration is more expensive to perform than hemodialysis, and so is not generally used to the same extent. 14.4.2.3 Peritoneal Dialysis As an artificial dialyzer is not used in peritoneal dialysis, use of the term ‘‘artificial kidney’’ might not be appropriate in this case. In peritoneal dialysis, the dialysate solution is infused into the peritoneal cavity of the patient, and later discharged. Uremic toxins in the blood are removed as the blood flows through the capillaries in the peritoneum to the dialysate, by diffusion. Water is removed by adding

14.4 Artificial Kidney

glucose to the dialysate, thereby making the osmolarity of dialysate higher than that of the blood. In continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), approximately 2 l of dialysate solution is infused into the patient’s peritoneal cavity, and is exchanged with new dialysate about four times each day. The patient need not stay in bed, as with ordinary hemodialysis, but it is difficult to continue CAPD for many years due to the formation of peritoneal adhesions. 14.4.3 Mass Transfer in Hemodialyzers (cf. Section 8.2)

In the situation where the effect of filtration – that is, water movement across the membrane due to the difference in hydrostatic pressure and/or osmolarity – can be neglected, the overall resistance for mass transfer in hemodialyzers with flat membranes is given as: 1=KL ¼ 1=kB þ 1=kM þ 1=kD

ð14:25Þ

where KL is the overall mass transfer coefficient (cm min1), kB is the blood phase mass transfer coefficient (cm min1), kM is the diffusive membrane permeability (cm min1), and kD the dialysate phase mass transfer coefficient (cm min1). Equation 14.25 holds for each of the diffusing components. The blood phase mass transfer coefficient kB and the dialysate phase mass transfer coefficient kD can generally be estimated when the design and operating conditions of the hemodialyzer are known. (cf. Chapter 6). The diffusive membrane permeability kM varies with the material and thickness of the membrane, and with the diffusing components. This must be experimentally determined by using an appropriate apparatus under standard conditions. Many membrane materials have been developed and are used for hemodialyzers. Today, these include regenerated cellulose, cellulose acetate, polyacrylonitrile, poly(methylmethacrylate), vinyl alcohol–ethylene copolymer, polysulfone, polyamide, and others. The relative magnitudes of the three terms on the right-hand side of Equation 14.25 vary with the diffusing substance, the flow conditions of both fluids, and especially with the membrane material and thickness. With the hollow-fiber-type hemodialyzers that are widely used today, the membrane resistance usually takes a substantial fraction of the total resistance, and the fraction increases with the increasing molecular weight of the diffusing component. One widely used performance index of hemodialyzers is that of clearance, defined similarly to that of the human kidney. The clearance of a hemodialyzer is the conceptual volume of blood (ml min1) from which a uremic substance is completely removed by hemodialysis. Let QB (ml min1) be the blood flow rate through the dialyzer, QD (ml min1) the dialysate flow rate, and CB and CD (mg cm3) the concentrations of a uremic substance in blood and dialysate, respectively, with the subscripts i and o indicating values at the inlet and outlet, respectively. The rate of

| 247

248

| 14 Medical Devices transfer of the substance in the dialyzer w (mg min1) is then given as: w ¼ QB ðCBi CBo Þ ¼ QD ðCDo CDi Þ

ð14:26Þ

The clearance of the hemodialyzer Cl (ml min1), for the substance is defined as Cl ¼ w=CBi ¼ QB ðCBi CBo Þ=CBi ¼ QD ðCDo CDi Þ=CBi

ð14:27Þ

From the mass transfer relations (cf. Chapter 6): w ¼ KL AðDCÞlm ¼ KL AðDC1 DC2 Þ=lnðDC1 =DC2 Þ

ð14:28Þ

where A (cm2) is the membrane area. In the case of hollow-fiber membranes, A is the inside or outside area of the fiber with which KL is defined, and (DC)lm is the logarithmic mean (cf. Section 5.3) of the concentration difference at one end of the dialyzer, DC1, and that at the other end, DC2. In theory, the log mean can be used only for the cases of: (i) counter-current flow; (ii) parallel-current flow; and (iii) one phase completely mixed. However, in the case where the ratio of the concentration differences at both ends is less than 2, the simple arithmetic mean could practically be used, as the difference between the two mean values is less than a few percent. Another index of hemodialyzer performance is the dialysance (ml min1), defined as: Dl ¼ w=ðCBi CDi Þ ¼ KL AðDCÞlm =ðCBi CDi Þ

ð14:29Þ

Note that the denominator is (CBiCDi) in place of CBi in Equation 14.27. Dialysance is the conceptual volume of blood (ml min1) from which a uremic substance is removed down to the concentration equal to its concentration in the entering dialysate. In case the entering dialysate does not contain the substance, dialysance is equal to clearance. It should be noted also that the values of clearance and dialysance may vary with the particular uremic substance, such as urea and creatinine, with which clearance and dialysance are defined. From Equations 14.26 and 14.29 E ¼ Dl=QB ¼ ðCBi CBo Þ=ðCBi CDi Þ

ð14:30Þ

which defines the extraction ratio E. Combining Equations 14.27 to 14.30 and further manipulation results in the following relationships [18]: (a) For counter flow: E ¼ f1 exp½NM ð1 ZÞg=fZ exp½NM ð1 ZÞg

ð14:31Þ

(b) For parallel flow: E ¼ f1 exp½ NM ð1 þ ZÞg=ð1 þ ZÞ

ð14:32Þ

14.4 Artificial Kidney

where NM ðnumber of transfer unitsÞ ¼ KL A=QB

ð14:33Þ

Zðflow ratioÞ ¼ QB =QD

ð14:34Þ

In the above relationships, the effect of the so-called ‘‘filtration’’ – that is, the permeation of water across the membrane – on the clearance and dialysance has been neglected. In the case where the QF (ml min1) of water moves from the blood phase to the dialysate across the membrane, the clearance of a hemodialyzer with respect to a uremic substance Cl is given as: Cl ¼ ðQBi CBi QBo CBo Þ=CBi ¼ fðQBo þ QF Þ CBi QBo CBo g=CBi

ð14:35Þ

¼ ½ðCBi CBo Þ QBo =CBi g þ QF

Example 14.2

In a hollow-fiber-type hemodialyzer of the following specifications, 200 ml min1 of blood (inside fibers) and 500 ml min1 of dialysate (outside fibers) flow countercurrently. Hollow fiber inside diameter ¼ 212 mm Membrane thickness ¼ 20.7 mm Effective length of hollow fibers: L ¼ 16.8 cm Inside diameter of the shell: Di ¼ 2.86 cm Total membrane area (based on i.d.) A ¼ 7400 cm2 Diffusive membrane permeability (based on i.d.): kM ¼ 0.00 116 cm s1 Calculate the overall mass transfer coefficient KL (based on the hollow-fiber inside diameter) and the dialysance of the hemodialyzer for urea, neglecting the effect of water permeation. Data: Urea diffusivity in blood: DB ¼ 0.507 105 cm2 s1 Urea diffusivity in dialysate: DD ¼ 1.37 105 cm2 s1 Blood viscosity: mB ¼ 0.027 g cm1 s1 Blood density: rB ¼ 1.056 g cm3

Solution

For simplicity, it is assumed that dialysate flows parallel to the hollow fibers, although the real flow pattern is not so simple.

| 249

250

| 14 Medical Devices Number of hollow fibers: n ¼ 7400=ðp 0:0212 16:8Þ ¼ 6617 The blood phase urea transfer coefficient kB is estimated as follows: . Volumetric blood flow rate through one hollow fiber: FB ¼ 200=ð60 6617Þ ¼ 5:04 104 ml s1 . Blood velocity through hollow fibers: vB ¼ 5:04 104 =½ðp=4Þð0:0212Þ2 ¼ 1:428 cm s1 . Blood Reynolds number ¼ (Re)B ¼ (0.0212) (1.428) (1.056)/0.027 ¼ 1.184 The blood-side mass transfer coefficient kB is estimated by Equation 6.26a. Since (FB/DB L) ¼ 5.04 104/[(0.507 105) (16.8)] ¼ 5.91o10 it can be assumed that (Sh) ¼ kB d/DB ¼ 3.66. Then kB ¼ (3.66) (0.507 105)/(0.0212) ¼ 8.75 104 cm s1. The dialysate phase urea transfer coefficient kD is estimated as follows. . Sectional area of the dialysate channel: S ¼ ðp=4Þð2:862 6618 0:02532 Þ ¼ 3:096 cm2 . Equivalent diameter of the dialysate channel: dE ¼ 4 S=ðwetted perimeterÞ ¼ 4ð3:096Þ=½pð0:0253Þ6617 þ 2:86p ¼ 0:0232 cm ¼ 232 mm . Dialysate velocity through the channel: uD ¼ 500=ð60Þð3:095Þ ¼ 2:69 cm s1 . Dialysate Reynolds number: ðReÞD ¼ dE uD rD =mD ¼ ð0:0232Þð2:69Þð1:00Þ=ð0:01Þ ¼ 6:25 Hence, it is assumed that (Sh) ¼ (kD dE/DD) ¼ 3.66 kD ¼ 3:66 DD =dE ¼ ð3:66Þð1:37 105 Þ=0:0232 ¼ 2:16 103 cm s1 ðbased on fiber o:d:Þ Overall urea transfer coefficient KL: (based on fiber i.d.) 1=KL ¼ 1=kB þ 1=kM þ 1=½kD ð252=212Þ ¼ 1140 þ 862 þ 389 ¼ 2 391 s cm1 KL ¼ 0:000 418 cm s1 ¼ 0:0251 cm min1 NM ¼ KL A=QB ð0:0251Þð7400Þ=200 ¼ 0:929 Z ¼ QB =QD ¼ 200=500 ¼ 0:4

14.5 Bioartificial Liver

Equation 14.31 gives the extraction ratio: E ¼ ½1 expð0:929 0:6Þ=½0:4 expð0:929 0:6Þ ¼ 0:554 Dialysance for urea is given by Equation 14.30: Dl ¼ QB E ¼ 200 0:554 ¼ 111 ml min1

14.5 Bioartificial Liver 14.5.1 Human Liver

In humans, the liver is the largest organ, typically weighing 1.2 to 1.6 kg. The many functions of the liver are performed by the liver cells, or hepatocytes. One important function of the liver is the secretion of bile, which is essential for the digestion and absorption of lipids in the intestine. Bile, when collected through the bile capillaries by the bile ducts that unite with the hepatic duct, is either transferred to the gallbladder or enters the duodenum directly. Other functions performed by liver cells, through contact with blood, include the metabolism and storage of carbohydrates, the detoxication of drugs and toxins, the manufacture of plasma proteins, the formation of urea, and the metabolism of fat, among many others. The liver can, therefore, be regarded as the complex ‘‘chemical factory’’ of the human body. Two main blood vessels (see Figure 14.1) enter the liver: the hepatic artery carries oxygen-rich blood directly from the heart, while the hepatic portal vein carries blood from the spleen and nutrient-rich blood from the intestine. On leaving the liver, the blood is returned to the heart via the hepatic vein. The liver contains an enormous number of hepatocytes which perform the various functions noted above. The hepatocytes are contained within minute units known as hepatic lobules, in which the cell layers (which are one or two cells thick) are in contact with networks of minute blood channels – the sinusoids – which ultimately join the venous capillaries. Capillaries carrying blood from the hepatic artery and the portal vein empty separately into the sinusoids. The walls of sinusoids and liver cells are incomplete, and blood is brought into direct contact with the hepatocytes. Bile is an aqueous solution of bile salts, inorganic salts, bile pigments, fats, cholesterol, and others. The physiology of bile secretion is not simple, as it involves the active excretion of organic solutes from the blood to the bile. Bile is collected directly from the liver cells through separate channels, without being mixed with blood. The liver cell membrane incorporates extremely fine passages that permit bile secretion.

| 251

252

| 14 Medical Devices 14.5.2 Bioartificial Liver Devices

Although certain simple functions of the liver, such as the removal of some toxins, can be performed by using dialysis and adsorption with activated charcoal, it is clear that such a simple artificial approach cannot perform the complex functions of the liver, and that any practical liver support system must use living hepatocytes. It should be mentioned at this point that hepatocytes have an anchoragedependent nature; that is, they require a form of ‘‘anchor’’ (i.e., a solid surface or scaffold) on which to grow. Thus, the use of single-cell suspensions is not appropriate for liver cell culture, and liver cells attached to solid surfaces are normally used. Encapsulated liver cells and spheroids (i.e., spherical aggregates of liver cells) may also be used for this purpose. In recent years, many investigations have been conducted, including clinical trials, with bioartificial liver devices using either animal or human liver cells. Likewise, many reports have been made with various designs of bioartificial liver device [19]. However, there are no established liver support systems that can be used routinely in the same way as hemodialyzers or blood oxygenators. Today, bioartificial liver devices can be used to assist the liver functions of patients with liver failure on only a partially and/or temporary basis. Moreover, none of these devices can excrete bile, as does the human liver. It should be noted here that the bioartificial liver device is not only a bioreactor but also a mass transfer device. The mass transfer of various nutrients from the blood into the liver cells, and also the transfer of many products of biochemical reactions from the cells into bloodstream, should be efficient processes. In human liver, the oxygen-rich blood is delivered via the hepatic artery, and bioartificial devices should be so designed that the oxygen can be easily delivered to the cells. In order to sustain life, a bioartificial liver device should contain at least 10–30% of the normal liver mass (i.e., 150–450 g of cells in the case of an adult). In a bioartificial liver device, the animal or human liver cells can conceivably be cultured and used in several forms, including: (i) independent single-cell suspensions; (ii) spheroid (i.e., globular) aggregates of cells of 100–150 mm diameter; (iii) cylindroid, rod-like aggregates of cells of 100–150 mm diameter; (iv) encapsulated cells; and (v) cells attached to solid surfaces, such as microcarriers, flat surfaces, and the inside or outside of hollow fibers. In order to facilitate mass transfer, a direct contact between the cells and the blood seems preferable. Among the various types of bioartificial liver device tested to date, four distinct groups can be identified [19]: (1) Hollow fibers. The general configuration of the hollow-fiber apparatus is similar to that of hemodialyzers and blood oxygenators. Hepatocytes or microcarrier-attached hepatocytes are cultured either inside the hollow fibers or in the extra-fiber spaces, and the patient’s blood is passed outside or inside the fibers. A bioartificial liver of this type, using 1.5 mm o.d. hollow fibers with 1.5 mm clearances between them, and with tissue-like aggregates of animal

14.5 Bioartificial Liver

hepatocytes cultured in the extra-fiber spaces, can maintain liver functions for a few months [20]. (2) Flat plates. In this case, the hepatocytes are cultured on multilayered solid sheets, between which the blood is passed through narrow channels. This configuration, with direct blood–cell contact, somewhat resembles that of the human liver. However, scale-up is not easy because of the possible maldistribution of blood, and the existence of large dead spaces. (3) Packed bed. Here, the hepatocytes are cultured on the inside surfaces of small pieces of highly porous resin that are packed randomly in a vertical cylindrical reactor [21]. A high cell density can be attained, as the cells grow in the minute pores of the resin. The cells are in direct contact with the blood. (4) Encapsulation and suspension. In this case, encapsulated spheroids of hepatocytes are contacted with blood in fluidized-bed, spouted-bed, and/or packed-bed systems. The mass transfer resistance should be high with encapsulated cells. However, the use of a suspension would lead to excessive shear forces being exerted on the cells. The bioartificial liver support systems tested to date have been shown to perform liver functions on only a partial and/or temporary basis. The development of a true ‘‘bioartificial liver’’ will require more fundamental studies to be conducted, and in this regard ‘‘tissue engineering’’ involving nanobiotechnology will undoubtedly play an important role. Tissue engineering applies the principles of engineering and biology to the development of biological substitutes that restore, maintain, or improve tissue functions [22]. To date, the regeneration of skin, cornea and other tissues have been studied by tissue engineers. The structure of the bioartificial liver devices mentioned above differs notably from that of the natural liver. Hence, the culture of liver tissue which is more similar to human liver, using hepatocytes to create an implantable, bioartificial liver, should be the target of tissue engineering research.

" Problems

14.1 The pH of a blood sample is 7.40 at 310 K, and its total CO2 concentration is 25.2 mmol l1. Estimate the partial pressure of CO2 for this blood sample. 14.2 A hollow-fiber-type membrane blood oxygenator, in which blood flows inside the hollow fibers, has a total membrane area (outside fibers) of 4.3 m2. The inside diameter, membrane thickness and length of the hollow fibers are 200 mm, 25 mm, and 13 cm, respectively. When venous blood (Ht ¼ 40%, pO2 ¼ 36 mmHg) is supplied to the oxygenator at a flow rate of 4.0 l min1 and 310 K, estimate the oxygen saturation of the blood at the exit by the advancing front model. The partial pressure of oxygen in the gas phase is 710 mmHg, and the diffusive membrane resistance can be neglected.

| 253

254

| 14 Medical Devices 14.3 For the situation in Problem 14.2, calculate the pressure drop through the hollow fibers. The density of blood is 1.05 g cm3 at Ht ¼ 40%. 14.4 In a hollow-fiber-type hemodialyzer, 200 ml min1 of blood (inside fibers) and 500 ml min1 of dialysate (outside fibers) flow countercurrently. The urea concentrations of the inlet blood, outlet blood, and outlet dialysate are 100 mg dl1, 80 mg dl1 and 32 mg dl1, respectively. Calculate the clearance for urea. 14.5 In a hollow-fiber-type hemodialyzer of the total membrane area (based on o.d., A ¼ 1 m2), 200 ml min1 of blood (inside fibers) and 500 ml min1 of dialysate (outside fibers) flow countercurrently. The overall mass transfer coefficient KL for urea (based on the outside diameter of the hollow fiber) is 0.030 cm min1. Estimate the dialysance for urea.

References 1 Ganong, W.F. (1989) Medical Physiology, 14th edn, Lange Medical Publications. 2 Kahle, W., Leonhardt, H., and Platzer, W. (1986) Color Atlas and Textbook of Human Anatomy, Vol. 2, Internal Organs, Thieme, Stuttgart and New York. 3 Adair, G.S. (1925) J. Biol. Chem., 63, 515. 4 Lambertsen, C.T., Bunce, P.L., Drabkin, D.L., and Schmidt, C.F. (1952) J. Appl. Physiol., 4, 873. 5 Ohshima, N. and Yoshida, F. (1971) Bull. Heart Inst. Japan, 13, 14. 6 Hill, A.V. (1921) Biochem. J., 15, 577. 7 Comroe, J.H. (1970) Physiology of Respiration, Year Book Medicine Publications. 8 Lightfoot, E.N. (1968) AIChE J., 14, 669. 9 Katoh, S. and Yoshida, F. (1972) Chem. Eng. J., 3, 276. 10 Shimizu, S. and Yoshida, F. (1981) Jinko Zoki (in Japanese), 10, 179. 11 Yoshida, F. (1993) Artif. Organs Today, 2, 273.

12 Katoh, S. and Yoshida, F. (1978) Ann. Biomed. Eng., 6, 48. 13 Cooney, D.O. (1976) Biomedical Engineering Principles, Marcel Dekker, Inc. 14 Henderson, L.W., Besarab, A., Michaels, A., and Bluemle, L.W. Jr (1967) Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs, 13, 216. 15 Colton, C.K. (1975) J. Lab. Clin. Med., 85, 355. 16 Porter, M.C. (1972) I .& E. C. Prod. Res. Dev., 11, 234. 17 Okazaki, M. and Yoshida, F. (1976) Ann. Biomed. Eng., 4, 138. 18 Michaels, A.S. (1968) Chem. Eng. Prog., 64, 31. 19 Allen, J.W., Hassanein, T., and Bhatia, S.N. (2001) Hematology, 34, 447. 20 Funatsu, K. et al. (2001) Artif. Organs, 25, 194. 21 Ohshima, N., Yanagi, K., and Miyoshi, H. (1997) Artif. Organs, 21, 1169. 22 Langer, R. and Vacanti, J.P. (1993) Science, 260, 920.

| 255

Appendix Conversion Factors for Units Parameter [dimension] Length [L]

Mass [M]

Density [ML3]

Force [MLT2]

meter (m)

centimeter (cm)

inch (in)

foot (ft)

1 1.00 000E-02 2.54 000E-02 3.04 800E-01

1.00 000E + 02 1 2.54 000E + 00 3.04 800E + 01

3.93 701E + 01 3.93 701E-01 1 1.20 000E + 01

3.28 084E + 00 3.28 084E-02 8.33 333E-02 1

kilogram (kg)

gram (g)

ounce (oz)

pound (lb)

1 1.00 000E-03 2.83 495E-02 4.53 592E-01

1.00 000E + 03 1 2.83 495E + 01 4.53 592E + 02

3.52 740E + 01 3.52 740E-02 1 1.60 000E + 01

2.20 462E + 00 2.20 462E-03 6.25 000E-02 1

kg m3

g cm3

lb in3

lb ft–3

1 1.00 000E + 03 2.76 799E + 04 1.60 185E + 01

1.00 000E-03 1 2.76 799E + 01 1.60 185E-02

3.61 273E-05 3.61 273E-02 1 5.78 704E-04

6.24 280E-02 6.24 280E + 01 1.72 800E + 03 1

N

Dyn

kgf

lbf

1 9.80 665E + 00 4.44 822E + 00

1.00 000E + 05 9.80 665E + 05 4.44 822E + 05

1.01 972E-01 1 4.53 592E-01

2.24 809E-01 2.20 462E + 00 1

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

256

| Appendix Pressure [ML1T2]

Energy [ML2T2]

Heat conductivity [MLT3h1]

Viscosity [ML1T1]

Pa

Bar

atm

mmHg (torr)

lbf in2 (psi)

1 1.00 000E + 05 1.01 325E + 05 1.33 322E + 02 6.89 476E + 03

1.00 000E-05 1 1.01 325E + 00 1.33 322E-03 6.89 476E-02

9.86 923E-06 9.86 923E-01 1 1.31 580E-03 6.80 460E-02

7.50 062E-03 7.50 062E + 02 7.60 000E + 02 1 5.17 150E + 01

1.45 038E-04 1.45 038E + 01 1.46 960E + 01 1.93 368E-02 1

J

Erg

calth

Btuth

kWh

1 1.00 000E-07 4.18 400E + 00 1.05 435E + 03 3.60 000E + 06

1.00 000E + 07 1 4.18 400E + 07 1.05 435E + 10 3.60 000E + 13

2.39 006E-01 2.39 006E-08 1 2.51 996E + 02 8.60 421E + 05

9.48 452E-04 9.48 452E-11 3.96 832E-03 1 3.41 443E + 03

2.77 778E-07 2.77 778E-14 1.16 222E-06 2.92 875E-04 1

W m1 K1

kcalth m1 h1 1C1

Btuth ft1 h1 1F1

1 1.16 222E + 00 1.72 958E + 00

8.60 421E-01 1 1.48 817E + 00

5.78 176E-01 6.71 968E-01 1

Pa s (kg m1 s1)

poise (g cm1 s1)

1 1.00 000E-01

1.00 000E + 01 1

| 257

Index a absorption 11 – chemical 79 – effective interfacial areas 91f. – gas 3, 6, 73, 75, 78f., 82f., 88f., 91 – gas-phase resistance-controlled 91 – oxygen 73, 82 – rate 92 accumulation 8f. – term 99 activation energy 29f., 43 – thermal cell death 156 Adair equation 231 adiabatic expansion 158 adsorbate concentration 166f., 168, 172 adsorption 165 – break point 170ff. – break time 173 – breakthrough curve 171 – capacity 170f., 223 – constant pattern 172f. – equilibrium 165, 168, 172f. – exhaustion point 172f. – fixed beds 170f., 222 – liquid–solid 166 – monolayer 166 – multi-stage operations 168f. – rate 166f., 172 – selective 174 – single-stage operations 168ff. – site 167 – zone 171f., 223 adsorption isotherms 166, 172 – Freundlich-type 166, 173 – Langmuir-type 166f., 173 aeration 112ff. – number 115 – rate 118, 188 airlift reactor 125f., 188

– external loop (EL) 125f. – internal loop (IL) 125 Arrhenius plot 29f. ATU (area per transfer unit) 240

b bioactive materials 211 biochemical reactions, see reactions biological safety 211f. bioreactor operation mode 3, 8, 54, 98 – continuous plug-flow 54, 99 – continuous stirred 98 – stirred-batch 98 – stirred-semi batch 98 bioreactors 27, 73, 97ff. – airlift 125ff. – blood oxygenator 97, 230ff. – bubble column 78f., 87f., 97, 107, 109 – bubbling gas-liquid 107, 124 – continuous fixed-bed 105 – continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) 98ff. – gas–liquid 234 – gas-sparged stirred tank 116ff. – gassed stirred tank 108f. – mechanically stirred tank 97, 112ff. – membrane 97, 133f., 141f. – microreactors 97, 128ff. – mixed batch reactor 99 – packed bed 78f., 86, 91, 97, 127 – performance 99, 101 – plug-flow reactor (PFR) 98ff. – volume 129 blood – carbon dioxide 232ff. – circulation 229f. – components 227f. – laminar flow 236f.

Biochemical Engineering: A Textbook for Engineers, Chemists and Biologists Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Copyright r 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32536-8

258

| Index – oxygenation 230ff. – turbulent flow 237 blood oxygenators 230f., 234ff. – carbon dioxide transfer rate 241 – oxygen transfer rate 236ff. – types 234f. boiling – liquid 62, 64, 68 – refrigerant 62 – solution 79 – water 68 Bond number 122 Briggs–Haldane approach 37 bubble – breakup 121, 123 – coalescence 108, 121, 123f. – column 121 – liquid–gas systems 109 – rise velocity 198 – size 108, 121f., 197 – surface 188 – volume–surface mean diameter 108, 123 buffer – exchange 180 – layer 20ff.

c cake – compressible 215 – incompressible 147, 214 – layer 147f., 214 – porosity 147, 215 – resistance 146f., 214ff. catalyst 28, 98 – bio-catalyst 35 – heterogeneous 128 catalyst particles – dissolution 86 – radius 104 – shape 103 – solid 86 – spherical 104f. – surface 103f. – volume 104 catalytic – activity 36 – heterogeneous system 102 – homogeneous system 102 – reaction 102f. cell – aerobic cell culture 49f. – anchorage-dependent 207 – anchorage-independent 207

– animal cell culture 207ff. – batch culture 49f. – concentration time 50 – cultivation time 49, 53, 55 – damage 207 – death rate 155f., 164 – debris 152 – disruption 145, 151ff. – extracellular products 145 – inracellular products 145 – immobilized 98 – mass concentration 48, 50 – number density 48 – physical damage 200 – productivity 208 – tissue 207 – walls 151, 207 – yield 49, 52, 208 cell growth 47ff. – accelerating phase 50, 55 – batch fermentors 52f. – continuous stirred-tank fermentors (CSTF) 52 – curve 49f., 53, 55 – decelerating phase 50, 52f., 55 – doubling time 48, 54 – exponential phase 49f., 52, 54f., 208 – inhibition 52 – lag phase 49f. – phases 49 – rate 48, 51f., 208 – specific growth rate 48, 50f., 54f. – stationary phase 50, 52 centrifugation 105, 146, 212 centrifuge – disk-stack 149 – tubular-bowl 149f., 152f. chromatography – affinity 175, 181ff. – columns 165, 218ff. – distribution coefficient 178ff. – equilibrium model 176 – gel 174f., 180f., 212 – HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) 178, 219, 222f. – hydrophobic interaction 212 – ion-exchange 175, 180, 212 – liquid column 165f., 218 – mobile phase 174f., 218f. – peak width 176 – radius of packed particles 219, 221 – rate model 178 – resolution 178f. – retention time 176, 218

Index – sample volume injected 219 – separation 174f., 218ff. – stage model 177f. – stationary phase 174ff. concentration 28 – curves 74 – enzyme 36 – gradient 14, 21, 74f. – inhibitor 42f. – liquid-phase 83 – osmolar 141 – polarization model 137, 139ff. – profiles 83 – substrate 36ff. – time-dependent 30, 54 condensing – steam 69 – vapor 62, 64, 68, 70 conductivity – gas 65 – liquid 59, 65, 67 – metal wall 59ff. – thermal 14, 21, 23, 59, 61, 65, 67, 69 consistency index 17, 190, 208 cooling – cycle 156, 191 – fluid 64f. – gas 65 – water 70, 157

– effective 168 – gas mixtures 14 – liquid phase 14, 83, 117, 122, 197, 199 – oxygen 131 – solution 137 – thermal 14, 16 dilution rate 100, 205, 208 dimensional analysis 6 discharge 149 dispersion – axial 158, 164 – coefficient 160 – gas 112, 120 – gas–liquid 108 – model 158 dissolution – carbon dioxide 198f. – partial 86 distillation 3, 78, 134 – equipment 68 downstream processing 211ff. – chromatography 218ff. – filtration 214ff. – fixed beds 222 – interferon a 211ff. – monosodium glutamate 212, 214 – sanitation 223 – steps 211ff.

e d ¨hler number 103, 159 Damko Deborah number 197f. desorption 78f. – carbon dioxide 198f. – equilibrium curve 89f. – gas 88ff. – rate constant 166 – selective 174 dialysate 133f., 245ff. dialyzer, see medical devices diffusion – back-diffusion 137 – catalyst particles 103ff. – coefficient 14, 105, 130 – equimolar counter-diffusion 14 – immobilized enzyme particles 105ff. – oxygen 196 – pore 168, 180 – reactant 105 – surface 168 – transient 81 diffusivity 14, 16, 24, 81f., 84ff. – axial eddy 158f., 178

eddy – activity 21 – diffusivity 21f. – kinematic viscosity 22 – thermal conductivity 22 – thermal diffusivity 22 – viscosity 22 effectiveness factor 103ff. – catalyst particles 130 effluent adsorbate concentration 171ff. elastic modulus 17 elution – curve 176ff. – gradient 174f., 218 – isocratic 174f., 180f., 218, 221 – operation 170 – stepwise 174f., 218 – volume 177f., 181 emulsions – interfacial oil–water tension 195 – liquid film mass transfer volumetric coefficient 195 energy – balance 9f.

| 259

260

| Index – kinetic 9ff. – potential 9ff. enhancement factor 82f., 92 – blood oxygenation 239 – gas absorption 108 enthalpy 10 – saturated steam 164 – total change 10 enzymatic reaction 28, 35ff. – competitive inhibition 39f. – enzyme-catalyzed 35, 99 – inhibition mechanism 44f. – inhibitor constant 40 – liquid-phase 102 – noncompetitive inhibition 41, 52 – rate 102 – uncompetitive inhibition 42, 52 enzymatic system – heterogeneous 102 – homogeneous 102 enzyme – activity 33 – beads 130 – heat inactivation 32f. – immobilized 73, 97f., 105, 130 – purity 36 enzyme-inhibitor complex 39 enzyme–substrate complex 35ff. equation – dimensional 5, 65 – dimensionless 5f., 20, 64, 84, 120 – non-dimensional 5 – overall rate 62 equilibrium 6f. – chemical 6 – concentration 7, 111 – curve 89f. evaporation 3 – equipment 68 – liquids 86 extraction 81, 212 – equipment 76 – liquid 73 – liquid–liquid 112

f Fanning equation 20 feed – composition 101 – liquid–solid mixture 146 – medium 54 – rate 54 – side 141 – suspension 149, 151

– volumetric feed rate 100 fermentation – aerobic 7, 73, 76, 80, 82, 97, 155, 162, 187f., 201 – anaerobic 187, 200 – broths 17, 188f., 191f., 198, 208 – equipment 155 – hydrocarbon substrate 124 – media 48 – temperature 191f., 208 fermentor – animal cell cultures 207ff. – batch 52f., 208 – bubble column 187, 201, 208 – chemostat 54, 206 – continuous stirred-tank fermentors (CSTF) 52, 54f., 205f. – engineering 187ff. – gas–liquid mass transfer 116, 193ff. – glas-type 189, 199 – heat-transfer 191ff. – industrial apparatus 187ff. – laboratory apparatus 187 – liquid film mass transfer volumetric coefficient 193ff. – pilot plant-scale apparatus 187, 200f., 208 – scaling-up 199, 201 – stirred tank 187, 191, 201f., 207f. – tubing method 198 – turbidostat 54, 206 – washout 205 fermentor operation mode – batch 202f. – continuous 204ff. – fed-batch 203f. Fick’s law 14 film effective thickness concept 24 filter 146 – area 146f., 215 – membrane 162 – plate, see filter press – press 146, 214 – rotary drum 146, 214 filtrate – flux 136f., 139, 146f., 214ff. – resistance 146f. – volume 147, 215f. filtration 3, 105, 146ff. – conventional 146f., 214 – cross-flow (CFF) 147f., 153, 216ff. – dead-end 147f., 214f., 217 – microfiltration 146ff. – rate 146f., 163 – resistance 164

Index – sterilizing 162 – time 215 – ultrafiltration 148, 212 finish-up 8 flow – behavior index 17 – channel 22 – counter-current 79, 248 – direction 99 – laminar 5, 15, 18ff. – heterogeneous 121 – homogeneous 121, 123 – isothermal laminar 19 – outlet 99 – parallel-current 248 – steady-state 10, 158 – steady turbulent 20 – turbulent 5, 15, 18ff. – viscous 15 flow rate 54 – gas 120 – total 20 – volumetric 18f., 85, 88, 101, 150 fluid – average linear velocity 84 – Bingham plastic 16 – density 5, 18, 20, 84ff. – dilatant 16f. – incompressible 20 – laminar film layer 15, 20 – laminar layer thickness 23, 82 – laminar sublayer 20f., 59f. – Newtonian 16, 19f., 117 – non-Newtonian 16f., 115, 117, 120, 123, 189ff. – pseudoplastic 16f., 190 – thermal conductivity 86 – viscoelastic 17, 197f. – viscosity 5, 18, 65, 84ff. – volume 27 fluid film – resistance 69 – stagnant laminar 81 fluid velocity 5, 18, 22f., 88 – average 20, 65 – distribution 19f. – mass 67, 85 – profile 15, 19 – superficial 86, 88 force – buoyancy 149f. – centrifugal 150, 153 – chemical binding 166 – drag 149

– gravitational 151 – shearing 151 – van der Waals 166 fouling factor 61f., 69f., 193 Fourier’s law 14 frequency factor 29, 43 friction 18, 20 Froude number 115, 122

g Galilei number 122 gas bubble 81, 107 – bubble–liquid mixture 107f. – volume fraction 107 gas holdup 107f., 117, 122 – emulsions 123f. – fractional 122f., 198 – suspensions 123f. gas law – constant 5, 24, 29, 140 – ideal 24 – solubility 7, 75f., 109 gas – solubility 7, 75f., 109 – velocity, see superficial gas velocity 91f., 115, 117, 122f., 126f., 197f. – volume per volume of liquid per minute (VVM) 200 gel layer surface 137, 153 glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 243f. Graetz number 65 gravitational – accelaration 124, 150f. – constant 91, 115, 120, 122

h Hagen–Poiseuille law 20 Hatta number 84 Hatta theory 82f. heat – flux 23, 59 – radiation 14 – specific 10, 14, 63ff. – vaporization 11 heat exchanger 11, 59, 159 – coil-type 60 – co-current 62 – counter-current 62 – double-tube-type 59f., 66, 71 – gas–gas 68 – gas–liquid 69 – liquid–liquid 62, 68 – metal tube 61f., 69 – multi-tubular 66

| 261

262

| Index – parallel flow-type microreactor 128f. – plate-type 60 – shell-and-tube-type 59f., 66f., 70 heat transfer 3, 14, 16, 21f., 24 – coefficients 64, 67 – conduction 14, 59 – conduction transfer 21 – conductivity 12, 24 – conversion 14 – equipment 59, 61ff. – film coefficients 23f., 61, 64f., 68, 70, 84 – liquid–coil surface 67 – liquid–vessel wall 67 – overall coefficients 61, 68, 70 – overall resistance 61, 69f., 193 – rate 22f. – resistance 61f., 68ff. – surface 61f., 188 – surface area 70 – total area 63 – total rate 63 heating – constant rate 157 – condensing vapor 68, 157 – cycle 156, 191 – electric 156f. – fluid 64f. – gas 65 – indirect 164 – system 158 hemodialyzer, see medical devices hemofiltration (HF), see medical devices Henry’s law 7 – constant 11, 77 holding – cycle 156, 191 – section 160f., 164 – time 160f. – tube 159, 161 HTU (height of transfer units) 90f. hydrolysis – catalyzed 44f. – enzyme-catalyzed 35 – rates 39, 42f. – substrate 40, 44

– pitched-blade 190 – radial flow 112 – rotational speed 71, 117, 189f. – six-flat blade turbine 112ff. – speed 115, 118, 120, 200, 208 – three-blade marine 113f. – turbine-type 190, 208 – two-flat blade paddle 113ff. inactivation – constant 33 – heat 33 – rate 32, 44 – rate constant 32f. inclusion bodies 151 industrial-scale processing – animal cell culture 207 – chromatography 219 – downstream 211 – fermentor 187ff. inhibition reaction, see enzyme reaction intensive state function 10 interaction – electrostatic 166 – substrate–enzyme 36 interface – fluid–adsorbent 166 – fluid–fluid 81 – gas–liquid 74, 108, 195f., 234 – liquid–particle 167 – stationary 81 – surface-active substance 74 interfacial areas 88, 91, 108, 123 – chemical method 108 – effective 91f. – gas–liquid 91, 109, 123f. – packings 91 – photographic method 108 – specific 109 – transmission technique 108 International System of Units (SI), see units

j J-factor – heat transfer 86f. – mass transfer 86f.

i impeller – anchor-type 189f. – axial flow 113 – blade width 115 – diameter 112, 114f., 119, 189f. – flooding 120 – helical ribbon-type 189f.

k kinetics – biochemical reaction 27f., 97 – cell 47f., 97 – chemical reaction 27ff. – enzyme reaction 35 – parameter 37ff.

Index – thermal cell death 155f. Kozeny–Carman equation 147, 214f.

l law of conversation of energy 9 law of conversation of mass 8 linear driving force assumption 168 Lineweaver–Burk plot, see Michaelis–Menten approach liquid – depth-to-diameter-ratio 115 – gassed 113f. – inelastic 197 – kinematic viscosity 115, 120, 122f. – ungassed 114 living cells, see cell

m mass balance 8f. – calculations 9 – equation 99 – reactant 100 – total 8 mass flow rate 65 mass transfer 3, 14, 16, 21f. – flux 74, 134 – gas–liquid 75f., 80, 109, 116f., 188 – gas-phase 86 – liquid film 86, 153 – liquid-phase 82, 91, 127 – single-phase 84ff. – solid–liquid 21 mass transfer coefficient – averaged 82 – dynamic method 110f. – film 23, 73f., 77, 84, 137 – gas-phase 109 – liquid-phase 81f., 86, 108f., 134, 167, 178 – measurements of volumetric 109ff. – overall 74f., 109, 134, 168 – overall volumetric 111, 173 – steady-state mass balance method 109 – sulfite oxidation method 110 – unsteady-state mass balance method 109 – volumetric 88, 109, 122 mass transfer equipment 77ff. – bubble column 78, 80, 88 – membrane separation process 80 – packed bed 78f., 86, 91 – packed column 78f., 87ff. – packings 78 – plate column 79 – spray column 79

mass transfer model – penetration 81f. – stagnant film model 80ff. – surface renewal 81f. mass transfer rate 21, 82, 84f. – apparent 103 – gas–liquid 73, 77, 79, 88 – liquid–liquid 73, 76f. – maximum 103 – solid–liquid 73, 77 – total 118 mass transfer resistances 74, 102f. – liquid film 102f., 130 – liquid-phase 80 – reactant 103, 105 material balance, see mass balance medical devices – artificial kidney 245ff. – artificial liver 250ff. – blood oxygenator 97, 230ff. – dialyzer 245ff. membrane – artificial 133 – bubble point 162f. – filter 162 – flat 142 – hollow fiber 84, 138, 142f., 207, 240 – hydrophobic 162 – modulus 134, 141 – permeability 135, 140, 143 – plasmapheresis 139 – pores 139, 162f., 234 – resistance 241 – spiral 142 – surface 134f., 217f., 239f. – thickness 135 – transmembrane pressure 136, 153, 217 – tubular 142 membrane processes 73, 84 – dialysis 133ff. – metal wall 60, 68f. – microfiltration (MF) 133, 139, 148 – nanofiltration (NF) 134 – reverse osmosis (RO) 133f., 140f. – ultrafiltartion (UF) 133f., 136ff. – thermal conductivity 59ff. – thickness 61 Michaelis constant 36, 41, 100, 106, 127 Michaelis–Menten approach 35ff. – CA/rp vs CA plot 37f. – Eadie–Hofstee plot 38 – Lineweaver–Burk plot 37, 39ff. – rearrangement 37f. microcarriers 207

| 263

264

| Index microorganisms 82 – concentration 147 – heat sterilization 32 – respiration 84 – volume–surface diameter 214f. mixing 3, 99 – degree of 158 – liquid 101, 112, 118f., 188 – micro-mixing 118 – stirred tanks 118ff. – time 118f., 188 molecular – diffusion 14f., 22, 128 – diffusion coefficient 138 – diffusion rate 103 – diffusion transfer 21 – viscosity 15, 22 momentum – gradient 16 – transfer 21f. – transport 15f. Monod equation 51f.

n Newton’s law 16 NTU (number of transfer units) 90f., 240 Nusselt number 65

o oxygen – concentration 111, 130f. – desorption 117 – electrode 111 – transfer 76, 80, 200, 208 oxygenation, see blood

p packed beds, see mass transfer equipment packed columns, see mass transfer equipment partition constant 77 Peclet number 159, 161 peritoneal dialysis, see medical devices permeation 133 – rate 146 phase change 62f., 134 – boiling 68 – condensation 68 physical transfer processes 13ff. plant – bioprocess 3, 68, 73 – chemical 68 – fermentation 3 potentials 6 – electrostatic 108

– liquid film driving 89f. power number 114, 119, 189 Prandtl number 65, 86 pressure – constant 65 – constant filtration 216 – drop 19f., 87, 147, 215 – external 140 – fluctuations 151 – gauge 6 – hydraulic 139 – osmotic 140f., 151 – partial 7, 24, 75 – transmembrane 136, 153, 217 purification 151, 211 – interferon a 211ff. – rate 223

r Raschig rings 91ff. reactant 28f. – concentration 99, 103f. – concentration distribution 104 – fractional conversion 31, 99, 101, 129f. – inlet 127 – molecule 29 – outlet 127 – substrates 35 – time-dependent concentrations 30 reaction – bimolecular elementary 34 – biochemical 97, 133 – catalyst, see catalytic reaction – elementary 28 – endothermic 188 – enzyme, see enzymatic reaction – equilibrium 29, 35 – equilibrium constant 29, 35f., 40f. – exothermic 188 – first-order 30f., 83, 92, 100f., 155 – fractional activity 32f. – inactivation rate constant 32f. – liquid-phase 30, 44 – irreversible first-order 31, 99f., 129f. – irreversible second-order 34, 43f. – isomerization 35 – Michaelis–Menten-type 100ff. – nonelementary 28 – product 28, 30, 35ff. – product formation rate 40f. – pseudo first-order 83f., 92, 108 – reversible 28f., 35 – second-order 28, 30, 34, 83, 92, 99ff. – steady-state 8, 37, 59

Index – uni-molecular irreversible 31, 40 – zero-order 101 reaction kinetics 27ff. – differentiation method 30 – integration method 30, 32, 34, 43f. reaction rate 3, 7, 27ff. – apparent 103, 105 – constant 28f., 43f., 101, 103, 129 – initial 106f. – intrinsic 102f. – limiting step 28 reactor, see bioreactor reactor operation mode, see bioreactor recovery – adsorbate 169 – specific 168 refection coefficient 143 relaxation time 17, 197f. residence time 100, 158, 195 resistance – gas-phase 76 – hydraulic 136 – liquid-phase 76 retentate 133, 142 Reynolds number 5, 18, 20f., 65, 84, 114f., 118f., 149, 158f., 161, 189

s scaling-up – chromatography 221, 223 – cross-flow filtration 218 – fermentor 208 Schmidt number 84, 86, 122 sedimentation 105 – coefficient 150 – velocity 151ff. sedimentor 149f. separation 133, 149 – cell-liquid 145ff. – chromatography 174ff. – gas 134 – interferon a 211ff. – microfiltration 152 – microorganisms 214ff. – monosodium glutamate 212, 214 – primary 212 – proteins 165 shear – rate 15f., 113, 138, 190, 197 – stress 15ff. shear stress–shear rate diagram 16f. Sherwood number 84, 123 solubility 11

– curves 74 – diffusing phase 74 – gas 7, 75f., 109 – solute 135 solution – air–electrolyte 117 – albumin 153 – aqueous 82 – aqueous electrolyte 108 – buffer 181 – effluent 181 – electrolyte 122 – feed 137, 170, 172f. – nonelectrolyte 122 specific heat capacity 5 spreading coefficient 196 Stanton number 86 steam 59, 62 – condensing 69, 156f. – continuous steam injection 159 – direct steam sparging 156ff. – saturated 68f., 164 sterilization 155ff. – batch heat 156f. – continuous heat 158ff. – cooling cycle 156, 191 – degree 156, 158 – heat 156 – heating cycle 156, 191 – holding cycle 156, 191 – in situ media 191 – time 164 stirrer 67, 71 – critical speed 120 – diameter 120 – flad-blade paddle 67 – flad-blade turbine 67, 71, 208 – mechanical 112 – power 113f., 189f. Stokes law 149 stream – gas 188 – output 129 – wedge-like 91 sublimation – packings 91 – rate 86 superficial gas velocity 91f., 115, 117, 122f., 126f., 197f. surface – free liquid 118 – gas–liquid 196 – tension 117, 121f., 125, 163, 188, 195, 234

| 265

266

| Index suspension 123f. – aqueous 153 – cell 146, 196 – microorganisms 123 – solid particles 102, 120 Svedberg units 150

t temperature – absolute 5, 24, 29 – bulk 23 – critical 5 – gradient 14, 21, 23, 59f. – interface 23 – mean temperature difference 62ff. – overall temperature difference 61f. – rate constant 29 thermodynamic first law 9 Thiele modulus 103ff. TMP, see membrane transient start-up 8 tube – axis 19f. – bank 66 – bundle 85, 142 – capillary tube viscometer 20 – circular 64 – cross-section 5, 18f. – diameter 5, 18, 20, 62, 65ff. – length 20, 65, 69f., 85 – metall 61f., 69, 71 – radius 19 – surface 19f., 61f., 67, 69, 71, 193 – surface area 70 – wall 20, 158 – wall resistance 70 – wetted perimeter 66, 85

u units – conversion factors 11f. – mass 9 – metric 4f. – molar 9 – SI 4ff. ultrasonication 151f.

v van’t Hoff equation 140 vapor condensor 62 vaporization – gas-phase resistance-controlled 91 – liquid 79, 91 velocity – gradient 15 – interstitial 173, 218, 223 – limiting gas 87f. – limiting liquid 87 – terminal 150f. vessels – coiled 67 – diameter 67 – jacketed 67 – vertical cylinder 78, 80, 112 – wall 67 viscosity 15f. – apparent 17, 191f. – kinematic 16, 115, 120, 122f., 237f., 240f.

w water – boiling 68 – vapor 68 – waste water treatment 97 Weissenberg number 197

This page intentionally left blank
Shigeo Katoh and Fumitake Yoshida Biochemical Engineering
Related Titles S. Lutz, U.T. Bornscheuer (Eds.)
Pro...